{"url_path":"/sec/tm/10-k/2026/item-4","section_key":"item-4","section_title":"Item 4 INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"20-F","doc_date":"2026-06-10","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1094517/0001193125-26-264811-index.html","accession_number":"0001193125-26-264811","cik":"0001094517","ticker":"TM","issuer_name":"TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1094517/0001193125-26-264811-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0001094517","primary_entity_name":"TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/"},"word_count":31323,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY\n\n4.A HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY\n\nToyota Motor Corporation is a joint-stock company with limited liability incorporated under the Commercial Code of Japan and continues to exist under the Companies Act of Japan (the “Companies Act”). Toyota commenced operations in 1933 as the automobile division of Toyota Industries (formerly Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd.). Toyota was incorporated as a separate company in August 1937. In 1982, the Toyota Motor Company and Toyota Motor Sales merged to form the present Toyota Motor Corporation. As of March 31, 2026, Toyota operates through 602 consolidated subsidiaries (including structured entities) and 159 associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method.\n\nSee “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.B Business Overview — Capital Expenditures and Divestitures” for a description of Toyota’s principal capital expenditures and divestitures between April 1, 2023 and March 31, 2026 and information on Toyota’s principal capital expenditures and divestitures currently in progress.\n\nToyota’s principal executive offices are located at 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 471-8571, Japan. Toyota’s telephone number in Japan is +81-565-28-2121.\n\nThe SEC maintains a website (https://www.sec.gov/) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Toyota also maintains a website (https://global.toyota/en/) through which its annual reports on Form 20-F and certain of its other SEC filings may be accessed. Information contained on or accessible through Toyota’s website is not part of this annual report on Form 20-F.\n\n4.B BUSINESS OVERVIEW\n\nToyota primarily conducts business in the automotive industry. Toyota also conducts business in the financial services and other industries. Toyota sold 9,595 thousand vehicles in fiscal 2026 on a consolidated basis. Toyota had sales revenues of ¥50,684.9 billion and net income attributable to Toyota Motor Corporation of ¥3,848.0 billion in fiscal 2026.\n\n \n\n7\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nToyota’s business segments are automotive operations, financial services operations and all other operations. The following table sets forth Toyota’s sales to external customers in each of its business segments for each of the past three fiscal years.\n\n \n\n \n  \nYen in millions\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended March 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2024\n \n  \n2025\n \n  \n2026\n \n\nAutomotive\n\n  \n \n41,080,731\n \n  \n \n42,996,299\n \n  \n \n45,201,924\n \n\nFinancial Services\n\n  \n \n3,447,195\n \n  \n \n4,437,827\n \n  \n \n4,819,003\n \n\nAll Other\n\n  \n \n567,399\n \n  \n \n602,578\n \n  \n \n664,026\n \n\nToyota’s automotive operations include the design, manufacture, assembly and sale of passenger vehicles, minivans and commercial vehicles such as trucks and related parts and accessories. Toyota’s financial services business consists primarily of providing financing to dealers and their customers for the purchase or lease of Toyota vehicles. Toyota’s financial services business also provides mainly retail installment credit and leasing through the purchase of installment and lease contracts originated by Toyota dealers. Related to Toyota’s automotive operations, Toyota is working towards having all of its vehicles become connected vehicles, creating new value and reforming businesses by utilizing big data obtained from those connected vehicles, and establishing new mobility services. Toyota’s all other operations business segment includes the information technology related businesses including a web portal for automobile information called GAZOO.com.\n\nToyota sells its vehicles in approximately 200 countries and regions. Toyota’s primary markets for its automobiles are Japan, North America, Europe and Asia. The following table sets forth Toyota’s sales to external customers in each of its geographical markets for each of the past three fiscal years.\n\n \n\n \n  \nYen in millions\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended March 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2024\n \n  \n2025\n \n  \n2026\n \n\nJapan\n\n  \n \n10,193,556\n \n  \n \n10,719,120\n \n  \n \n10,985,614\n \n\nNorth America\n\n  \n \n17,624,268\n \n  \n \n18,930,253\n \n  \n \n20,661,490\n \n\nEurope\n\n  \n \n5,503,738\n \n  \n \n6,110,052\n \n  \n \n6,464,911\n \n\nAsia\n\n  \n \n7,604,269\n \n  \n \n7,903,360\n \n  \n \n7,966,455\n \n\nOther*\n\n  \n \n4,169,494\n \n  \n \n4,373,919\n \n  \n \n4,606,482\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n“Other” consists of Central and South America, Oceania, Africa and the Middle East.\n\nDuring fiscal 2026, 21.7% of Toyota’s automobile unit sales on a consolidated basis were in Japan, 30.6% were in North America, 12.3% were in Europe and 18.3% were in Asia. The remaining 17.1% of consolidated unit sales were in other markets.\n\nThe Worldwide Automotive Market\n\nToyota estimates that annual worldwide vehicle sales totaled approximately 92 million units in 2025.\n\nAutomobile sales are affected by a number of factors including:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nsocial, political and economic conditions;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nintroduction of new vehicles and technologies;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nvehicle prices, costs incurred by customers to purchase and operate automobiles; and\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nSupply chain disruptions arising from geopolitical risks\n\n \n\n8\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThese factors can cause consumer demand to vary substantially from year to year in different geographic markets and in individual categories of automobiles. Looking at the global economy in fiscal 2026, the U.S. economy remained resilient, supported principally by stable personal consumption. In China, fiscal policy measures, including economic stimulus packages, provided underlying support. As a result, according to our research, the global economy maintained a growth rate of around 3%.\n\nMeanwhile, in the automotive market, government policies and consumer stimulus measures across various countries bolstered demand, and the market continued to expand at a steady pace.\n\nLooking at the economies of major countries, in the United States, despite adverse conditions such as shifts in trade policy, the economy maintained solid performance, supported by resilient personal consumption. The Chinese economy maintained year-over-year growth, supported by resilient exports and fiscal policy measures; however, underlying domestic demand lacked momentum. In Europe, the economy accelerated from the previous year. Against a backdrop of moderated inflation and a stable employment environment, personal consumption served as the primary driver of growth. In Japan, the economy shifted from negative growth in the previous year to positive growth in 2025.\n\nAmid this environment, the global automotive market maintained a pace of expansion in 2025, with a year-on-year increase of 3%.\n\nIn North America, new vehicle sales were approximately 19.90 million units, an increase from the previous year. In Europe, new vehicle sales increased from the previous year to approximately 18.60 million units. New vehicle sales in the Chinese market totaled approximately 26.60 million units, remaining largely flat compared to the previous year. Emerging markets also continued on an upward trend. In India, in addition to underlying market strength, the revised Goods and Services Tax enacted in the second half of 2025 boosted automobile demand.\n\nThe share of each market across the globe, which Toyota estimates based on the available automobile sales data in each country and region information, was 29% for China, 22% for North America (including Mexico and Puerto Rico), 20% for Europe, 4% for Asia (excluding Japan, South Korea and China), and 10% for India and the Middle East.\n\nIn the medium- to long-term, Toyota expects the automotive market to continue growing driven principally by growth in China and other emerging countries. However, global competition is expected to be severe, as various regulations aimed at carbon neutrality have been strengthened and the pace of technological advancement and development of new products, particularly related to electrification, quickens further.\n\nThe worldwide automotive industry is affected significantly by government regulations aimed at reducing harmful effects on the environment, enhancing vehicle safety and improving fuel economy. These regulations have added to the cost of manufacturing vehicles. Many governments also mandate local procurement of parts and components and impose tariffs and other trade barriers, as well as price or exchange controls as a means of creating jobs, protecting domestic producers or influencing their balance of payments. Changes in regulatory requirements and other government-imposed restrictions can limit or otherwise burden an automaker’s operations. Government laws and regulations can also make it difficult to repatriate profits to an automaker’s home country.\n\nThe development of the worldwide automotive market includes the continuing globalization of automotive operations. Manufacturers seek to achieve globalization by localizing the design and manufacture of automobiles and their parts and components in the markets in which they are sold. By expanding production capabilities beyond their home markets, automotive manufacturers are able to reduce their exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, as well as to trade restrictions and tariffs.\n\n \n\n9\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nOver the years, there have been many global business alliances and investments entered into between manufacturers in the global automotive industry. There are various reasons behind these transactions including the need to address excessive global capacity in the production of automobiles, and the need to reduce costs and improve efficiency by increasing the number of automobiles produced using common vehicle platforms and by sharing research and development expenses for environmental and other technology, the desire to expand a company’s global presence through increased size; and the desire to expand into particular segments or geographic markets.\n\nToyota believes that its research and development initiatives, particularly the development of environmentally friendly new vehicle technologies, vehicle safety and information technology, provide it with a strategic advantage.\n\nToyota Philosophy\n\nThe automotive industry is experiencing a once-in-a-century transformation. We are now striving to transform ourselves into a mobility company. In an era which it is hard to predict the future, Toyota has reflected on the path it has taken thus far and has formulated the “Toyota Philosophy” as a roadmap for the future.\n\nToyota’s mission is “Producing Happiness for All” by expanding the possibilities of people, companies and communities through addressing the challenges of mobility as a mobility company. In order to do so, Toyota will continue to create new and unique value with various partners by relentlessly committing towards monozukuri (manufacturing), and by fostering imagination for people and society.\n\n \n\n \n \n\n \nMISSION\n \n\n \n\nProducing Happiness for All\nUsing our technology, we work towards a future of convenience and happiness, available to all\n\n \n\n \nVISION\n \n\n \n\nCreating Mobility for All\nToyota strives to raise the quality and availability of mobility so that individuals, businesses, municipalities and communities can do more, while achieving a sustainable relationship with our planet\n\n \n\n \nVALUE\n \n\n \n\nWe unite our three strengths (Software, Hardware and Partnerships) to create new and unique value that comes from the Toyota Way\n\n \n\nToyota Production System (“TPS”)\n\nTPS is imbued with the desire of Sakichi Toyoda, the founder of the Toyota Group, and Kiichiro Toyoda, the founder, “to make someone’s work easier.”\n\nTPS was established based on two concepts: Jidoka, which can be loosely translated as “automation with a human touch,” — an idea of stopping equipment immediately when a problem occurs, in order to prevent defective products from being produced — and “Just in Time” (“JIT”), a concept based on the idea that “each\n\n \n\n10\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nprocess produces only what is needed for the next process in a continuous flow.” Based on the basic philosophies of jidoka and JIT, through TPS, Toyota aims to efficiently and quickly produce vehicles of sound quality, one at a time, to fully satisfy customer requirements.\n\nToyota believes that improving upon TPS is essential to its future survival. Toyota has introduced TPS into development departments and administrative departments. Toyota applies TPS to its development departments not only to shorten development times and reduce costs, but also to develop our human resources, thus leading to the manufacturing of ever-better cars that customers will love.\n\nToyota Group Vision\n\nChairman Akio Toyoda unveiled the Toyota Group Vision in January 2024. By outlining the direction the Toyota Group should take and putting forth a vision and set of values to which all Toyota Group members can refer, we aim to empower everyone at the genba (front lines) to engage in autonomous action that is consistent with the common vector defined for the Group. Since announcing the vision, we have been advancing numerous initiatives to entrench this vision and the associated values throughout the organization. At the Groupwide level, Chairman Toyoda met with frontline leaders at Group companies to take part in frank discussions and provide advice. He also attended meetings of Daihatsu dealer representatives to gather input from dealers and customers so as to better understand actual conditions and issues on a genchi genbutsu (on-site, hands-on experience) basis. At Toyota Motor Corporation, meanwhile, steps have been taken to share our vision and values among members of management and frontline staff through the ongoing issuance of messages from then-President Koji Sato to employees, labor-management discussions, and regular visits to frontline organizations by management. Through these concerted efforts, we seek to foster an appropriate workplace environment. The Group Vision represents the direction the Toyota Group should take and the vision and values to which all Toyota Group members can return.\n\n“Inventing our path forward, together.”\n\nSakichi Toyoda, the founder of the Toyota Group, invented the Toyoda wooden hand loom with the desire to make life a little easier for his struggling mother. Kiichiro Toyoda invented the domestically produced passenger car with the idea that the automobile industry must be developed by the knowledge and skills of Japanese people. Thinking of others, learning, honing skills, making things, and bringing smiles to people’s faces — that passion and attitude toward invention are truly the starting point of the Toyota Group.\n\n \n\n11\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nIn a time when there is no right answer, we will build a corporate culture in which we can say “thank you” to each other and aim to be a Toyota Group that is needed in the future, where diverse human resources can play an active role.\n\n \n\n \n\nProduct-centered Management\n\nThe challenges our industry faces — carbon neutrality, connected mobility, and AI — cannot be solved by a single company acting alone. True breakthroughs emerge from synergies created when diverse people with varying perspectives collaborate and engage in lively discussion. We believe that co-creating in this manner is key to shaping the future.\n\nA good example is our recent collaboration on battery technology. Through continued development efforts, Toyota has successfully reduced the size of its all-solid-state batteries by one-third compared with conventional batteries while maintaining performance. These batteries are compact and lightweight, offering both short charging times and exceptional durability, and are targeted for commercialization between 2027 and 2028. This battery technology will enhance the flexibility of battery electric vehicles (“BEV”) proportions and packaging, enabling designs that strike a better balance between aesthetics and performance.\n\nBEVs are just one pillar of Toyota’s multi-pathway strategy for becoming carbon neutral. We are working with our partners on the development of carbon-neutral fuels such as biofuels and synthetic fuels, striving to lower the CO2 emissions of our existing vehicles. We also see great potential in hydrogen. For commercial vehicles, we are collaborating with Daimler Truck Holding AG, and for passenger vehicles, we are working with BMW, as well as the governments in Fukushima and Tokyo, to expand the use of hydrogen in both markets. In Japan, with the support of the government, we have begun introducing light-duty fuel-cell trucks for logistics in regions such as Fukushima and Tokyo. By promoting the wider adoption of hydrogen in commercial vehicles, which consume large amounts of fuel, we aim to accelerate infrastructure development to help contribute to the realization of a hydrogen society wherein hydrogen fuel can be stable and reliable.\n\nFurthermore, we are expanding the possibilities of mobility across land, sea, air, and space. Our collaboration with Joby Aviation, Inc. (“Joby”) on Joby’s electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL)\n\n \n\n12\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nhas the potential to transform people’s sense of distance and time, and we are working with them to steadily progress to open up a new dimension of mobility. Furthermore, we are venturing into the satellite and rocket fields with Interstellar Technologies Inc. and are also working to provide solutions to terrestrial issues through satellite communication.\n\nThe ultimate goal of automated driving and Software Defined Vehicles (“SDV”) is to realize a world with zero traffic accidents. Driving assist technologies and automated driving are expected to further reduce the number of accidents, but responding to unpredictable situations such as sudden obstacles emerging from blind spots requires information from the infrastructure side. We are building a system that integrates vehicles, people, and infrastructure, enabling the prediction and prevention of accidents before they occur. Demonstrations are already underway in Japan and China, and we are working steadily toward realizing a safe and secure mobility society in collaboration with many partners.\n\nIn addition, Toyota Research Institute, Inc. (“TRI”) is taking on the challenge of developing AI robots that work and grow together with humans as partners, rather than simply replacing them. To accelerate demonstrations and the advancement of these technologies, we are leveraging Woven City, a mobility test course. Woven City, which held its grand opening in 2025, brings together partners, universities, start-ups, research institutions, and other diverse partners to turn innovative ideas into reality. From here, Woven City will pave the way toward the next generation of mobility.\n\nToday, Toyota has outstanding partners who share our vision and are committed to creating the future together. They are likeminded allies who share a long-term perspective and the belief that collaboration accelerates progress. Together with these partners, we will realize the future of mobility and the sustainable growth of society.\n\nRegion-centered Management\n\nThe foundation of Toyota’s region-centered management is the concept of “best in town.” This concept does not aim to maximize global sales volume or market share. Instead, it reflects our commitment to remain the company that stays closest to customers’ daily lives and earns their trust in each community. Mobility is an integral part of everyday life. By continuing to address the unique challenges and expectations of each region, we believe we can achieve sustainable, long-term growth. Being recognized globally and being needed locally are not always the same. Toyota has achieved the former by steadily accumulating the latter. “Best in town” expresses this management approach. “Best in town” does not simply mean providing high-quality products. It means understanding customers’ lifestyles, culture, road conditions, climate, and values and providing mobility that best fits each region. Even the same vehicle may be used differently depending on the environment. Cold climates, deserts, urban areas, and rural communities require different performance and value. For this reason, rather than applying uniform global strategies, we emphasize systems that allow decisions and actions to be made locally.\n\nThis philosophy extends beyond product planning and design to sales and after-sales services. Dealers around the world serve not only as sales locations but also as our closest points of contact with customers. Feedback gathered through daily dialogue serves as the starting point for product improvements and new initiatives. For Toyota, volume and share ultimately represent the trust we build with customers. The accumulation of this trust has supported our business over the long term.\n\nToyota operates by dividing the world into eight major regions and managing each business based on the characteristics of those regions. Economic conditions, social issues, and levels of market maturity vary significantly from one region to another. For this reason, we have established a structure that enables each region to assess its own circumstances and customer needs and to make decisions and execute initiatives locally.\n\nThe cornerstone of this approach is our commitment to stay close to people’s lives and contribute to local communities through mobility. While the best solutions may differ by region, our overall direction remains the\n\n \n\n13\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nsame. This approach remains consistent across both emerging and developed markets. Guided by our belief that “no one should be left behind,” Toyota has continued to offer a full global lineup. Leaders in each of the eight regions work closely with customers and local communities to deliver vehicles that best meet the needs of their respective markets.\n\nAs a result, we deliver vehicles to customers globally on the basis of a well-balanced business foundation, without depending too heavily on any particular region or market. Energy conditions differ by region, and the pace of electrification and vehicle usage also varies widely. The powertrains required in each market therefore differ as well. To ensure that customer choice is never limited, Toyota continues to enhance the appeal and competitiveness of all powertrains, including BEVs. In an uncertain environment, rather than trying to predict the future, we prepare a range of options to respond quickly to change.\n\nInitiatives that begin in a single town and with a single customer are carried out by thousands of dealers around the world. By working together, Toyota has become a company chosen by customers globally. In addition to delivering high-quality products, Toyota is supported by the people who bring those products to customers in each region and build lasting relationships. Partnerships grounded in trust, credibility, and mutual understanding create value rooted in local communities and foster loyalty across generations.\n\nGuided by our aim to be “best in town” and the mantra of “making ever-better cars,” we continue to evolve our vehicles by responding to the unique characteristics of each market and the needs of customers in every region. By maintaining a full global lineup and continuously evolving our vehicles to meet the needs of different eras and regions, we have produced many long-selling models, such as the Corolla and the Land Cruiser, that are loved by customers worldwide. Going forward, under its “best in town” philosophy, Toyota will remain deeply rooted in local communities, stay close to customers’ lives, and continue delivering products that are loved for generations as a mobility company.\n\nFive-brands Strategy\n\nAt the Japan Mobility Show held in October 2025, we announced the launch of Century as a new brand alongside our Toyota, Lexus, Daihatsu, and GR brands. In particular, the “Century” brand’s goal is to share the pride of Japan with the world. Its name reflects the aspiration to shape the next 100 years, and through the creation of new value originating in Japan, Toyota aims to contribute to the realization of a sustainable and peaceful society.\n\nWe also introduced “TO YOU” as a brand concept in 2025 to represent the Toyota brand. Additionally, the IMV Origin, which we unveiled at Japan Mobility Show 2025, is deliberately shipped from the factory in an unfinished state, with final assembly carried out locally. This approach creates new jobs in vehicle assembly within the community and contributes to the development of employment opportunities and skills. In addition, by allowing flexible customization to suit a wide range of lifestyles and work needs, the IMV Origin aims to deliver mobility that best fits the unique conditions of each region.\n\nBy assuming roles that are both more clearly defined and complementary to one another, the Toyota Group’s brands will comprise a product lineup suitably diverse to meet the needs of each customer and offer them a wider range of options.\n\nContinuous Improvement in Break-even Volume\n\nIn 2024 and 2025, we faced certification issues and a lack of capacity head-on and reinforced our operational foundations. As a result, we have rigorously enhanced safety standards and quality requirements and secured additional capacity, which has stabilized production. On the other hand, we have recently seen a significant rise in our break-even volume due to a combination of increases in investments in human resources and future-oriented investments and the impact of U.S. tariffs.\n\n \n\n14\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nTherefore, we have initiated undertaking company-wide measures. First, we will increase earnings by reviewing fixed costs, achieving cost improvements, and initiating sales initiatives in all regions, groups, and in-house companies. Additionally, to boost productivity even further, we will encourage employees to reexamine their ways of working and pursue efficient, value-added work. For instance, we will step up our utilization of AI for routine tasks and low-value-added work so that personnel can focus on tasks only humans can perform, thereby heightening the “rate of value-added work.” In advancing the aforementioned measures, we will focus on improving our break-even volume by ensuring that the benefits of reinforcing our operational foundations are steadily reflected in our earnings power. Toyota needs a management structure that reliably generates earnings in both favorable and challenging operating conditions and thereby enables Toyota to continue pursuing joint growth initiatives with its stakeholders.\n\nIn our transformation into a mobility company, value chain businesses will play a crucial role. Providing continuous value to customers throughout the long ownership period after the sale of a new car, these businesses have steadily grown. This growth is thanks to the many different products we offer. Supported by strong brands forged through product- and region-centered management, our diverse product lineup has enabled us to have 150 million units in operation worldwide. The growth of our value chain businesses is also attributable to the strength of our products, including their ease of repair and our ability to supply parts for them, as well as to the efforts of frontline personnel engaged in services, sales finance, used car sales, and insurance to fully utilize the high residual value of each product. Going forward, in addition to the virtuous cycle of new cars and value chain businesses, we will further strengthen our earnings base by promoting the creation of new forms of value through software and diverse mobility services.\n\nAcross Toyota’s workplaces, starting with production sites, employees continue to tackle numerous challenges while striving every day to make “ever-better cars.” To translate these efforts into tangible results, management and the front lines (genba) will work together to create an environment that enables workplaces across Toyota, starting with production sites, to fully demonstrate their capabilities.\n\nAutomotive Operations\n\nToyota’s sales revenues from its automotive operations were ¥45,417.7 billion in fiscal 2026, ¥43,199.8 billion in fiscal 2025, and ¥41,266.2 billion in fiscal 2024.\n\nToyota produces and sells passenger vehicles, minivans and commercial vehicles such as trucks. Toyota Motor Corporation’s subsidiary, Daihatsu, produces and sells mini-vehicles and compact cars. Hino, which ceased to be a consolidated subsidiary of TMC effective April 1, 2026, produces and sells commercial vehicles such as trucks and buses. Toyota also manufactures automotive parts, components and accessories for its own use and for sale to others.\n\nVehicle Models and Product Development\n\nToyota’s vehicles (produced by Toyota, Daihatsu and Hino) can be classified largely into electrified vehicles and conventional engine vehicles. Toyota’s product line-up includes subcompact and compact cars, mini-vehicles, mid-size, luxury, sports and specialty cars, recreational and sport-utility vehicles, pickup trucks, minivans, trucks and buses. Toyota’s luxury cars are sold in North America, Europe, Japan and other regions, primarily under the Lexus brand name.\n\nIn fiscal 2024, Toyota launched the all-new Alphard and Vellfire, which were developed from a concept of “the joy of comfortable mobility” to create a space where everyone can share consideration and appreciation in all kinds of situations. To further contribute toward carbon neutrality, Toyota plans to introduce new plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (“PHEV”) in the future. Moreover, a new model has been added to the Century series, which has been sold for more than half a century as one of Japan’s representative chauffeur-driven vehicles. The new model is a next-generation chauffeur-driven vehicle that inherits Japanese aesthetics, quietness and\n\n \n\n15\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nhospitality, combines a human-centered approach, and dramatically evolves the rear-seat space to allow true comfort and elegant entry and exit. In Thailand, Toyota launched the Hilux Champ IMV 0, a new model of the IMV series. The pickup truck is regarded as a local favorite and integral to daily life in Thailand. Toyota decided to return to its origins and create an IMV pickup truck that meets the needs of customers. In addition, Toyota launched the all-new Lexus LBX. Redefining luxury with a stylishly compact size, it provides an engaging driving experience that instills a lasting desire to continue exploring the road ahead.\n\nIn fiscal 2025, Toyota launched the new Land Cruiser 250 Series. The 250 Series is a core Land Cruiser model that returns to the car’s origin, a vehicle that is simple and sturdy, and helps fulfill both customers’ lifestyle choices and practical needs. By pursuing dynamic styling and functionality so drivers can enjoy an active lifestyle, Toyota also created Crown Estate as a vehicle that embodies both the dignity and functionality of the Crown, what we call a mature active cabin. The Camry, with its distinctive exterior, quality, and reliability, has remained a leading sedan in the U.S. for over 20 years according to our estimates. For the Lexus brand, alongside master driver Akio Toyoda, Toyota developed the LBX MORIZO PR as a high-performance model that delivers the refined signature LEXUS driving quality and sophisticated design, enhancing the dialogue between driver and car, evokes spontaneous smiles, and provides an exhilarating out-of-the-ordinary experience.\n\nIn fiscal 2026, Toyota launched the all-new 6th generation RAV4, which is an SUV built on the idea that “Life is an Adventure,” embodying a go-anywhere, do-anything spirit. While maintaining the RAV4’s signature solid and powerful design and packaging, it has been developed around the keywords Diversification, Electrification, and Intelligence. Arene, the software development platform, was leveraged for crucial UI (user interface) software, such as the cockpit. The Lexus brand unveiled the all-new 8th-generation ES as a forerunner in LEXUS’s next-generation electrification lineup. This model aspires to deliver a refined driving experience across every scene — further enhancing quietness and ride comfort while staying in tune with customer needs. In pursuit of carbon neutrality through a multi-pathway approach, both hybrid electric vehicles (“HEV”) and BEV powertrains are offered to meet a diverse range of mobility demands.\n\nMarkets, Sales and Competition\n\nToyota’s primary markets are Japan, North America, Europe and Asia. The following table sets forth Toyota’s consolidated vehicle unit sales by geographic market for the periods shown. The vehicle unit sales below reflect vehicle sales made by Toyota to unconsolidated entities (recognized as sales under Toyota’s revenue recognition policy), including sales to unconsolidated distributors and dealers. Vehicles sold by Daihatsu and Hino are included in the vehicle unit sales figures set forth below.\n\n \n\n \n  \nThousands of Units\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended March 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2024\n \n \n2025\n \n \n2026\n \n\n \n  \nUnits\n \n  \n%\n \n \nUnits\n \n  \n%\n \n \nUnits\n \n  \n%\n \n\nJapan\n\n  \n \n1,993\n \n  \n \n21.1\n% \n \n \n1,991\n \n  \n \n21.3\n% \n \n \n2,082\n \n  \n \n21.7\n% \n\nNorth America\n\n  \n \n2,816\n \n  \n \n29.8\n \n \n \n2,703\n \n  \n \n28.9\n \n \n \n2,934\n \n  \n \n30.6\n \n\nEurope\n\n  \n \n1,192\n \n  \n \n12.6\n \n \n \n1,172\n \n  \n \n12.5\n \n \n \n1,183\n \n  \n \n12.3\n \n\nAsia\n\n  \n \n1,804\n \n  \n \n19.1\n \n \n \n1,838\n \n  \n \n19.6\n \n \n \n1,759\n \n  \n \n18.3\n \n\nOther*\n\n  \n \n1,638\n \n  \n \n17.4\n \n \n \n1,659\n \n  \n \n17.7\n \n \n \n1,637\n \n  \n \n17.1\n \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n  \n \n9,443\n \n  \n \n100.0\n% \n \n \n9,362\n \n  \n \n100.0\n% \n \n \n9,595\n \n  \n \n100.0\n% \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n“Other” consists of Central and South America, Oceania, Africa and the Middle East, etc.\n\nThe following table sets forth Toyota’s vehicle unit sales and market share in Japan, North America, Europe and Asia on a retail basis for the periods shown. Each market’s total sales and Toyota’s sales represent new vehicle registrations in the relevant year (except for the Asia market where vehicle registration does not\n\n \n\n16\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nnecessarily apply). All information on Japan excludes mini-vehicles. The sales information contained below excludes unit sales by Daihatsu and Hino, each a consolidated subsidiary of Toyota as of March 31, 2026. Vehicle unit sales in North America represents the combined total for the United States and Canada. Vehicle unit sales in Asia do not include sales in China.\n\n \n\n \n  \nThousands of Units\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended March 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2024\n \n \n2025\n \n \n2026\n \n\nJapan:\n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal market sales (excluding mini-vehicles)\n\n  \n \n2,906\n \n \n \n2,951\n \n \n \n2,848\n \n\nToyota sales (retail basis, excluding mini-vehicles)\n\n  \n \n1,506\n \n \n \n1,487\n \n \n \n1,450\n \n\nToyota market share\n\n  \n \n51.8\n% \n \n \n50.4\n% \n \n \n50.9\n% \n\n \n  \nThousands of Units\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended December 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2023\n \n \n2024\n \n \n2025\n \n\nNorth America:\n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal market sales\n\n  \n \n17,306\n \n \n \n17,827\n \n \n \n18,273\n \n\nToyota sales (retail basis)\n\n  \n \n2,475\n \n \n \n2,572\n \n \n \n2,767\n \n\nToyota market share\n\n  \n \n14.3\n% \n \n \n14.4\n% \n \n \n15.1\n% \n\nEurope:\n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal market sales\n\n  \n \n17,439\n \n \n \n17,807\n \n \n \n18,552\n \n\nToyota sales (retail basis)\n\n  \n \n1,174\n \n \n \n1,217\n \n \n \n1,229\n \n\nToyota market share\n\n  \n \n6.7\n% \n \n \n6.8\n% \n \n \n6.6\n% \n\nAsia (excluding China):\n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal market sales\n\n  \n \n11,024\n \n \n \n10,928\n \n \n \n11,556\n \n\nToyota sales (retail basis)\n\n  \n \n1,407\n \n \n \n1,434\n \n \n \n1,500\n \n\nToyota market share\n\n  \n \n12.8\n% \n \n \n13.1\n% \n \n \n13.0\n% \n\nJapan\n\nJapan is one of the leading countries with respect to technological innovation and improvements in the automotive industry and will continue to demonstrate such strength. Toyota strives to earn customer satisfaction by introducing products distinctive of Japan’s manufacturing ability, through the full lineup of Toyota brand vehicles, including not only passenger cars but also commercial and mini vehicles, as well as the advanced, premium Lexus brand. Furthermore, by advancing electrification centered on a multi-pathway strategy encompassing BEVs, PHEVs, fuel cell electric vehicles (“FCEV”), and HEVs, dealers and manufacturers will work together to realize a carbon-neutral society. Toyota endeavors to secure and maintain its significant share of and position atop the Japanese market. Toyota held a domestic market share (excluding mini-vehicles) on a retail basis of 51.8% in fiscal 2024, 50.4% in fiscal 2025, and 50.9% in fiscal 2026.\n\nAlthough Toyota’s principle is to conduct production in regions where it enjoys true competitiveness, it considers Japan to be the source of its good manufacturing practices. Having 16 production sites in Japan, Toyota supports its operations worldwide through measures such as the development of new technologies and products, low-volume vehicles to complement local production, production of global vehicle models which straddle multiple regions and supporting overseas factories.\n\nNorth America\n\nThe North American region is one of Toyota’s most significant markets. The United States, in particular, is the largest market in the North American region, accounting for 86% of Toyota’s retail sales in the region. In the region, Toyota has in recent years reorganized its production structure and made improvements to its product lineup. In addition, Toyota has a wide product lineup in every segment (excluding large trucks and buses).\n\n \n\n17\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nToyota’s North American production capacities include the production of vehicle models such as the RAV4, Camry, Tacoma and Highlander through 14 manufacturing entities.\n\nIn 2025, Toyota Battery Manufacturing, North Carolina (“TBMNC”) began supplying batteries. TBMNC is Toyota’s eleventh U.S. plant and the company’s first and only battery plant outside of Japan. Batteries assembled at TBMNC are set to power the Camry HEV, Corolla Cross HEV, RAV4 HEV, and a yet-to-be-announced all-electric 3-row BEV. When the facility reaches full production, it will have 14 production lines supporting battery production for HEV, BEV and PHEV.\n\nToyota has five research and development centers in North America. As for vehicle development, the Toyota Technical Center spearheads the design, planning, and evaluation of vehicles and parts as to their ability to meet customer needs.\n\nEurope\n\nToyota’s principal European markets are Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy and Spain. In the European markets, as a full-lineup car manufacturer, Toyota aims to increase its global vehicle sales with a focus on electrified vehicles (HEVs, PHEVs, FCEVs and BEVs) that suit the needs of customers and the circumstances of each region.\n\nIn terms of production, to strengthen its business setup so that it is less likely to be affected by exchange rates, Toyota produces models such as the Corolla, Yaris and C-HR locally through six entities in Europe. In addition, Toyota is actively promoting production and sales measures that meet local demand by strengthening its value chain including used car dealerships, after-sales services and finance and insurance services.\n\nAsia\n\nToyota’s principal Asian markets are Thailand, India, Indonesia and Taiwan.\n\nIn light of the importance of the Asian market that is further expected to grow in the long term, Toyota aims to build an operational framework that is efficient and self-reliant, as well as a predominant position in the automotive market in Asia. Toyota has responded to increasing competition in Asia by making strategic investments in the market and developing relationships with local suppliers. Toyota believes that its existing local presence in the market provides it with an advantage over new entrants to the market and expects to be able to promptly respond to demand for vehicles in the region.\n\nIn terms of production, Toyota manufactures models such as the Hilux, Hiace, Corolla, Camry and Vios through 15 entities. Toyota’s plants in Thailand not only meet domestic demand, but also serve as a production base for locations inside and outside of the ASEAN region.\n\nChina\n\nToyota has been conducting operations in China in large part through joint ventures, and its success in producing products that meet local demands and in establishing its sales and service network has significantly contributed to Toyota’s profits. Based on the firm business foundation that it has established, Toyota is conducting its operations with the aim of promoting further growth and increasing profitability through further development of its sales and service network and expansion of its product lineup.\n\nIn terms of production, Toyota has been conducting a significant portion of its China business, including in relation to the production and sales of vehicles, through joint ventures. Toyota has two major joint venture partners in China, namely, China FAW Group Corporation and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. The joint venture with China FAW Group manufactures models such as the Avalon, Corolla, RAV4 and bZ3 and the joint venture with Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. manufactures models such as the Camry, Frontlander, Highlander, Wildlander, and bZ3X.\n\n \n\n18\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nTotal vehicle unit sales in the Chinese market reached 27.73 million vehicles in 2025, representing 105.5% of that of 2024, and 26.28 million vehicles in 2024, representing 101.1% of that of 2023. In this market, Toyota’s new vehicle sales were 1.78 million vehicles in 2025, accounting for 100.4% of that of 2024, and 1.77 million vehicles in 2024, accounting for 93.1% of that of 2023. In 2025, the domestically produced passenger vehicle market in mainland China (24.02 million vehicles), Toyota had a 7.4% market share. Toyota has been expanding the distribution network for locally produced vehicles in cooperation with China FAW Group and Guangzhou Automobile Group under the names Tianjin FAW Toyota Motor Co., Ltd. and Guanqi Toyota Motor Co., Ltd., respectively, and for imported vehicles, Toyota has also been expanding primarily the Lexus brand sales network. Toyota seeks to increase sales by expanding the number of dealers and its product lineup. In addition, as the market in China develops and becomes more sophisticated, Toyota plans to promote so-called “Value Chain” businesses, such as used car sales, services, financing and insurance, so as to contribute to the development of a mobility society.\n\nSouth and Central America, Oceania, Africa and the Middle East\n\nToyota’s principal markets in South and Central America, Oceania, Africa and the Middle East (collectively, the “Four Regions”) are Brazil and Argentina in South and Central America, Australia in Oceania, South Africa in Africa and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East. The core models in the Four Regions are global models such as the Corolla, IMV (the Hilux) and Camry.\n\nToyota has seven production bases in the Four Regions. In these regions, which are expected to become increasingly important to Toyota’s business strategy, Toyota aims to continue developing new products which meet the specific demands of each region, increasing production and promoting sales.\n\nProduction\n\nAs of March 31, 2026, Toyota and its affiliated companies produce automobiles and related components through more than 50 overseas manufacturing organizations in 27 countries and regions aside from Japan. Facilities are located principally in Japan, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Turkey, Czech Republic, Poland, Thailand, China, Taiwan, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Argentina and Brazil. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.D Property, Plants and Equipment” for a description of Toyota’s principal production facilities.\n\nIn promoting a sustainable growth strategy, establishing a system capable of providing optimal supply of products in the global market is integral to Toyota’s strategy.\n\nIn line with its basic policy of manufacturing in countries or regions where there is demand and where Toyota is truly competitive, Toyota will make efficient use of and maximize capacity utilization at its existing plants to respond to the expanding market and will continue to focus on making efficient capital investments as necessary.\n\nFurthermore, Toyota will continue to place top priority on safety and quality in strengthening true competitiveness with the aim of achieving sustainable growth.\n\n \n\n19\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThe following table shows Toyota’s worldwide vehicle unit production by geographic market for the periods shown. These production figures do not include vehicles produced by Toyota’s unconsolidated affiliated companies. The sales unit information elsewhere in this annual report includes sales of vehicle units produced by these affiliated companies. Vehicle units produced by Daihatsu and Hino are included in the vehicle unit production figures set forth below.\n\n \n\n \n  \nThousands of Units\n \n\n \n  \nYear Ended March 31,\n \n\n \n  \n2024\n \n  \n2025\n \n  \n2026\n \n\nJapan\n\n  \n \n4,042\n \n  \n \n4,000\n \n  \n \n4,149\n \n\nNorth America\n\n  \n \n1,976\n \n  \n \n1,958\n \n  \n \n2,050\n \n\nEurope\n\n  \n \n846\n \n  \n \n811\n \n  \n \n815\n \n\nAsia.\n\n  \n \n1,876\n \n  \n \n1,790\n \n  \n \n1,802\n \n\nOther*\n\n  \n \n523\n \n  \n \n491\n \n  \n \n477\n \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n  \n \n    9,263\n \n  \n \n    9,049\n \n  \n \n    9,293\n \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n  \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n“Other” consists of Central and South America and Africa.\n\nToyota closely monitors its actual units of sale, market share and units of production data and uses this information to allocate resources to existing manufacturing facilities and to plan for future expansions.\n\nSee “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.B Business Overview — Capital Expenditures and Divestitures” for a description of Toyota’s recent investments in completed plant constructions and for a description of Toyota’s current investments in ongoing plant constructions.\n\nDistribution\n\nToyota’s automotive sales distribution network is the largest in Japan. As of March 31, 2026, this network consisted of 226 dealers employing approximately 100 thousand personnel and operating approximately 4.2 thousand sales and service outlets. TOYOTA Mobility Tokyo Inc. is the only dealer owned by Toyota and the rest are independent.\n\nToyota believes that this extensive sales network of independent local interests has been an important factor in its success in the Japanese market. A large number of the cars sold in Japan are purchased from salespersons who visit customers in their homes or offices. In recent years, however, the traditional method of sales through home visits is being replaced by showroom sales, and the percentage of automobile purchases through showrooms has been gradually increasing. Toyota expects this trend to continue, and accordingly is working to improve its sales activities such as customer reception and meticulous service at showrooms, as well as online sales, to increase customer satisfaction.\n\nSales of Toyota vehicles in Japan had been conducted through four sales channels until April 2020, but from May 2020 shifted to a framework where all of its Japanese-market vehicle models are made available through all sales outlets in Japan. In addition, Toyota introduced the Lexus brand to the Japanese market in August 2005, and currently distributes the Lexus brand vehicles through a network of 191 new-vehicle sales outlets dedicated to the Lexus brand in order to enhance its competitiveness in the domestic luxury automotive market. The following table provides information on the dealer network as of March 31, 2026.\n\n \n\n \n  \n\nDealers\n\nChannel\n\n  \n\nToyota Owned\n\n  \n\nIndependent\n\n  \n\nOutlets\n\nToyota brand\n\n  \n1 company\n  \n225 companies\n  \n4,245 outlets\n\nLexus brand\n\n  \n23 outlets\n  \n168 outlets\n  \n191 outlets\n\n \n\n \n\n20\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nOutside Japan, Toyota vehicles are sold through approximately 168 distributors in approximately 204 countries and regions. Through these distributors, Toyota maintains networks of dealers. The chart below shows the number of Toyota distributors as of March 31, 2026 by country and region:\n\n \n\nCountry/Region\n\n  \nNumber of Countries\n \n  \nNumber of Distributors\n \n\nNorth America\n\n  \n \n4\n \n  \n \n5\n \n\nEurope\n\n  \n \n55\n \n  \n \n29\n \n\nChina\n\n  \n \n1\n \n  \n \n4\n \n\nAsia (excluding China)\n\n  \n \n20\n \n  \n \n20\n \n\nOceania\n\n  \n \n15\n \n  \n \n15\n \n\nMiddle East\n\n  \n \n16\n \n  \n \n14\n \n\nAfrica\n\n  \n \n54\n \n  \n \n48\n \n\nCentral and South America\n\n  \n \n39\n \n  \n \n40\n \n\nMulti-pathway Strategy — Overview\n\nThe push for carbon neutrality is a matter of urgency if cars are to remain a necessary part of society. Providing our customers around the world with options for mobility under our multi-pathway strategy while also promoting the decarbonization of our monozukuri (manufacturing) and supply chains serves as the core of our activities.\n\nConsidering ways in which mobility takes into account the future of energy is important. The strategy’s basic premise is that we need to move away from fossil fuels from the perspective of the global environment and sustainability. Furthermore, over the medium- to long- term, renewable energy sources will continue to proliferate, with electricity and hydrogen emerging as the primary energy sources sustaining society. In the short term, however, it is critical to acknowledge global realities and implement changes in practical ways that maintain energy security.\n\nThis is precisely why we are committed to providing mobility options that are in tune with a diverse range of energy situations and customer needs, while also keeping an eye on the future of electricity and hydrogen. In short, the underlying concept of our multi-pathway strategy is to focus on promoting practical transition even as we pursue carbon neutrality.\n\nBEV Strategies\n\nNext-generation BEVs\n\nThrough our next-generation BEVs, we seek to change the future of cars. This will entail evolving the products we provide to customers. Through the integration of next-generation batteries and sonic technology, we aim to achieve a game-changing BEV driving range of 1,000 km.\n\nOur next step will be to capture customers’ hearts with stylish designs. AI will be used to help ensure excellent aerodynamic performance, doubling the time that designers can devote to creating attractive cars.\n\nOur BEVs will also offer a customizable ride feel. The Arene software platform and a full over-the-air system, which provides vehicle software updates via wireless transmission, will greatly expand the possibilities for enjoying cars. Moreover, Toyota will deliver exciting surprises and fun, like the manual electric vehicle, to its customers with technologies that only an automobile manufacturer can create.\n\nAutomobile bodies will be constructed in a new modular structure consisting of three main components. The finished automobiles are then assembled after each of the three modules is completed. This structure allows each module to be evolved separately, expediting action, particularly important in the race to develop better batteries. Furthermore, the use of giga casting will allow significant component integration, contributing to the reduction of vehicle development costs and plant investment.\n\n \n\n21\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThe new modular structure and self-propelling production and other automation technologies will halve the number of processes required. Self-propelling production will be key to building next-generation BEVs. By greatly reducing the time and cost, as well as efforts on the part of production and technical staff required to modify plants and expand buildings whenever a new model is introduced, this technology will accelerate the launch of new products to market. Such new approaches to manufacturing, combined with the use of digital twin technology, are expected to halve production lead times.\n\nWe are advancing the integrated planning of our full global lineup of next-generation BEVs. In addition to efforts to increase product appeal, we will transform our manufacturing approaches to eliminate processes as well as reduce investment and lead times while securing earnings and increasing sales volume.\n\nToyota is targeting global BEV sales of 3.5 million units by 2030. This figure is shaped by customer demand and represents the base unit amount based on which supply systems will be prepared together with suppliers and dealers. However, we will adopt a flexible approach toward sales in recognition of the fact that it is customers who will ultimately decide what they purchase.\n\nBEV Battery Development\n\nThe battery is the heart of the BEV. Just as the heart pumps blood through the body, the battery transfers electricity to the vehicle. As Toyota advances its efforts toward introducing next-generation BEVs, it is also evolving batteries with new technologies to meet customer expectations. The earnings of Toyota’s next-generation BEVs will be driven by our next-generation batteries, which will be developed with a focus on achieving world-leading levels of efficiency. Our development approach entails viewing batteries and vehicles as a set, and this approach is the starting point for the development of BEVs. Toyota’s development of both batteries and vehicles in-house provides an advantage in this area. The resources afforded by this advantage will be used to improve our product appeal to exceed customer expectations and secure earnings.\n\nLiquid lithium-ion batteries, which are currently the mainstream, will gain enhanced performance through improvement to the energy density of prismatic batteries, an area in which Toyota has longstanding expertise. In addition, by using the bipolar battery structure developed for HEVs in BEVs, we will expand our lineup to provide customers with a variety of options, from low-cost batteries for popularization to batteries optimized for maximum performance.\n\nFurthermore, all-solid-state batteries, which are highly anticipated as game-changers, are finally approaching the phase of practical application for use in BEVs. Our full lineup of competitive batteries will support the evolution of Toyota’s BEVs in the future.\n\nNotes:\n\n \n\n \n1.\n\nThe performance version of next-generation batteries are being developed with Prime Planet Energy & Solutions Inc., while the popularization and high-performance versions of next-generation batteries and the all-solid-state battery for BEVs are being developed with Toyota Industries, combining the knowledge of the Toyota Group.\n\n \n\n \n2.\n\nThe bZ4X referenced in this report refers to the 2022 model. The bZ4X underwent a partial update in October 2025.\n\nLiquid Lithium-ion Battery Development\n\n1. Next-generation Batteries: Performance Version\n\nThe next-generation BEVs will have a cruising range of 1,000 km.* For such cars, we are developing a performance-oriented rectangular battery to expand the degree of freedom in vehicle design. While increasing the\n\n \n\n22\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nenergy density of the battery, we also aim to extend cruising range by improving vehicle efficiencies, such as aerodynamics and weight reduction, while at the same time reducing costs by 20% compared with the earlier bZ4X and achieving a quick charge time of 20 minutes or less (state-of-charge (“SOC”) =10–80%).\n\n2. Next-generation Batteries: Popularization Version\n\nToyota is also developing good, low-cost liquid lithium batteries that will contribute to the widespread use of BEVs to provide customers with a variety of battery options. Bipolar structure batteries, which have been used in the Aqua and Crown hybrid vehicles, are now being applied to BEVs. These batteries use inexpensive lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and are expected to be commercialized. We are aiming for a 20% increase in cruising range* and 40% reduction in cost compared with the earlier bZ4X, as well as quick recharging in 30 minutes or less (SOC=10–80%). We are also considering installing these batteries in BEVs in the popularization price range.\n\nIn a regular battery, individual current collectors are coated on both sides with either an anode or cathode, then paired to make a set. In contrast, every current collector in a bipolar configuration is coated with an anode on one side and a cathode on the other, making for a simpler structure that requires only one-third as many components. At the same time, material costs can be reduced by using LFP for the cathode in place of rare metals, such as nickel and cobalt. However, to make these batteries a reality, Toyota must overcome three difficulties: applying the material evenly, doing so at high speeds, and simultaneously sealing all the cells. Furthermore, all this needs to be achieved in batteries large enough to power a car.\n\nIn tackling these challenges, Toyota is drawing on approximately 30 years of battery production technologies honed through its HEVs along with bipolar nickel-metal hydride battery technology and expertise, precision coating used for FCEVs, and various digital technologies. Using all of these together, we are advancing development toward mass production.\n\n3. Bipolar Lithium-ion Battery: High-performance Version\n\nThe high-performance version of the battery combines the best aspects of both the performance and popularization versions. This battery combines a bipolar structure with a high-nickel cathode to achieve further advances. We expect an even greater performance than the performance version of the prismatic battery will be achieved along with a 10% increase in cruising range* and a 10% reduction in cost, as well as a quick charge time of 20 minutes or less (SOC=10–80%). We aim to commercialize this battery in 2027-2028.\n\n(*Including vehicle efficiency improvements such as aerodynamics and weight reduction.)\n\n \n\n \n\nDevelopment of All-solid-state Batteries\n\nAll-solid-state batteries have a solid electrolyte, allowing faster movement of ions and greater tolerance of high voltages and temperatures. It is hoped that this technology will result in increased power output, longer cruising range, and shorter charging times.\n\nThe tradeoff, meanwhile, is thought to be a shorter battery life. Solid electrolytes repeatedly expand and contract as the battery charges and discharges, which can create cracks in the electrodes that inhibit the\n\n \n\n23\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nmovement of ions between the cathode and anode. Toyota has discovered a new technology that overcomes this issue. Aiming for commercialization in 2027–2028, Toyota continues to advance product development and the development of mass production methods.\n\nIn October 2023, Toyota announced a partnership with Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. (“Idemitsu”) to work toward the mass production of all-solid-state batteries for BEVs. Through the integration of materials development technologies of both companies, including Idemitsu’s materials manufacturing technologies and Toyota’s battery processing and assembly technologies honed in on electrified vehicle development, we both aim to realize the mass production of solid electrolytes and all-solid-state batteries that will be widely used by consumers.\n\nIn October 2025, we announced a collaboration with Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. (“Sumitomo Metal Mining”) aimed at mass production of cathode materials. Leveraging the company’s proprietary powder synthesis technology, we jointly developed a new cathode material with superior durability suited for all-solid-state batteries. Going forward, we will continue to draw on Sumitomo Metal Mining’s expertise accumulated over two decades of supplying cathode materials, as we work toward the supply and subsequent mass production of this newly developed material.\n\nEstablishment of a New Company\n\nOn February 5, 2025, Toyota announced that it will sign a comprehensive partnership agreement with the Shanghai municipal government in China regarding carbon neutrality. In addition, Toyota established Lexus (Shanghai) New Energy Co., Ltd., a new wholly owned company in Jinshan District in southwest Shanghai, to develop and produce BEVs and batteries.\n\nUnder this partnership with the Shanghai municipal government, Toyota hopes to contribute to the Chinese government’s goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 in fields such as hydrogen energy, automated driving technology, and battery recycling and reuse. To drive the initiative forward, Toyota will establish a new company based on the belief that quicker supply of products that meet customers’ needs is important in China, where there is a high demand for new energy vehicles.\n\nThe newly formed company will develop a new BEV under the Lexus brand, with production scheduled to begin from 2027 onward. The initial production capacity will be around 100,000 units per year, and 1,000 new jobs are planned for the start-up phase.\n\nToyota has been working with partners such as China FAW Group Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co., Ltd. to bring smiles to customers in China. Going forward, Toyota will continue working together with all its partners to be a “best-in-town” company to achieve its goal of “producing happiness for all.” In doing so, we will forge ahead with our mission of transforming cars, monozukuri (manufacturing), and work to change the future with BEVs.\n\nHydrogen Business Strategies\n\nWe have seen significant global developments in the area of hydrogen business in recent years, with countries introducing policies and taking active steps with an eye toward 2030. To anticipate these rapid changes and respond to customer needs, we established in July 2023 a new business unit called Hydrogen Factory, which is able to make rapid decisions under one leader, from sales to development and production, all at once. The Hydrogen Factory is advancing business activities based on three key axes.\n\nThe first is localizing R&D and production in countries within the major markets. We are working to accelerate our efforts by establishing local bases, mainly in Europe and China. In Europe, Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA is engaged in the development of hydrogen fuel-cell systems and carries out production and external\n\n \n\n24\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nsales. In China, we have already established a development and production base in collaboration with Beijing SinoHytec Co., Ltd. This base began production of fuel cells in August 2024. Toyota began offering the fuel-cell unit installed in the Mirai passenger vehicle as a modular product to partners aiming to realize a hydrogen society. In recent years, as demand for commercial applications has expanded across various countries, sales of fuel-cell units have continued to grow year by year, reaching a global cumulative total of more than 3,000 units as of December 2025.\n\nThe second is strengthening alliances with leading partners. Hydrogen has been positioned as an important energy source in Toyota’s CO2 emissions reduction efforts in its quest to achieve carbon neutrality. To create a hydrogen-powered society, we are promoting the widespread adoption of fuel-cell products, including passenger and commercial fuel-cell electric vehicles as well as fuel-cell stationary generators. Through such initiatives, we are working with various industry partners in the areas of producing, transporting, and using hydrogen.\n\nIn Europe, Toyota announced a partnership with Daimler Truck Holding AG in May 2023. The scope of this partnership includes collaboration on hydrogen-related development. Furthermore, in September 2024, we unveiled plans to bolster coordination with BMW in the field of hydrogen, pursuing joint development and standardization of components to drive cost reductions. These components are also being considered for use in Toyota models going forward. In China, we entered into a partnership in November 2024 with GLP Investment (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (GLP China) in the field of high-value-added green trunk-line logistics. In collaboration with leading domestic logistics companies For-U Smart Freight and Shenzhen Dekun Logistics Co., Ltd., we began operating 50 heavy-duty fuel-cell trucks in 2025. In Japan, in February 2024, we agreed with Chiyoda Corporation to jointly develop a large-scale water electrolysis system that produces hydrogen from water and electricity by applying the fuel-cell technology used in the Mirai. Preparations are underway for demonstrations to begin in 2026.\n\nThe third is enhancement of competitiveness and technologies. The next-generation (third-generation) fuel-cell unit currently under development aims to offer durability equivalent to twice that of the current generation and is designed to be virtually maintenance-free even under commercial vehicle operating conditions. Fuel efficiency and driving range have been improved by 20%, enabling travel between Tokyo and Osaka without refueling. We are developing dedicated units for both passenger and commercial applications, while standardizing cells to achieve lower costs. Our plan is to roll out this next-generation fuel-cell unit, capable of meeting a wide range of use cases, from passenger cars to commercial vehicles, starting in fiscal 2027.\n\nAt the same time, hydrogen remains a costly energy source. To expand its utilization, reducing its price is essential. To this end, Toyota is working with partners on technology for hydrogen production.\n\nIn 2023, DENSO Fukushima Co., Ltd. introduced an electrolysis system at its production plant. The system leverages fuel-cell technology from the Mirai and has a capacity of approximately 0.4 megawatts. Since April 2024, it has been supplying hydrogen to combustion furnaces within the plant and continues to be used.\n\nThe hydrogen production market is expected to grow rapidly both in Japan and overseas. To enhance scalability of hydrogen production equipment, Toyota is combining Chiyoda Corporation’s processing plant design expertise and large-scale plant construction technologies to develop large-scale electrolysis systems in the 5 megawatt to 20 megawatt range. In 2026, Toyota plans to build a facility called Hydrogen Park at its Honsha Plant and begin large-scale demonstration testing. Going forward, we will continue accelerating efforts toward commercialization.\n\nCommercial Sector Initiatives\n\nIn Japan, Toyota established Commercial Japan Partnership Technologies Corporation (“CJPT”) in 2021 together with Isuzu Motors Limited, Hino, Suzuki Motor Corporation, and Daihatsu with the aim of contributing to the resolution of issues in the transportation industry and helping realize a carbon-neutral society.\n\n \n\n25\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nWe are working with shippers and logistics companies in Fukushima and Tokyo on the social implementation of electrification that utilizes heavy- and light-duty fuel-cell electric trucks and light-duty BEV trucks. As of the end of December 2025, approximately 200 fuel-cell electric trucks have hit the roads, supporting the daily lives of local people not only as general delivery vehicles but also as waste collection vehicles and school lunch delivery vehicles. In addition, around 180 fuel-cell electric buses are operating across Japan and are beginning to take root as part of local transportation infrastructure. From fiscal 2027, we will begin production of a new model, further promoting the utilization of hydrogen.\n\nAt the same time, the widespread adoption of fuel-cell commercial vehicles faces challenges, including reductions in vehicle costs, the expansion of hydrogen refueling infrastructure, and the lowering of hydrogen costs. To address these challenges, efforts are being undertaken through close collaboration between the public and private sectors.\n\nIn May 2025, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan selected Fukushima, Tokyo, Kanagawa, Aichi, and Hyogo as priority regions for promoting the deployment of fuel-cell commercial vehicles. In response, Toyota and CJPT have started work on the following initiatives, aiming to ultimately roll them out nationwide.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nCreation of massive hydrogen demand and new hydrogen utilization models through the deployment of heavy-duty fuel-cell electric trucks\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nEstablishment of sales and operating environments in newly designated priority regions\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nExpansion of the lineup of fuel-cell commercial vehicles\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nSupport for businesses working to reduce hydrogen costs\n\nDevelopment of Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engines\n\nIn 2025, Toyota’s efforts to race a Corolla equipped with one of its hydrogen engines currently in development entered their fifth year. Hydrogen engines work like modified versions of conventional gasoline engines powered by burning hydrogen directly as fuel. The fuel is 100% pure hydrogen, unmixed with gasoline. As no fossil fuels are burned, hydrogen-engine vehicles emit almost no CO2 when in operation — only that from the combustion of minute amounts of engine oil. The hydrogen engine is thus one option that offers great potential to contribute to carbon neutrality while making use of technologies for internal combustion engines built up over the decades and protecting engine-related jobs in the automotive industry.\n\nIn 2024, we took another step forward in the evolution of our hydrogen engines by increasing the durability of pumps, which had needed to be replaced numerous times in prior races; extending driving ranges by modifying tank shapes; automating the processes of switching CO2 collection units; and implementing other substantial improvements. This cemented the achievement of our target driving range of 30 consecutive laps.\n\nIn 2025, we conducted test drives of vehicles with small, highly efficient superconducting motors within their fuel tanks, improving tank capacity over 1.3 times. Going forward, this will lead to further improvements in cruising range and driving performance and a reduction in the volume of boil-off gas.\n\nWe are striving to practically implement superconductivity technology with the aim of further developing liquid hydrogen technology.\n\nToyota could not have taken on this initiative with liquid hydrogen alone. A portion of the liquid hydrogen used in the hydrogen engine-equipped Corolla in the 2023 Fuji 24 Hours Race was lignite-derived hydrogen produced and transported from Australia in the Suiso Frontier liquid hydrogen carrier built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. as part of the HySTRA project. In addition, the mobile liquid hydrogen station used at the circuit was jointly developed by Iwatani Corporation and Toyota. Moreover, the switch to liquid hydrogen fuel required\n\n \n\n26\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nthe modification of many parts. In 2024, Toyota partnered with Japan Metals & Chemicals Co., Ltd. to develop an electricity supply system that used hydrogen storage alloy in order to address the boil-off gas* issues faced with prior liquid hydrogen fueling systems. A concept model of an engine that reused boil-off gas produced during driving as fuel or for generating electricity was displayed at the final race of the Super Taikyu Fuji Final 4 Hour Race, attracting individuals with similar ambitions to join us in the development process. Through cooperation with our numerous partners, the liquid hydrogen-fueled Corolla successfully completed the race, and, as a result of such efforts, our number of partners has grown from eight companies in May 2021 to 60 companies by the end of the 2025 season.\n\n \n\n*\n\nVaporized hydrogen produced due to the evaporation of liquid hydrogen fuel contained within tanks as a result of natural influx of outside heat\n\nThe scope of hydrogen engine development is expanding beyond motorsports. For example, a verification test of a hydrogen-powered Hiace was conducted on public roads in Australia from the end of 2023. In addition, Japan’s first verification test of a mobile liquid hydrogen fueling system was carried out at the Iwatani Hydrogen Station in Kariya City, Aichi Prefecture, in 2024.\n\nToyota will continue in its efforts to expand the possibilities of hydrogen engines. Aiming to contribute to the realization of a carbon-neutral society, we will continue to evolve alongside our partners in line with the principle of “making ever-better cars from a starting point in motorsports” and our multi-pathway strategy.\n\nEfforts in Realizing a Safe Mobility Society\n\nToyota’s ultimate goal is to achieve zero casualties from traffic accidents, and ultimately, a society with zero traffic accidents. Additionally, to achieve a safe mobility society, we believe it will be important to adopt an integrated three-pronged approach involving people, vehicles, and the traffic environment.\n\nIt will also be vital for us to pursue real-world safety by learning from actual accidents and incorporating that knowledge into vehicle development. Toyota has defined its “Integrated Safety Management Concept” as the basic philosophy behind its technologies for eliminating traffic accident casualties and is moving forward with the development of technologies based on this concept.\n\nToyota provides optimized driver support for safety at every stage of driving, from parking to normal operation, the moment before a collision, during a collision, and post-collision emergency response. We also aim to enhance safety by reinforcing links between vehicle safety systems, rather than thinking about each system as a separate component. These are the approaches behind our Integrated Safety Management Concept.\n\nWe introduced the Toyota Safety Sense system, which packages multiple preventive safety functions that help reduce serious traffic accidents with the potential to cause death or injury, to the market in 2015. These functions include avoiding and mitigating damage from collisions with cars in front of a vehicle or with pedestrians, preventing accidents caused by a vehicle leaving its current lane, and ensuring optimal forward visibility during nighttime driving. Toyota Safety Sense has now been installed in more than 61 million vehicles globally (as of March 2026). Toyota Safety Sense is now available on nearly all passenger car models (as standard or option) in the Japanese, U.S., and European markets. It has also been introduced in a total of 144 countries and regions, including such key markets as China, other select Asian countries, the Middle East, and Australia.\n\nSoftware Defined Vehicles (SDVs)\n\nSDVs are playing a leading role in the transformation of mobility. Toyota’s main aspiration in working with SDVs is a society with zero traffic accidents. Through SDVs, we aim to realize safer, more reliable, and more fun mobility. However, realizing such a society is difficult with just the technological innovation of cars. It requires\n\n \n\n27\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nan integrated three-pronged approach involving cars, people, and infrastructure. For example, this includes coordination with road infrastructure that utilizes data from built-in sensors to address blind spots — an issue that evolution of vehicles cannot overcome alone — and AI agents that autonomously support drivers (people). An environment with uninterrupted communication and the development of infrastructure such as data centers are key to linking cars with society. Accordingly, we worked together with NTT, Inc. (formerly Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation) in 2024 to begin creating appropriate infrastructure.\n\nToyota places strong emphasis and priority on safety and security. At the same time, we have an opportunity to leverage the strength of having 150 million private vehicles in operation to help identify the diverse values of SDVs, including the use of things such as AI agents that grow alongside customers and cars that may one day be capable of reproducing more professional or proficient driving styles. We aim to continue to provide customers with safe, reliable, high-quality software through innovative digital platforms that are the foundation of software development and our Arene software creation platform. We will accelerate the development of an SDV infrastructure unique to Toyota through cooperation with our partners across industries.\n\nArene\n\nThe structural components supporting SDVs include applications, software, and electronic platforms. To enhance the scalability as it relates to cars, we have encouraged co-creation with partner companies and have renewed our electronic platforms, including improving chip performance.\n\nFurthermore, supporting the software development is Arene, introduced with the new RAV4. Arene is a software development platform through which we will mass-produce safe, reliable, and high-quality software, which will help accelerate the development of SDVs by applying the knowledge and technologies from the monozukuri that Toyota has cultivated to date. There are three components of the Arene platform.\n\n \n\n \n1.\n\nArene SDK\n\nArene SDK is a modular development kit for developers, enabling the rapid development of high-quality software and easy deployment of developed software across multiple vehicles.\n\n \n\n \n2.\n\nArene Tools\n\nArene Tools are tools for verifying and evaluating software in a virtual environment, reducing physical inspections of actual cars and enabling the creation of functions at an even earlier stage. The Arene SDK and Arene Tools shorten the development period for software, contributing to the quick provision of better software to customers.\n\n \n\n \n3.\n\nArene Data\n\nArene Data is the component referring to the collection and analysis of data that will contribute to providing a personalized driving experience tailored to each customer by continuously improving the car’s functions as the owner drives it. By adopting Arene in the RAV4, a popular Toyota model loved by countless customers across regions, we can collect various data from customers around the world and continue evolving cars. Looking ahead, we expect this approach to expand and will consider cross-domain development. As the first step in mass production of Toyota RAV4 SDVs, we will make ever-better cars in line with regional needs through Arene, contributing to the future realization of a society with zero traffic accidents.\n\nToyota Woven City\n\nToyota aspires to transform into a mobility company. On our road toward accomplishing this goal, Toyota Woven City will function as a “mobility test course” for creating new products and services. Toyota and its group\n\n \n\n28\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\ncompany Woven by Toyota are advancing the Woven City project. Woven City saw its official launch on September 25, 2025, with companies and individuals commencing demonstrations of various products and services, and some residents have begun moving in. Access to this facility will not be limited to the Toyota Group. Rather, we hope to make Woven City a place where external stakeholders who share our desire to act “for others” can also use the environment, in which people actually live, to create new values to help shape a better future and enhance well-being for all. The companies and individuals who utilize Woven City to develop and demonstrate new products and services are called “Inventors.”\n\nBy combining Toyota’s manufacturing expertise, Woven by Toyota’s advanced software capabilities, and the unique strengths of each Inventor, Woven City seeks to foster kakezan, a Japanese concept of “multiplication,” where new innovation and societal value emerge from the convergence of different ideas and capabilities. The people who live in and visit Woven City, called “Weavers,” also participate in inventions through kakezan.\n\nWeavers test the products and services developed by Inventors, sharing their comments on usability and opinions as feedback that Inventors will incorporate into their inventions. The Weavers and Inventors who gather at Woven City aim to work together to produce well-being for all under Toyota’s goal of working for others. Inventors are Toyota Group companies as well as like-minded outside companies and other organizations who have joined this quest for expanding mobility. Toyota and Woven by Toyota will also take advantage of Woven City to conduct tests as Inventors. Additionally, Toyota hosted an accelerator program attended by start-up companies, entrepreneurs, universities, and research institutions. The selected winners are expected to join the Inventors. The addition of start-up companies to the Inventors, which have primarily consisted of large corporations, is expected to further accelerate innovation through kakezan.\n\n \n\nCo-creation Themes by Investors\n\n \n\n \n \n\nInventor\n \nTheme\n\n \n \n\nDaikin Industries, Ltd.\n\n \n\nTesting “pollen-less spaces” and “personalized functional environments”\n\n \n \n\nDyDo DRINCO, INC.\n\n \nCreating new value through innovative vending machine concepts\n\n \n \n\nNISSIN FOOD PRODUCTS CO., LTD.\n\n \nCreating and evaluating food environments to inspire new “food cultures”\n\n \n \n\nUCC Japan Co., Ltd.\n\n \nConducting a proof-of-concept study to demonstrate the effect of coffee on creativity and productivity\n\n \n \n\nZoshinkai Holdings Inc.\n\n \nLeveraging data to realize innovative educational methods and new learning environments\n\n \n \n\nInterstellar Technologies Inc.\n\n \nDeveloping a robust rocket production system*\n\n \n \n\nKyoritsu Seiyaku Corporation\n\n \nFinding new ways to enhance human-pet coexistence\n\n \n \n\nNaoto Inti Raymi\n\n \nDeveloping future-oriented soundscapes\n\n \n \n\nAI Robot Association (AIRoA)\n\n \nExploring the practical deployment of robots through real-world challenge identification and feedback cycles\n\n \n \n\nDAIICHIKOSHO CO., LTD.\n\n \nCreating more flexible karaoke experiences through real-world demonstration experiments\n\n \n \n\nJoby Aviation, Inc.\n\n \nExploration of an air mobility ecosystem\n\n \n\n29\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n \n\nToyota Financial Services Corporation\n\n \nDeveloping new sales and financing models based on verified, real-world mobility usage data\n\n \n\n*\n\nInterstellar Technologies Inc. will conduct its work outside Woven City, with development support provided by Toyota and Woven by Toyota in the form of engineering know-how and technical staff.\n\nThe products and services developed by Inventors will be tested by Weavers (residents and visitors). These individuals are indispensable to the testing processes or co-creation activities and will serve a similar function to the test drivers who take part in the automobile development process. Their contributions to tests will come in the form of the feedback they provide with regard to the products and services being tested.\n\nFollowing the official launch of Woven City, in September 2025, residents — primarily Toyota and Woven by Toyota staff and their families — have resided in Woven City as Weavers. The community will then gradually expand to include external Inventors and their families. Under Phase 1, the total population of Woven City is expected to reach approximately 300 in the future. Initially, visitors will be limited to related parties, with plans to welcome the general public to participate as Weavers in co-creation activities starting in fiscal 2026 and beyond. Woven City is a test course for mobility that demonstrates mobility infrastructure via a three-pronged approach of people, mobility, and infrastructure. The goal of this approach is to help realize the safe and secure mobility society that Toyota envisions. Up until now, Toyota has pursued this vision by focusing on the development of automobiles and working to make ever-better cars on dedicated automobile test courses. However, realizing a truly safe and secure mobility society requires that we expand our focus beyond automobiles and other forms of mobility to also consider the people who use these mobility options and the infrastructure that supports mobility. Woven City functions as a test course for implementing such demonstration testing. Under Phase 1, which has been officially launched, we have included the following features.\n\n \n\n \n\nIn April 2026, the Woven City Inventor Garage (the “Inventor Garage”) began operations as a facility designed to further accelerate kakezan of Inventors. The Inventor Garage is located in the former stamping facility of Toyota Motor East Japan, Inc.’s Higashi-Fuji plant, which supported passenger vehicle production for more than 50 years, and was renovated to serve as a co-creation hub.\n\nAs a real-world test course, Woven City supports agile development and validation through three environments: the Inventor Garage, which serves as a hub for development of products and services, the “Woven City Inventor Field,” in which performance and safety tests are conducted in an environment without residents, and the “Phase 1 Residential Area,” which enables testing in a living environment currently home to approximately 100 Weavers. Woven City is intended to continue expanding as an “ever-evolving city,” and by providing a test course where safety and security are maintained at every stage, it aims to further support kakezan.\n\nWoven City has officially launched, but this is just the starting point. We will work through trial and error together with Inventors and Weavers, while improving Woven City’s performance as a test course, to create products and services that will become the future fabric of life.\n\n \n\n30\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nMobility is not just the physical movement from point A to point B. It is also about being able to “move” people’s hearts and creating excitement. Moving toward inventions that will become the future fabric of life and expanding people’s potential: this is our vision for expanding mobility and for Woven City itself. Together with allies who share our vision, we will leverage Woven City to further our transformation into a mobility company that will help weave the future.\n\nFinancial Services\n\nToyota’s financial services include loan programs and leasing programs for customers and dealers. Toyota believes that its ability to provide financing to its customers is an important value-added service. In July 2000, Toyota established a wholly-owned subsidiary, Toyota Financial Services Corporation, to oversee the management of Toyota’s finance companies worldwide, through which Toyota aims to strengthen the overall competitiveness of its financial business, improve risk management and streamline decision-making processes. Toyota has expanded its network of financial services, in accordance with its strategy of developing auto-related financing businesses in significant markets. Accordingly, Toyota currently operates financial services companies in 42 countries and regions, which support its automotive operations globally.\n\nToyota’s sales revenues from its financial services operations were ¥4,857.1 billion in fiscal 2026, ¥4,481.1 billion in fiscal 2025, and ¥3,484.1 billion in fiscal 2024. In fiscal 2026, Toyota’s business saw solid growth mainly due to an accumulated balance of earning assets resulting from new car sales support for Toyota and Lexus vehicles. Under such circumstances, as a result of Toyota’s continued collaboration with dealers in various countries and regions and efforts to expand products and services that meet customer needs, Toyota’s share of financing provided for new car sales of Toyota and Lexus vehicles in regions where Toyota Financial Services Corporation operates reached approximately 30%, and the balance of earning assets continued to steadily increase. In addition, to fund the growing asset base, Toyota is making efforts to provide both its customers and dealers with stable financial services by diversifying its funding methods by deposit-based funding in addition to using already existing means as commercial paper, corporate bonds, bank borrowings, and asset securitization. As a result of ongoing monitoring of bad debt and diligent, detailed collection efforts, the percentage of credit losses remained at stable levels of 0.43% in fiscal 2026 and 0.46% in fiscal 2025. Toyota continues to work towards improving its management measures in connection with residual value risks in leasing.\n\nToyota Motor Credit Corporation is Toyota’s principal financial services subsidiary in the United States and provides financial services, including retail financing, retail leasing, wholesale financing, and insurance services. Toyota also provides financial services in 42 other countries and regions through various financial services subsidiaries, including:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Finance Corporation in Japan;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Credit Canada Inc. in Canada;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Finance Australia Ltd. in Australia;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Kreditbank GmbH in Germany;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Financial Services (UK) PLC in the United Kingdom;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Leasing (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in Thailand; and\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nToyota Motor Finance (China) Co., Ltd. in China.\n\nKINTO, which started in Japan in 2019 in response to the shift from “owning” cars to “using” cars, has been steadily enhancing its service lineup and gaining brand awareness. This service is also being made available in Europe and other regions. Furthermore, Toyota developed and provides customers with the payment application “TOYOTA Wallet” as a platform that contributes to improving the convenience of customers’ daily payments and creating a foundation for a mobility society.\n\n \n\n \n\n31\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nA large portion of Toyota’s financial services is related to the sale of Toyota vehicles. Finance receivables for all of Toyota’s dealer and customer financing operations were ¥38,966.6 billion as of March 31, 2026, representing an increase of 15.9% compared to the previous year. As of March 31, 2026, 52.2% of Toyota’s finance receivables were attributable to North America, 15.4% from Europe, 11.4% from Asia, 10.0% from Japan and 11.0% from other areas.\n\nApproximately 40% of Toyota’s unit sales in the United States during fiscal 2026 included a finance or lease arrangement with Toyota.\n\nThe worldwide financial services market is highly competitive. Toyota’s competitors in retail financing and retail leasing include commercial banks, credit unions and other finance companies. Commercial banks and other automobile finance subsidiary companies serving their parent automobile companies are competitors of Toyota’s wholesale financing activities. Competitors in Toyota’s insurance operations are primarily national and regional insurance companies.\n\nFor information on Toyota’s finance receivables and operating leases, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — 5.A Operating Results — Financial Services Operations.”\n\nRetail Financing\n\nToyota’s finance subsidiaries acquire new and used vehicle installment contracts primarily from Toyota dealers. Installment contracts acquired must first meet specified credit standards. Thereafter, the finance company retains responsibility for installment payment collections and administration. Toyota’s finance subsidiaries acquire security interests in the vehicles financed and can generally repossess vehicles if customers fail to meet their contractual obligations. Almost all retail financings are non-recourse, which relieves the dealers from financial responsibility in the event of repossession. In most cases, Toyota’s finance subsidiaries require their retail financing customers to carry automobile insurance on financed vehicles covering the interests of both the finance company and the customer.\n\nToyota has historically sponsored, and continues to sponsor, special lease and retail programs by subsidizing below market lease and retail contract rates.\n\nRetail Leasing\n\nIn the area of retail leasing, Toyota’s finance subsidiaries acquire new vehicle lease contracts originated primarily through Toyota dealers. Lease contracts acquired must first meet specified credit standards after which the finance company assumes ownership of the leased vehicle. The finance company is generally permitted to take possession of the vehicle upon a default by the lessee. Toyota’s finance subsidiaries are responsible for contract collection and administration during the lease period. The residual value is normally estimated at the time the vehicle is first leased. Vehicles returned to the finance subsidiaries at the end of their leases are sold by auction. For example, in the United States, vehicles are sold through a network of auction sites, as well as through the Internet. In most cases, Toyota’s finance subsidiaries require lessees to carry automobile insurance on leased vehicles covering the interests of both the finance company and the lessee.\n\nWholesale Financing\n\nToyota’s finance subsidiaries also provide wholesale financing primarily to qualified Toyota dealers to finance inventories of new Toyota vehicles and used vehicles of Toyota and others. The finance companies acquire security interests in vehicles financed at wholesale. In cases where additional security interests would be required, the finance companies take dealership assets or personal assets, or both, as additional security. If a dealer defaults, the finance companies have the right to liquidate any assets acquired and seek legal remedies.\n\n \n\n \n\n32\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nToyota’s finance subsidiaries also make term loans to dealers for facilities refurbishment, real estate purchases and working capital requirements. These loans are typically secured with liens on real estate, other dealership assets and/or personal assets of the dealers.\n\nInsurance\n\nToyota provides insurance services in the United States through Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. (“TMIS”) and its wholly owned insurance company subsidiaries. Their principal activities include marketing, underwriting and claims administration. TMIS also provides coverage related to vehicle service agreements through Toyota dealers to customers. In addition, TMIS also provides coverage and related administrative services to affiliated companies of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation. Toyota dealers in Japan and in other countries and regions also engage in vehicle insurance sales.\n\nOther Financial Services\n\nToyota Finance Corporation launched its credit card business in April 2001 and began issuing Lexus credit cards in 2005 when the Lexus brand was introduced in Japan. As of March 31, 2026, Toyota Finance Corporation has 15.7 million card holders (including Lexus credit card holders).\n\nAll Other Operations\n\nIn addition to its automotive operations and financial services operations, Toyota is involved in a number of other non-automotive business activities. Sales revenues for these activities totaled ¥1,651.4 billion in fiscal 2026, ¥1,447.1 billion in fiscal 2025, and ¥1,368.1 billion in fiscal 2024.\n\nGovernmental Regulation, Environmental and Safety Standards\n\nToyota’s products must comply with government regulations governing, among many other things, their emissions, fuel economy, noise and safety. In addition, Toyota is subject to laws regulating pollutants generated by its manufacturing operations. Toyota has incurred significant costs in complying with these laws and regulations and expects to incur significant compliance costs in the future. Toyota’s management views leadership in environmental protection as an important competitive factor in the marketplace.\n\nThe following is a summary of the more significant existing environmental and safety standards that apply to our products.\n\nInternational Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations\n\nThe World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (“WP.29”) of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe has been working to promote international harmonization of the technical prescriptions for the construction and approval of wheeled vehicles. Towards that end, it has developed certain international rules and regulations such as the UN Regulations (“UNR”) under the 1958 Agreement and the Global Technical Regulations (“GTR”) under the 1998 Agreement. The UNR has been adopted in jurisdictions such as Japan, EU and Russia, and each participating party’s type approvals are mutually recognized under the 1958 Agreement. The parties to the 1998 Agreement include the U.S., China and India in addition to Japan, the EU and Russia, and 25 Global Technical Regulations have been established to date. Progress in international harmonization of technical prescriptions is expected to reduce country to country variations in product specifications and to lead to greater efficiency in Toyota’s product development.\n\n \n\n33\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nVehicle Emissions\n\nJapanese Standards\n\nThe Air Pollution Control Act of Japan and the Road Transport Vehicle Act and the Act Concerning Special Measures for Total Emission Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides and Particulate Matter from Automobiles in Specified Areas regulate vehicle emissions in Japan. In recent years, more stringent regulations have been introduced to match the European Union Standards, as can be seen from, among other things, the strengthened regulations on particulate matters emitted from gasoline-fueled vehicles, the adoption of the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Cycle (“WLTC”) driving cycles and the introduction of the Real Driving Emission (“RDE”). UN-R154 has also been adopted. The Noise Regulation Act and the Road Transport Vehicle Act provide for noise reduction standards on automobiles in Japan.\n\nU.S. Federal Standards\n\nThe federal Clean Air Act directs the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to establish and enforce air quality standards, including emission control standards on passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks and heavy-duty vehicles (with such classifications based on gross vehicle weight ratings). Manufacturers are not permitted to sell vehicles in the United States that do not meet the standards. In 2014, EPA finalized new “Tier 3” tailpipe emission and evaporative emission standards for passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks, medium-duty passenger vehicles and some heavy-duty vehicles. Under that rule, tailpipe emission standards for non-methane organic gases, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, as well as standards for evaporative emissions and guaranteed useful life (which relates to a vehicle’s ability to meet emission limits over time), became increasingly stringent in phases from model years 2017 to 2025. It also required reductions in gasoline’s sulfur content beginning in model year 2017, which was expected to improve the performance of emission control systems. With the Tier 3 rule, EPA brought federal requirements in line with California’s more stringent emission standards (discussed below).\n\nIn March 2024, the EPA announced a final rule for Tier 4 emission standards for passenger vehicles, light-duty trucks, medium-duty passenger vehicles and some heavy-duty vehicles from model year 2027 through 2032. The rule tightened criteria pollutant limits, requiring reductions in non-methane organic gases and nitrogen oxides emissions and a particulate matter cap, fully phased in by model year 2031. Under the current Trump administration, however, the EPA has initiated steps to roll back these standards, framing them as an overreach that effectively mandates electric vehicle adoption. This deregulation effort is expected to face legal challenges from environmental groups and states, potentially delaying or altering the implementation of the original rules.\n\nCalifornia Standards\n\nThe federal Clean Air Act generally prohibits states from enacting their own emission standards for new motor vehicles and engines. However, California is allowed to establish its own more stringent vehicle emission control standards if it receives a waiver of preemption from EPA. Other states then may decide to adopt the California standards that are allowed under the waiver.\n\nOver the years, EPA has granted many such preemption waivers to California. Among those was a January 2013 waiver in support of California’s Advanced Clean Cars (“ACC”) program.\n\nThe California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) had adopted the ACC program in coordination with the EPA and the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”). It included the Low-Emission Vehicle III (“LEV III”) regulations, which set progressively stringent standards to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter and greenhouse gases (“GHG”). The regulations also addressed standards for evaporative emissions and extended vehicle useful life requirements.\n\nAnother part of the ACC program was a “zero-emission vehicles” (“ZEV”) mandate requiring manufacturers to sell a specified percentage of ZEVs—including BEVs, FCEVs and certain advanced technology\n\n \n\n34\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nvehicles such as PHEVs that meet “partial zero-emission vehicles requirements”. Toyota’s MIRAI, an FCEV, is one example of a vehicle that qualifies as a zero-emission vehicle. Toyota intends to continue to develop additional advanced technologies and alternative fuel technologies that will allow other vehicles to qualify as zero-emission vehicles or partial zero-emission vehicles.\n\nIn 2022, CARB finalized the Advanced Clean Cars II (“ACC II”) regulations, which include updated LEV IV exhaust emissions standards and an expanded ZEV sales mandate applicable to model years 2026 through 2035. LEV IV standards further tighten criteria pollutant limits for light- and medium-duty vehicles, while the ZEV mandate requires 100% of new passenger vehicles sold in California to be ZEVs by 2035, consistent with California Governor Newsom’s Order of 2020 (N 79 20).\n\nLegal challenges to the ACC II program have been filed, including suits over CARB’s authority and the waiver granted by the EPA under the Clean Air Act, particularly as federal policy on vehicle electrification has shifted under the second Trump administration. For example, the US Congress passed joint resolutions in May 2025 under the Congressional Review Act that disapproved EPA waivers for several California vehicle emission programs, including the ACC II rules; President Trump signed these resolutions into law on June 12, 2025. Developments such as these with their associated legal battles create significant uncertainty around future emissions standards under the Clean Air Act.\n\nAside from its emission standards, California has adopted regulations that require On-Board Diagnostics (“OBD”) systems to be incorporated into the computers of vehicles sold in California. OBD systems monitor components that can affect the emission performance of a vehicle and, if a problem with a component is detected, illuminates a warning light on the vehicle’s instrument panel. The systems also store the malfunction information in the computer to facilitate repairs. California’s OBD regulations are the most stringent in the world.\n\nOther States’ Standards\n\nUnder Section 177 of the Clean Air Act, states can adopt California’s vehicle emissions standards and opt-in to that more stringent program. Approximately seventeen other states, for example, have adopted regulations substantially similar to California’s LEV standards. At least fifteen of those (Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington) have adopted California’s ZEV program. Delaware and Pennsylvania have implemented the LEV standards but not the ZEV standards. Approximately eleven states (in addition to California) and the District of Columbia have adopted California’s ACC II regulations, mandating that 100% of new light-duty vehicle sales be ZEVs by 2035. Some of these state measures have faced reversal due to such concerns as the effect and cost of the mandates on consumers.\n\nCanadian Standards\n\nCanada finalized vehicle emission standards equivalent to federal standards in the United States in October 2014, responding to the strengthening of U.S. standards for model years 2017 to 2025; however, while the U.S. EPA published even stronger standards in March 2024 to drive significant ZEV penetration through 2032, it officially rescinded its Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding and repealed all federal GHG standards on February 12, 2026, leaving Tier 4 regulations on hold.\n\nAlthough Canada typically aligns with the most stringent North American performance standards via “incorporation by reference,” U.S. regulatory reversals and legal threats have created uncertainty for Canada’s post-2026 emissions framework.\n\nFurther, in February 2026 the federal government announced a significant policy redirection by announcing it will repeal its ZEV Mandate (Electric Vehicle Availability Standard) and replace it with more stringent, Canada-unique fleet-average GHG emission standards for model years 2027–2032, with an eventual goal of 75% EV sales by 2035 and 90% by 2040 to be achieved via GHG emissions standards.\n\n \n\n35\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nDespite this federal uncertainty, provinces of British Columbia and Quebec maintain their own ZEV mandates. In March 2026, British Columbia announced that it will modify its ZEV mandate to require manufacturers to reach 75% ZEV sales in model year 2035 (down from 100%). Quebec announced in 2025 that it would lift its 2035 ban on new gasoline-powered vehicles, set a new 2035 target of 90% ZEV sales — combining both BEVs and PHEVs, and provide some credit for hybrid vehicles within its ZEV mandate, with draft regulation reflecting these changes expected by the end of 2026.\n\nTo support these transitions, Canada provides a federal incentive through the Electric Vehicle Affordability Program (EVAP), which can often be combined with active provincial programs, though availability varies as several other regional programs have recently closed or paused. Furthermore, Canada remains committed to its 2017 fuel regulations, which limit sulfur concentration to 10mg/kg.\n\nEuropean Union Standards\n\nIn 2007, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU adopted the Vehicles Emissions Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 715/2007), which introduced more stringent emission standards for passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles. The effective date for phasing in these stricter standards for passenger vehicles was September 2014 for Euro 6. For light commercial vehicles, the effective date was September 2015.\n\nThe primary focus of Euro 6 is to limit further emissions of diesel-powered vehicles and bring them down to a level equivalent to gasoline-powered vehicles. The EU implements RDE regulations, which require manufacturers to conduct on-road emissions tests using portable emissions testers to demonstrate compliance. Since September 2017, manufacturers have been required to reduce the divergence between the regulatory limit tested in laboratory conditions and the values of RDE tests, and this divergence factor was made more stringent for all new vehicles effective January 2021. The EU also implements the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure (“WLTP”), which was introduced on September 1, 2017. The OBD regulations have also been tightened in terms of both subject parts and regulatory values. On January 1, 2019, an improved WLTP that purports to eliminate test flexibilities and introduces on-board fuel and energy consumption monitoring devices took effect. In March 2023, further regulations came into effect to harmonize requirements with UNR, tighten the divergence factor on RDE, and tighten the method for calculating CO2 emissions for PHEVs.\n\nOn May 28, 2024, Euro 7 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1257), which further strengthens Euro 6, came into effect. The dates of application of the Euro 7 regulation depend on vehicle type. They will apply to new types of passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles from November 29, 2026, to new passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles from November 29, 2027, to new types of buses and lorries from May 29, 2028, and to new buses and lorries from May 29, 2029. The Euro 7 regulation maintains the Euro 6 exhaust emission limits for passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles (except the particle number limit), tightens exhaust emission limits for buses and lorries (e.g., introducing new in-scope pollutants such as N2O), establishes rules for other types of emissions such as brake particle emissions and tire abrasion, and introduces minimum performance requirements for battery durability in electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles (BEVs/PHEVs). Euro 7 also introduces on-board monitoring (OBM) systems, which monitor real-time exhaust emissions using on-board sensors and transmits the monitored data over the air from vehicles to manufacturers’ servers.\n\nChinese Standards\n\nThe next-generation emissions regulations for passenger vehicles, or Level 6 Emissions Regulations (China 6), were issued as GB18352.6-2016 at the end of 2016, pursuant to which tighter requirements will be implemented in two steps, depending on the regulated subjects and the implementation timing. Specifically, China 6a will apply to all models to be sold or registered in July 2020 and beyond, and China 6b will apply to all models to be sold or registered in July 2023 and beyond. China 6b will also introduce the RDE Regulations adopted under Euro 6. The OBD regulations have also been tightened in terms of both subject parts and regulatory values. With respect to fuels in the market, the quality standards and the implementation from\n\n \n\n36\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nJanuary 2019 for China 6 gasoline fuel and China 6 diesel fuel have been provided in GB17930-2016 and GB19147-2016 so as to keep up with the implementation timing of China 6 emissions regulations. Discussions are currently underway for Level 7 Emissions Regulations (“China 7”), which will be more stringent than the China 6 Emissions Regulations. Potential regulations for particulate matter emitted from brake pads and tire wear and the expansion of regulations to make BEVs/FCEVs subject to the OBD regulations are being considered.\n\nFor heavy-duty diesel-powered commercial vehicles, pursuant to GB17691-2005, the China V Emissions Regulations are being implemented from July 2017. With the establishment of GB17691-2018, which provides next-level China VI Emissions Regulations (“China VI”), it has been decided that China VIa will be implemented from July 2021 and China VIb from July 2023 (these regulations will apply to gas-fueled vehicles and public vehicles for urban areas earlier than those dates). For heavy-duty gasoline-powered commercial vehicles, pursuant to GB14762-2008, Level IV Emissions Regulations (“China IV”) apply to new models after July 2012. In parallel with China VII for passenger vehicles, tightening of the next-generation emissions regulations (China VII) is currently considered for heavy-duty gasoline-powered commercial vehicles.\n\nStandards of Other Countries or Regions\n\nAt present, certain countries such as India, Thailand, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Chile and Peru have also decided to introduce regulations equivalent to Euro 6.\n\nVehicle Fuel Economy\n\nJapanese Standards\n\nThe Act on Rationalizing Energy Use and Shifting to Non-fossil Energy requires automobile manufacturers to improve their vehicles to meet specified fuel economy standards. Fuel economy standards are established according to the types of vehicles, and are required to be met by either fiscal 2011 (April 2010-March 2011), fiscal 2016 (April 2015-March 2016), fiscal 2021 (April 2020-March 2021), fiscal 2023 (April 2022-March 2023), fiscal 2026 (April 2025-March 2026) or fiscal 2031 (April 2030-March 2031). From 2020, if the WLTC mode is applied as a vehicle emissions test cycle, fuel economy test must be also conducted based on the WLTC mode.\n\nU.S. Standards\n\nSince 1975 when Congress passed the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, each automobile manufacturer must comply with corporate average fuel economy (“CAFE”) standards across its fleet of new cars and trucks. A manufacturer is subject to substantial civil penalties if, in any model year, its vehicles do not meet the CAFE standards. Manufacturers that exceed the CAFE standards earn credits determined by the difference between the average fuel economy performance of their vehicles and the CAFE standards. Credits may be used for the three years preceding the model year in which they were earned and the five years after.\n\nAn original goal of the CAFE Program was fuel efficiency. But the program also provided the means for EPA to address GHG emissions from vehicles. The two are linked since carbon dioxide emissions are directly proportional to fuel consumed. In 2012, for example, NHTSA and EPA issued a joint rule for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles for model years 2017 through 2025. NHTSA focused on fuel efficiency. It required passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks to meet an industry average fuel economy level of 49.7 miles per gallon in model year 2025. EPA, on the other hand, required an estimated combined average emission level of 163 grams of carbon dioxide per mile in model year 2025, which would be equivalent to 54.5 miles per gallon if met solely through improvements in fuel economy (without using any available credits for reducing air conditioning leakage).\n\n \n\n \n\n37\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nUnder the first Trump administration, in 2018, EPA and NHTSA proposed more relaxed GHG emission standards and CAFE standards. EPA also withdrew the preemption waiver allowing California to issue its own more stringent GHG emission standards under the ACC program. The Biden administration, however, moved to tighten the fuel economy program. EPA and NHTSA withdrew the prior Trump administration’s proposed GHG emission standards and CAFE standards.\n\nIn 2021 the Biden EPA issued a final rule revising passenger car and light-duty truck GHG emissions standards for model years 2023 through 2026. That rule projected reductions in GHG emissions, year-over-year, by 9.8% for model year 2023, 5.1% for 2024, 6.6% for 2025, and 10.3% for 2026. Based on these reductions, the industry-wide average emission targets for passenger cars and light-duty trucks were projected by the EPA to be 161 grams of carbon dioxide per mile in model year 2026.\n\nIn 2022, NHTSA followed with a final rule revising passenger car and light-duty truck fuel economy standards for model years 2024 through 2026. That rule set a fleet-wide standard of approximately 49 mpg for passenger cars and light duty trucks in model year 2026. This was to be achieved by increasing fuel efficiency, year-over-year, by 8% for model year 2024, 8% for 2025, and 10% for 2026.\n\nAlso in 2022, EPA reinstated California’s authority to enforce its own GHG emissions standards for vehicles.\n\nIn March 2024, EPA issued a final rule setting GHG emissions standards for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles from model years 2027 to 2032, projecting an industry-wide average target of 85 grams of carbon dioxide per mile by model year 2032. This represented an almost 50% reduction and was expected to accelerate the market shift towards electrification.\n\nHowever, with the second Trump administration, NHTSA decided to review and reconsider fuel economy standards applicable to vehicles from model year 2022. In support of that effort, NHTSA issued an interpretive rule addressing the extent of its legal authority for the CAFE program. It was followed by a December 2025 proposed rule to amend the fuel economy standards for light duty vehicles for model years 2022 to 2026 and 2027 to 2031. In 2026, moreover, the Trump EPA rescinded the 2009 endangerment finding that provided the basis for its regulation of GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines. Environmental stakeholders filed to start litigation on this decision, leading to uncertainty regarding such regulation.\n\nBoth the CAFE and GHG emissions standards are expected to remain dynamic in response to shifting federal policy priorities, technological developments, and market trends. A return of a Democratic administration, for example, could result in a tightening of such standards beyond model year 2032. Whatever the standards, legal and political challenges are likely. As such, the regulatory landscape is likely to evolve, with periodic rulemakings, midterm reviews and potential litigation shaping the trajectory of U.S. vehicle GHG emissions and fuel economy standards in the coming years.\n\nEuropean Union Standards\n\nIn April 2019, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU adopted the EU Emissions Performance Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/631), which introduced new carbon dioxide standards for vehicles and light commercial vehicles. Under these standards, average emissions of the EU fleet of new vehicles and light commercial vehicles were set to be reduced by 15% lower than 2021 levels by 2025 and, by 2030, emissions were set to a further 37.5% and 31% reduction of 2021 levels for vehicles and light commercial vehicles, respectively. As such, the 2020 to 2024 EU-fleet wide average carbon dioxide emissions target for light commercial vehicles was 147 grams per kilometer, and for passenger vehicles, 95 grams per kilometer. Since 2021, these emissions targets have been tested using the WLTP.\n\n \n\n \n\n38\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nAs part of its “Fit for 55” package, on April 19, 2023, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU adopted an amendment to the EU Emissions Performance Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/851), which introduced more stringent carbon dioxide emission standards for vehicles and light commercial vehicles. The new standards strengthen the 2030 targets from 37.5% to a 55% reduction for new passenger cars and from 31% to a 50% reduction for new light commercial vehicles, both relative to the 2021 baseline discussed above. In addition, the new standards introduce a new 2035 carbon dioxide target set at a 100% reduction for new vehicles and light commercial vehicles, again relative to the 2021 baseline. Since 2019, manufacturers failing to meet their targets have incurred penalties, which are currently set at €95 per vehicle from the first gram of target exceedance onwards.\n\nOn July 9, 2025, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU adopted an amendment to the EU Emissions Performance Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2025/1214), which introduced a one-time flexibility measure allowing manufacturers to meet 2025–2027 carbon dioxide targets over a three-year average rather than annually. This exemption was implemented as part of the Industrial Action Plan for the automotive sector, which aims to support investment in the clean transition while preserving overall climate ambition. Furthermore, since 2025, a zero- and low-emission vehicles (“ZLEV”) crediting system has been introduced to relax a manufacturer’s specific carbon dioxide emissions targets where the manufacturer produces numbers of ZLEV above specified benchmarks.\n\nIn December 2025, the European Commission published an “Automotive Package” comprising proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/851 (the amended CO2 fleet-wide performance standards for cars and vans), a proposed Directive on clean corporate vehicle fleets, a proposed Automotive Omnibus Regulation on the simplification of type-approval and market surveillance requirements, and a Battery Booster investment program. The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/851 would replace the 100% tailpipe emissions reduction target for new cars and vans by 2035 with a 90% target, with the remaining 10% to be compensated through the use of low-carbon steel produced in the EU, e-fuels or biofuels. The proposals also introduce additional compliance flexibilities, including “super credits” for small affordable electric vehicles manufactured in the EU, a “banking and borrowing” mechanism for the 2030–2032 period, and a reduction of the 2030 CO2 target for vans from 50% to 40%. The proposed Directive on clean corporate vehicle fleets would require Member States to set mandatory targets for the uptake of zero- and low-emission vehicles by large companies and to make zero- or low-emission status and EU origin prerequisites for vehicles benefiting from public financial support. The proposed Automotive Omnibus Regulation is expected to streamline type-approval testing procedures, reduce the volume of delegated and implementing acts to be adopted under the General Safety Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/2144) and Euro 7 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1257), and introduce a new vehicle category for small affordable electric cars of up to 4.2 meters in length. The Battery Booster investment program allocates €1.8 billion, including €1.5 billion in interest-free loans for European battery cell producers, to support the development of a fully EU-based battery value chain. These proposals remain subject to adoption by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU, and their final form may differ from the European Commission’s proposals.\n\nAlso adopted as part of the “Fit for 55” package, the recast Renewable Energy Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/2413) enables Member States to require that renewable energy accounts for at least 29% of final energy consumption in transport by 2030, including a combined sub-target of 5.5% for advanced biofuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin (“RFNBOs”) such as green hydrogen and e-fuels, of which at least 1% must come from RFNBOs.\n\nThe Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1804), also part of the “Fit for 55” package, mandates the deployment of publicly accessible electric vehicle charging infrastructure along TEN-T (Trans-European Transport Network) core and comprehensive network corridors and hydrogen refueling stations along TEN-T core corridors.\n\n \n\n39\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nChinese Standards\n\nFuel consumption regulations are being implemented pursuant to the Chinese National Standards (“GB”), and the manufacture and sale of vehicle models not meeting these regulations are prohibited. For light-duty passenger vehicles, GB27999-2011 was issued. In these Level 3 Fuel Consumption Regulations for passenger vehicles, the regulation framework was substantially revised, such as the introduction of new regulations requiring automobile manufacturers to meet standards of corporate average fuel consumption across models in addition to existing regulations requiring each model to meet consumption standards. Furthermore, in order to achieve the national target for average fuel efficiency for 2020, the following more stringent fuel consumption regulations have been enforced. First, GB19578-2014, which has been enacted to strengthen regulations for each model, is being applied to new models after January 2016. Second, GB27999-2014, which has been enacted as Level 4 Fuel Consumption Regulations for passenger vehicles to strengthen corporate average regulations, has been in effect since 2016. In 2021, the fuel economy test mode was changed from NEDC to WLTC, and the Level 5 Fuel Consumption Regulations for passenger vehicles to achieve the average fuel efficiency target by 2025, GB19578-2021 and GB27999-2019, have been in effect since 2021. As a further enhancement of fuel consumption regulations, GB19578-2024 and GB27999-2025, which are the Level 6 Fuel Consumption Regulations for passenger vehicles, have been enacted and took effect in 2026. In addition, GB36980.1-2025, which regulates smaller electric vehicles (BEVs) by model, was enacted and has been applied to all new vehicles from January 2026. For light commercial vehicles, GB20997-2015 was enacted, based on which Level 3 Fuel Consumption Regulations have been applied to all new vehicles from January 2018. As a further enhancement of fuel consumption regulations, GB20997-2024, which are the Level 4 Fuel Consumption Regulations for light commercial vehicles, were enacted and applied to new vehicles from January 2026. Moreover, the implementation of the Life Cycle Assessment, which comprehensively regulates the amount of carbon dioxide emitted during the vehicle manufacturing, use, and disposal processes, among others, is being considered earlier than in the rest of the world.\n\nWith respect to large commercial vehicles, pursuant to GB30510-2018, Level 3 Fuel Consumption Regulations apply to new vehicles from July 2019 and are currently being enforced. In addition, in an effort to further strengthen fuel consumption regulations for the next generation, GB30510-2024, which is the Level 4 Fuel Consumption Regulations, have been enacted and applied to new vehicles from July 2025.\n\nStandards of Other Countries or Regions\n\nIndia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Taiwan have imposed regulations that require automobile manufacturers and dealers to reduce fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.\n\nVehicle Safety\n\nJapanese Standards\n\nJapan has been participating in the 1958 Agreement of the UN and has a number of technical standards that are harmonized with the UNRs described below.\n\nOBD testing to verify compliance with safety standards during vehicle inspections became mandatory for domestic vehicles starting October 2024 for imported vehicles starting October 2025.\n\nFrom 2025 onwards, new UNRs have been adopted, including the pedal misapplication acceleration control system (UN-R175) and the emergency lane keeping system (UN-R178), among others.\n\nBased on the outcomes of deliberations by the public–private council, Japan has implemented a harmonization of domestic effective dates. For standards for which application dates have already been determined, effective dates will be consolidated on an annual basis in September. For standards to be newly introduced going forward, effective dates will be unified to either September or March each year.\n\n \n\n40\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nIn addition, pursuant to the agreement between Japan and the United States concerning tariffs, a new certification scheme for U.S.-manufactured passenger vehicles has been established. By utilizing this scheme, passenger vehicles manufactured in the United States and compliant with U.S. regulatory standards may be accepted for sale in Japan without the need for additional testing within Japan.\n\nU.S. Standards\n\nIn November 2021, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill was signed into law by President Biden. It requires the NHTSA to create regulations that cover a wide range of vehicle safety matters, including advanced driver assistance technologies, driver monitoring systems, headlamps, connected vehicles technologies, event data recording, and impaired driving prevention technologies. In response to these mandates, the NHTSA has so far completed several key rulemakings. A final rule permitting Adaptive Driving Beam headlamps was issued in 2022, a final rule mandating Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (“AEBS”) was issued in 2024, and a notice of proposed rulemaking for enhanced seatback strength was issued in 2025.\n\nIn the area of automated vehicles (“AV”), while the federal government has not issued binding AV regulations beyond the policy-level AV 4.0 guidance released in 2020, recent federal actions indicate a possible shift. In April 2025, the Trump administration proposed easing AV deployment restrictions while maintaining incident reporting for higher-level automated systems. Meanwhile, California and other states continue to advance AV oversight in the absence of comprehensive federal standards, with California recently proposing to lift its ban on autonomous heavy-duty truck testing.\n\nEuropean Union Standards\n\nIn December 2019, the EU issued the revised General Safety Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/2144) to tighten the requirements concerning safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users. This revised General Safety Regulation (which came into effect in July 2022) made certain vehicle safety equipment mandatory in a phased approach, including: automated emergency braking, emergency lane keeping systems, driver drowsiness and attention warning, intelligent speed assistance, reversing detection systems, tire pressure monitoring systems, and data recorders in case of an accident (“event data recorders”). In October 2024, Regulation (EU) 2024/2220 was published specifying the specific test procedures and technical requirements for event data recorders for heavy vehicles.\n\nIn relation to this, various UNRs were developed (as detailed further below). The General Safety Regulation has been updated regularly to reflect new UNRs. For the equipment for which UNRs have not been developed, such as automated driving systems for automated vehicles, the EU has established its own technical standards.\n\nIn order to adapt to new telecommunication technologies in the EU, Regulation (EU) 2024/1180 was adopted in April 2024, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/758 which governs a 112-based eCall in-vehicle system. Detailed requirements and test procedures for the approval of eCall systems are currently being revised to align with the new regulations, and are expected to be issued shortly.\n\nUnited Nations Standards\n\nThe United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (“GRVA”) has been continuing to advance global regulatory frameworks on automated driving systems (“ADS”).\n\nAmendments to UNR No. 157 on Automated Lane Keeping Systems (“ALKS”) have increased the permissible operating speed for ALKS from 60 km/h to 130 km/h and introduced provisions for automated lane change functions.\n\n \n\n \n\n41\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nGRVA has been actively developing a new UNR/GTR on ADSs, with contributions from Canada, China, the EU, Japan, the UK and the US. Those new regulations aim to establish harmonized international technical requirements for ADS, encompassing functional safety, cybersecurity, software updates, and DSSAD (Data Storage System for Automated Driving) requirements. In parallel, amendments of all relevant UN GTRs and UNs for considering ADS fitness are being coordinated toward voting at WP.29 in June 2026.\n\nWP.29 has endorsed “Considerations on Artificial Intelligence in the context of road vehicles” in June 2024. GRVA is exploring regulatory measures addressing artificial intelligence (“AI”). Now WP.29 will be exploring some instruments addressing AI used in vehicles.\n\nIn addition to automated driving, WP.29 is also engaged in the development of other new regulations. In March 2026, it adopted regulations requiring the issuance of warnings to drivers in cases of driver distraction or reduced alertness. Furthermore, other subsidiary working parties under WP.29 are progressing the development of regulations concerning, among other matters, the safety of children left in vehicles, awareness of vulnerable road users proximity, and ensuring ease of door opening in emergency situations such as vehicle fires or vehicle submersion.\n\nChinese Standards\n\nVehicle safety regulations in China were in general established having regard to the UNRs. However, China is adding its own requirements in consideration of the Chinese market and traffic environment, and establishing its own standards to improve the technological capabilities of its industries and to ensure international competitiveness. This is especially true in the area of “electrification,” or new energy vehicles (“NEVs”), which China is strongly promoting, and China’s own national technical standards on functions such as batteries, motors, and the charging and remote surveillance of NEVs have been made mandatory. Fuel-cell vehicles are subject to the supervising regulations on the safety of high-pressure gas in addition to the vehicle type approval requirement. Moreover, in accordance with the Made in China 2025 policy, the country considers “intelligentization” to be the next core technological area, and more than 100 standards for intelligent connected vehicles are being developed (including automation, telecommunication and security). As is the case in the field of electrification, it is anticipated that more of China’s own standards will become mandatory in a short period in the future. In particular, in recent years, from the perspective of ensuring data security against the backdrop of the U.S.-China trade friction and other factors, China has been vigorously and rapidly promoting legislation to strictly control the extraterrestrial transfer of data acquired within China, and the automotive sector is no exception to this. Although the authorities have already mandated to obtain clearance for personal information and important data to be transferred outside of China through security review, there is a risk that Toyota will need a major review of the necessity for further development of new technologies or of the technology development system, including technology transfer to China, depending on the terms of future laws and regulations. Furthermore, with the rapid expansion of the commercialization of advanced driver assistance technologies by local IT companies and OEMs, the development of related standards is also progressing at a fast pace. Accidents occurring during the use of these functions have become a social issue, and there is a shift toward only permitting technologies that provide support even in complex driving scenarios, by establishing performance requirements that significantly exceed those of UNRs. In addition, with a growing movement to prohibit features that have become widespread in NEVs, such as retractable door handles and one-pedal driving modes, regulatory developments specific to China are accelerating.\n\nEnvironmental Matters\n\nJapanese Standards\n\nAutomotive operations in Japan are subject to substantial environmental regulation under laws such as the Air Pollution Control Act, the Water Pollution Prevention Act, the Noise Regulation Act and the Vibration Control Act. Under these laws, if a business entity establishes or alters any facility that is regulated by these laws,\n\n \n\n42\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nthe business entity is required to give prior notice to regulators, and if a business entity uses, discharges, or stores substances that are environmental burdens or causes noise or vibration from such facility, the business entity is also required to comply with the applicable standards. Toyota has established and complies with environmental standards that exceed applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, based on agreements reached with relevant local administrative authorities. Under the Waste Management and Public Cleansing Act, producers of industrial waste must dispose of industrial waste in the manner prescribed in the same act.\n\nThe Soil Contamination Countermeasures Act of Japan requires that landowners conduct contamination testing and submit a report at the time they cease to use hazardous substances, such as in connection with the sale of a former factory, or if there is a possibility of health hazards due to land contamination. If it is found that land contamination exceeds a certain level, the relevant prefectural authority designates the area as considered to be contaminated, orders the landowner to submit a plan for decontamination (such plan must describe the measures to be taken in the area, the reasons therefor, and the deadline for implementing such measures, etc.), and has the landowner take such measures in accordance with such plan. In addition, under the Act on Recycling, etc. of End-of-Life Vehicles, vehicle manufacturers are required to take back and recycle specified materials (automotive shredder residues, air bags and fluorocarbons) of end-of-life vehicles and the provisions concerning such obligations of vehicle manufacturers became effective in January 2005. Toyota has coordinated with relevant parties to establish a vehicle take-back and recycle system throughout Japan. As a result, in fiscal 2025, Toyota achieved a recycling/recovery rate of 97% for automobile shredder residue (the legal requirement being 70% or higher) and 97% for air bags (the legal requirement being 85% or higher) and reached the targets set forth in this law.\n\nU.S. Standards\n\nThe federal environmental statutes applicable in the United States include, among others, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (which governs wastes), and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Toyota also is subject to a variety of state laws that parallel, and in some cases are more stringent than, federal requirements.\n\nPursuant to the Clean Air Act, the EPA has promulgated National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) for six “criteria” pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter). Every five years EPA must review and possibly revise these NAAQS. In March 2024, the EPA announced a final rule, effective May 2024, lowering the primary (health-based) annual standard for particulate matter with diameters less than 2.5 micrometers (“PM2.5”) (the fine inhalable particles) from 12.0 to 9.0 micrograms per cubic meter (“µg/m3”). This revised standard, as well as any future NAAQS revisions for other criteria pollutants, could lead to additional pollution control requirements for stationary sources of air emissions, including Toyota’s U.S. manufacturing facilities.\n\nThe rule has faced legal challenges from several states, including Louisiana and Texas, as well as industry groups. Arguing that EPA’s action was procedurally improper and failed to adequately consider economic impacts, they filed petitions for judicial review in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. In March 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a formal reconsideration of the PM2.5 NAAQS, citing concerns about the previous administration’s standards and their potential impact on permitting processes. The legal challenges remain pending.\n\nEuropean Union Standards\n\nIn the EU, the Ambient Air Quality and Clearer Air for Europe Directive (Directive 2008/50/EC) sets the environmental standards for air quality. A revised Ambient Air Quality and Clearer Air for Europe Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/2881) entered into force on December 10, 2024, aligning 2030 EU air quality standards more closely with the World Health Organization recommendations. In particular, the new Directive cuts the allowed annual limit value for the main air pollutant, fine particulate matter (PM2.5), by more than half. It also\n\n \n\n43\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nupdates the air quality standards by lowering the permissible levels for twelve air pollutants. In relation to these Directives, environmental regulations, such as the National Emissions Ceilings Directive, or NEC Directive (2016/2284/EU), the Industrial Emissions Directive, or IED Directive (2010/75/EU) (as amended by Directive (EU) 2024/1785), and the Motor Vehicle Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2018/858), which is intended to control on-road emission sources, have been established, and emissions are managed under these directives based on their source.\n\nA review of the EU Directive on End-of-Life Vehicles (Directive 2000/53/EC) was launched in 2021, resulting in a proposal for a new regulation in July 2023. The new proposed regulation would improve the quality of end-of-life treatment, incentivize reuse of recycled materials to enable more resource-efficient use of materials, recover more and better-quality raw materials (e.g., CRMs, plastics, steel and aluminum), and strengthen responsibility and cooperation between producers.\n\nToyota strives to ensure that its operations comply with environmental regulatory requirements concerning its facilities and products in each of the markets in which it operates. Toyota continuously monitors these requirements and takes necessary operational measures in an effort to remain in material compliance with all of these requirements. However, in light of the net zero transition, compliance with environmental regulations and standards has increased costs and is expected to lead to higher costs in the future. Therefore, Toyota recognizes that effective environmental cost management will become increasingly important. Moreover, innovation and leadership in the area of environmental protection are becoming increasingly important to remain competitive in the market. As a result, Toyota has proceeded with the development and production of environmentally friendly technologies, such as HEVs, PHEVs, FCEVs, BEVs and high fuel efficiency, low emission engines.\n\nBeyond the product and facility-level environmental regulations described above, the European operations of automotive manufacturers are also potentially subject to a growing body of EU corporate sustainability and supply chain legislation. For instance, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) requires large undertakings operating in the EU to report detailed sustainability information in accordance with European Sustainability Reporting Standards. In addition, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/1760) requires in-scope companies to conduct environmental and human rights due diligence. These Directives may apply to the EU subsidiaries of automotive manufacturers that meet the applicable size thresholds, and may also apply at group level under the Directives’ relevant third-country parent provisions, depending on the consolidated EU net turnover of such manufacturers.\n\nFinally, the EU Deforestation Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1115), which prohibits the placing on the EU market of specified commodities, including natural rubber, unless they are verified as deforestation-free and legally produced, has applied to large operators from December 30, 2025. This may be relevant to Toyota’s tire and rubber supply chain.\n\nIn addressing environmental issues, based on an assessment of the environmental impact of its products through their entire life cycles, from production through sales, disposal and recycling, Toyota, as a manufacturer, strives to take all possible measures from development stage and continues to work towards technological innovations to make efficient use of resources and to reduce the burden on the environment.\n\nToyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability\n\nThe following is a discussion of Toyota’s approach to and initiatives towards sustainability. It contains forward-looking statements that are based upon the current judgment, assumptions and beliefs of Toyota’s management. See “Cautionary Statement With Respect To Forward-Looking Statements.” Actual business, financial and operational results may vary significantly from those described below as a result of unanticipated changes in various factors, including those described in “Risk Factors.”\n\n \n\n44\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nApproach Towards Sustainability\n\nWe believe that Toyota should conduct business for the public good and serve people’s happiness and social development. This strong conviction is inherited from the belief, “always be faithful to your duties, thereby contributing to the company and to the overall good,” which is part of the Toyoda Principles, the roots of the Toyota Group.\n\nIn 2020, we revisited our roots and developed the Toyota Philosophy, which established “Producing Happiness for All” as our corporate mission. This mission expresses our commitment to sustainable development for society and business to bring more happiness to our customers and other stakeholders around the world. This is our commitment to sustainable business.\n\nThrough business based on the Toyoda Principles and Toyota Philosophy, Toyota established a product/business-driven operational base, with a company-wide emphasis on three values that make us Toyota: “making ever-better cars,” “best-in-town carmaker,” and “for someone other than oneself.”\n\nWe are now building on this legacy. Our next step is to evolve our growth strategy and business vision with a greater commitment to sustainability and to formulate concrete action plans to fulfill the mission of “Producing Happiness for All.”\n\nTo fulfill this mission, Toyota aims to transform into a mobility company that provides freedom of mobility for all without leaving anyone behind. To put our mission into action, we assessed the materiality of our impacts as well as risks and opportunities, which incorporated a comprehensive range of stakeholder perspectives — customers, community/business partners, and employees. The materiality assessment resulted in the identification of six key themes with the greatest priority: “expanding the value of mobility,” “safety & reliability,” “co-existence of humanity and the earth,” “supporting the community and employment,” “Active Contribution by All” and “strong production and business operation.”\n\nAt the heart of our key themes is our aspiration for making cars, which is expressed through our motto, “Let’s change the future of cars.”\n\nWe will continue to evolve our business from auto manufacturing to mobility, so that cars will be useful to society and bring smiles to customers for years to come. In pursuit of this goal, we must maximize cars’ positive impacts, focusing on enhancing user-friendliness, comfort, and emotional value and making them fun to drive. Simultaneously, we are dedicated to minimizing negative impacts such as traffic accidents, congestion, and environmental burdens.\n\nFor Toyota, transformation into a mobility company means creating a new industrial structure that benefits the development of a mobility society through the evolution of the automobile. We will lead the transformative journey to shape the future with a sense of mission, working together with business partners who share the purpose.\n\nWe are now in an era in which it is hard to predict the future. That is why we believe that persistent and purposeful action makes a difference. In the spirit of hyaku-setsu futo (indefatigability), one of the cherished phrases of our founder Sakichi Toyoda, we will live up to our convictions and challenge ourselves to change the future of cars. Toyota’s Origins and Materiality (Key Issues)\n\n \n\n45\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n\nGovernance\n\nIn order to grasp changes in the external environment and societal demands, and to prioritize issues of greater importance and urgency, we continuously strive to promote and improve environmental, social, and governance sustainability activities while working closely with the relevant groups under the promotion system illustrated below and under the supervision and decision-making of the Board of Directors.\n\nTo deliberate on key, multidisciplinary sustainability issues related to management, we have established the Sustainability Meeting chaired by the CEO, which mainly deals with themes associated with Environment and Social, and the Governance Risk Compliance Meeting chaired by the Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”), which deals with themes associated with Governance. In addition, we have established a framework in which meetings attended by the heads of the relevant divisions and the Carbon Neutral (CN) Strategy Subcommittee deliberate on individual issues and themes that are closer to actual practice.\n\n<Sustainability Governance Structure>\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n46\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n  \n  \nSustainability Meeting\n  \n\nGovernance Risk\nCompliance\n\nMeeting\n\n  \nCN Strategy Subcommittee\n\nChairperson\n  \nPresident\n  \nCRO/CCO*\n  \nPresident, Carbon-Neutral Engineering Development Center\n\nMembers\n  \nVice Chairman of the Board of Directors (1); Executive vice presidents (2); outside member of the Board of Directors (1); outside Audit and Supervisory Committee members (2); CRO/CCO (1), others (3)\n  \nExecutive vice presidents (2); outside member of the Board of Directors (1); outside Audit and Supervisory Committee members (3); Audit and Supervisory Committee member (1); others (4)\n  \nExecutive vice presidents (2); operating officers (4), others (10)\n\nNumber of times held in fiscal year 2026\n  \n4\n  \n4\n  \n3\n\nTiming of reports to the Board of Directors\n  \nWhen an important matter arises\n  \nWhen an important matter arises\n  \nWhen an important matter arises\n\nDuties\n  \nContribution to increases in corporate value by deliberating, making decisions, and promoting activities for important sustainability-related issues\n  \nMaking proposals and deliberation on important matters relating to governance, risk, and compliance, in particular matters requiring strategic direction at the management level\n  \n\nCultivation of shared understanding regarding important global trends pertaining to carbon neutrality and environmental issues\n\nReporting and deliberation on targets, key performance indicators, and other important management provisions related to above duties\n\n \n\n*\n\nCRO: Chief Risk Officer\n\n \n\nCCO: Chief Compliance Officer\n\nRisk Management\n\nToyota will further strengthen risk management in response to uncertainties amid our constantly needing to rise to new challenges in the era of major changes in the circumstances surrounding, and in the values of, the automobile industry, such as carbon neutrality, expanding value of mobility (electrification, intelligent technologies, diversification), and other factors.\n\nIn order for each region, function, and in-house company to cooperate and support each other and prevent, mitigate, reduce, and appropriately control risks arising in business activities from a global perspective, Toyota has appointed a CRO and Deputy CRO in charge of risk management, as well as the head of risk management in each region. Toyota has also established the Governance Risk Compliance Meeting under the CRO’s supervision to identify, take action against, and monitor material risks from a company-wide perspective.\n\nIn addition, as a risk management system framework, we regularly identify, evaluate, consolidate, implement measures against, and monitor risks based on the Toyota Global Risk Management Standard (“TGRS”), a company-wide risk management framework established by referencing frameworks such as the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and COSO (Committee for Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission).\n\nThe identified risks that are deemed significant to Toyota are deliberated by the Governance Risk Compliance Meeting, chaired by the CRO, and are referred to the Board of Directors and other relevant governing bodies, as appropriate, to promote the execution of business operations.\n\n \n\n47\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nApproach to and Initiatives Towards Human Resources\n\nBased on the philosophy that “monozukuri (manufacturing) depends on human resource development,” Toyota believes that its greatest asset is its people, and Toyota has been focusing on human resource development since its foundation. The common foundation of our human resource development consists of three pillars: Toyota’s “philosophy” (Toyota Philosophy), “skills” (Toyota Production System, or TPS), and “behavior” (Toyota Way 2020). We cultivate talent whom, under our “philosophy” of “working for the sake of others,” acquire the “skills” of TPS—which seeks to thoroughly eliminate waste and shorten lead times—and put our “philosophy” into practice through their own actions, that is, their “behavior.” We believe that the ability of such individuals to think and act autonomously in their fields strengthens our capacity to respond to changes in the operating environment.\n\n1. Governance\n\nToyota places importance on dialogue with employees in order to accurately identify issues related to human capital. In particular, the president, executive vice presidents, and other members who also serve on the Sustainability Meeting participate in the Labor-Management Council and the Joint Labor-Management Round Table Conference, which serve as opportunities to understand the voices of employees and to identify the direction for addressing human capital-related issues.\n\nAmong the issues identified, those that are deemed particularly material or that require cross-functional responses are referred to the Sustainability Meeting described in “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.B Business Overview — Toyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability — Governance” where such matters are deliberated and determined to promote “priority sustainability initiatives” relating to human capital.\n\nReference: Number of times held in fiscal 2026\n\nSustainability Meeting: 4\n\nLabor-Management Council: 4\n\nJoint Labor-Management Round Table Conference: 2\n\n \n\n48\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n2. Strategy\n\nIn advancing our transformation into a mobility company, we have identified six materiality topics (key issues) based on the perspectives of our stakeholders, including customers, local communities, business partners, and employees. Among these, under “Active Contribution by All” and “Supporting the Community & Employment,” we have identified six priority action items related to human capital.\n\n \n\nMateriality\n  \nAim\n\nActive Contribution by All\n  \nHuman Resource Development\n  \nAcquire and develop human resources who “continuously think and act for the benefit of others” based on the Toyota Philosophy\n\n  \nDialogue with employees\n  \nTranslate dialogue between the company and employees of mutual trust/responsibility into action\n\n  \nDE&I\n  \nCreate corporate culture where all people working for Toyota feel respected, and can demonstrate their uniqueness, strength, and abilities, while embracing their diverse talents and values\n\n  \nLabor Practices\n  \nContribute to the peace of mind of employees and the sustainable growth of local communities through stable employment and maintaining/improving labor conditions\n\n  \nHealth and Safety\n  \nEliminate all kinds of unsafety by fostering company-wide safety culture, while protecting the good health and well-being of employees and their families\n\nSupporting the Community & Employment\n  \nRespect for Human Rights\n  \nRespect the human rights of all people involved in our business activities\n\nWe believe that advancing initiatives in these priority action items is essential to developing the talent that will drive our future.\n\n3. Risk Management\n\nWe identify risks related to human capital through ongoing monitoring of workplace conditions via multiple communication channels—including dialogue with employees, engagement surveys, and consultation services—as well as through information gathering and benchmarking that take into account revisions to applicable laws and regulations and changes in the external environment.\n\nAmong the risks identified through these efforts, those deemed material from a company-wide perspective are escalated to management for decision-making and the consideration of responsive measures, in accordance with the process described in “Toyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability—Risk Management.”\n\n4. Metrics and Targets\n\nIn connection with the priority initiative of “Promoting Active Participation of Diverse Talent,” the table below sets forth representative metrics for TMC on an unconsolidated basis, together with the corresponding targets and results for fiscal 2026.\n\n \n\n49\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n \n \n \n\nMetrics\n  \nTarget\n \nResult (Fiscal 2026)\n \n  \n\nNumber of women in managerial positions (unconsolidated)\n  \nBy 2030, increase to five times the target set in 2014\n \n455\n(4.5 times the target set in 2014)\n \n(Note 1)\n\nRatio of eligible male employees taking childcare leave\n(unconsolidated)\n  \nAchieve an average ratio of employees taking childcare leave of 85% or above during the period from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2030\n \n79.0%\n \n(Note 2)\n\n \n\nNote 1\n  \nAs of March 31, 2026\n\nNote 2\n  \nThe ratio of eligible employees taking childcare leave is calculated based on the ratio of employees taking childcare leave under Article 71-6, Item 1 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members (Ministry of Labour Ordinance No. 25 of 1991), in accordance with the provisions of the Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members (Act No. 76 of 1991).\n\nClimate Change-related Disclosures\n\nToyota aims to establish a sustainable society in harmony with nature through contributions to the goal of carbon neutrality. Toyota addresses climate change-related impacts, risks, and opportunities guided by the principles of the “Toyota Earth Charter” and “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050,” intending to fully concentrate on achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 across the entire vehicle life cycle. Toyota intends to reduce GHG emissions through multiple approaches, including the multi-pathway strategy, driven by the principles of “leaving no one behind” and “delivering freedom of movement to all.”\n\n1. Governance\n\nThe Oversight of Climate change-related Issues by the Board of Directors\n\nToyota positions the Board of Directors as its ultimate supervisory, decision-making authority for climate change-related issues, including risks and opportunities. In order to effectively plan and execute strategies in response to social trends, we bring important climate change-related issues before the Board of Directors as they arise.\n\nResponses to climate change-related issues (including risk and opportunity assessments and management implemented more than once a year) are addressed primarily by the CN Strategy Subcommittee, with oversight by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors makes decisions based on the deliberations of each committee, including trade-offs between sustainability and climate change-related issues. The CN Strategy Subcommittee approves the formulation, review and monitoring of progress of climate change-related targets under the oversight of the Board of Directors, following deliberation by the Environmental Product Design Assessment Committee and the Consolidated Environment Committee. For details of the overall process, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.B Business Overview — Toyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability — Governance”.\n\nExamples of decisions made by the Board of Directors in 2025 include the approval to execute a comprehensive partnership agreement with the municipal government of Shanghai and the establishment of Lexus (Shanghai) New Energy Co., Ltd., which develops and manufactures BEVs and batteries, aimed at contributing to the realization of carbon neutrality in China. The new company will develop Lexus-branded BEVs, with mass production to launch in 2027 or later.\n\n \n\n50\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n2. Strategy\n\n(a) Toyota’s Strategies (Fundamental approach of Toyota’s multi-pathway strategy)\n\nCarbon neutrality is an urgent issue for cars to remain an essential part of society. Toyota is making efforts to provide our customers around the world with options for mobility under our multi-pathway strategy, while promoting the decarbonization of manufacturing and supply chains. It is important to consider the ways in which mobility takes into account the future of energy. The strategy’s basic premise is that we need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels from the perspective of the global environment and sustainability. Furthermore, over the medium- to long-term, renewable energy sources will continue to proliferate, with electricity and hydrogen emerging as the primary energy sources sustaining society. In the short term, however, it is critical to acknowledge global realities and implement changes in practical ways that maintain energy security. This is precisely why we are committed to providing mobility options that are aligned with a diverse range of energy situations and customer needs, while also keeping an eye on the future of electricity and hydrogen.\n\nThe underlying concept of our multi-pathway strategy is to achieve carbon neutrality through practical transition.\n\n(b) Identification and Assessment of Climate Change-Related Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities\n\nOverview of Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities\n\nToyota identifies factors that may impact the future based on the identified Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities (“IROs”). Toyota responds appropriately under Toyota’s strategies and transition plans. The overview of climate change-related IROs are as follows.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nImpacts: Effects that a company has on the environment and society as a result of its activities or business transactions.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nRisks\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nTransition risk: Negative impact on the company arising from the transition to a low-carbon society, such as the introduction or strengthening of climate change-related policies and the advancement of low-carbon technologies.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nPhysical risk: Negative impact on the company arising from physical climate events caused by climate change.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nOpportunities: Positive impact for the company arising from responses to market changes and technological innovation, driven by the transition to a low-carbon society and the progression of climate change.\n\nWe established a process to identify and assess climate change-related risks and opportunities using scenario analysis. We also incorporated financial impact assessments into the process to enhance the accuracy of IRO materiality.\n\nTime horizon for IRO assessment\n\n \n\n \n\n51\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nProcess of Identifying and Assessing Climate Change-Related Impacts\n\nWe analyze activities across Toyota and our value chain to identify potential environmental and social impacts. We conduct assessments on identified impacts based on severity (scale and scope of impact) and likelihood of occurrence. Scope 3 emissions account for a significant portion of Toyota’s total emissions, with category 11 representing a substantial share thereof. As they contribute significantly to climate change, reduction efforts across the entire value chain are essential. However, Scopes 1 and 2 emissions, while accounting for a small percentage, fall within the company’s direct control. This makes them important for Toyota, which has set a target under the Life Cycle Zero CO2 Emissions Challenge. For details of the Life Cycle Zero CO2 Emissions Challenge, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4B. Business Overview — Toyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability — Climate Change-related Disclosures — 2. Strategy — (c) Resilience Analysis.”\n\nProcesses for Identifying and Assessing Climate Change-related Risks and Opportunities\n\nToyota identifies and assesses climate change-related risks and opportunities and evaluates the resilience of its strategies by having an internal team of climate change experts and external specialists conduct scenario analysis based on various future society projections.\n\n \n\nIdentification and Assessment of Risks and Opportunities\n\nToyota identifies primary factors (risk drivers) for climate change-related risks and opportunities based on anticipated future social conditions from the perspectives of transition risks (policy/legislation, markets, technology, reputation) and physical risks (acute, chronic). Toyota identifies risks and opportunities by analyzing driving factors and incorporates disclosure topics defined in ISSB* industry-based guidance, as well as climate change-related risks identified through TGRS, Toyota’s cross-functional risk management system, and climate change-related risks and opportunities specified by referencing external information into risks and opportunities identified through driver analysis. Toyota examines how the likelihood and impact of risks and opportunities differ in each scenario based on the identified risk drivers. The overall materiality of each risk and opportunity is\n\n \n\n52\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\ndetermined based on a quantitative assessment of likelihood and impact as well as a qualitative assessment that takes into account factors such as corporate social responsibility and Toyota’s key issues.\n\n \n\n*\n\nInternational Sustainability Standards Board\n\nScenario Analysis Overview\n\nScenario analysis is conducted in accordance with the processes outlined in guidance provided by the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) and the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Toyota conducts 1.5°C scenario analysis to assess transition risks and opportunities as well as a 4°C scenario analysis to assess physical risks based on climate hazards.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nScope\n\nTransition risks and opportunities: Automotive business and value chains in Toyota Motor Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries\n\nPhysical risks: Toyota Motor Corporation, consolidated subsidiaries, and unconsolidated vehicle manufacturing subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nImpact assessment period\n\nTransition risks and opportunities: Up to 2035\n\nPhysical risks: Up to the late 21st century\n\n1.5°C Scenario Analysis\n\nSelection of 1.5°C Scenarios\n\nToyota uses multiple published scenarios as reference for analysis, such as the scenarios from IEA*1 and IPCC*2 AR6*3 WG3 report. Toyota envisions society’s future energy landscape as converging on electricity and hydrogen with the widespread introduction of renewable energy, and recognizes that the transition speed varies by region depending on energy conditions.\n\nAgainst the backdrop of recent global developments, discussions have begun on balancing environmental issues with economic security. There are also observable phenomena such as a slowdown in renewable energy investments due to international inflation and a stagnation in the growth trend of BEV sales in Europe and the U.S. At international forums such as the Conference of the Parties (“COP”) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, discussions are progressing on transitional measures extending into the future. There is a growing recognition of the importance of introducing diverse decarbonization methods tailored to conditions in each country and region.\n\nIn recognition of these backgrounds, our multi-pathway strategy offers mobility options tailored to energy situations in each country/region and the diverse needs of customers through a practical transition in the short term with a view toward a future in which electricity and hydrogen serve as primary energy sources underpinning society in the long term.\n\nThe 1.5°C scenario analysis for passenger vehicles considers both the IEA NZE scenario,*4 which highlights the introduction of BEVs and PHEVs as key decarbonization measures, and other 1.5°C scenarios that incorporate regional characteristics and an increased range of mitigation measures (such as CO2 removal (CDR*5), carbon capture and storage (CCS), and carbon-neutral fuels) to assess corporate strategic resilience.\n\nThe assumptions and global circumstances of each scenario are organized as follows:\n\nAccording to the IEA NZE Scenario (IEA World Energy Outlook 2025), reducing GHG emissions from the power generation sector may decrease emissions from other sectors. GHG emissions may be reduced by the\n\n \n\n53\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nwidespread adoption of BEVs in the road transport field of the transportation sector, where electrification is relatively easier. In reality, the speed of progress and timeframe of these initiatives may be delayed depending on energy conditions and policy developments in each country and region. In such cases, CDR technologies will become essential.\n\nIn other 1.5°C scenarios, concerns over energy and economic security and a decline in industrial competitiveness will cause delays in the progress of mitigation measures driven by energy conditions and policy developments in each country and region to spread globally. Furthermore, the introduction of decarbonization technologies to the market requires substantial investment in the initial stages, and differences in investment levels may lead to disparities in progress.\n\nWhile decarbonization technologies beyond electrification may be utilized with low-emission power, the expansion of biofuel usage in road transport could be limited by the food-versus-fuel dilemma and variations in supply volume caused by land-use restrictions to protect the environment. A slower pace of reduction for GHG emissions will inevitably lead to an overshoot in temperature rise, making it necessary to assume the later large-scale and extensive deployment of CDR technologies compared to the NZE scenario.\n\n \n\n*1\n\nInternational Energy Agency\n\n \n\n*2\n\nIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\n\n \n\n*3\n\nSixth Assessment Report\n\n \n\n*4\n\nNet Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario\n\n \n\n*5\n\nCarbon Dioxide Removal\n\nStudy on the IEA NZE Scenario\n\nThe IEA reports that the following is required to accomplish the NZE scenario. The shift of passenger vehicles to BEVs will progress as electricity is decarbonized with the active introduction of renewable energy, leading to a sharp reduction in GHG emissions after 2030 and the achievement of net zero emissions, including emissions from owned vehicles by 2050. To achieve this goal, it is assumed that governments around the world will introduce ambitious climate policies such as carbon pricing, tighter fuel efficiency standards, and bans on the sale of vehicles with internal combustion engines, along with expanded incentives to support the growth of BEVs. BEVs will become more widely accepted in the market as consumer awareness of the environment grows and stronger policies are put in place, along with technological advancements in vehicle electrification, development of innovative batteries, and energy management systems powered by renewable power. The societal shift towards electrification and renewable energy will suppress energy consumption with improvements in efficiency. For fossil fuels in hard-to-electrify sectors and delays in transitioning to electrification and renewable energy, carbon removal from the atmosphere via CDR technology is necessary. In the IEA World Energy Outlook prior to 2023, the use of CDR technology was not assumed in the NZE scenario. However, the 2024 edition reports that it will be necessary, and the 2025 edition indicates even greater use is required. The transition risks and societal challenges associated with the achievement of this scenario are as set forth below.\n\nTransition risks associated with this scenario:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nFines or other penalties imposed for non-compliance with fuel efficiency, GHG, or ZEV regulations.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nRamp-down of production and decrease in units sold caused by sudden product changes to comply with regulations.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nIncrease in R&D costs in response to developments in powertrain technology.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nSupply shortages and rising procurement costs due to increased demand for feedstocks related to BEVs.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nIncrease in manufacturing costs due to the surge in renewable electricity prices.\n\n \n\n54\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThe following challenges must be addressed to accomplish this scenario:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nFormulation of government policies and active investment to promote the introduction of renewable energy.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nCreation of social systems to secure the supply of battery feedstocks and development of recycling technologies.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nInnovating and reducing the costs of decarbonization technologies that use electricity and hydrogen.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nDevelopment of charging infrastructure accompanying the widespread adoption of electric vehicles.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nAn increase of cost burdens associated with the introduction of decarbonization and CDR technologies\n\nStudies on Other 1.5°C Scenarios\n\nIn addition to the IEA NZE scenario, multiple 1.5ºC scenarios published by the IPCC and various research institutions are compared and examined in detail to analyze differences in energy conditions and policy developments across countries and regions. The pathway toward achieving the 1.5°C target set out in the Paris Agreement is as follows.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nEnergy sector:\n\nIntroduction of various technologies, such as CCS, in addition to the use of renewable energy and the adoption of low-carbon and carbon-neutral fuels, such as biofuels and synthetic fuels.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nTransportation sector:\n\nIn addition to vehicle electrification, efforts also include the use of fuel-efficient vehicles and the adoption of low-carbon and carbon-neutral fuels such as biofuels and synthetic fuels.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nDifferences between countries and regions:\n\nRenewable energy sources, such as biomass, are utilized to their fullest extent depending on conditions in each country and region. During the transition period, the aim is to balance economic development and carbon-neutral by also using fossil fuel combined with CCUS* technologies. With the advancement of diverse energy infrastructure such as low-carbon fuels and carbon-neutral fuels, various energy sources and powertrains are selected based on their respective convenience.\n\n* Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage\n\nTransition Risks Associated with the Aforementioned Scenarios:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nTransition risks associated with the enhancement of BEVs are similar to those stated in the IEA NZE scenario; however, their impact on Toyota’s strategy and finances will be relatively small, considering the current track record of BEV adoption in each country and region and reviews of their policies.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nDelays in the adoption of low-carbon fuels and carbon-neutral fuels such as biofuels and synthetic fuels.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nIncrease in R&D costs associated with the diversification of automotive fuels.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nIncrease in energy procurement costs due to the decarbonization of energy sources such as gas and liquid fuels, in addition to electricity.\n\nSocial Challenges Toward Achieving Scenarios are More Diverse Compared to the IEA NZE Scenario:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nDeveloping technologies for low-carbon and carbon-neutral fuels, such as hydrogen, biofuels, and synthetic fuels, adapted to each country and region, and support in the early stage of introduction\n\n \n\n55\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n•\n \n\nSolving issues such as the food versus fuel dilemma related to biofuels and curbing the rise in fuel prices\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nEnsuring the supply of low-carbon fuels and carbon-neutral fuels through collaboration with other sectors\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nDevelopment of infrastructure and aid policies to ensure a stable supply of energy\n\nRisks and Opportunity Trade-Offs in the 1.5°C Scenario\n\nWhile electrification presents opportunities in relation to sales, it also brings risks such as increased R&D expenses and higher raw material procurement costs.\n\n4°C Scenario Analysis\n\nSelection of 4°C Scenarios\n\nWe selected IPCC AR6 WG1 SSP5-8.5 as the reference scenario for the 4°C scenario analysis. The IPCC SSP5-8.5 is the highest emission scenario that represents a fossil fuel-dependent economic development path without the implementation of climate policies, resulting in the occurrence of extremely frequent and severe physical climate events. We assessed the resilience of our business activities by conducting analyses under this scenario.\n\nStudies on the 4°C Scenario\n\nWe consider that major physical risks under this scenario include the following:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nSuspended production and sales resulting from supply chain disruptions caused by more frequent and severe natural disasters.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nImpacts on production caused by water shortage and higher water costs.\n\nWe conducted the below screenings of high-risk sites:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nScreened high-risk sites for flooding hazards, such as river flooding, inland flooding, and storm surges, using geographical coordinates for 137 business locations in Japan and 73 locations overseas.\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nIdentified sites in and outside of Japan where future hazard grades have been changed as a result of climate change and are evaluated as hazard grade B or higher, requiring attention to risks.\n\nAs a result of our risk analysis, we confirmed that some business sites are at risk for river flooding, inland flooding, and storm surges, but the impact is slight.\n\nDefinition of Hazard Grade\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n56\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nResults of Physical Risk Screening\n\n \n\n \n\nEfforts to Minimize Risk\n\nTo minimize physical risks, Toyota is undertaking various initiatives, including selection of locations for new plants, taking water risk into account, taking measures based on the results of water risk assessments, continuous revisions of BCP*1 based on experience from past disasters as well as the initiatives related to BCM*2, including the supply chain.\n\n \n\n*1\n\nBusiness Continuity Plan. A plan for companies to minimize damage and ensure business continuity and recovery when emergencies such as disasters occur\n\n*2\n\nBusiness Continuity Management. A framework for operational management that ensures each countermeasure plan defined in the BCP functions can be executed\n\nFinancial Impact Assessments\n\nToyota analyzes causal links between identified risks and opportunities and their financial impacts. Toyota assesses relationships with management themes, such as mobility concepts related to identified risks and opportunities and priority sustainability initiatives, to confirm the materiality of these risks and opportunities. In addition, Toyota assesses the financial impacts of identified high-priority risks and opportunities in light of the assumptions of each scenario.\n\n \n\n57\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n\n \n\n58\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n(c)\n\nResilience Analysis\n\nStrategies and Business Models for Addressing Material IROs\n\nWe recognized that the material IROs specified through the aforementioned process assessment have a significant impact on Toyota. Under the multi-pathway strategy, we incorporate measures to address these IROs into the transition plan and others, and secure resources to address these responses.\n\nTransition Plan\n\nWe announced the “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050” in October 2015, prior to the Paris Agreement. We established the “Life Cycle Zero CO2 Emissions Challenge,” “New Vehicle Zero CO2 Emissions Challenge,” and “Plant Zero CO2 Emissions Challenge” to clarify our long-term climate change objectives. The “8th Toyota Environmental Action Plan” sets specific reduction targets for each emission scope in the medium term. We have set our reduction targets for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 category 11 with reference to and in line with criteria established by SBTi*1; however, such targets are not set forth in this annual report based upon the authority of or in reliance upon SBTi as experts with respect to such targets.\n\nWe support the Paris Agreement and under these GHG reduction targets, we intend to fully concentrate on achieving the 2050 Carbon Neutrality by advancing a multi-pathway strategy. We formulated a transition plan that organizes reduction initiatives and other measures aimed at achieving targets. This plan is recognized as crucial for Toyota to address climate change-related risks and opportunities, and is integrated into management plans such as sales plans and the midterm business plan.\n\nThe transition plan is developed around key emission scopes and includes initiatives Toyota considers important for contributing to carbon neutrality. We set primary reduction initiatives as reduction levers for each emissions scope. Under these levers, we implement specific emission reduction measures and manage the progress of our efforts. The transition plan considers the assumptions of the 1.5°C scenario referenced in the scenario analysis.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n*1\n\nScience Based Targets initiative. An initiative established by the CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)\n\n \n\n59\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nResilience Analysis\n\nThe strategic resilience of the multi-pathway strategy is verified through scenario analysis.\n\n1.5°C Scenario Analysis Results\n\nThe scenario analysis has revealed a variety of pathways to achieve the 1.5°C target aligned with the Paris Agreement, each accompanied by specific conditions and social challenges. With our global reach, we have reaffirmed the validity of focusing on our multi-pathway strategy, which includes various measures and technologies capable of addressing uncertainties to respond to global market and stakeholder demands, rather than specializing in or adhering to a single policy or technology.\n\n4°C Scenario Analysis Results\n\nThrough the scenario analysis, some domestic and overseas sites are facing risks for river flooding, inland flooding, and storm surges, but the impact is estimated to be slight. Disaster drills and other means for improvements through PDCA cycles have proven to enhance the effectiveness of BCP and accelerate the speed of recovery after a disaster. We have positioned these activities as BCM and are promoting it as a collaborative framework between employees and their families, the Toyota Group and suppliers, and Toyota Motor Corporation.\n\nResults from Resilience Analysis\n\nGuided by the philosophy of being the “best-in-town,” we will continue to provide a lineup of vehicles that are well-received by customers and adaptable to different economic and energy situations in order to contribute to the development of each country and region. We will strive to reduce GHG emissions by utilizing existing infrastructure and assets. Toyota’s multi-pathway strategy has proven to be highly resilient in all of the scenarios presented.\n\nAs indicated in the IPCC assessment reports and other publications, there are multiple paths available to achieve the 1.5°C target as set out in the Paris Agreement. These paths can vary depending on local energy conditions and government policy, requiring the involvement of various industries and making collaboration with partners, including encouraging the use of carbon-neutral fuels, crucial. We stand with the Paris Agreement and take action to achieve its goals. We prioritize alignment with the Paris Agreement and work with our partners to promote the development of vehicles and social infrastructure based on our mobility concept, intending to fully concentrate on achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.\n\nAs the landscape changes, we will continue to conduct scenario analyses to reassess risks and opportunities, and reflect the responses to them into our strategies to further strengthen our resilience.\n\n3. Risk Management\n\nLinks Between Company-Wide Risk Management and Climate Change-Related Risk Management Processes\n\nRecognizing that the risks and opportunities present in climate change are key management concerns, we conduct scenario analyses based on the TCFD recommendations to identify risks and opportunities and assess the resilience of our business activities. Utilizing tools such as the TGRS, a company-wide risk management system designed by Toyota based on ISO standards and the COSO framework, we identify a broad range of risks related to our global business activities. When necessary, we establish cross-company task forces to promote risk management while monitoring the progress of countermeasures.\n\nRisks are assessed based on the magnitude of impact and vulnerabilities. By setting a specific time horizon, we can clarify actual and strategic impacts on our businesses.\n\nThe magnitude of impact is rated on a five-grade scale for each of the following factors: finance, reputation, violation of laws and regulations, and business continuity. Vulnerability is assessed based on the current status of\n\n \n\n60\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\ncountermeasures and probability of occurrence. Risk owners are assigned for the key risks assessed by region, function (such as production and sales) and product based on the above perspectives. Chief Officers of divisions and in-house company presidents oversee initiatives, while at the working level, relevant measures are implemented and monitored under the instructions of divisional General Managers.\n\nIn addition to the aforementioned TGRS, climate change-related risks and opportunities are reviewed by relevant executives and divisions in charge, and the status of the response is monitored and reviewed. Toyota actively works to identify a wide range of risks and opportunities stemming from environmental issues, regularly reviews the validity of strategies such as the “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050” and promotes activities to boost competitiveness.\n\nCurrent and future GHG emissions from vehicles, production and sales operations, and supply chains are calculated and assessed in line with relevant science-based emission reduction pathways. Important risks and opportunities that require prompt responses are deliberated at the Governance Risk Compliance Meeting and reported to the Board of Directors to determine the course of action.\n\n4. Metrics and Targets\n\nMedium- and Long-Term Target Structure\n\nToyota has systematically formulated its vision and targets for the environmental issues in order to realize its mission of coexistence of humanity and the earth as well as the mass production of happiness. We share and collaboratively promote “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050” as our long-term vision, and the “8th Toyota Environmental Action Plan” as our medium-term target, with Carbon Neutrality (CN), Circular Economy (CE), and Nature Positive (NP) prioritized as our major pillars. For details on the transition plan, including medium- and long-term targets, please refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4B. Business Overview — Toyota’s Approach to and Initiatives Towards Sustainability — Climate Change-related Disclosures — 2. Strategy — (c) Resilience Analysis”\n\n \n\n \n\nReview of the “7th Toyota Environmental Action Plan (2025 Target)”\n\nToyota promoted the “7th Toyota Environmental Action Plan (2025 Target)”, a five-year action plan to achieve the “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050.”\n\n \n\n61\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n62\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThe “8th Toyota Environmental Action Plan (2030 Target)”\n\nToward the realization of “Toyota Environmental Challenge 2050,” we have formulated the “8th Toyota Environmental Action Plan (2030 target),” a new five-year action plan, and begun its implementation in April 2026. Based on the three pillars that Toyota has long prioritized—Carbon Neutrality (CN), Circular Economy (CE), and Nature Positive (NP)—we have developed specific targets for 17 categories. In 10 overseas countries and regions (North America, Europe, China, Asia, India, South America, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea), regional 2030 targets have been formulated in line with this.\n\n \n\n \n\nDisclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934\n\nNone.\n\nResearch and Development\n\nThe overriding goals of Toyota’s technology and product development activities are to minimize the negative aspects of vehicles, such as traffic accidents and impact on the environment, and maximize the positive aspects, such as driving pleasure, comfort and convenience. By achieving these sometimes-conflicting goals to a high degree, Toyota seeks to open the door to the automobile society of the future. To ensure efficient progress in research and development activities, Toyota coordinates and integrates all research and development phases, from basic research and advanced research to forward-looking technology and product development. With respect to long-term basic research in areas such as energy, the environment, information technology, telecommunications and materials, projects are regularly reviewed and evaluated in consultation with outside experts to achieve research and development cost control. With respect to forward-looking, leading-edge technology and product development, Toyota establishes cost-performance benchmarks on a project-by-project basis to ensure efficient development investment.\n\n \n\n63\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nThe chart below provides an overview of Toyota’s R&D at each phase.\n\n \n\nBasic research\n\n  \n\nPhase to discover development theme\n\nResearch on basic vehicle-related technology\n\nForward-looking and leading-edge technology development\n\n  \n\nPhase requiring technological breakthroughs such as components and systems\n\nDevelopment of leading-edge components and systems that are more advanced than those of competitors\n\nProduct development\n\n  \n\nPhase mainly for development of new models\n\nDevelopment of all-new models and existing-model upgrades\n\nWith a focus on environmentally friendly, carbon-neutral and safe-vehicle technology, Toyota is promoting research and development into the early commercialization of next generation environmentally friendly, energy- efficient and safe-vehicle technology. Toyota is also moving forward with the development of innovative technologies such as electrification, connected vehicles and automated driving so as to realize a mobility society of the future that enables everyone to enjoy freedom of movement beyond the conventional concept of vehicles. To this end, Toyota is focusing on the following areas:\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nfurther improvements in hybrid technologies, including in functions and cost, and contributions to the environment through advancements;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nimprovement in internal combustion engine fuel economy technology as well as improvement in technology in connection with more stringent emission standards;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\ndevelopment of BEVs, FCEVs and other alternative fuel vehicles;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\ndevelopment of advanced safety technology designed to promote driving and vehicle safety;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\ndevelopment of automated driving technologies;\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\nconnected car technologies; and\n\n \n\n \n•\n \n\ndevelopment of technology to bring about more comfortable movement.\n\nFor a detailed discussion of our research and development infrastructure, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — 5.C Research and Development, Patents and Licenses.”\n\nComponents and Parts, Raw Materials and Sources of Supply\n\nToyota purchases parts, components, raw materials, equipment and other supplies from multiple competing suppliers located around the world. Toyota works closely with its suppliers to pursue optimal procurement. Toyota believes that this policy encourages technological innovation, cost reduction and other measures to strengthen its vehicle competitiveness. Although there are supply restrictions with respect to the procurement of certain parts and components, Toyota plans to continue purchases based on the same principle.\n\nBecause Toyota had more than 50 overseas operations in 27 countries and regions as of March 31, 2026, procurement of parts and components is being carried out not only locally in the country of the production site but also from third countries. As a result, the distribution network has become increasingly complex. In order to realize timely and efficient distribution while minimizing costs, Toyota is promoting efforts to optimize each stage of the supply chain. To this end, Toyota has developed a standardized system of global distribution and is supporting the operation of the system at each production base. The use of the global distribution system aims at implementing parts procurement that meets changes in vehicle production in a timely manner. These varying efforts, combined together, have led to maximized customer satisfaction, as well as to building a good working relationship with Toyota’s suppliers.\n\nToyota aims to share information and collaborate among the procurement divisions in each of the regions throughout the world in order to procure parts and materials from the most competitive suppliers among Toyota\n\n \n\n64\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nfactories located in various areas worldwide. At the same time, Toyota carries out streamlining efforts together with suppliers in each country in order to achieve sustainable growth. Toyota has been working on cost reduction measures, referred to as RR-CI (ryohin-renka, or cost innovation) and VA (value analysis) activities, which aims to eliminate waste in all processes from design to production while ensuring the reliability and safety of each part. Through these activities, Toyota focuses on “developing a real cost-competitive structure” by working together with suppliers.\n\nIn response to a significant upward trend in materials costs, including related logistics and other costs, since fiscal 2022, Toyota is accelerating initiatives such as the replacement of raw materials with those that are less subject to price pressure and reduction of raw material usage.\n\nIntellectual Property\n\nThrough its ongoing challenge to be one step ahead in conducting new research and development, Toyota has enhanced its product appeal and technological prowess, which have been serving as the source of the company’s competitiveness. At the core of Toyota’s products created through this research and development always lies intellectual property, including invention, know-how and brands. This intellectual property functions as Toyota’s important management resources. By protecting and utilizing our intellectual property in an appropriate manner, we will continue to contribute to society.\n\nToward the realization of a future mobility society, Toyota is carrying out intellectual property activities in line with management priorities.\n\nFor example, we are focusing resources on such areas as carbon neutrality, including the development of electrified vehicles and batteries, and on software and connected initiatives, including connected and automated driving technologies. We are also reinforcing efforts to obtain and utilize intellectual property licenses in such areas to strengthen our future competitiveness.\n\nAs for the intellectual property activities framework, having established intellectual property functions at the R&D centers in Japan, the United States, Europe and China, Toyota supports technology development globally by securing organic, systematic coordination between R&D activities and intellectual property activities. Working in concert with approximately 110 law firms around the world, we also collect intellectual property information and take measures suitable for any intellectual property disputes that may arise in specific countries or regions. To enhance activities that incorporate management, R&D and intellectual property in one, Toyota has an Intellectual Property Management Committee. The members of the Committee discuss and make decisions concerning obtaining and utilizing important intellectual property conducive to management and for responding to management risks related to intellectual property.\n\nIn 2025, Toyota filed approximately 19,000 patent applications domestically and internationally. In Japan, based on the ranking published by IP Force, Toyota was ranked 1st among companies and 1st among automobile manufacturers that year in terms of the number of patent registrations as of December 31, 2025. In the United States, based on the ranking published by IFI CLAIMS, Toyota was ranked 8th among companies and 1st among automobile manufacturers that year in terms of the number of patent registrations as of December 31, 2025.\n\n \n\n65\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nCapital Expenditures and Divestitures\n\nSet forth below is a chart of Toyota’s principal capital expenditures between April 1, 2023 and March 31, 2026, the approximate total costs of such activity, as well as the location and method of financing of such activity, presented on a “by subsidiary” basis and as reported in Toyota’s annual Japanese securities report filed with the director of the Kanto Local Finance Bureau.\n\n \n\nDescription of Activity\n\n  \nTotal Cost\n(Yen in billions)\n \n  \nLocation\n \n  \n\nPrimary\nMethod of\nFinancing\n\nJapan\n\n  \n\n  \n\n  \n\nInvestment primarily in technology and products by\nToyota Motor Corporation\n\n  \n\n \n\n1,915.2\n\n \n\n  \n\n \n\nJapan\n\n \n\n  \n\nInternal funds, financing from issuance of bonds, etc.\n\nInvestment primarily in technology and products by\nPrime Planet Energy & Solutions, Inc.\n\n  \n \n168.5\n \n  \n \nJapan\n \n  \n\nBorrowing\n\nInvestment primarily in technology and products by\nToyota Auto Body Co., Ltd.\n\n  \n \n102.8\n \n  \n \nJapan\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in technology and products by\nToyota Motor Kyushu, Inc.\n\n  \n \n86.5\n \n  \n \nJapan\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nOutside of Japan\n\n  \n\n  \n\n  \n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Battery Manufacturing, Inc.\n\n  \n \n730.6\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Motor Thailand Co., Ltd.\n\n  \n \n290.1\n \n  \n \nThailand\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.\n\n  \n \n221.4\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.\n\n  \n \n184.0\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing Canada, Inc.\n\n  \n \n170.9\n \n  \n \nCanada\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing De Guanajuato, S.A. de\nC.V.\n\n  \n \n152.6\n \n  \n \nMexico\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by\nToyota do Brazil LTDA.\n\n  \n \n130.6\n \n  \n \nBrazil\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by Toyota Motor Technical Center (China) Co., Ltd.\n\n  \n \n113.0\n \n  \n \nChina\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, Inc.\n\n  \n \n102.9\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily to promote localization by Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA.\n\n  \n \n96.4\n \n  \n \nBelgium\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in leased automobiles by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation\n\n  \n \n\n7,032.5\n\n \n\n  \n \n\nUnited States\n\n \n\n  \nInternal funds, financing from issuance of bonds, etc.\n\n \n\n66\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nSet forth below is information with respect to Toyota’s material plans to construct, expand or improve its facilities between April 2026 and March 2027, presented on a “by subsidiary” basis and as reported in Toyota’s annual Japanese securities report filed with the director of the Kanto Local Finance Bureau.\n\n \n\nDescription of Activity\n\n  \nTotal Cost\n(Yen in billions)\n \n  \nLocation\n \n  \n\nPrimary\nMethod of\nFinancing\n\nJapan\n\n  \n\n  \n\n  \n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Motor Corporation\n\n  \n \n850.0\n \n  \n \nJapan\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nOutside of Japan\n\n  \n\n  \n\n  \n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc\n\n  \n \n260.9\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Kirloskar Motor Private Ltd.\n\n  \n \n128.9\n \n  \n \nIndia\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.\n\n  \n \n119.1\n \n  \n \nUnited States\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Motor Europe NV/SA\n\n  \n \n107.5\n \n  \n \nBelgium\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nInvestment primarily in manufacturing facilities by\nToyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc.\n\n  \n \n70.8\n \n  \n \nCanada\n \n  \nInternal funds\n\nToyota does not collect information on the amount of expenditures already paid for each plant under construction because Toyota believes that it is difficult and it would require unreasonable effort or expense to identify and categorize each expenditure item with reasonable accuracy as past and future expenditures. Toyota’s construction projects consist of numerous expenditures, each of which is continually being adjusted and incurred in variable and constantly changing amounts as part of the overall work-in-progress.\n\nSeasonality\n\nToyota does not consider its seasonality material in the sense of significantly higher sales during any certain period of the year as compared to other periods of the year.\n\nLegal Proceedings\n\nToyota and other automakers are subject to certain class actions relating to Takata airbag issues. The actions against Toyota are being litigated in Brazil and Argentina.\n\nToyota is named as a defendant in an economic loss class action lawsuit in Australia in which damages are claimed on the basis that diesel particulate filters in certain vehicle models are defective. On April 7, 2022, March 27, 2023, and November 6, 2024, Toyota received unfavorable judgments in the court of first instance, the Federal Court of Australia, and the High Court of Australia, respectively. The judgments included a finding that there was a perceived reduction in vehicle value of certain vehicle models. However, the High Court remanded the case to the court of first instance for further proceedings to determine the specific calculation of the reduction in vehicle value. Other claims of economic loss in this class action lawsuit continue to be litigated at the court of first instance. In calculating the provision we should record in the consolidated financial statements as a result of the aforementioned judgments, Toyota has considered various factors including the legal and factual circumstances of the case, the contents of the judgment of the court of first instance and the Federal Court of Australia, and the views of legal counsel. The currently estimated probable economic outflow related to the class action is immaterial to Toyota’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. At this stage, however, the final outcome and therefore ultimate financial liability for Toyota on account of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty.\n\n \n\n67\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nIn April 2020, Toyota reported possible anti-bribery violations related to a Thai subsidiary to the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and cooperated with these investigations. In June 2025, the DOJ and SEC informed Toyota that they had closed their investigations into the matter.\n\nOn March 4, 2022, Hino, a Japanese company that produces and sells commercial trucks and buses, and of which Toyota owns 66.16% of the voting interests as of March 31, 2026, disclosed that it had voluntarily commenced an investigation into potential issues regarding emissions performance and certification in the North American and Japanese markets, and that it has reported such issues to and is cooperating with the relevant authorities. Hino announced that, through such investigation, it identified past misconduct in relation to its applications for certification concerning the emissions and the fuel economy performance of certain of its engines for the Japanese market. In Japan, Hino was subject to an on-site inspection from the MLIT, and received a corrective action order from it. From October 7, 2022 to May 22, 2024, Hino submitted recurrence prevention reports to the MLIT. The MLIT has also revoked certain of the “type approvals” (that is, approvals that exempt new vehicles or vehicles with certain equipment from individual testing by government inspectors prior to sale) and the fuel consumption ratings relating to certain engine models. Hino has also further agreed to compensate certain of its customers in Japan for certain additional motor vehicle taxes that have become payable on account of the misconduct, as well as in connection with vehicles with engines with respect to which there were fuel efficiency problems. The investigation by Hino’s special investigation committee for engines for the Japanese market has been completed; however, some verification, investigations and communications with related parties are still ongoing.\n\nIn Canada, Hino and certain of its subsidiaries were sued in a putative class action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, on October 19, 2023, and a similar lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of Quebec, Canada. Hino entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs on November 13, 2024, and received final approval of the Supreme Court of British Columbia on May 6, 2025 (local time), as well as final approval of the Superior Court of Quebec on June 2, 2025 (local time).\n\nWith respect to the United States, a lawsuit naming Hino and certain of its subsidiaries as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit was filed at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida claiming damages related to Hino’s vehicles sold in the U.S. from 2004 to 2021, was filed at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 5, 2022 (local time). Hino entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff on October 25, 2023 and received final approval of the court on April 1, 2024 (local time). In addition, the DOJ and other U.S. agencies commenced an investigation with respect to potential violations of relevant laws and regulations regarding the certification of certain of Hino’s engines for the U.S. market. On January 16, 2025, Hino reached an agreement with the DOJ to resolve its criminal investigation into engine emissions certification testing and performance issues in the U.S. market, which became effective on March 19, 2025. Hino and its U.S. subsidiaries also reached a consolidated civil resolution with U.S. federal and California government authorities to resolve their civil investigations into the issues, which became effective on May 21, 2025.\n\nIn these resolutions, Hino agreed to the payment of criminal and civil penalties. In addition, Hino has started the implementation of measures for the engines in the market and a project for reducing environmental burdens. Furthermore, Hino has extended warranties for vehicles in the wake of the settlement in the class action lawsuit filed in the U.S., the civil settlement with the U.S. authorities, and the settlement in the class action lawsuit filed in Canada.\n\nIn addition, on April 17, 2023, a lawsuit against Hino and its subsidiaries as defendants in a representative action lawsuit has also been filed in Australia as a class action lawsuit. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs claimed that they had suffered loss and damage resulting from alleged misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to non-compliance of the affected vehicles with emissions standards and fuel efficiency standards. Hino entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff on February 14, 2025, and received final approval of the court on July 18, 2025.\n\n \n\n68\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nIn New Zealand, Hino and local distributors which have no capital ties with Hino were sued in a class action in the High Court of New Zealand on March 3, 2025 (local time). Hino entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs on February 9, 2026.\n\nFor the year ended March 31, 2025, Toyota recorded ¥281,140 million in costs and expenses related to the Hino certification issues described above. This amount covers costs associated with the aforementioned resolutions with the U.S. authorities, the settlement of the class action litigation in Canada, and the legal settlement in Australia, to the extent that Toyota can reasonably estimate them based on available information.\n\nHino ceased to be a consolidated subsidiary of Toyota as a result of its business integration with Mitsubishi Fuso Truck and Bus Corporation (“MFTBC”) effective April 1, 2026.\n\nSimilar lawsuits have been filed, and may be filed in the future. Investigations by governmental authorities, as well as civil litigation, related to these matters could result in the imposition of further civil or criminal penalties, fines or other sanctions, damages awards, or other consequences. Except as stated above, Toyota cannot predict the scope, duration, or outcome of these matters described above at this time.\n\nToyota also has various other pending legal actions and claims, including without limitation personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits and claims in the United States, as well as intellectual property litigation, and is subject to government investigations from time to time.\n\nBeyond the amounts accrued with respect to all aforementioned matters, Toyota is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss, if any, for the pending legal matters because (i) many of the proceedings are in evidence gathering stages, (ii) significant factual issues need to be resolved, (iii) the legal theory or nature of the claims is unclear, (iv) the outcome of future motions or appeals is unknown and/or (v) the outcomes of other matters of these types vary widely and do not appear sufficiently similar to offer meaningful guidance. Therefore, for all of the aforementioned matters, which Toyota is in discussions to resolve, any losses that are beyond the amounts accrued could have an adverse effect on Toyota’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.\n\n4.C ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE\n\nAs of March 31, 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation had 216 domestic subsidiaries and 386 foreign subsidiaries. The following table sets forth for each of Toyota Motor Corporation’s principal subsidiaries, the country of incorporation and the percentage ownership interest and the voting interest held by Toyota Motor Corporation.\n\n \n\nName of Subsidiary\n\n  \nCountry of\nIncorporation\n  \nPercentage\nOwnership\nInterest\n \n  \nPercentage\nVoting\nInterest\n \n\n \n  \n \n  \n%\n \n  \n%\n \n\nHino Motors, Ltd.*1\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n71.92\n \n  \n \n66.16\n \n\nPrime Planet Energy & Solutions, Inc.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n51.00\n \n  \n \n51.00\n \n\nToyota Financial Services Corporation\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nDaihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Finance Corporation\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Auto Body Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Kyushu, Inc.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor East Japan, Inc.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nWoven by Toyota, Inc.\n\n  \nJapan\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor North America, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Credit Corporation\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\n \n\n69\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nName of Subsidiary\n\n  \nCountry of\nIncorporation\n  \nPercentage\nOwnership\nInterest\n \n  \nPercentage\nVoting\nInterest\n \n\n \n  \n \n  \n%\n \n  \n%\n \n\nWoven Capital, L.P.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Battery Manufacturing, Inc.\n\n  \nUnited States\n  \n \n90.00\n \n  \n \n90.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc.\n\n  \nCanada\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Europe NV/SA\n\n  \nBelgium\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V.\n\n  \nNetherlands\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd.\n\n  \nUnited Kingdom\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing Turkey Inc.\n\n  \nTurkey\n  \n \n90.00\n \n  \n \n90.00\n \n\nGuangqi Toyota Engine Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nChina\n  \n \n70.00\n \n  \n \n70.00\n \n\nToyota Motor (China) Investment Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nChina\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Finance (China) Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nChina\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nLexus Electrified Shanghai Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nChina\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.\n\n  \nSingapore\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Leasing (Thailand) Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nThailand\n  \n \n90.00\n \n  \n \n90.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Thailand Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nThailand\n  \n \n86.43\n \n  \n \n86.43\n \n\nToyota Motor Asia (Thailand) Co., Ltd.\n\n  \nThailand\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd.\n\n  \nAustralia\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota Finance Australia Ltd.\n\n  \nAustralia\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\nToyota do Brasil Ltda.\n\n  \nBrazil\n  \n \n100.00\n \n  \n \n100.00\n \n\n \n\n*1 \n\nHino ceased to be a consolidated subsidiary of Toyota as a result of its business integration with MFTBC effective April 1, 2026.\n\n4.D PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT\n\nAs of March 31, 2026, Toyota and its affiliated companies produced automobiles and related components through more than 50 overseas manufacturing organizations in 27 countries and regions besides Japan. The facilities are located principally in Japan, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Turkey, Czech Republic, Poland, Thailand, China, Taiwan, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Argentina and Brazil.\n\nIn addition to its manufacturing facilities, Toyota’s properties include sales offices and other sales facilities in major cities, repair service facilities and research and development facilities.\n\nThe following table sets forth information, as of March 31, 2026, with respect to Toyota’s principal properties and facilities that are owned by Toyota Motor Corporation or its subsidiaries. However, small portions, all under approximately 20%, of some facilities are on leased premises.\n\n \n\nFacility or Subsidiary Name\n\n \n\nLocation\n\n \nLand Area\n(thousands\nof square\nmeters)\n \nNumber of\nEmployees\n \n\nPrincipal\nProducts or\nFunctions\n\nJapan (Toyota Motor Corporation)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nToyota Technical Center\nShimoyama\n\n \nToyota City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n5,947\n  \n \n \n1,941\n   \n \nResearch and Development\n\nTahara Plant\n\n \nTahara City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n4,029\n \n \n \n6,564\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Head Office and Technical\nCenter\n\n \nToyota City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n2,725\n \n \n \n23,479\n \n \nResearch and Development\n\nHigashi-Fuji Technical Center\n\n \nSusono City, Shizuoka Pref\n \n \n2,719\n \n \n \n2,516\n \n \nResearch and Development\n\nMotomachi Plant\n\n \nToyota City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n1,575\n \n \n \n8,035\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nTakaoka Plant\n\n \nToyota City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n1,305\n \n \n \n4,337\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\n \n\n70\n\n##### Table of Contents\n\nFacility or Subsidiary Name\n\n \n\nLocation\n\n \nLand Area\n(thousands\nof square\nmeters)\n \nNumber of\nEmployees\n \n\nPrincipal\nProducts or\nFunctions\n\nHonsha Plant\n\n \nToyota City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n623\n \n \n \n1,893\n \n \nAutomobile parts\n\nMyochi Plant\n\n \nMiyoshi City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n555\n \n \n \n1,443\n \n \nAutomobile parts\n\nShimoyama Plant\n\n \nMiyoshi City, Aichi Pref.\n \n \n474\n \n \n \n814\n \n \nAutomobile parts\n\nToyota Woven City\n\n \nSusono City, Shizuoka\n \n \n263\n \n \n \n8\n \n \nResearch and Development\n\nJapan (Subsidiaries)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDaihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.\n\n \nIkeda City, Osaka, etc.\n \n \n7,721\n \n \n \n11,143\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nHino Motors, Ltd.*1\n\n \nHino City, Tokyo, etc.\n \n \n5,795\n \n \n \n11,622\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Auto Body Co., Ltd.\n\n \nKariya City, Aichi Pref., etc.\n \n \n2,118\n \n \n \n11,915\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nTOYOTA Mobility Tokyo Inc.\n\n \nMinato-ku, Tokyo, etc.\n \n \n403\n \n \n \n6,391\n \n \nSales facilities\n\nPrime Planet Energy & Solutions, Inc.\n\n \nChuo-ku, Tokyo, etc.\n \n \n300\n \n \n \n4,299\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nOutside Japan (Subsidiaries)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nToyota Battery Manufacturing, Inc.\n\n \nNorth Carolina, U.S.A.\n \n \n7,400\n \n \n \n2,675\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, De Guanajuato, S.A. de C.V.\n\n \nGuanajuato, Mexico\n \n \n6,091\n \n \n \n2,823\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc.\n\n \nKentucky, U.S.A.\n \n \n5,161\n \n \n \n9,636\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Motor Manufacturing Canada, Inc.\n\n \nOntario, Canada\n \n \n4,752\n \n \n \n8,298\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\nToyota Motor Thailand Co., Ltd.\n\n \nSamutprakarn, Thailand\n \n \n4,414\n \n \n \n7,463\n \n \nAutomobiles\n\n \n\n*1 \n\nHino ceased to be a consolidated subsidiary of Toyota as a result of the business integration with MFTBC effective April 1, 2026.\n\nToyota is constantly engaged in upgrading, modernizing and revamping the operations of its manufacturing facilities based on its assessment of market needs and prospects. To respond flexibly to fluctuations in demand in each of its production operations throughout the world, Toyota continually reviews and implements appropriate production measures such as revising take time and adjusting days of operation. As a result, Toyota believes it would require unreasonable effort to track the exact productive capacity and the extent of utilization of each of its manufacturing facilities with a reasonable degree of accuracy.\n\nAs of March 31, 2026, property, plant and equipment having a net book value of approximately ¥1,926.7 billion was pledged as collateral securing indebtedness incurred by Toyota Motor Corporation’s consolidated subsidiaries. Toyota believes that there does not exist any material environmental issues that may affect the company’s utilization of its assets.\n\nToyota considers all its principal manufacturing facilities and other significant properties to be in good condition and adequate to meet the needs of its operations.\n\nSee “Item 4. Information on the Company — 4.B Business Overview — Capital Expenditures and Divestitures” for a description of Toyota’s material plans to construct, expand or improve facilities."}