{"url_path":"/sec/umbf/10-k/2026/item-8","section_key":"item-8","section_title":"Item 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"10-K","doc_date":"2026-02-26","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101382/0001193125-26-076496-index.html","accession_number":"0001193125-26-076496","cik":"0000101382","ticker":"UMBF","issuer_name":"UMB FINANCIAL CORP","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101382/0001193125-26-076496-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0000101382","primary_entity_name":"UMB FINANCIAL CORP"},"word_count":38571,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"## ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA\n\nREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM\n\nTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors\n\nUMB Financial Corporation:\n\nOpinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements\n\nWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UMB Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.\n\nWe also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.\n\nBasis for Opinion\n\nThese consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.\n\nWe conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.\n\nCritical Audit Matters\n\nThe critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.\n\nAllowance for credit losses on certain loans evaluated on a collective basis\n\nAs discussed in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s total allowance for credit losses on loans was $419.5 million as of December 31, 2025, a substantial portion of which related to the allowance for credit losses for loans evaluated on a collective basis for the commercial and industrial and commercial real estate segments (the collective ACL). The collective ACL includes the measure of expected credit losses on a pool basis for loans where similar risk characteristics exist and is determined using relevant available information from internal and external sources related to historical credit loss experience, current\n\n73\n\n \n\nconditions, and reasonable and supportable economic forecasts. The Company uses probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) models for the commercial and industrial and commercial real estate segments. For the commercial and industrial segment, the collective ACL is calculated by modeling PD over future periods multiplied by historical LGD multiplied by contractual exposure at default minus any estimated prepayments and charge offs. For the commercial real estate segment, the collective ACL is calculated by modeling PD over future periods based on peer bank data. The PD loss rate is then multiplied by historical LGD multiplied by contractual exposure at default minus any estimated prepayments and charge offs. Primary risk drivers are segment specific and include macro-economic variables and risk ratings of the individual loans within the commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loan segments. After the reasonable and supportable forecast periods, the Company reverts to historical loss experience for each portfolio using a cliff or straight-line reversion method. A portion of the collective ACL is comprised of qualitative factors which represent adjustments to historical loss experience.\n\nWe identified the assessment of the collective ACL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the collective ACL. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the collective ACL methodology, including the methods and models used to estimate (1) the PD and LGD and historical loss rates and their significant assumptions, including average prepayment rates, the economic forecast scenario, macro-economic variables, the reasonable and supportable forecast periods, lengths of time and methods of reversion, and risk ratings, and (2) the qualitative factors and their significant assumptions. The assessment also included an evaluation of the conceptual soundness and performance of the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models.\n\nThe following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the measurement of the collective ACL, including controls related to the:\n\n•\ndesign of the collective ACL methodology\n\n•\ncontinued use of the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models\n\n•\ndetermination and measurement of the significant assumptions used in the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models\n\n•\ncontinued use of the qualitative factors\n\n•\nperformance monitoring of the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models\n\n•\nanalysis of the overall ACL results, trends, and ratios\n\n•\nrisk ratings assigned to loans.\n\nWe evaluated the Company’s process to develop the collective ACL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:\n\n•\nevaluating the Company’s collective ACL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles\n\n•\nevaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the continued use and performance monitoring of the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models by comparing them to relevant Company specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices\n\n•\nassessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the PD and LGD and historical loss rate models by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use\n\n•\nevaluating the methodology used to develop the economic forecast scenario and underlying assumptions by comparing it to the Company’s business environment and relevant industry practices\n\n•\ntesting the historical credit cycle period and evaluating the length of the reasonable and supportable forecast period by comparing to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends\n\n74\n\n \n\n•\ntesting individual risk ratings for a selection of commercial and industrial and commercial real estate loans by evaluating the financial performance of the borrower, sources of repayment, and any relevant guarantees or underlying collateral\n\n•\nevaluating the methodology used to develop the qualitative factors and the effect of those factors on the collective ACL compared with relevant credit risk factors and consistency with credit trends and identified limitations of the underlying quantitative models.\n\nFair value measurement of acquired loans and the core deposit intangible in the acquisition of Heartland Financial USA, Inc. (HTLF)\n\nAs discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 31, 2025, the Company completed its acquisition of Heartland Financial USA, Inc. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are required to be measured at fair value at the date of acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. The Company acquired loans with a fair value of $9.8 billion and established a core deposit intangible (CDI) asset with a fair value of $474.1 million. The fair value of the acquired loans is based on a discounted cash flow method that considered the loans’ underlying characteristics including account type, remaining terms of loan, annual interest rates or coupon, fixed or variable interest rates, past delinquencies, risk ratings, timing of principal and interest payments, current market rates, loan to value ratios, loss exposure, more specifically the probability of default and loss given default, and remaining balance. The fair value of the CDI asset is estimated using a net cost savings method, a variation of the income approach. This approach considers expected client attrition rates, average life and balance inflation, alternative cost of funds, the interest cost and net maintenance cost associated with the client deposit base, and a discount rate used to discount the future economic benefits of the core deposit intangible asset to present value.\n\nWe identified the evaluation of the fair value measurement of the acquired loans and CDI asset as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the fair value measurements due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment of the fair value measurements involved an evaluation of the valuation methods and certain assumptions, including the risk ratings, probability of default rates, and loss given default rates for the acquired loans; and the expected client attrition rates for the CDI asset. Changes in the assumptions could have a significant impact on the estimated fair values.\n\nThe following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the fair value measurement of the acquired loans and the CDI asset, including controls related to the:\n\n•\ndevelopment of the valuation methods\n\n•\ndetermination of the risk ratings, probability of default rates, and loss given default rates for the acquired loans\n\n•\ndetermination of the expected client attrition rates for the CDI asset.\n\nWe evaluated the Company’s process to develop the fair values of the acquired loans and the CDI asset by testing certain sources of data and assumptions that the Company used and considered the relevance and reliability of such data and assumptions. We involved valuation and credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the valuation methods used by the Company to estimate the fair values of acquired loans and CDI asset for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles:\n\nSpecific to the acquired loans:\n\n•\ndeveloping independent ranges of fair value for acquired loans, including the development of independent assumptions for probability of default rates and loss given default rates\n\n•\nassessing the Company’s estimate of fair value for acquired loans by comparing them to the independently developed ranges\n\n•\ntesting individual risk ratings for a selection of acquired loans by evaluating the financial performance of the borrower, sources of repayment, and any relevant guarantees or underlying collateral.\n\n75\n\n \n\nSpecific to the CDI asset:\n\n•\nevaluating the expected client attrition rates by comparing historical experience and the specific facts and circumstances of the acquisition to market information from third-party sources.\n\n/s/ KPMG LLP\n\nWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.\n\nKansas City, Missouri\nFebruary 26, 2026\n\n76\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS\n\n(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nASSETS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n$\n\n38,779,408\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,642,301\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses on loans\n\n \n\n \n\n(419,478\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(259,089\n\n)\n\nNet loans\n\n \n\n \n\n38,359,930\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,383,212\n\n \n\nLoans held for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n2,030\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,756\n\n \n\nSecurities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAvailable for sale (amortized cost of $13,999,900 and $8,407,676, respectively)\n\n \n\n \n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,774,334\n\n \n\nHeld to maturity, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,684 and $2,645, respectively (fair value of $5,250,465 and $4,748,938, respectively)\n\n \n\n \n\n5,722,543\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,376,267\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n22,331\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,533\n\n \n\nOther securities\n\n \n\n \n\n676,300\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n471,018\n\n \n\nTotal securities\n\n \n\n \n\n20,130,315\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,650,152\n\n \n\nFederal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell\n\n \n\n \n\n1,548,093\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n545,000\n\n \n\nInterest-bearing due from banks\n\n \n\n \n\n6,940,535\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,986,270\n\n \n\nCash and due from banks\n\n \n\n \n\n952,547\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n573,175\n\n \n\nPremises and equipment, net\n\n \n\n \n\n398,271\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n221,773\n\n \n\nAccrued income\n\n \n\n \n\n349,639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n246,095\n\n \n\nGoodwill\n\n \n\n \n\n1,839,825\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n207,385\n\n \n\nOther intangibles, net\n\n \n\n \n\n486,869\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n63,647\n\n \n\nOther assets\n\n \n\n \n\n2,086,036\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,530,199\n\n \n\nTotal assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n73,094,090\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n50,409,664\n\n \n\nLIABILITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDeposits:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNoninterest-bearing demand\n\n \n\n$\n\n17,143,341\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13,617,167\n\n \n\nInterest-bearing demand and savings\n\n \n\n \n\n39,752,587\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,397,195\n\n \n\nTime deposits under $250,000\n\n \n\n \n\n1,934,617\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n969,132\n\n \n\nTime deposits of $250,000 or more\n\n \n\n \n\n1,826,245\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,158,535\n\n \n\nTotal deposits\n\n \n\n \n\n60,656,790\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n43,142,029\n\n \n\nFederal funds purchased and repurchase agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n3,324,938\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,609,715\n\n \n\nLong-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n474,229\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n385,292\n\n \n\nAccrued expenses and taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n435,351\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n368,457\n\n \n\nOther liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n509,214\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n437,630\n\n \n\nTotal liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n65,400,522\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n46,943,123\n\n \n\nSHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSeries B Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 30,000 authorized, issued and outstanding\n\n \n\n \n\n294,066\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommon stock, $1.00 par value; 160,000,000 and 80,000,000 shares authorized; 78,665,809 and 55,056,730 shares issued, 75,960,675 and 48,814,177 shares outstanding, at December 31, 2025 and December 2024, respectively\n\n \n\n \n\n78,666\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n55,057\n\n \n\nCapital surplus\n\n \n\n \n\n4,011,047\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,145,638\n\n \n\nRetained earnings\n\n \n\n \n\n3,736,413\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,174,948\n\n \n\nAccumulated other comprehensive loss, net\n\n \n\n \n\n(261,520\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(573,050\n\n)\n\nTreasury stock, 2,705,134 and 6,242,553 shares, at cost, respectively\n\n \n\n \n\n(165,104\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(336,052\n\n)\n\nTotal shareholders' equity\n\n \n\n \n\n7,693,568\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,466,541\n\n \n\nTotal liabilities and shareholders' equity\n\n \n\n$\n\n73,094,090\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n50,409,664\n\n \n\n \n\nSee Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\n\n77\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME\n\n(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nINTEREST INCOME\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,415,279\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,612,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,399,961\n\n \n\nSecurities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTaxable interest\n\n \n\n \n\n504,630\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n257,562\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n214,981\n\n \n\nTax-exempt interest\n\n \n\n \n\n130,206\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n99,375\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n102,197\n\n \n\nTotal securities income\n\n \n\n \n\n634,836\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n356,937\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n317,178\n\n \n\nFederal funds and resell agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n38,152\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,628\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,647\n\n \n\nInterest-bearing due from banks\n\n \n\n \n\n264,915\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n182,145\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n103,190\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n1,098\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,351\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n729\n\n \n\nTotal interest income\n\n \n\n \n\n3,354,280\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,171,009\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,838,705\n\n \n\nINTEREST EXPENSE\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDeposits\n\n \n\n \n\n1,336,549\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n982,302\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n704,210\n\n \n\nFederal funds and repurchase agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n108,704\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n106,558\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n93,026\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n46,822\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n81,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n121,353\n\n \n\nTotal interest expense\n\n \n\n \n\n1,492,075\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,170,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n918,589\n\n \n\nNet interest income\n\n \n\n \n\n1,862,205\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,000,892\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n920,116\n\n \n\nProvision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n154,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n61,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41,227\n\n \n\nNet interest income after provision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n1,707,705\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n939,842\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n878,889\n\n \n\nNONINTEREST INCOME\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTrust and securities processing\n\n \n\n \n\n343,398\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n290,571\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n257,200\n\n \n\nTrading and investment banking\n\n \n\n \n\n25,305\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,226\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,630\n\n \n\nService charges on deposit accounts\n\n \n\n \n\n113,206\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n84,512\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n84,950\n\n \n\nInsurance fees and commissions\n\n \n\n \n\n910\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,009\n\n \n\nBrokerage fees\n\n \n\n \n\n79,592\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n61,564\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n54,119\n\n \n\nBankcard fees\n\n \n\n \n\n113,924\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n87,797\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n74,719\n\n \n\nInvestment securities gains (losses), net\n\n \n\n \n\n30,967\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,720\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,139\n\n)\n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n82,748\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67,470\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n53,365\n\n \n\nTotal noninterest income\n\n \n\n \n\n790,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n628,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n541,853\n\n \n\nNONINTEREST EXPENSE\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSalaries and employee benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n883,883\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n593,913\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n553,421\n\n \n\nOccupancy, net\n\n \n\n \n\n73,722\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,539\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,502\n\n \n\nEquipment\n\n \n\n \n\n64,915\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n63,406\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n68,718\n\n \n\nSupplies and services\n\n \n\n \n\n28,503\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,845\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,829\n\n \n\nMarketing and business development\n\n \n\n \n\n45,682\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,439\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,749\n\n \n\nProcessing fees\n\n \n\n \n\n172,846\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n117,899\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n103,099\n\n \n\nLegal and consulting\n\n \n\n \n\n92,304\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n46,207\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,998\n\n \n\nBankcard\n\n \n\n \n\n49,503\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n44,265\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,969\n\n \n\nAmortization of other intangible assets\n\n \n\n \n\n93,521\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,705\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,587\n\n \n\nRegulatory fees\n\n \n\n \n\n28,751\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n31,904\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n77,010\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n89,170\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,564\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n34,258\n\n \n\nTotal noninterest expense\n\n \n\n \n\n1,622,800\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,026,686\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n999,140\n\n \n\nIncome before income taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n874,955\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n541,273\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n421,602\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense\n\n \n\n \n\n172,557\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n100,030\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n71,578\n\n \n\nNET INCOME\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nLess: Preferred dividends\n\n \n\n \n\n17,781\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS\n\n \n\n$\n\n684,617\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPER SHARE DATA\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet income per common share – basic\n\n \n\n$\n\n9.35\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9.05\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7.22\n\n \n\nNet income per common share – diluted\n\n \n\n \n\n9.29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.99\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7.18\n\n \n\nDividends per common share\n\n \n\n \n\n1.63\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.57\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.53\n\n \n\nWeighted average common shares outstanding – basic\n\n \n\n \n\n73,259,082\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,747,814\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,503,643\n\n \n\nWeighted average common shares outstanding – diluted\n\n \n\n \n\n73,670,643\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n49,056,956\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,763,820\n\n \n\n \n\nSee Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\n\n78\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME\n\n(dollars in thousands)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nOther comprehensive income (loss), before tax:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized gains and losses on debt securities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nChange in unrealized holding gains and losses, net\n\n \n\n \n\n343,056\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(8,956\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n147,977\n\n \n\nLess: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income\n\n \n\n \n\n(473\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(139\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n279\n\n \n\nAmortization of net unrealized loss on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity\n\n \n\n \n\n32,049\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n35,905\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,851\n\n \n\nChange in unrealized gains and losses on debt securities\n\n \n\n \n\n374,632\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,810\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n188,107\n\n \n\nUnrealized gains and losses on derivative hedges:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nChange in unrealized gains and losses on derivative hedges, net\n\n \n\n \n\n32,973\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(40,530\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n15,015\n\n \n\nLess: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income\n\n \n\n \n\n7,287\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(8,069\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(10,654\n\n)\n\nChange in unrealized gains and losses on derivative hedges\n\n \n\n \n\n40,260\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(48,599\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n4,361\n\n \n\nOther comprehensive income (loss), before tax\n\n \n\n \n\n414,892\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(21,789\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n192,468\n\n \n\nIncome tax (expense) benefit\n\n \n\n \n\n(103,362\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n5,674\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(46,668\n\n)\n\nOther comprehensive income (loss)\n\n \n\n \n\n311,530\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(16,115\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n145,800\n\n \n\nComprehensive income\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,013,928\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n425,128\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n495,824\n\n \n\n \n\nSee Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\n\n79\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY\n\n(dollars in thousands, except per share data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPreferred\nStock\n\n \n\nCommon\nStock\n\n \n\n \n\nCapital\nSurplus\n\n \n\n \n\nRetained\nEarnings\n\n \n\n \n\nAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income\n\n \n\n \n\nTreasury\nStock\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nBalance January 1, 2023\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n$\n\n55,057\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,125,949\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,536,086\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(702,735\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(347,264\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,667,093\n\n \n\nTotal comprehensive income\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n350,024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n145,800\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n495,824\n\n \n\nCommon dividends ($1.53 per share)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(75,286\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(75,286\n\n)\n\nPurchase of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(8,367\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,367\n\n)\n\nIssuances of equity awards, net of forfeitures\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(10,385\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,104\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n719\n\n \n\nRecognition of equity-based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,975\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,975\n\n \n\nSale of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n220\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n296\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n516\n\n \n\nExercise of stock options\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n604\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,341\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,945\n\n \n\nBalance December 31, 2023\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n$\n\n55,057\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,134,363\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,810,824\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(556,935\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(342,890\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,100,419\n\n \n\nTotal comprehensive income (loss)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(16,115\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n425,128\n\n \n\nCommon dividends ($1.57 per share)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(77,119\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(77,119\n\n)\n\nPurchase of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(7,738\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(7,738\n\n)\n\nIssuances of equity awards, net of forfeitures\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(11,220\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,923\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n703\n\n \n\nRecognition of equity-based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21,876\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21,876\n\n \n\nSale of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n342\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n582\n\n \n\nExercise of stock options\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,413\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,103\n\n \n\nCommon stock issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,413\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,413\n\n)\n\nBalance December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n$\n\n55,057\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,145,638\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,174,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(573,050\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(336,052\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,466,541\n\n \n\n \n\n80\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY\n\n(dollars in thousands, except per share data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPreferred\nStock\n\n \n\nCommon\nStock\n\n \n\n \n\nCapital\nSurplus\n\n \n\n \n\nRetained\nEarnings\n\n \n\n \n\nAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income\n\n \n\n \n\nTreasury\nStock\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nBalance January 1, 2025\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n$\n\n55,057\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,145,638\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,174,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(573,050\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(336,052\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,466,541\n\n \n\nTotal comprehensive income\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n311,530\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,013,928\n\n \n\nCash dividends declared:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPreferred dividends Series A ($350.00 per share)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,025\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,025\n\n)\n\nPreferred dividends Series B ($458.54 per share)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13,756\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13,756\n\n)\n\nCommon dividends ($1.63 per share)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(123,357\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(123,357\n\n)\n\nPurchase of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(17,628\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(17,628\n\n)\n\nIssuances of equity awards, net of forfeitures\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(18,816\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,616\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n800\n\n \n\nRecognition of equity-based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n57,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n57,334\n\n \n\nSale of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n343\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n351\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n694\n\n \n\nExercise of stock options\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n524\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n614\n\n \n\nCommon stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67,056\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n168,085\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n235,141\n\n \n\nPreferred stock issuance, net of issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n294,066\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n294,066\n\n \n\nPreferred stock redemption\n\n \n\n \n\n(110,705\n\n)\n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,500\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n205\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(115,000\n\n)\n\nStock issuance for acquisition, net of issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n110,705\n\n \n\n \n\n23,609\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,763,902\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,898,216\n\n \n\nBalance December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n$\n\n294,066\n\n \n\n$\n\n78,666\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,011,047\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,736,413\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(261,520\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(165,104\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n7,693,568\n\n \n\nSee Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\n\n81\n\n \n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS\n\n(dollars in thousands)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nOPERATING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nAdjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nProvision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n154,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n61,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41,227\n\n \n\nNet (accretion) amortization of premiums and discounts from acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n(139,775\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,573\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,060\n\n \n\nDepreciation and amortization\n\n \n\n \n\n141,770\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n52,771\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n58,723\n\n \n\nAmortization of debt issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n745\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n876\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n876\n\n \n\nDeferred income tax expense (benefit)\n\n \n\n \n\n82,825\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(16,174\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,439\n\n)\n\nNet decrease (increase) in trading securities and other earning assets\n\n \n\n \n\n6,202\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(10,440\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(113\n\n)\n\n(Gains) losses on investment securities, net\n\n \n\n \n\n(30,967\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(10,720\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,139\n\n \n\nLosses (gains) on sales of assets\n\n \n\n \n\n105\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,197\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(4,343\n\n)\n\nAmortization of securities premiums, net of discount accretion\n\n \n\n \n\n(9,739\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n44,323\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n42,037\n\n \n\nOriginations of loans held for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n(101,890\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(87,129\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(68,673\n\n)\n\nGains on sales of loans held for sale, net\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,742\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,279\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,693\n\n)\n\nProceeds from sales of loans held for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n105,358\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n91,072\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67,924\n\n \n\nEquity-based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n37,745\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,579\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,694\n\n \n\nChanges in:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAccrued income\n\n \n\n \n\n(29,265\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(24,592\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(31,075\n\n)\n\nAccrued expenses and taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n26,247\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(20,453\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n148,154\n\n \n\nOther assets and liabilities, net\n\n \n\n \n\n83,176\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(317,217\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(132,918\n\n)\n\nNet cash provided by operating activities\n\n \n\n \n\n1,026,693\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n225,286\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n472,604\n\n \n\nINVESTING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSecurities held to maturity:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nMaturities, calls and principal repayments\n\n \n\n \n\n627,137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n458,174\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n424,341\n\n \n\nPurchases\n\n \n\n \n\n(507,706\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(121,021\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(227,077\n\n)\n\nSecurities available for sale:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSales\n\n \n\n \n\n646,962\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,154\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,193\n\n \n\nMaturities, calls and principal repayments\n\n \n\n \n\n1,661,802\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,384,085\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,204,346\n\n \n\nPurchases\n\n \n\n \n\n(4,742,724\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,111,653\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,162,115\n\n)\n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSales\n\n \n\n \n\n22,104\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPurchases\n\n \n\n \n\n(602\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(357\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(277\n\n)\n\nEquity securities without readily determinable fair values:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSales\n\n \n\n \n\n52,176\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n35,304\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,614\n\n \n\nMaturities, calls and principal repayments\n\n \n\n \n\n14,958\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n71,963\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n334,898\n\n \n\nPurchases\n\n \n\n \n\n(131,593\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(50,861\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(404,972\n\n)\n\nPayment of tax equity investment commitments\n\n \n\n \n\n(49,855\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(71,244\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(40,806\n\n)\n\nNet increase in loans\n\n \n\n \n\n(3,252,475\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,415,581\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,159,132\n\n)\n\nNet (increase) decrease in fed funds sold and resell agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,003,093\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(299,656\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n713,253\n\n \n\nNet cash activity from acquisitions and divestitures\n\n \n\n \n\n169,262\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(109,046\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(793\n\n)\n\nNet decrease (increase) in interest-bearing balances due from other financial institutions\n\n \n\n \n\n955,764\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(31,753\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n43,359\n\n \n\nNet purchases of bank premises and equipment\n\n \n\n \n\n(48,584\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,009\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(23,104\n\n)\n\nPurchases of bank-owned and company-owned life insurance\n\n \n\n \n\n(35,977\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,000\n\n)\n\nProceeds from bank-owned and company-owned life insurance death benefit\n\n \n\n \n\n2,346\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNet cash used in investing activities\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,620,098\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3,262,501\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,273,272\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n82\n\n \n\n \n\nFINANCING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet increase in demand and savings deposits\n\n \n\n \n\n3,098,494\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,295,094\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n997,273\n\n \n\nNet increase (decrease) increase in time deposits\n\n \n\n \n\n63,860\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(945,924\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,156,453\n\n \n\nNet increase (decrease) in fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n692,590\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n490,071\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(102,523\n\n)\n\nProceeds from short-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n500,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,856,000\n\n \n\nRepayment of short-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,300,000\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(31,056,000\n\n)\n\nRepayment of long-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n(200,000\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCash dividends paid\n\n \n\n \n\n(135,620\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(77,127\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(74,245\n\n)\n\nPayment of common stock issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n(524\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,413\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nProceeds from exercise of stock options and sales of treasury shares\n\n \n\n \n\n1,308\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,685\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,461\n\n \n\nPurchases of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n(17,628\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(7,738\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,367\n\n)\n\nCommon stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n235,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPreferred stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n294,066\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPreferred stock redemption\n\n \n\n \n\n(115,000\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNet cash provided by financing activities\n\n \n\n \n\n3,916,687\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,957,648\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,771,052\n\n \n\n(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents\n\n \n\n \n\n(676,718\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,920,433\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,970,384\n\n \n\nCash and cash equivalents at beginning of year\n\n \n\n \n\n8,448,691\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,528,258\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,557,874\n\n \n\nCash and cash equivalents at end of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n7,771,973\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,448,691\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,528,258\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSupplemental disclosures:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nIncome tax payments\n\n \n\n$\n\n63,242\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,930\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n79,334\n\n \n\nTotal interest payments\n\n \n\n \n\n1,466,097\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,204,688\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n844,397\n\n \n\nNoncash disclosures:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAcquisition of tax equity investments\n\n \n\n$\n\n62,358\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n62,958\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n85,555\n\n \n\nCommitment to fund tax equity investments\n\n \n\n \n\n62,358\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n62,958\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n85,555\n\n \n\nTransfer of loans to other real estate owned\n\n \n\n \n\n1,531\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n828\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,738\n\n \n\nTransfer of loans to other repossessed assets\n\n \n\n \n\n39\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,779\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nIssuance of common stock as consideration for acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n2,783,510\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nIssuance of preferred stock as consideration for acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n115,230\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nStock based compensation as consideration for acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n20,389\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\nSee Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.\n\n83\n\n \n\nNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS\n\n \n\n1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES\n\nUMB Financial Corporation is a bank holding company, which offers a wide range of banking and other financial services to its customers through its branches and offices primarily in the Midwestern, Southwestern, and Western regions of the United States. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also impact reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Following is a summary of the more significant accounting policies to assist the reader in understanding the financial presentation.\n\nConsolidation\n\nThe Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements (references hereinafter to the Company in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include wholly owned subsidiaries). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.\n\nBusiness Combinations\n\nThe Company accounts for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date.\n\nOn January 31, 2025 (Acquisition Date), the Company acquired Heartland Financial USA, Inc. (HTLF) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 28, 2024. See Note 20, “Acquisition” for additional information.\n\nRevenue Recognition\n\nInterest on loans and securities is recognized based on rate multiplied by the principal amount outstanding. This includes the impact of amortization of premiums and discounts. Interest accrual is discontinued when, in the opinion of management, the likelihood of collection becomes doubtful. Noninterest income is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied.\n\nCash and cash equivalents\n\nCash and cash equivalents include Cash and due from banks and amounts due from the FRB. Cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, and amounts due from correspondent banks are included in Cash and due from banks. Amounts due from the FRB are interest-bearing for all periods presented and are included in the Interest-bearing due from banks line on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.\n\nThis table provides a summary of cash and cash equivalents as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nDue from the FRB\n\n \n\n$\n\n6,819,426\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,875,516\n\n \n\nCash and due from banks\n\n \n\n \n\n952,547\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n573,175\n\n \n\nCash and cash equivalents at end of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n7,771,973\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,448,691\n\n \n\n \n\nAlso included in the Interest-bearing due from banks line, but not considered cash and cash equivalents are interest-bearing accounts held at other financial institutions, which totaled $121.1 million and $110.8 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n84\n\n \n\nLoans and Loans Held for Sale\n\nLoans are classified by the portfolio segments of commercial and industrial, specialty lending, commercial real estate, consumer real estate, consumer, credit cards, and leases and other.\n\nA loan is considered to be collateral dependent when management believes it is probable that it will be unable to collect all principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is collateral dependent, the Company records a valuation allowance equal to the carrying amount of the loan in excess of the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral.\n\nA loan is accounted for as a modification made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty when a modification has been granted that is deemed concessionary and not temporary to a debtor experiencing financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications generally include interest rate adjustments, principal reductions, and amortization and maturity date extensions. These modifications allow the debtor short-term cash relief to allow them to improve their financial condition. If a loan modification is determined to be made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the loan is considered to be collateral dependent and is evaluated for credit loss as part of the allowance for credit loss analysis.\n\nLoans, including those that are considered to be collateral dependent, are evaluated regularly by management. Loans are considered delinquent when payment has not been received within 30 days of its contractual due date. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of interest or principal is 90 days or more past due unless the loan is adequately secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current income. Loans may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied to principal unless the remaining principal balance has been determined to be fully collectible.\n\nThe adequacy of the ACL on loans is based on management’s judgment and continuous evaluation of the pertinent factors underlying the credit quality inherent in the loan portfolio. Consideration of quantitative and qualitative factors relevant to each specific segmentation of loans includes lifetime historical loss experience, the impact of the current economic environment, reasonable and supportable forecasts, and detailed analysis of loans determined to be collateral dependent. The actual losses incurred over the lifetime of the portfolio, notwithstanding such considerations, however, could differ from the amounts estimated by management.\n\nThe Company maintains an allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposures, to address the credit risk to which the Company is exposed via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancelable by the Company. The allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposure is included in the Accrued expenses and taxes line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In order to maintain the allowance for off-balance sheet items at an appropriate level, a provision to increase or reduce the allowance is included in the Provision for credit losses line item in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposure is calculated by applying portfolio segment expected credit loss rates to the expected amount to be funded.\n\nLoans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Loan fees (net of certain direct loan origination costs) on loans held for sale are deferred until the related loans are sold or repaid. Gains or losses on loan sales are recognized at the time of sale and determined using the specific identification method.\n\nAcquired Loans\n\nAcquired loans are initially recorded at fair value. The Company’s accounting methods for acquired loans depends on whether or not the loan reflects more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination at the date of acquisition.\n\nNon-Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans\n\nNon-purchased credit deteriorated (Non-PCD) loans do not reflect more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination at the date of acquisition. These loans are recorded at fair value and an increase to the allowance for credit losses (ACL) is recorded with a corresponding increase to the provision for credit losses at the date of\n\n85\n\n \n\nacquisition. The difference between fair value and the unpaid principal balance at the acquisition date is amortized or accreted to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method.\n\nPurchased Credit Deteriorated Loans\n\nPurchased loans that reflect a more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination at the date of acquisition are classified as purchased credit deteriorated (PCD) loans. PCD loans are recorded at fair value plus the ACL expected at the time of acquisition. Under this method, there is no provision for credit losses on acquisition of PCD loans. The non-credit-related difference between fair value and the unpaid principal balance at the acquisition date is amortized or accreted to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method.\n\nSecurities\n\nDebt securities available for sale principally include U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, GSE mortgage-backed securities, certain securities of state and political subdivisions, corporates, and collateralized loan obligations. Debt securities classified as available for sale are measured at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported in AOCI until realized.\n\nSecurities held to maturity are carried at amortized historical cost, net of the allowance for credit losses, based on management’s intention, and the Company’s ability to hold them to maturity. The Company classifies certain U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, GSE mortgage-backed securities, and securities of state and political subdivisions as held to maturity.\n\nTrading securities, acquired for subsequent sale to customers, are carried at fair value. Market adjustments, fees and gains or losses on the sale of trading securities are considered to be a normal part of operations and are included in trading and investment banking income.\n\nThe gain or loss realized on the sale of securities classified as available for sale, as determined using the specific identification method for determining the cost of the securities sold, is computed with reference to its amortized cost and is included in current earnings.\n\nSecurities may be transferred from the available-for-sale classification to the held-to-maturity classification when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Transfers of securities are made at fair value at the time of transfer. The unrealized holding gain or loss at the time of transfer is retained in AOCI and amortized over the remaining life of the securities, offsetting the related amortization of discount or premium on the transferred securities. No gains or losses are recognized at the time of the transfer.\n\nEquity-method investments\n\nThe Company accounts for certain other investments using equity-method accounting. For equity securities without readily determinable fair values, the Company’s proportionate share of the income or loss is recognized on a one-quarter lag. When transparency in pricing exists, other investments are considered equity securities with readily determinable fair values.\n\nGoodwill and Other Intangibles\n\nGoodwill is tested for impairment annually and more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. To test goodwill for impairment, the Company performs a qualitative assessment of each reporting unit. If the Company determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not greater than the carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is not required. Otherwise, the Company compares the fair value of its reporting units to their carrying amounts to determine if an impairment exists and the amount of impairment loss. An impairment loss is measured as the excess of the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill over its fair value.\n\nNo goodwill impairments were recognized in 2025, 2024, or 2023. Other intangible assets, which relate to core deposits, non-compete agreements, and customer relationships, are amortized over their useful life. Intangible assets are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances dictate. No intangible asset impairments were recognized in 2025, 2024, or 2023. The Company does not have any indefinite lived intangible assets.\n\n86\n\n \n\nPremises and Equipment\n\nPremises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is computed primarily on the straight-line method. Premises are depreciated over 7 to 40 year lives, while equipment is depreciated over lives of 3 to 25 years. Gains and losses from the sale of Premises and equipment are included in Other noninterest income and Other noninterest expense, respectively.\n\nImpairment of Long-Lived Assets\n\nLong-lived assets, including Premises and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The impairment review includes a comparison of future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets to their current carrying value. If the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), an impairment loss is recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeds fair value. No impairments were recognized in 2025, 2024, or 2023.\n\nIncome Taxes\n\nThe Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The provision for deferred income taxes represents the change in the deferred income tax accounts during the year excluding the tax effect of the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale and certain derivative items.\n\nThe Company records deferred tax assets to the extent these assets will more likely than not be realized. All available evidence is considered in making such determination, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. A valuation allowance is recorded for the portion of deferred tax assets that are not more-likely-than-not to be realized, and any changes to the valuation allowance are recorded in income tax expense.\n\nThe Company records the financial statement effects of an income tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that it will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured and recorded as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained. The benefit associated with previously unrecognized tax positions are generally recognized in the first period in which the more-likely-than-not threshold is met at the reporting date, the tax matter is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation, or when the related statute of limitations for the relevant taxing authority to examine and challenge the tax position has expired. When the Company determines that an unrecognized tax benefit liability is no longer necessary, the liability is reversed, and a tax benefit is recognized in the period in which it is determined that the unrecognized tax benefit liability is no longer necessary. The recognition, derecognition and measurement of tax positions are based on management’s best judgment given the facts, circumstance and information available at the reporting date.\n\nThe Company recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in other noninterest expense. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related liability lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company has recognized an immaterial amount in interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits.\n\nDerivatives\n\nThe Company records all derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Currently, 15 of the Company’s derivatives are designated in qualifying hedging relationships. The remainder of the Company’s derivatives are not\n\n87\n\n \n\ndesignated in qualifying hedging relationships, as the derivatives are not used to manage risks within the Company’s assets or liabilities. All changes in fair value of the Company’s non-designated derivatives and fair value hedges are recognized directly in earnings. Changes in fair value of the Company’s cash flow hedges are recognized in AOCI and are reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.\n\nPer Share Data\n\nBasic net income per common share is computed using net income available to common shareholders and the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per common share is determined using net income available to common shareholders and the weighted average common shares and assumed incremental common shares issued.\n\nThe following table provides the amounts used in the determination of basic and diluted net income per common share at December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands, except share and per share data):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nLess: Preferred dividends\n\n \n\n \n\n17,781\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNet income available to common shareholders\n\n \n\n$\n\n684,617\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share\n\n \n\n \n\n73,259,082\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,747,814\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,503,643\n\n \n\nAssumed incremental common shares issued upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units\n\n \n\n \n\n411,561\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n309,142\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n260,177\n\n \n\nWeighted average common shares for diluted earnings per share\n\n \n\n \n\n73,670,643\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n49,056,956\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,763,820\n\n \n\nNet income per common share – basic\n\n \n\n$\n\n9.35\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9.05\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7.22\n\n \n\nNet income per common share – diluted\n\n \n\n \n\n9.29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.99\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7.18\n\n \n\nNumber of antidilutive restricted stock units excluded from diluted earnings per share computation\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNumber of antidilutive stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share computation\n\n \n\n \n\n4,962\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n55,649\n\n \n\nAccounting for Stock-Based Compensation\n\nThe Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of the grant. For stock options, restricted stock, and service-based restricted stock unit awards, the grant date fair value is estimated using either an option-pricing model which is consistent with the terms of the award or an observed market price, if such a price exists. For performance-based restricted stock unit awards, the grant date fair value is based on the quoted price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date less the present value of expected dividends not received during the vesting period. Such cost is generally recognized over the vesting period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award and, in some cases, when performance metrics are met. The Company accounts for forfeitures of stock-based compensation on an actual basis as they occur.\n\n2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS\n\nSegment Reporting In November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures.” The ASU requires expanded segment disclosures, including disclosure of significant segment expenses and other segment items on an annual and interim basis. The Company adopted the amended guidance for the annual financial statements in 2024 and the interim disclosure requirements will be effective for interim periods beginning January 1, 2025. The adoption of this amendment did not have any impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements aside from additional disclosures. See Note 12, “Business Segment Reporting” for related disclosures.\n\nIncome Taxes In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures.” The ASU is intended to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. The amendments in this update require additional disclosures primarily related to the rate\n\n88\n\n \n\nreconciliation and income taxes paid information. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The amendments in this update were adopted on January 1, 2025. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements aside from additional disclosures. See Note 16, “Income Taxes” for related disclosures.\n\n3. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES\n\nLoan Origination/Risk Management\n\nThe Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to minimize the level of risk within the loan portfolio. Diversification of the loan portfolio manages the risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions. Authority levels are established for the extension of credit to ensure consistency throughout the Company. It is necessary that policies, processes, and practices implemented to control the risks of individual credit transactions and portfolio segments are sound and adhered to. The Company maintains an independent loan review department that reviews and validates the risk assessment on a continual basis. Management regularly evaluates the results of the loan reviews. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.\n\nCommercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Commercial loans are made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of the borrower, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts from its customers. Beginning with the third quarter 2025, commercial and industrial loans include all loans to Non-Depository Financial Institutions (NDFIs), which includes a wide range of financial entities that provide services similar to those of traditional banks but do not accept deposits from the general public and are not regulated by the same federal banking agencies. Previously reported balances have been reclassified for purposes of comparability.\n\nSpecialty lending loans include Asset-based loans, which are offered primarily in the form of revolving lines of credit to commercial borrowers that do not generally qualify for traditional bank financing. Asset-based loans are underwritten based primarily upon the value of the collateral pledged to secure the loan, rather than on the borrower’s general financial condition. The Company utilizes pre-loan due diligence techniques, monitoring disciplines, and loan management practices common within the asset-based lending industry to underwrite loans to these borrowers.\n\nCommercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. The Company requires that an appraisal of the collateral be made at origination and on an as-needed basis, in conformity with current market conditions and regulatory requirements. The underwriting standards address both owner and non-owner-occupied real estate. Also included in Commercial real estate are Construction loans that are underwritten using feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis or absorption and lease rates, and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, economic conditions, completion of the construction project, and the availability of long-term financing.\n\nConsumer real estate loans, including residential real estate and home equity loans, are underwritten based on the borrower’s loan-to-value percentage, collection remedies, and overall credit history.\n\n89\n\n \n\nConsumer loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s repayment ability. The Company monitors delinquencies on all of its consumer loans and leases. The underwriting and review practices combined with the relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Consumer loans and leases that are 90 days past due or more are considered non-performing.\n\nCredit cards include both commercial and consumer credit cards. Commercial credit cards are generally unsecured and are underwritten with criteria similar to commercial loans, including an analysis of the borrower’s cash flow, available business capital, and overall creditworthiness of the borrower. Consumer credit cards are underwritten based on the borrower’s repayment ability. The Company monitors delinquencies on all of its consumer credit cards and periodically reviews the distribution of credit scores relative to historical periods to monitor credit risk on its consumer credit card loans. During the first quarter of 2024, the Company purchased a co-branded credit card portfolio. The purchase included $109.4 million in credit card receivables.\n\nCredit risk is a potential loss resulting from nonpayment of either the primary or secondary exposure. Credit risk is mitigated with formal risk management practices and a thorough initial credit-granting process including consistent underwriting standards and approval process. Control factors or techniques to minimize credit risk include knowing the client, understanding total exposure, analyzing the client and debtor’s financial capacity, and monitoring the client’s activities. Credit risk and portions of the portfolio risk are managed through concentration considerations, average risk ratings, and other aggregate characteristics.\n\nThe loan portfolio is comprised of loans originated by the Company and purchased loans in connection with the Company’s acquisition of HTLF on January 31, 2025. The purchased loans were recorded at estimated fair value at the Acquisition Date with no carryover of the related allowance. As of the Acquisition Date, loans from the HTLF acquisition had a fair value of $9.7 billion, net of allowance for credit losses on PCD loans. See Note 20, “Acquisition” for additional information.