# ENVIROTEK
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY1986 · — · Final Order No Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `2012`
- **Case Number:** 02-1986-0027
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order No Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** $0
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- ENVIROTEK (complaint)
## Summary

**THIS IS AN AMENDED COMPLAINT.************************      DURING A MAY 5, 1983 INSPECTION THERE WERE CONTAINERS OF   HAZARDOUS WASTE WHICH WERE NOT IN GOOD CONDITION & RESPOND-  ENT HAD NOT TRANSFERRED THE HAZARDOUS WASTE TO CONTAINERS IN GOOD CONDITION OR MANAGED THE WASTE IN COMPLIANCE W/ RQRMTS  OF 40 CFR PART 265.  ALSO, THERE WERE OPEN CONTAINERS TO     WHICH NO WASTE WAS BEING ADDED AND FROM WHICH NO WASTE WAS   BEING REMOVED (VIOLATIONS OF  40 CFR 265.171 & 265.173(A).     AT THE TIME OF A MARCH 25, 1985 INSPECTION, RESPONDENT     DID NOT HAVE THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION REQUIRED TO DESIGNATE THE FACILITY AS AN AUTHORIZED TREATMENT, STORAGE, OR DISPO-  SAL FACILITY FOR WASTES BEING OFFERED FOR SHIPMENT (VIOLA-   TION OF NYCRR 372.2(B)(2)(I)).                                 AT THE TIME OF THE 3/25/85 INSPECTION, RESPONDENT HAD ONE  LEAKING DRUM IN BUILDING 24 WITH SOLVENT LEAKING (VIOLATION  OF 6 NYCRR 373-3.9(B)).                                        AT THE TIME OF THE 5/16/85 PART B INSPECTION, RESPONDENT   WAS EMPLOYING A SPARGING OPERATION WHICH WAS NOT SPECIFIED   IN THE INTERIM STATUS APPLICATION & RESPONDENT HAD NOT RE-   VISED THE INTERIM STATUS APPLICATION PRIOR TO SUCH A CHANGE. (VIOLATION OF 6 NYCRR 360.3(C)(2)(II)).                        AS OF DATE OF THIS COMPLAINT , RESPONDENT'S PART B APPLI-  CATION IS STILL INCOMPLETE AND DEFICIENT (VIOLATION OF RCRA  SECTION 3005, 42 USC 6925, AND 40 CFR 270.10(E)(4).

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*