# HIGHFILL OIL, AN OKLAHOMA FIRM
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2000 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `40721`
- **Case Number:** 06-2000-1107
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** $3K
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- HIGHFILL OIL (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

1. SECTIONS 311(B)(6)(A)(II) AND 311(B)(6(B)(I) OF THE          CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTIONS                  1321(B)(6)(A)(II) AND 1321(B)(6)(B)(I), AS AMENDED BY THE    OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990.                                2. HIGHFILL OIL, AN OKLAHOMA COMPANY                            FACILITY: JANE RILEY LEASE                                             SECTION 4, T24 N, R17 E                                      CLAREMORE, ROGERS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74017        3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 311(J) OF THE CWA     BY: A) SPCC PLAN HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AND CERTIFIED BY      A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER; B) SPCC PLAN HAS NOT BEEN RE-       VIEWED BY THE OWNER/OPERATOR FOR AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 3       YEARS; C) SPCC PLAN HAS NO EVIDENCE OF MANAGEMENT APPROV-    AL; D) FIELD DRAINAGE DITCHES, ROAD DITCHES, AND OIL         TRAPS, SUMPS OR SKIMMERS ARE NOT REGULARLY INSPECTED FOR     ACCUMULATED OIL NOR THE LEAKED OIL IS BEING REMOVED FROM     THE GROUND; E) FACILITY HAD NO SECONDARY MEANS OF CON-       TAINMENT; F) EVIDENCE OF HEAVY CORROSION AND LEAKING         LINES INDICATING THAT THE FACILITY HAS AN INADEQUATE         FLOWLINE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM; G) INSPECTION WRITTEN PRO-     CEDURES HAVE NOT BEEN MADR PART OF THE SPCC PLAN AND THE     INSPECTIONS RECORDS WERE NOT BEING KEPT BY THE FACILITY;     AND H) SPCC PLAN DID NOT INDICATE A DESIGNATED PERSON RE-    SPONSIBLE FOR SPILL PREVENTION.                           4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*