← EPA enforcement cases

Crosman Corporation

Administrative - Formal · FY2003 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 91298

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
02-2003-4203
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

The �Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil Penalties, Etc.,� 40 C.F.R. Part 22 (July 1, 2000), provide in 40 C.F.R. � 22.13(b) that when the parties agree to settle one or more causes of action before the filing of an Administrative Complaint, a proceeding may be simultaneously commenced and concluded by the issuance of a Consent Agreement and Final Order pursuant to 40 C.F.R. �22.18(b)(2) and (3). A review of the Toxic Release Inventory Envirofacts Database (TRI Database) indicated that the Respondent voluntarily submitted the following Forms R to the EPA: CHEMICAL YEAR DUE DATE POSTMARK DATE DAYS LATE Chromium 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19,1999 201 Nickel 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19, 1999 201 Lead 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19, 1999 201 Manganese 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19, 1999 201 Zinc Compounds 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19, 1999 201 Copper Compounds 1997 July 1, 1998 January 19, 1999 201 On June 28, 2002, a letter addressing the above late reporting violations was sent to the company in an effort to gain more insight into the circumstances concerning the above violations. By letters dated August 22, 2002 and October 22, 2002, Crosman Corporation provided the requested information. Based on this information, it was determined that Crosman Corporation had �processed� (as defined in 40 C.F.R. � 372.3) greater than 25,000 pounds each of chromium, nickel, lead, manganese, zinc compounds and coppe

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown