# Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates

> **NCT04483895** · NA · UNKNOWN · sponsor: **Ain Shams University** · enrollment: 120 (estimated)

## Conditions studied

- Endotracheal Intubation

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** Endotracheal tube insertion

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT04483895
- **Lead sponsor:** Ain Shams University
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** UNKNOWN
- **Start date:** 2019-11-15
- **Primary completion:** 2020-12-21
- **Final completion:** 2020-12-21
- **Target enrollment:** 120 (ESTIMATED)
- **Last updated:** 2020-07-23


## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04483895

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04483895, "Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-06-03 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT04483895. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*