← EPA enforcement cases

MILBANK ALFALFA PRODUCTS, INC.

Administrative - Formal · FY1985 · — · Withdrawn by Region/State · 47758

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
08-1985-0022
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Withdrawn by Region/State
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

MILBANK ALFALFA PRODUCTS, INC. OWNS AN ALFALFA PROCESSING PLANT APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST OF MECKLING, S. D. SOUTH DAKOTA SIP REGULATION ARSD 74:26:03:05 PROHIBITS ANYPERSON OPERATING AN ALFALFA PELLETIZING OR DEHYDRATING FACILITY FROM DISCHARGING INTO THE AMBIENT AIR ANY AIR CONTAMINANT OF A SHADE OR DENSITY EQUAL TO OR OF A SHADE OR DENSITY EQUAL TO OR DARKER THAN ... THIRTY PERCENT OPACITY. TWO VIOLATIONS WERE OBSERVED BY S. D. DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION, JANUARY 20, 1983 - 41% OF OPACITY OCTOBER 3, 1983 - 55% OF OPACITY. REGION 8 ISSUED A SECTION 120 NON ON 06-11-84. ON FEBRUARY 28, 1985, MIKE RISNER OF REGION 8 SENT EPA HQ A SAMPLE CONSENT AGREEMENT WHICH HE PROPOSED WOULD ADEQUATELY SETTLE ALL FIVE OF THE REGION 8 ALFALFA CASE: JENSEN BROTHERS, NATIONAL ALFALFA, SIOUX ALFALFA, BARNES HAY AND FEED, AND MILBANK ALFALFA. HQ RESPONDED AT THE END OF MARCH, 1985, STATING THAT THERE WERE ONLY TWO EXPLICIT WAYS OF SETTLING A SECT. 120 PROCEEDING SHORT OF OBTAINING THE FULL ECONOMIC BENEFIT PENALTY, EITHER THROUGH WITHDRAWL OR MODIFICATION OF NON BECAUSE THE SOURCE IS NOT IN VIOLATION OR IS ENTITLED TO AN EXCEPTION UNDER 40 C. F. R. SECTIONS 66.31-66.33. HQ RESPONDED THAT THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT WAS INADEQUATE.

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown