# Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse

> **NCT01594372** · NA · TERMINATED · sponsor: **Brigham and Women's Hospital** · enrollment: 14 (actual)

## Conditions studied

- Uterine Prolapse

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with sacropexy
- **PROCEDURE:** Vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral colposuspension

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT01594372
- **Lead sponsor:** Brigham and Women's Hospital
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** TERMINATED
- **Start date:** 2013-01
- **Primary completion:** 2015-05
- **Final completion:** 2015-05
- **Target enrollment:** 14 (ACTUAL)
- **Why stopped:** Laproscopic procedure not offered at this time; will not be offered for the foreseeable, thus we are unable to randomize participants between the two arms.
- **Last updated:** 2022-03-04


## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01594372

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01594372, "Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-06-02 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT01594372. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*