6/3/04 - CAA 112(r) EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY F $3,330. PENALTY PAID.
VIOLATIONS:
1. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RECOGNIZED AND GENERALLY ACCEPTED GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE. PIPING AND VALVES WERE NOT LABELED OR TAGGED, OR OTHERWISE UNIQUELY IDENTIFIED, AND ELECTRICAL BOXES WERE UNCOVERED (40 CFR 68.65(d)(2).
2. FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A SYSTEM TO PROMPTLY ADDRESS PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSIS FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; AND FAILURE TO DEVELOP A WRITTEN SCHEDULE OF WHEN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE COMPLETED (40 CFR 68.67(e).
3. FAILURE TO DOCUMENT WRITTEN PROCEDURES WHICH ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
OPERATING LIMITS - CONSEQUENCES OF DEVIATIONS (40 CFR 68.69(a)(2)(i); AND STEPS REQUIRED TO CORRECT OR AVOID DEVIATION (40 CFR 68.69(a)(2)(ii);
SAFETY AND HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS - PROPERTIES OF, AND HAZARDS PRESENTED BY, THE CHEMICALS USED IN THE PROCESS (40 CFR 68.69(a)(3)(i); PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EXPOSURE, INCLUDING ENGINEERING CONTROLS, ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS, AND PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (40 CFR 68.69(a)(3)(ii); CONTROL MEASURES TO BE TAKEN IF PHYSICAL CONTACT OR AIRBORNE EXPOSURE OCCURS (40 CFR 68.69(a)(3)(iii).
4. FAILURE TO ANNUALLY CERTIFY THAT THE OPERATING PROCEDURES ARE CURRENT AND ACCURATE, AND THAT PROCEDURES HAVE BEN REVIEWED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY (40 CFR 68.69(c).
5. FAILURE TO TRAIN EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN OPERATING A PROCESS THAT WAS CHANGED AND RE-STARTED AFTER IMPLEMENTATION O