# CHROMPARTS
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY1999 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `31434`
- **Case Number:** 05-1999-0042
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** $25K
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** $0
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- CHROMPARTS (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

ANDRE DAUGEVIETIS HAS BEEN CHIEF COUNSEL TO THE CHROMIUM     MACT WORKGROUP.                                              THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS OF THE HARD   CHROME PLATING NESHAP UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT; FAILURE TO    CONDUCT PERFORMANCE TEST IN A TIMELY FASHION; MONITORING     VIOLATIONS, RECORDKEEPING VIOLATIONS, NOTIFICATION           VIOLATIONS.  THE COMPLAINT SEEKS A $24,640 PENALTY           THIS CASE WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF U.S. EPA BY THE    REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN DAYTON, OHIO.       EVIDENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS WAS PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY AS    A RESPONSE TO A SECTION 114 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.  A      FINDING OF VIOLATION WAS ISSUED TO THE COMPANY ON FEBRUARY   24, 1999 CITING VIOLATIONS OF THE CHROME PLATING NESHAP.     THE PRIMARY VIOLATION THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CASE IS A  PERFORMANCE TEST CONDUCTED 3 MONTHS AFTER THE REQUIRED DEAD- LINE.  ADDITIONALLY, VARIOUS MONITORING, RECORDKEEPING, AND  REPORTING REQUIREMENTS WERE NOT MET.  THE LATE PERFORMANCE   TEST WAS DONE CORRECTLY, AND THE FACILITY HAD BEGUN PROPERLY MONITORING ITS POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT BEFORE THE CASE   WAS REFERRED TO U.S. EPA.  THE FACILITY RECERTIFIED ITS      REMAINING VIOLATIONS SHORTLY AFTER THE FOV WAS ISSUED.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*