# PRISTINE, INC.
> **Judicial** · FY1991 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `27797`
- **Case Number:** 05-1991-0206
- **Type:** Judicial
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
- **Penalty assessed:** $0
- **Cost recovery:** $150K
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- C.H. HEIST CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
- CAMCO CHEMICAL COMPANY (complaint) (settlement)
- KINMAN, RILEY (complaint) (settlement)
- MAACO AUTO PAINTING (complaint) (settlement)
- POLYMER CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
- SUN CHEMICAL CORP(GENERAL PRINTING INK) (complaint) (settlement)
- WAYNE CORPORATION (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

A GROUP OF PRPS (SETTLORS) SIGNED A CONSENT DECREE TO        FINANCE AND PERFORM THE RD/RA WORK.  UNDER THE CONSENT       DECREE, WHICH WAS ENTERED IN 10/90, U.S.EPA RECEIVED REIM-   BURSEMENT OF 90% OF PAST COSTS AT THE FACILITY THROUGH ENTRY OF THE DECREE BY THE SETTLORS.  CURRENTLY, THERE IS A DIS-   PUTE WITH THE SETTLORS OVER THE INTEREST.  2 PRP FINANCED    REMOVALS WERE COMPLETED.  SEEKING $470,000 IN UNREIMBURSED   PAST COSTS INCLUDING INTEREST.                               -                                                            WE PROPOSE THAT THE U.S. SUE 7 DEFS, ALL NON-SETTLORS TO     THE CONSENT DECREE, FOR ALL OF THE REMAINING UNREIMBURSED    COSTS.  AS SUCH, THIS CASE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PART OF      U.S.EPA'S SUPERFUND  NON-SETTLOR/NON-COMPLIER INITIATIVE.    WE ALSO SEEK A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY FOR ANY     FUTURE COSTS EXPENDED AT THE PRISTINE FACILITY.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*