# DURALAB EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
> **Judicial** · FY1983 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `1875`
- **Case Number:** 02-1983-0010
- **Type:** Judicial
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** $11K
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- DURALAB EQUIPMENT CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

THIS LITIGATION ACTION PROPOSES THE FILING OF A CIVIL   ACTION PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT PROVISION OF THE  CAA, AS AMENDED AGAINST DURALAB EQUIPMENT CORP. FOR ITS VIO- LATIONS OF PART 228 OF TITLE 6 OF THE OFFICIAL COMPILATION   OF CODES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.   ( 6 NYCRR ). THIS REGULATION IS DESIGNED TO LIMIT THE EMIS-  SION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) INTO THE ATMOSPHERE BY SPECIFYING A MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE VOC SOLVENT CONTENT FOR  COATINGS USED AT VARIOUS TYPES OF COATING LINES. THIS REGU-  LATION IS A PROVISION OF THE FEDERALLY-APPROVED AND FEDER-   ALLY-ENFORCEABLE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) PROMULGATED BY THE STATE OF NY PURSUANT TO SECTION 110 OF THE ACT, AND   APPLICABLE TO THE AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGION IN WHICH DURA-  LAB IS LOCATED.                                                   6 NYCRR SECTION 228.1(A) APPLIES TO THE OWNER OR OPERA- TOR OF A PROCESS INVOLVING CERTAIN TYPES OF COATING LINES    FOR WHICH THE ANNUAL POTENTIAL EMISSIONS OF VOC EQUAL OR EX- CEED 100 TONS. SPECIFICALLY, THIS REGULATION REQUIRES THAT   THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF ANY DESCRIBED PROCESS LOCATED IN A  NONATTAINMENT AREA FOR OZONE (1) SUBMIT TO THE COMMISSIONER  OF THE NY STATE DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ( DEC )  ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1 1980, A PROPOSED SCHEDULE WHICH IN-   CLUDES THE ACTION STEPS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE VOC EMISSION LIMITATION SPECIFIED IN 6 NYCRR  PART 228, AND THE DATES BY WHICH EACH ACT

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*