{"url_path":"/sec/notv/8-k/2026-05-18/item-8-01","section_key":"item-8-01","section_title":"Item 8.01 Other Events.**","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"8-K","doc_date":"2026-05-18","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/720154/0001104659-26-063032-index.html","accession_number":"0001104659-26-063032","cik":"0000720154","ticker":"NOTV","issuer_name":"Inotiv, Inc.","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/720154/0001104659-26-063032-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0000720154","primary_entity_name":"Inotiv, Inc."},"word_count":575,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"** **\n\n**Item 8.01. Other Events.**\n\n**** \n\n*Convertible Notes*\n\n \n\nOn\nApril 15, 2026, the Company was required to make an interest payment of approximately $2.139 million under the Convertible Indenture\nand was entitled to a grace period thereunder through and including May 15, 2026.\n\n \n\nOn\nMay 15, 2026, the Company, BAS Evansville, Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, entered into the Supplemental Indenture,\nwhich extended the grace period in respect of the failure to make interest payments from thirty days to forty-four days, thereby extending\nthe foregoing grace period through and including May 29, 2026.\n\n \n\n5 \n\n \n\n \n\n*Privacy Class Actions*\n\n* *\n\nAs previously disclosed, the Company has been\na party to three putative class actions filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (the “Federal\nActions”) relating to the cybersecurity incident experienced in August 2025 (the “Cybersecurity Incident”), in which\na threat actor gained unauthorized access to the Company’s systems and may have acquired certain data. On March 14, 2026, (a) the\nFederal Actions were dismissed without prejudice, and (b) the same plaintiffs who filed the Federal Actions filed a putative class action\nin the Marion Superior Court, Marion County, Indiana under the caption *Doyal, et al. v. Inotiv, Inc.*, Case No. 49D01-2604-CE-020713\n(the “Indiana State Court Action”) on behalf of the same class of persons identified in the Federal Actions. The Indiana State\nCourt Action generally alleged the same claims as the Federal Actions, namely that the plaintiffs and the proposed class members were\nharmed when their personally identifying information and protected health information were impacted by the Cybersecurity Incident.\n\n \n\nOn May 13, 2026, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and\nRelease that resolves the claims of the plaintiffs and the proposed class in the Indiana State Court Action (the “Proposed Cybersecurity\nIncident Settlement”). The Company entered into the Proposed Cybersecurity Incident Settlement to eliminate the uncertainty, burden\nand expense of protracted litigation. The Proposed Cybersecurity Incident Settlement does not assign or reflect an admission of wrongdoing\nor liability by the Company, which denies any wrongdoing. The Proposed Cybersecurity Incident Settlement is subject in all respects to\ncourt approval and there can be no assurance that the court will approve the Proposed Cybersecurity Incident Settlement.\n\n \n\nUnder the terms of the Proposed Cybersecurity\nIncident Settlement, the members of the putative class, which is expected to consist of all persons who received a notice from the Company\nfollowing the Cybersecurity Incident stating that such persons’ personally identifiable information may have been compromised, can\nmake claims for (a) compensation for lost time attributable to the Cybersecurity Incident, (b) the recovery of ordinary expenses incurred\nin connection with the Cybersecurity Incident, (c) the recovery of extraordinary losses incurred in connection with the Cybersecurity\nIncident, or (d) in lieu of the settlement benefits stated in (a), (b) and (c), an alternative cash payment. All such class benefits are\nsubject to certain monetary caps and verification by a third-party settlement administrator. In addition to the benefits outlined above,\nclass members can elect to make a claim for two years of credit monitoring services. Plaintiffs will seek an award of attorneys’\nfees and costs and expenses not to exceed $275,000, as well as service award payments for the class representatives.\n\n \n\nIf approved by the court, the Proposed Cybersecurity\nIncident Settlement will fully resolve the Indiana State Court Action. The Company expects that all payments required by the Proposed\nCybersecurity Incident Settlement will be fully funded by available insurance."}