# HENDERSONVILLE UTILITY DISTRICT
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2009 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `1800008820`
- **Case Number:** 04-2009-8031
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** —
## Defendants
- HENDERSONVILLE UTILITY DISTRICT (SB) (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

7/14/09 - EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $2,280, DUE WITHIN 15 DAYS. 

ALLEGED VIOLATIONS:

BASED ON A COMPLIANCE MONITORING INSPECTION AT RESPONDENT'S FACILITY ON AUGUST 15, 2007, EPA ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENT VIOLATED THE CAA'S CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAM WHEN RESPONDENT DID NOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT IT HAS:

DOCUMENTED ALL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE PROCESS, INCLUDING PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR 68.65(d)(1)(ii);

PERFORMED AND DOCUMENTED AN INITIAL PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSIS, TO IDENTIFY, EVALUATE AND CONTROL THE HAZARDS INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR 68.67(a);

DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED WRITTEN OPERATING PROCEDURES THAT ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS FOUND AT 40 CFR 68.69(a): (3) SAFETY AND HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS, INCLUDING (i) PROPERTIES OF, AND HAZARDS PRESENTED BY THE CHEMICALS USED IN THE PROCESS; AND (iii) CONTROL MEASURES TO BE TAKEN IF PHYSICAL CONTACT OR AIRBORNE EXPOSURE OCCURS;

ANNUALLY CERTIFIED THAT THE OPERATING PROCEDURES ARE CURRENT AND ACCURATE AND THAT PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR 68.69(c); AND

CONDUCTED AUDITS TO EVALUATE ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AT LEAST EVERY 3 YEARS, AND BASED ON SUCH AUDITS, CERTIFIED THAT THE PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES ARE ADEQUATE AND ARE BEING FOLLOWED AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR 68.79(a).

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*