# Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

> **NCT06745167** · NA · NOT_YET_RECRUITING · sponsor: **Shanghai Chest Hospital** · enrollment: 600 (estimated)

## Conditions studied

- Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** Pulsed field ablation
- **PROCEDURE:** Radiofrequency ablation alone

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT06745167
- **Lead sponsor:** Shanghai Chest Hospital
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- **Start date:** 2025-01-01
- **Primary completion:** 2026-12-31
- **Final completion:** 2026-12-31
- **Target enrollment:** 600 (ESTIMATED)
- **Last updated:** 2024-12-20

## Collaborators

- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]

## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06745167

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT06745167, "Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Extensive Electro-Anatomical Guided Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-05-26 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT06745167. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*