← EPA enforcement cases

Advanced Environmental Technology Corp. et al.

Judicial · FY2005 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery · 152894

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-2005-0014
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
DOJ Docket
90-11-3-480/2
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (27)

Summary

ROD for Site issued in October 2004. Region II sent PRN to DOJ seeking to commence negotiations with PRPs for implementation of remedy called for in ROD. Negotiations are now complete and the CD was entered on June 15, 2007. CD does not resolve PRP liability at the Site. Left unresolved are the RA for the Horseshoe Drum Dump (HRDD) portion of the Site. We anticipate that data gathered during the RD for HRDD will implicate the PRPs at that site, and that the CD will be amended or a new CD entered which will cover the RA for HRDD. Also unresolved is 0U3 which is the marshy part of the Site along the Raritan River. A ROD is anticipated in late FY07/early FY08 for OU3. Supplemental PRN sent on June 24, 2011 to amend the RD/RA CD. First amended CD entered on February 26, 2013. Following completion of the OU2 remedial design for the ARC Site and the Horseshoe Road Drum Dump (HRDD) portion of the Horseshoe Road Site in 2011 (under the original Consent Decree), the parties engaged in further negotiations, resulting in the proposed First Amended Consent Decree, which is intended to supercede the original Consent Decree. Under the First Amended Consent Decree, in addition to performing the OU2 remedial action for the ARC Site which was already required under the original Consent Decree, one group of the Settling Defendants (the Settling Work Defendants) will also perform the OU2 remedial action for the HRDD Site. The United States, on behalf of the Department of Defens

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown