← EPA enforcement cases

F. B. PURNELL SAUSAGE, INC.

Administrative - Formal · FY2014 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 3400208914

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
04-2014-1516
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

9/3/2014 - CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $72,100. RESPONDENT SHALL MAKE PAYMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS. ORDER ALLEGES: BASED ON AN RMPROGRAM COMPLIANCE MONITORING INVESTIGATION INITIATED BY EPA ON JANUARY 17, 2013, THE EPA ALLEGES THAT THE RESPONDENT VIOLATED THE CODIFIED RULES GOVERNING THE CAA CHEMICAL ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROVISIONS, BECAUSE RESPONDENT DID NOT ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT PROVISIONS OF 40 CFR PART 68 WHEN IT: 1) FAILED TO DOCUMENT NAMED INDIVIDUALS OR POSITIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING INDIVIDUAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, AND DEFINE THE LINES OF AUTHORITY THROUGH AN ORGANIZATION CHART OR SIMILAR DOCUMENT AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.15(c) 2) FAILED TO UPDATE AND REVALIDATE THE PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSIS AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE INITIAL PROGRESS HAZARD ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.67(f); 3) FAILED TO RETAIN DOCUMENTED PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSES AND UPDATES OR REVALIDATIONS FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROCESS AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.67(g); 4) FAILED TO CERTIFY ANNUALLY THAT OPERATING PROCEDURES ARE CURRENT AND ACCURATE AN REQUIRED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.69(a); 5) FAILED PROVIDE REFRESHER TRAINING AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS TO EACH EMPLOYEE INVOLVED IN OPERATING A PROCESS AS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.71(b); 6) FAILURE TO CONDUCT VIBRATION ANALYSES AT A FREQUENCY CONSISTENT WITH GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICES AS REQUIED BY 40 CFR SECTION 68.73(d)(3);

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown