# DARLING INT'L (FORMERLY AW STADLER)
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2000 · — · Final Order No Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `32656`
- **Case Number:** 05-2000-0663
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order No Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- DARLING INT'L (FORMERLY AW STADLER) (settlement)
## Summary

IN AUGUST 1996, EPA INSPECTED THIS FACILITY IN RESPONSE TO A LONG HISTORY OF NUMEROUS CITIZEN COMPLAINTS.  IN AUGUST,     1997, EPA ISSUED A NOV TO DARLING FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE      OHIO AIR POLLUTION NUISANCE RULE IN THE OHIO SIP.  AFTER A   SECTION 113 CONFERENCE WITH DARLING, EPA REFERRED THE VIO-   LATION TO DOJ, WHICH POINTED OUT THAT THE CASE DOES NOT      HAVE A CLEAR LEGAL NEXUS BETWEEN THE MALODOROUS SUBSTANCES   THAT THE FACILITY EMITS AND THE ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY IN     SECTION 113 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT.  SECTION 301 DEFINES       APPLICABLE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO EXCLUDE SIP RULES THAT DO  NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS ANY COMPOUND OR SUBSTANCE FOR WHICH EPA HAS NOT PROMULGATED A NAAQS.  DARLING STOPPED USING      THE RENDERING COOKER AT THE FACILITY BECAUSE OF CHANGES IN   THE INDUSTRY.  DARLING IS USING THE FACILITY ONLY AS A       TRANSFER STATION.  THE CASE TEAM RECOMMENDED THAT EPA ISSUE  AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AS A  PEACE WITH HONOR  RESOLUTION.  THE ORDER PROHIBITS DARLING FROM USING THE RENDERING COOKER  UNTIL IT APPLIES TO THE OHIO EPA FOR A NEW PERMIT TO INSTALL AND OBTAINS SUCH A PTI.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*