RESPONDENT EXCEEDED THE MONTHLY AVERAGE CONCENTRATION LIMIT AND CEILING CONCENTRA- TION LIMIT FOR ARSENIC IN THE SLUDGE AND LAND APPLIED THE SLUDGE TO A FIELD. RESPONDENT WAS ALSO CITED FOR FAILURE TO MONITOR FOR SELENIUM IN THE SLUDGE, RESPONDENT'S CPLR FOR ALL METALS WAS WITHIN THE LIMIT FOR LAND APPLIED SLUDGE. RESPONDENT ALSO PROVIDED INFORMATION THAT IT HAD TRACKED FOR SELEMIUM, AND THAT IT HAD APPLIED THE SLUDGE ON FEWER DATES. THEREFORE, RESPONDENT SETTLED CASE FOR THE REMAINING CEILING CONCENTRATION VIOLATION OF ARSENIC.