{"url_path":"/sec/pths/10-q/2026/item-1","section_key":"item-1","section_title":"Item 1 Legal Proceedings","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"10-Q","doc_date":"2026-05-14","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1919246/0001919246-26-000070-index.html","accession_number":"0001919246-26-000070","cik":"0001919246","ticker":"PTHS","issuer_name":"Pelthos Therapeutics Inc.","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1919246/0001919246-26-000070-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0001919246","primary_entity_name":"Pelthos Therapeutics Inc."},"word_count":572,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"Item 1. Legal Proceedings\n\nFrom time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, would have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity and reputation harm, and other factors.\n\nKopfli Matter\n\nOn February 14, 2024, Chromocell’s board of directors received a demand letter from an attorney representing Chromocell Holdings and its former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Strategy Officer, Mr. Christian Kopfli, who was released for “cause.” Mr. Kopfli alleged an improper termination for “cause” and claimed to seek monetary damages in the amount of $479,169. Of the $479,169 asserted by Mr. Kopfli, as of September 30, 2024, Chromocell had accrued $363,091 in compensation expenses associated with Mr. Kopfli’s prior employment with Chromocell. However, Chromocell believed the assertions made by Mr. Kopfli were without merit and commenced a lawsuit against Mr. Kopfli and Chromocell Holdings in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, County of New York on June 7, 2024 (Index No. 652917/2024, the “New York Action”), asserting causes of action against Mr. Kopfli for breach of the Employment Agreement entered into on January 10, 2023 between Chromocell and Mr. Kopfli, breach of fiduciary duty by Mr. Kopfli, as well as breach of contract against Chromocell Holdings. Chromocell also asserted a “faithless servant” claim against Mr. Kopfli, seeking a ruling that Mr. Kopfli was not entitled to compensation from Chromocell. Chromocell sought monetary damages against Mr. Kopfli and Chromocell Holdings in the New York Action, plus disgorgement of all compensation previously paid or accrued to Mr. Kopfli by Chromocell.\n\nBy Order dated October 3, 2024, the court in the New York Action awarded Chromocell a default judgment against Mr. Kopfli and Chromocell Holdings on all claims. On October 7, 2025, following an inquest held before the Court regarding Chromocell’s damages, a judgment was entered in favor of Chromocell and against Mr. Kopfli and Chromocell Holdings, jointly and severally, in the amount of $17,950,810, as well as additional damages against Mr. Kopfli in the amount of $348,461 (the “Judgment”). As of June 30, 2025, the Company has removed the accrual of $348,461 in compensation expenses. By a subsequent Order dated February 27, 2026, the Court in the New York Action ordered the assignment of Chromocell Holdings’ rights, title and interest in and to U.S. Patent No. 10,179,781 and its foreign counterparts to Chromocell in partial satisfaction of the Judgment.\n\nLang Demand Letter\n\nOn July 24, 2025, the Company received a demand latter (the “Lang Demand Letter”) from an attorney representing Dr. Eric Lang, the former Chief Medical Officer of the Company. The Lang Demand Letter asserted that the Company breached Dr. Lang’s employment contract with the Company and violated Dr. Lang’s rights under New Jersey wage and hour laws and the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. The Lang Demand Letter asserted potential liability of as much as $1,008,095, an amount that included liquidated damages of $640,000 that the Company believed was unavailable under applicable law. The Company settled the matter without payment of any liquidated damages. The final payment under the employment contract was made on March 13, 2026. The Company believes that this matter has been fully resolved."}