← EPA enforcement cases

PHARR YARNS, LLC

Administrative - Formal · FY2010 · — · Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication · 1800077489

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
04-2010-4758
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

1/19/10 - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ISSUED. VIOLATION: PHARR YARNS HAS VIOLATED SEC 301(a) OF THE CWA AND THE PERMIT, IN THAT PHARR YARNS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE EFFLUENT LIMITS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ORDER REQUIRES: A. WITHIN 6 MONTHS, SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (CPE) TO EPA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 1. THE CPE SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES: (a) EVALUTE THE MAJOR UNIT PROCESSES; (b) IDENTIFY ALL PERFORMANCE-LIMITING FACTORS; (c) PRIORITZE PERFORMANCE LIMITING FACTORS; (d) ASSESS THE ABILITY OF A COMPOSITE CORRECTION PLAN (CCP) TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; AND (e) REPORT TO EPA THE RESULTS OF THE CPE. 2. THE CPE SHALL ALSO EVALUATE THE CAUSE OF ANY EFFLUENT LIMIT VIOLATION OCCURRING AT THE WWTP WITHIN THE LAST 3 YRS. 3. THE CPE SHALL EVALUATE THE MAJOR UNIT PROCESSES, TO INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM: a. A PERFORMANCE SUMMAYR, WITH SUPPORTING DATA, OF THE PRIMARY AND SECORDY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES INCLUDING, AT MINIMUM, THE AERATION BASIN, MIX CHAMBER (POLYMER/ALUM), SECONDARY CLARIFIERS, RETURN SLUDGE CONTROL/PROCESS, EFFLUENT FILTER, AND DISINFECTION. 4. THE CPE SHALL ALSO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: a. THE PROCESS OF MIXING THE RAW INFLUENT WASTEWATER DIRECTLY WITH IN RETURN SLUDGE. b. OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR WEEKEND/NON-WORKING DAY PLANT OPERATIONS AND ITS AFFECT ON THE TREATMENT PROCESS. c. AN ANALYSIS OF THE AFFECTS THAT DRAMATIC INFLUENT CHANGES HAVE ON THE AERATION BASIN PERFOR

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown