# Socioeconomic gradients in mortality new questions about personality and IQ

> **NIH NIH R01** · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · 2020 · $395,099

## Abstract

Project Summary
Some have proposed that SES inequalities in mortality can be explained by the influence of individual traits
upon both later SES and mortality. This so-called “indirect selection” model has far-reaching implications not
only for social theory, but also for public policy. Vigorous debate exists over whether policies should treat
health as a matter of personal responsibility dependent upon traits such as Conscientiousness and IQ, or as a
matter of social responsibility dependent upon socioeconomic factors outside the individual's control. However,
converging strands of theory suggest that the standard version of the indirect selection model may be overly
simplistic in at least three respects. First, the “brute luck” of socioeconomic circumstances at birth likely
influences not only later SES, but also individual traits. The strength of this influence likely explains some of the
apparent role personality and IQ seem to play in explaining associations between adulthood SES and earlier
mortality. Second, key pathways in the indirect selection model likely vary across both gender and
race/ethnicity. Institutional barriers may reduce the economic and health benefits of meritocratic traits among
women, minorities, and those growing up within limited opportunity structures. Third, many argue that the
measurement of IQ (and possibly personality) is systematically biased across social class and race. If true, the
apparent role of traits in SES and race differences in mortality could be spuriously inflated or systematically
distorted. We have carefully set the stage for a 55-year mortality follow-up of over 94,000 members of Project
Talent--a national cohort sampled during high school in 1960, and again when they were on average 29-30
years old. The sample is unprecedented in combining national US scope with depth of psychological
measurement. Detailed information exists on the childhood SES of participants, cognitive ability and
personality in high school, and attained SES by age 29-30. We also leverage unique aspects of the cohort's
historical context—Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty—in exploratory questions on static and changing local
economic opportunity structure and institutionalized racial discrimination. Our mortality data-collection
approximates the end of the natural life expectancy of the PT cohort (age 72-73), allowing us to focus on
premature mortality--arguably, the most sensitive barometers of health inequalities. Our team features a mix of
experts from personality and sociology (including the PT Survey Director), includes a minority health expert
and historian, and is led by a PI who has focused on these issues for the past several years. Our project is
thus poised to test and refine pivotal au currant conjectures about the role personality and IQ may play in
social mortality inequalities.

## Key facts

- **NIH application ID:** 9905379
- **Project number:** 5R01AG053155-05
- **Recipient organization:** UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
- **Principal Investigator:** Benjamin P Chapman
- **Activity code:** R01 (R01, R21, SBIR, etc.)
- **Funding institute:** NIH
- **Fiscal year:** 2020
- **Award amount:** $395,099
- **Award type:** 5
- **Project period:** 2016-09-30 → 2023-03-31

## Primary source

NIH RePORTER: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9905379

## Citation

> US National Institutes of Health, RePORTER application 9905379, Socioeconomic gradients in mortality new questions about personality and IQ (5R01AG053155-05). Retrieved via AI Analytics 2026-05-23 from https://api.ai-analytics.org/grant/nih/9905379. Licensed CC0.

---

*[NIH grants dataset](/datasets/nih-grants) · CC0 1.0*