← EPA enforcement cases

PRODUCTION PLATING - PRODUCTION PLATING (CERCLA)

Judicial · FY2002 · — · Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery · 87875

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
05-2002-0380
Type
Judicial
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

ON OCTOBER 12, 1999 A FIRE DESTROYED AN ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHING FACILITY LOCATED AT 23120 GRATIOT AVENUE IN EASTPOINTE, MICHIGAN. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY OWNED AND WAS OWNED AT THE TIME OF THE FIRE BY VALENTINE INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. (VALENTINE). VALENTINE LEASED THE PROPERTY TO PRODUCTION PLATING, INC. (PLATING) AND PLATING CONDUCTED THE METAL FINISHING OPERATIONS AT THE FACILITY. AS A RESULT OF THE FIRE, HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES USED IN THE PLATING PROCESSES WERE RELEASED. ON THE DAY OF THE FIRE, PLATING RETAINED M.L. CHARTIER, INC. (CHARTIER), AN ENVIRON- MENTAL CONTRACTOR, TO CONDUCT CLEANUP OPERATIONS AT THE FACI LITY. HOWEVER, BEFORE THE CLEANUP WAS COMPLETED, CHARTIER ABANDONED ITS CLEANUP OPERATIONS BECAUSE IT RECEIVED NO PAY- MENT FOR ITS SERVICES. AFTER CHARTIER DISCONTINUED ITS CLEANUP OPERATIONS, EPA ISSUED A UNILATERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UNDER SECTION 106 OF CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.  9606, TO VALENTINE AND P LATING REQUI- RING THEM TO COMPLETE THE CLEANUP ACTIVITIES. VALENTINE AND PLATING INFORMED THE REGION THAT THEY COULD NOT PERFORM THE WORK REQUIRED BY THE ORDER DUE TO FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, EPA CONDUCTED A REMOVAL AT THE FACILITY NOW KNOWN AS THE PRODUCTION PLATING FIRE SUPERFUND SITE (THE SITE). EPA WAS NAMED AS A DEFENDANT IN AN INTERPLEADER CASE FILED BY TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPAN

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown