# Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision

> **NCT06766838** · NA · RECRUITING · sponsor: **Sohag University** · enrollment: 100 (estimated)

## Conditions studied

- Prepuce; Accessory

## Interventions

- **PROCEDURE:** 1. Conventional dissection technique (group A) :
- **PROCEDURE:** 2. Bone cutting forceps technique (Group B)
- **PROCEDURE:** 3. Electro-cauterization (bipolar) assisted circumcision (Group C)
- **PROCEDURE:** 4. Thermal cauterization assisted circumcision (Group D)
- **PROCEDURE:** 5. Gomco clamp technique (Group E):
- **PROCEDURE:** 6. Plastibell device technique (Group F):

## Key facts

- **NCT ID:** NCT06766838
- **Lead sponsor:** Sohag University
- **Sponsor class:** OTHER
- **Phase:** NA
- **Study type:** INTERVENTIONAL
- **Status:** RECRUITING
- **Start date:** 2024-12-01
- **Primary completion:** 2025-06-01
- **Final completion:** 2025-07-01
- **Target enrollment:** 100 (ESTIMATED)
- **Last updated:** 2025-01-13


## Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06766838

## Citation

> US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT06766838, "Outcomes Of The Different Techniques Of Male Circumcision". Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-08-11 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/clinical/NCT06766838. Licensed CC0.

---

*[Clinical trials dataset](/datasets/clinical-trials) · CC0 1.0*