# Enertec, Inc. Kaplan Conoco Bulk Plant
> **Administrative - Formal** · FY2003 · — · Withdrawn by Region/State
## Case
- **Activity ID:** `90787`
- **Case Number:** 06-2003-4303
- **Type:** Administrative - Formal
- **Lead:** EPA
- **Outcome:** Withdrawn by Region/State
- **Penalty assessed:** —
- **Cost recovery:** —
- **Compliance action $:** —
- **Multimedia (multi-env):** —
## Defendants
- Enertec, Inc., Kaplan Conoco Bluk Plan (complaint) (settlement)
## Summary

*Inspections required by 40 CFR part 112 are not in accordance with written procedures developed for the facility.
*Written procedures and a record of inspections are not signed by facility supervisor.
*Written procedures and a arecord of inspections are not made part of the plan.
*Written procedures and a record of inspections are not maintained for three years.
*No training on the operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges.
*No training on the applicable laws, rules, and regulations.
*Spill prevention briefings are not scheduled and conducted periodically.
*Walls of containment system are slightly eroded or have low areas.
*Adequate records of drainage events are not maintained.
*Inadequate secondary containment, and/or rack drainage does not flow to catchment basin, treatment system, or quick drainage system.
*Facility not fully fenced and entrance gates are not locked and/or guarded when plant is unattended or not in production.

---
*Source: [EPA ECHO](https://echo.epa.gov/) · AI Analytics · CC0 1.0*