# FRANC MOTORS ET AL
> **Judicial** · FY2002 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `1650`
- **Case Number:** 01-2002-0012
- **Type:** Judicial
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- CLY-DEL MANUFACTURING CO (complaint) (settlement)
- DRESSER INC (complaint) (settlement)
- DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC (complaint) (settlement)
- FRANC MOTORS ET AL (complaint) (settlement)
- FUSCO CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
- OIL RECOVERY CORP (complaint) (settlement)
- SOUTHAMPTON SANITARY ENGINEERING (complaint) (settlement)
- WESTVACO CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

ON JANUARY 8, 2002, EPA REQUESTED THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE'S APPROVAL OF A SECOND CONSENT DECREE THAT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY EIGHT BUSINESSES THAT SENT WASTE OIL TO NATIONAL OIL SERVICES INC., A FORMER WASTE OIL STORAGE, TREATMENT, TRANSFER, RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL FACILITY IN WEST HAVEN, CT. EPA PERFORMED A REMOVAL ACTION AT THE NATIONAL OIL SERVICES  SITE ( SITE ) IN 1998 THAT CONSISTED GENERALLY OF THE REMOVAL, CHARACTERIZATION AND OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER, WASTE OIL AND SLUDGE. EACH SETTLING PARTY WILL PAY  8.5 CENTS FOR EACH GALLON OF WASTE IT SENT TO THE SITE  (AS SHOWN IN HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFESTS) IN RETURN FOR A RELEASE FROM LIABILITY FOR EPA'S PAST COSTS AS OF MAY 15, 2001 AND PROTECTION FROM CONTRIBUTION ACTIONS BROUGHT BY OTHER PARTIES. THIS SECOND CONSENT DECREE SHOULD REIMBURSE  EPA FOR APPROXIMATELY $350,000 OF ITS PAST COSTS. THE FIRST CONSENT DECREE, WHICH WAS SIGNED BY APPROXIMATELY 400 PARTIES AND WAS LODGED WITH THE COURT ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2001, SHOULD REIMBURSE EPA FOR APPROXIMATELY $850,000. (FOR VARIOUS REASONS, THE EIGHT BUSINESSES MENTIONED ABOVE DID NOT SIGN THE FIRST CONSENT DECREE.) IN TOTAL, THE TWO CONSENT DECREES WILL REIMBURSE EPA FOR ALMOST 70% OF ITS APPROXIMATELY $1.6 MILLION OF PAST COSTS. (EPA FILED A COST  RECOVERY LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CURRENT SITE OWNERS AND THE     LARGEST VOLUMETRIC CONTRIBUTOR TO THE SITE FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ITS REMAINING COSTS.) EPA DOES NOT HAVE PLANS TO PERFORM  FURTHER CLEANUP WORK AT THE SITE. THE SECOND C

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*