← EPA enforcement cases

MOSCHIANO PLATING COMPANY, INC.

Administrative - Formal · FY1999 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery · 31634

Penalty
$40K
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
05-1999-0295
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (2)

Summary

THIS IS A CERCLA SECTION 122(H) COST RECOVERY AGREEMENT. REMOVAL ACTIVITIES COST APPROXIMATELY $450,000. LIABLE PARTIES BASICALLY ARE THE ESTATE OF THE FORMER OWNER/OPERA- TOR. EPA IS RECOVERING ALMOST ALL CASH LEFT IN THE ESTATE. SETTLING PARTIES ALSO MUST BE THEIR BEST EFFORTS TO SELL THE SITE PROPERTY, THOUGH THE LIKEKLIHOOD OF SUCCESS SEEMS LOW. FACILITY IS NOW CLOSED. AFTER REMOVAL ACTIVITIES, BUILDING WAS DEMOLISHED BY THE CITY OF CHICAGO. THIS SITE WAS THE SUBJECT OF A REMOVAL ACTIOIN WHICH WAS FUNDED AND PERFORMED BY EPA, REGION 5, EPA DID RECOVER $39,750 FROM THE ESTATE OF THE FORMER OWNER/OPERATOR OF THE SITE(A FORMER PLATING FACILITY); THIS COST REIMBURSEMENT WAS RELIZED THROUGH A CERCLA 122H AGREEMENT WHICH WAS EFFECTIVE IN APRIL 1999. ON MAY 7, 2001, A FINAL CLOSE- OUT MEMO FOR REMOVAL ACTION RELATING TO THIS SITE AND APPROXIMATELY $526,000 IN UNREIMBURSED RESPONSE COSTS WAS APPROVED AND SIGNED BY THE REGIONAL COUNSEL AND THE SUPERFUND DIV. DIRECTOR. IN THIS CLOSE-OUT MEMO REGION 5 DOCUMENTED THAT THERE WERE NO REMAINING VIABLE AND LIABLE PRPS AND THAT THE POTENTIAL RECOVERY EPA MIGHT REALIZE FROM BRINGING AN IN REM ACTION TO FORCE AN AUCTION SALE OF THE PROPERTY WAS TOO SPECULATIVE AND LIKELY WOULD BE TOO SMALL OF A SUM TO MAKE THE RESOUCE COMMITMENT WORTHWHILE. THIS WAS A FUN-FINANCED AND PERFORMED CERCLA REMOVAL ACTION. NO ADMINSTRATIVE OR JUDICIA

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown