← EPA enforcement cases

BAYONNE BARREL AND DRUM COMPANY

Judicial · FY1986 · — · EPA Did Not Pursue · 2120

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-1986-0178
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
EPA Did Not Pursue
DOJ Docket
90-7-1-367
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (2)

Summary

THIS IS A CIVIL ACTION PURSUANT TO RCRA 3008(A), 42 USC 6928(A) AGAINST BAYONNE BARREL AND DRUM AND FRANK LANGELLA, INDIVIDUALLY. IN ADDITION, THIS REFERRAL RECOMMENDS SUING BAYONNE BARREL AND DRUM, PURSUANT TO RCRA 3008(C), FOR VIO- LATION OF A FINAL CONSENT AGREEMENT & CONSENT ORDER, ISSUED TO THE CO. IN SEPTEMBER 1984, IN SETTLEMENT OF A RCRA AD- MINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTION BY EPA REGION II. PURSUANT TO THAT CONSENT ORDER, THE COMPANY WAS OBLIGATED TO REMOVE WASTE ASH FROM ITS FACILITY IN NEWARK, NJ, TO SUBMIT A CLO- SURE PLAN AND DECONTAMINATE THE FACILITY, AND TO POST A BOND GUARANTEEING ITS PERFORMANCE. THESE AND OTHER STEPS HAVE NOT BEEN TAKEN BY BAYONNE BARREL, & THE CO. IS, THEREFORE IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSENT ORDER. BAYONNE BARREL AND DRUM OPERATED A DRUM RECONDITIONING PLANT IN NEWARK UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1983. THE COMPANY STILL OWNS THE PROPERTY, AND THE COMPANY'S PRESIDENT, FRANK A. LANGELLA, OWNS IN HIS OWN NAME AN ADJACENT SIX ACRES OF LAND UPON WHICH OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY WERE ALSO CONDUCTED. THERE ARE ONGOING VIOLATIONS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INTERIM STATUS OPERATING, CLOSURE AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT THESE TWO PROPERTIES. PROPOSED RELIEF TO BE SOUGHT INCLUDES INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSENT ORDER AND RCRA REGULA- TIONS AND PROPER CLEANUP OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES. 08/13/93: JUDGEMENT AND ORDER RECEIVED

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown