← EPA enforcement cases

HOWARD, THOMAS d/b/a TOWER OIL COMPANY

Administrative - Formal · FY2005 · — · Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication · 142179

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
04-2005-1250
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

3/18/05 - COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED. VIOLATION 1: A. 40 CFR 144.28(g)(2)(ii)(B) REQUIRES THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A RULE AUTHORIZED WELL TO MONITOR MONTHLY FOR INJECTION PRESSURE, FLOW RATE, AND CUMULATIVE VOLUME INJECTED. 40 CFR 144.28(h)(2)(i) FURTHER REQUIRES THAT THE OWNER OR OPERATOR SUBMIT AN ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIZING THE RESULTS OF THE ABOVE MONITORING TO EPA. B. ON MARCH 19, 2004, EPA CONDUCTED A COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF THE FILES ON SUBJECT WELL AND DETERMINED THAT RESPONDENT HAD NEVER SUBMITTED ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS TO EPA FOR THE SUBJECT WELL. C. EPA DETERMINED THAT RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 144.28(g)(2)(ii)(B) AND 40 CFR 144.28(h)(2)(i) FOR FAILURE TO MONITOR AND TO SUBMIT TO EPA THE ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS SUMMARIZING THE REQUIRED MONITORING INFORMATION. VIOLATION 2: A. 40 CFR 144.28(g)(2)(iv)(A) REQUIRES THAT AN OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A RULE AUTHORIZED INJECTION WELL DEMONSTRATES THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF THE WELL AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 5 YEARS. B. DURING THE COMPLIANCE REVIEW, EPA DETERMINED THAT RESPONDENT HAD LAST DEMONSTRATED THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF THE SUBJECT INJECTION WELL ON JULY 31, 1991. C. EPA DETERMINED THAT RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 144.28(g)(2)(iv)(A) FOR FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF THE SUBJECT WELL AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 5 YEARS. ORDER REQUIRES: A. WITHIN 15 DAYS, RESPONDENT SHALL CONTACT EPA TO ARRANGE FOR THE SCHEDULING OF A MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST. B. W

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown