# DAYTON, CITY OF
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY1998 · — · Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `37805`
- **Case Number:** 06-1998-0108
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- DAYTON, CITY OF (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

1. SECTION 309(A) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C.     SECTION 1319(A).                                          2. CITY OF DAYTON                                               0.50 MILE SW OF INTERSECTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 146 AND        U.S. HIGHWAY 90                                              DAYTON, LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS 77535                       3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY     DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS FROM THE FACILITY THAT EXCEEDED       PERMITTED EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, AS SHOWN IN THE CERTIFIED    DMRS FILED WITH EPA.                                      4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUAN TTO SECTION 309(A) OF THE CWA, EPA     ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO) ORDERING THE RESPOND-    ENT TO: A) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AO    TAKE WHATEVER CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NECESSARY TO ELIMINATE    AND PREVENT RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS CITED, B) WITHIN    30 DAYS OF THE AO, SUBMIT A WRITTEN REPORT DETAILING THE     SPECIFIC ACTIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND EX-     PLAINING WHY SUCH ACTIONS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE SUFFIC-      IENT TO PREVENT RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS, AND C) IF      THE PERMITTEE BELIEVES COMPLETE CORRECTION OF THE VIOLA-     TIONS IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHIN 30 DAYS, SUBMIT A SCHEDULE      FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE VIOLATIONS IN THE SHORTEST        TIME POSSIBLE.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*