← EPA enforcement cases

INDIUM CORP OF AMERICA

Administrative - Formal · FY2001 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 8467

$17K
Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-2001-4221
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
Y

Defendants (1)

Summary

05/23/00 - AUDIT POLICY DISCLOSURE DATE. ON MAY 23, 2000 INDIUM DISCLOSED TO EPA THAT AT A EPA SPON- SORED TRI COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE SEMINAR THE COMPANY DIS- COVERED THEY HAD INCORRECTLY CALCULATED LEAD RELEASES FOR TWO OF ITS FACILITIES LECATED N CLINTON, NY AND UTICA, NY, RESPECTIVELY. AS SUCH, THIS LEAD TO THE IMPROPER FILING OF A FORM A, WHEN A FORM R SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILED, FOR REPORT- ING YEARS 1995 THROUGH 1998. * ON MAY 23, 2000, INDIUM SUBMITTED A WRITTEN AND SIGNED STATEMENT OF VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE TO EPA, STATING THAT THEY HAD BEEN INCORRECTLY FILING EPCRA FORM A TRI REPORTS FOR LEAD, IN LIEU OF FORM R, FOR REPORTING YEARS 1995 THROUGH 1998, AT TWO SEPARATE FACILITIES. NOTWITHSTANDING THE EX- PLICIT LANGUAGE IN THE REGULATION 40 CFR SECTION 372.27(A) THAT SPECIFIES THAT THE AMOUNTS TRANSFERRED FROM A FACILITY TO OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR RECYCLING PURPOSES IS INCLUDED IN THE COMBINED TOTAL QUANTITIES RELEASED, THE FACILITY HAD ERRONESOUSLY THOUGHT THAT SENDING SPENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LEAD OFF-SITE TO A METAL RECLAMATION FACILITY DID NOT COUNT AS A RELEASE. AND, WITHOUT INCLUDING THESE OFF-SITE TRANS- FERS, INDIUM THOUGHT THEY MET THE NECESSARY CRITERIA TO FILE A FORM A. IN THEIR DISCLOSURE, IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT ON MAY 4, 2000 REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE COMPANY ATTENDED AN EPA SPONSORED SECTION 313 TRI COMPLI

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown