CASE SUMMARY: * FACILITY HAD A DEVICE SIMILAR TO A SEPTIC TANK WHICH HAD A DEVICE USED FOR DISPOSAL OF HAZ SUBSTANCES. NMEID HAD CON- SIDERED THE UNIT AN UNREGULATED DRY WELL FOR YEARS AND HAD TREATED IT AS SUCH. FINALLY, THE UNIT WAS TREATED AS A RCRA UNIT AND NMEID WAS UNABLE TO GET RCRA CLOSURE, SO IT REFER- RED THE CASE TO US. WE HAVE SETTLED FOR A $150,000 PENALTY AND THE COMPANY WILL DO A RCRA CLOSURE.