← EPA enforcement cases

MENOMINEE PAPER COMPANY INC.

Judicial · FY1987 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 26719

$2.10M
Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
05-1987-0538
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
DOJ Docket
90-5-1-1-3033
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

A CONSENT DECREE RESOLVING CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF MENO MINEE WAS ENTERED ON OCT. 2, 1989. THE DECREE REQUIRES MENO MINEE TO UPGRADE ITS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN ORDER TO MEET EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS SPECIFIED IN THE CITY'S NAT'L POL- LUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPDES ) PERMIT AND UN- DERTAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS AND STUDIES RELATED TO CONTROLLING COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS. THE STUDIES AND RESULTING WORK ARE ESTIMATED TO COST UPWARDS OF $750,000. THE DECREE ALSO PROVIDES FOR PAYMENT OF A CIVIL PENALTY OF $105,000 FOR A COMMUNITY OF SLIGHTLY OVER 10,000 PEOPLE. THE U.S. HAD ASSERTED THAT MPC'S DISCHARGES WERE GOVERNED BY A 1973 NPDES PERMIT. MPC ARGUED THAT A DRAFT PERMIT WHICH WAS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO A 1979 CONSENT JUDGMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN AND MPC CONTROLLED MPC DISCHARGES TO THE MENOMINEE RIVER. JUDGE HILLMAN CONSIDERED AND REJECTED MPC ARGUMENTS THAT REGION V DID NOT RAISE A TIMELY AND SUFFICIENT OBJECTION TO THE 1979 PROPOSED PERMIT THEREBY ALLOWING THE PROPOSED PERMIT TO TAKE EFFECT AND SUPERSEDE THE VALID 1973 NPDES PERMIT. JUDGE HILLMAN FOUND THE USEPA OBJECTION VALID, BE- CAUSE USEPA HAD MET ITS BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT IT HAD MADE A TIMELY OBJECTION AND THAT THE OBJECTION ADEQUATELY STATED WHY THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT WOULD NOT COMPLY W/ THE CWA. ANY OBJECTION RAISED BY USEPA WOULD HAVE TO CONTAIN A STATE- MENT OF THE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS USEPA

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown