# Does Higher (100% Oxygen) Versus Lower (21% Oxygen) During CC+SI During CPR of Asphyxiated Newborns Improve Time to ROSC

> **NCT03902652** · NA · WITHDRAWN · sponsor: **University of Alberta**

## Conditions studied

- Heart; Arrest, Newborn
- Birth Asphyxia
- Bradycardia Neonatal

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** Intervention (21% oxygen during CC+SI)
- **PROCEDURE:** Intervention (100% oxygen during CC+SI)

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT03902652
- **Lead sponsor:** University of Alberta
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** WITHDRAWN
- **Start date:** 2022-08-27
- **Primary completion:** 2027-06-30
- **Final completion:** 2027-09-30
- **Target enrollment:** 0 (ACTUAL)
- **Why stopped:** Study never commenced at trial site.
- **Last updated:** 2022-09-26


## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03902652

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03902652, "Does Higher (100% Oxygen) Versus Lower (21% Oxygen) During CC+SI During CPR of Asphyxiated Newborns Improve Time to ROSC". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-07-26 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT03902652. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*