RCRA ENFORCEMENT SECTION CONSIDERS THIS TO BE A PRECEDEN- TIAL CASE BECAUSE IT'S THE FIRST COMPLAINT ISSUED TO A PERMITTED FACILITY (AS OPPOSED TO ONE OPERATING UNDER INTERIM STATUS). SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS WERE UNPRODUCTIVE - THE SIZE OF THE PENALTY IS THE MAJOR ISSUE, SO WE COMPLETED THE PREHEARING EXCHANGE ON 3/21/86 AND AWAIT THE ASSIGNMENT OF A HEARING DATE. I FILED A MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, DROPPING 2 CHARGES AND ADJUSTING THE PENALTY DOWN TO $37,900. THERE HAS NOT YET BEEN A RULING ON THE MOTION.