# Landis Award for Outstanding Mentorship: Administrative Supplement to NS131225

> **NIH NIH R01** · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · 2024 · $155,500

## Abstract

Project Summary: Developing disease-modifying therapies for neurodegenerative diseases has been challenging, in part
because accurate statistical models to identify the optimal time for intervention do not exist. Models of how symptoms
worsen over time (i.e., the symptom trajectory) before and after a clinical diagnosis can help identify that optimal time.
These models can help pinpoint when a therapy could prevent a clinical diagnosis or slow the disease after a clinical
diagnosis. Yet modeling the symptom trajectory is not easy even for Huntington disease, where researchers can track
asymptomatic patients guaranteed to develop the disease and its symptoms. Like other neurodegenerative diseases,
Huntington disease progresses slowly over decades, so studies that track symptoms often end before clinical diagnosis.
This makes time to clinical diagnosis right-censored (i.e., a patient's motor abnormalities will merit a clinical diagnosis
sometime after the last study visit, but exactly when is unknown), leaving researchers with the challenge of trying to model
the symptom trajectory before and after clinical diagnosis without full information about when clinical diagnosis occurs.
The challenge creates a unique statistical problem of modeling the symptom trajectory as a function of a right-censored
covariate, time to clinical diagnosis (hereafter, simply “time to diagnosis”).
 Tackling this problem by modeling the distribution for time to diagnosis has long been thought to be the best strategy.
For years, we and others worked to develop reliable distribution models, but we found that if the model was even slightly
wrong, we would get biased estimates of how the symptom trajectory changes as a function of time to diagnosis. This
bias causes problems for clinical trials because they are incorrectly powered to determine if a therapy modiﬁes the disease
course. We began seeking a strategy that does not require us needing to accurately model the distribution for time to
diagnosis. Our team developed such a strategy for a related problem: estimating a regression model that has a covariate
measured with error. Like a right-censored covariate, when a covariate is measured with error, the covariate's true value
and distribution are unknown. Rather than ﬁnding the correct distribution, our model-free strategy accurately estimates
the regression model even when the distribution for the covariate is mismodeled.
 Our overarching objective is to develop a similarly robust, model-free strategy when we have a right-censored covariate,
which requires tackling challenges in three new areas: when the study ends before clinical diagnosis occurs (noninformative
censoring; Aim 1), when worsening symptoms lead to study dropout (informative censoring; Aim 2), and when the data
are longitudinal (Aim 3). This Landis Award Supplement will fund the training and development of a postdoctoral
researcher, allowing them to integrate all project aims into a new software package for ...

## Key facts

- **NIH application ID:** 11128200
- **Project number:** 3R01NS131225-02S3
- **Recipient organization:** UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL
- **Principal Investigator:** Tanya Pamela Garcia
- **Activity code:** R01 (R01, R21, SBIR, etc.)
- **Funding institute:** NIH
- **Fiscal year:** 2024
- **Award amount:** $155,500
- **Award type:** 3
- **Project period:** 2023-06-01 → 2028-04-30

## Primary source

NIH RePORTER: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/11128200

## Citation

> US National Institutes of Health, RePORTER application 11128200, Landis Award for Outstanding Mentorship: Administrative Supplement to NS131225 (3R01NS131225-02S3). Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-05-21 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/grant/nih/11128200. Licensed CC0.

---

*[NIH grants dataset](/datasets/nih-grants) · CC0 1.0*
