# Comparison of Epicardial Versus Conventional Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

> **NCT01302470** · NA · COMPLETED · sponsor: **St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center** · enrollment: 30 (actual)

## Conditions studied

- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
- Heart Failure

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** Primary epicardial placement of left ventricular lead
- **PROCEDURE:** Transvenous placement of left ventricular lead

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT01302470
- **Lead sponsor:** St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** COMPLETED
- **Start date:** 2005-02
- **Primary completion:** 2012-03
- **Final completion:** 2012-03
- **Target enrollment:** 30 (ACTUAL)
- **Last updated:** 2015-02-19

## Collaborators

- [object Object]

## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01302470

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01302470, "Comparison of Epicardial Versus Conventional Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-06-23 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT01302470. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*