← EPA enforcement cases

DERIDDER, CITY OF

Judicial · FY1985 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 33886

$20K
Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
06-1985-0002
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
DOJ Docket
90-5-1-1-2347&A
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (2)

Summary

NATURE OF THE CASE: THE CITY OF DERIDDER IS LOCATED IN BEAUREGARD PARISH, LA. AND OPERATES THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY. THE CITY WAS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN APPROVABLE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM IN 1982 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN ITS NPDES PERMIT. TO DATE THE CITY HAS FAILED TO SUBMIT AN APPROVABLE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM AND HAS FAILED TO JUSTIFY THE THREE YEAR DELAY FOR A PROGRAM WHICH SHOULD TAKE ONLY SIX MONTHS TO DEVELOP. THIS SUIT IS REQUESTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 309 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. CAUSE OF ACTION: THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY HAS EXPERIENCED SEVERAL OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PROB- LEMS. THE CITY TREATS THE WASTEWATER OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT INDUSTRIES EACH DAY. THE EXACT NUMBER OF INDUSTRIES IS UNKNOWN SINCE THE CITY'S INDUSTRIAL SURVEY SUBMITTAL, PART OF THE PRETREATMENT REGULATION REQUIREMENTS, WAS INCOMP- LETE AND CONTAINED CONFLICTING INFORMATION. THE CITY HAS ALSO EXPERIENCED PERMIT EFFLUENT VIOLATIONS WHICH MAY AT LEAST IN PART BE ATTRIBUTABLE TO INDUSTRIAL INFLUENT. A PRETREATMENT PROGRAM COULD ADEQUATELY ASCERTAIN WHE- THER A PROBLEM EXISTS AND ACCURATELY IDENTIFY THE MAJOR CAUSE(S). ALSO, A PRETREATMENT PROGRAM WOULD ADEQUATELY ADDRESS ANY OTHER INDUSTRIAL INFLUENT PROBLEMS. ADDITION- ALLY, A RECENT INSPECTION NOTED BYPASS PROBLEMS AT THE FACILITY, INCOMPLETE NONCOMPLIANCE

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown