← EPA enforcement cases

Rutgers, Newark Campus

Administrative - Formal · FY2003 · — · Source Agrees · 89775

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-2003-0800
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Source Agrees
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
Y

Defendants (1)

Summary

On 10/24/2002 Rutgers submitted a supplemental disclosure for the USTR audit at its Newark campus. The previous review had missed a heating tank that stored Diesel Fuel for the Woodward Residence Hall & Stonsby Dining facility. In the supplemental self-disclosure Rutgers identified the following two violations associated with an underground storage tank (UST) at its Newark Campus: 40 CFR 280.21(a), and 40 CFR 280.22(a). Disclosure of violation 280.22(a) is a correct determination. Disclosure of 280.21(a), however, is incorrect; there is no such violation associated with said UST. This UST system was installed after Dec. 22, 1988 and is therefore considered a new tank system (as defined in 40 CFR 280.12). Hence, the violations identified by Rutgers as failure to meet upgrade requirements under 280.21 are actually violations of the performance standards for new UST systems under 280.20 (specifically 280.20(b)(2), 280.20(c)(1)(i), and 280.20(c)(1)(ii). Since the regulatory requirements of 280.20 and 280.21 are frequently mistaken for one another, the EPA program specialist proceeded with the review as if Ru

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown