# KANCHANLAL PATEL (SUPER MART)
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2008 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `1000011984`
- **Case Number:** 04-2008-0001
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** —
## Defendants
- KANCHANLAL PATEL (complaint) (settlement)
- SUPER MART (SB)
## Summary

7/18/2008 - COMPLAINT AND COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED, PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $47,728.  ORDER ALLEGES:  AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THREE USTs AT FACILITY 1.  COUNT- RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE UST RELEASE DETECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1. AT THE TIME OF THE INPSECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THE UNDERGROUND PIPING THAT ROUTINELY CONTAINED REGULATED SUBSTANCES AND WAS CONNECTED TO HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 3 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT HAD NOT PERFORMED THE REQUIRED TESTING FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1.  RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CATHODIC PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1.  COUNT 4 - AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1.  COUNT 5 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTLIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR HIS FIVE USTs AT FACILITY #2.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*