RESPONDENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO PROVIDE LEAD HAZARD PAMPHLET TO LESSEES; RESPONDENT ALSO FAILED TO INCLUDE LEAD WARNING STATEMENT IN LEASE; FAILED TO DISCLOSE LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF LEAD HAZARDS IN LEASE; FAILED TO INDICATE IN LEASE THAT NO RECORDS OF LEAD HAZARD EXISTED. CHILDREN HAD LEAD PAINT POISONING.
NOTE: VIOLATIONS OCCURRED AT A PRIVATE RESIDENCE.
LEAD ABATEMENT WAS COMPLETED AT THE PROPERTY.