# SPRINGTOWN, CITY OF, A TEXAS MUNICIPALITY
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY1999 · — · Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `38720`
- **Case Number:** 06-1999-0040
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- SPRINGTOWN, CITY OF (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

1. SECTION 309(A) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C.     SECTION 1319(A).                                          2. CITY OF SPRINGTOWN, A TEXAS MUNICIPALITY                     INTERSECTION OF SPRING BRANCH TRAIL AND 3RD STREET           SPRINGTOWN, PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS 76082                    3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY     DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS FROM ITS FACILITY THAT EXCEEDED       PERMITTED EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, AS SHOWN IN THE CERTIFIED    DMRS FILED WITH EPA, AND BY FAILING TO SUBMIT DMRS FOR       FECAL COLIFORM DURING THE PERIOD OF MAR. 1995 THROUGH        SEPT. 1995, AS REQUIRED.                                  4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(A) OF THE CWA, EPA     ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (AO) TO THE RESPONDENT.       THE AO ORDERED THE RESPONDENT TO: A) WITHIN 30 DAYS, TAKE    WHATEVER CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NECESSARY TO ELIMINATE AND     PREVENT RECURRENCE OF THE VIOLATIONS CITED, B) WITHIN 30     DAYS, SUBMIT A WRITTEN REPORT DETAILING THE SPECIFIC AC-     TIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND EXPLAINING HOW     THEY WILL PREVENT RECURRENCE, C) IF NOT POSSIBLE TO COR-     RECT THE VIOLATIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS, WITHIN 30 DAYS, SUB-     MIT A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO DO SO IN THE SHORTEST TIME       POSSIBLE, AND D) WITHIN 30 DAYS, SUBMIT TO EPA DMRS FOR      FECAL COLIFORM FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAR. 1995 THROUGH         SEPT. 1996.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*