← EPA enforcement cases

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE EXTENSION

Administrative - Formal · FY2008 · — · Source Agrees · 2600016249

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
04-2008-9170
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Source Agrees
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
Y

Defendants (1)

Summary

11/30/10 - NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ISSUED. UT EXT DISCOVERED THE VIOLATIONS OF CAA, CWA, FIFRA, AND RCRA ON MARCH 6, 2008 UPON RECEIPT OF AN AUDIT REPORT. UT EXT DISCLOSED THE VIOLATIONS TO EPA ON MARCH 26, 2008. ALL OF THE CAA, CWA, FIFRA AND ALL BUT ONE OF THE RCRA VIOLATIONS WERE CORRECTED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. THE REMAINING RCRA VIOLATION WAS CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME FRAME PROVIDED BY AN EPA EXTENSION. NONE OF THE VIOLATIONS DISCOVERED ARE REPEAT VIOLATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, NONE OF THE VIOLATIONS RESULTED IN SERIOUS HARM NOR DID THEY PRESENT AN IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT. FINALLY UT ETX HAS TAKEN STEP TO PREVENT THE RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS AND HAS COOPERATED FULLY WITH EPA. IN ADDITION, UT EXT DISCLOSED POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF RSCA. EPA EXAMINED THESE POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE TSCA LEAD BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE RULES AND DETERMINED THAT THERE WERE NO ACTUAL VIOLATIONS. SPECIFICALLY THE UT EXT IDENTIFIED THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE LEAD BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE INFORMAITON TO SHORT TERM RENTERS OF ITS CEDAR LODGE FACILITY AS A VIOLATION OF THE LEAD-BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE RULE. EPA DETERMINED THAT THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION BECAUSE RENTALS UNDER 100 DAYS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND THE CEDAR LODGE IS NEVER RENTED FOR MORE THAN A WEEKEND.

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown