9/30/05 - COMPLAINT ISSUED PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $157,500. 9/30/05 - COMPLAINT FILED, PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $157,500. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PART I.A.2 OF THE PERMIT BY FAILING TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN AS APPROVED AND BY FAILING TO AMEND THE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE EXTRA TEMPORARY BASIN NEAR SEEP BERM G. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PART I.B.1 OF THE PERMIT BY FAILING TO INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN O.5 INCHES OF RAN PER TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOUR PERIOD. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH I.B.2 OF THE PERMIT BY FAILING TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION IMMEDIATELY TO CONTROL THE DISCHARGEE OF SEDIMENTS FROM LEAVING THE DISTURBED LIMITS OF THE FACILITY. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PART I.C.1 OF THE PERMIT BY FACILITY TO COMPLY WITH FINAL LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS AS EVIDENCED BY THE LACK OF MAINTENANCE OF BMPS THROUGHOUT THE FACILITY. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PART I.C.2 OF THE PERMIT BY FAILING TO PROVIDE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE NECESSARY TO OPERATE STROM WATER CONTROLS AT OPTIMUM EFFICIENCY AS EVIDENCED BY THE LACK OF MAINTENANCE OF BMPS THROUGHOUT THE FACILITY. RESPONDENT FAILED COMPLY WITH PART II.B.1 OF THE PERMIT WHICH REQUIRES THE PERMITEE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. RESPONDENT HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT BY FAILING TO CORRECT BMP MAINTENANCE ISSUES, FAILING TO PROVIDE A