THE CAFO ADDRESSES ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF BOTH THE CLEAN AIR ACT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT. FOR THE CAA, THE CAFO ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENT VIOLATED 10 CSR 10-6.060 BY FAILING TO OBTAIN A PROPER PERMIT UNDER EXCEEDING THE DE MINIMIS EMISSION LEVELS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE IN ITS DE MINIMIS PERMIT. FOR RCRA, THE CAFO ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENT VIOLATED ITS HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY PERMI8T BY (1) EXCEEDING CERTAIN PERMITTED POLLUTANT EMISSIONS LIMITS (PARTICULATES, HYDROGEN CHLORIDE AND CHLORINE GAS, AND DIOXINS AND FURANS) AND OPERATING PARAMETERS (STACK GAS FLOW), AND (2) FAILING TO MAINTAIN OR OPERATE CONTINUOUS MONITORS TO RECORD CERTAIN OPERATING PARAMETERS AND CONDITIONS.