# ERSPLAS, INC.
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2001 · — · Final Order With Penalty
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `8422`
- **Case Number:** 02-2001-3407
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Final Order With Penalty
- **Penalty assessed:** $50K
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** $500
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** N
## Defendants
- ERSPLAS, INC. (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

FACILITY DID NOT SEEK COVERAGE TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER      ASSOCIATED WITH ITS INDUSTRIALACTIVITY AFTER THE BASELINE    PERMIT EXPIRED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1997.  IN DECEMBER 2000,     EPA ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (CWA-02-2001-3023)        REQUESTING THE FACILITY TO SEEK COVERAGE UNDER THE MULTI-    SECTOR GENERAL PERMIT (MSGP) THAT WAS PUBLISHED BY EPA IN    10/2000 AND TO COMPLY THEREAFTER WITH ALL THE TERMS AND      CONDITIONS OF THE MSGP.  AFTER THE ORDER WAS ISSUED, EPA     INSPECTED THE FACILITY AND FOUND THAT IT E=WAS NOT COMPLYING WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE MSGP.                   *********************                                        MOA PRIORITY - CAA AIR TOXICS & NSR                          ***********                                                  FACILITY DID NOT SEEK COVERAGE TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER      ASSOCIATED WITH ITS INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AFTER THE BASELINE   PERMIT EXPIRED IN SEPTEMBER 24, 1997.  IN DECEMBER 2000, EPA ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (CWA-02-2001-3023) REQUESTING THE FACILITY TO SEEK COVERAGE UNDER THE MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMIT (MSGP) THAT WAS PUBLISHED BY EPA IN 10/2000 AND TO    COMPLY THEREAFTER WITH ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE   MSGP.  AFTER THE ORDER WAS ISSUED, EPA INSPECTED THE         FACILITY AND FOUND THAT IS WAS NOT COMPLYING WITH THE TERMS  AND CONDITIONS OF THE MSGP.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*