{"url_path":"/sec/bnkk/10-q/2026/item-1","section_key":"item-1","section_title":"Item 1 Legal Proceedings.**","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"10-Q","doc_date":"2026-05-13","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1760903/0001493152-26-022743-index.html","accession_number":"0001493152-26-022743","cik":"0001760903","ticker":"BNKK","issuer_name":"BONK, INC.","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1760903/0001493152-26-022743-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0001760903","primary_entity_name":"BONK, INC."},"word_count":506,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"**Item\n1. Legal Proceedings.**\n\n \n\nThe\nCompany may be subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from contracts or other matters from time to time in the ordinary course\nof business. Management is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation where the ultimate disposition or resolution could have\na material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.\n\n \n\nOn September 5, 2023, “Sabby”\nVolatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. filed a lawsuit against the Company in the federal district court for the Southern District of New\nYork case captioned Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. v. Jupiter Wellness, Inc., No.1:23-cv-07874-KPF (the “Litigation”).\nSabby’s initial complaint in the Litigation alleges that the Company’s delayed spin-off and distribution of the common stock\nof “SRM” Entertainment. Inc. give rise to claims of breach-of-contact, promissory estoppel, and negligent misrepresentation.\nOn November 10, 2023, Jupiter sought judicial permission to move to dismiss Sabby’s complaint, arguing that Sabby had no legal right\nto the delayed distribution occurring on the original record date, and that regardless, no law requires the Company to compensate Sabby\nfor the costs of covering its short position against the Company. The Litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the federal district\ncourt for the Southern District of New York on September 23, 2024. On October 10, 2024, Sabby filed an appeal of the Southern District’s\ndismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In or around March of 2025, Sabby was successful in its appeal\nto the Second Circuit and the lower court’s ruling was overturned as to Sabby’s breach of contract claim – Sabby’s\nremaining claims were dismissed. On or about July 1, 2025, the Second Circuit denied the Company’s petition for reconsideration.\nOn May 6, 2026, the Company agreed to settle the Litigation by agreeing to pay Sabby $250,000 in exchange for a dismissal of the case\nand a full release from any claims related to the Litigation.\n\n \n\nOn\nFebruary 9, 2024, “Sabby” Volatility Warrant Master Find Ltd. sued the Company in the federal district court for the\nSouthern District of New York, case captioned, Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd. v. Safety Shot, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-920-NRB\n(the “Litigation”). Sabby’s initial complaint alleges that the Company has improperly refused to honor\nSabby’s exercise of a Warrant to acquire 2,105,263 shares of common stock. On March 8, 2024, Sabby filed an amended complaint\nand the Company answered the amended complaint. Sabby seeks “liquidated and compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at\ntrial,” including compensatory damages “estimated to be at least $750,000,” liquidated damages “estimated to\nbe at least $600,000,” specific performance, attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs. The Company does not believe that the\nLitigation’s ultimate disposition or resolution will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position,\nresults of operations or liquidity. The Company has made an offer of $1.5 million to settle this matter. In January of 2026,\nthe Company participated in a trial in the Litigation as to damages only and is awaiting the Court’s ruling."}