# A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants

> **NCT00733369** · PHASE4 · TERMINATED · sponsor: **DePuy International** · enrollment: 106 (actual)

## Conditions studied

- Knee Osteoarthritis

## Interventions

- **DEVICE:** PFC Sigma RP-F
- **DEVICE:** PFC Sigma RP

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT00733369
- **Lead sponsor:** DePuy International
- **Sponsor class:** INDUSTRY
- **Phase:** PHASE4
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** TERMINATED
- **Start date:** 2007-11
- **Primary completion:** 2010-08
- **Final completion:** 2014-08
- **Target enrollment:** 106 (ACTUAL)
- **Why stopped:** This study was closed for the reason of slow recruitment with only 16% of the target subjects recruited over a 29 month period.
- **Last updated:** 2016-09-13


## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00733369

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT00733369, "A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-05-28 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT00733369. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*