\n\nLoan Aging Analysis\n\nThe following tables provide a summary of loan classes and an aging of past due loans at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30-89\nDays Past\nDue and\nAccruing\n\n \n\n \n\nGreater\nthan 90\nDays Past\nDue and\nAccruing\n\n \n\n \n\nNonaccrual\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\nPast Due\n\n \n\n \n\nCurrent\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\nLoans\n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n$\n\n36,391\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,417\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n26,633\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n69,441\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16,201,079\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16,270,520\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n518,237\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n518,237\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n24,786\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n86,838\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n111,624\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,264,615\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,376,239\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n10,451\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n244\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,910\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40,605\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,395,863\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,436,468\n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n689\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,237\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n777\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,703\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n232,108\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238,811\n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n9,194\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,505\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n508\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,207\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n684,526\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n700,733\n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238,400\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238,400\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n81,511\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n18,403\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n144,666\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n244,580\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n38,534,828\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n38,779,408\n\n \n\n \n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30-89\nDays Past\nDue and\nAccruing\n\n \n\n \n\nGreater\nthan 90\nDays Past\nDue and\nAccruing\n\n \n\n \n\nNonaccrual\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\nPast Due\n\n \n\n \n\nCurrent\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\nLoans\n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n$\n\n446\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,423\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,870\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,988,901\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,993,771\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n469,194\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n469,194\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n1,013\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,818\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,129,467\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,131,285\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n553\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,614\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,167\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,172,963\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,187,130\n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n175\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n227\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n193,633\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n193,860\n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n9,316\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,589\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n400\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,305\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n561,461\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n578,766\n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88,295\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88,295\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n11,503\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,602\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,282\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n38,387\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,603,914\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,642,301\n\n \n\n \n\nThe Company sold consumer real estate loans with proceeds of $105.4 million, $91.1 million, and $67.9 million in the secondary market without recourse during the periods ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.\n\nThe Company has ceased the recognition of interest on loans with a carrying value of $144.7 million and $19.3 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Restructured loans totaled $169 thousand and $196 thousand at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest amounted to $18.4 million and $7.6 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. There was an insignificant amount of interest reversed related to loans on nonaccrual during 2025 and 2024. Nonaccrual loans with no related allowance for credit losses totaled $76.8 million and $19.3 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.\n\nThe following tables provide the amortized cost of nonaccrual loans with no related allowance for credit losses by loan class at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNonaccrual\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Nonaccrual Loans with no related Allowance\n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n$\n\n26,633\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,870\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n86,838\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n35,973\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n29,910\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,661\n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n777\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n777\n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n508\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n508\n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n144,666\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,789\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n91\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNonaccrual\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Nonaccrual Loans with no related Allowance\n\n \n\nLoans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,423\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,423\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n805\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n13,614\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,614\n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n40\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40\n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n400\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n400\n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n19,282\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,282\n\n \n\n \n\n92\n\n \n\nAmortized Cost\n\nThe following tables provide a summary of the amortized cost balance of each of the Company’s loan classes disaggregated by collateral type and origination year as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 as well as the gross charge-offs by loan class and origination year for the year ended December 31, 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLoan Segment\nand Type\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,989,029\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,901,767\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,039,595\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n929,230\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n471,193\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n321,761\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,636,442\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13,301,203\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n30,385\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,585\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,980\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,827\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,859\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,180\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n426,729\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,258\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n521,803\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n130,392\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n286,076\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n368,137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n86,436\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,136\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,406\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,517,283\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n271\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,430,137\n\n \n\nOverdrafts\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,377\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,377\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\n3,149,806\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,210,428\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,432,712\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,023,493\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n487,188\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n354,347\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,597,831\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,715\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,270,520\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n1,835\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,794\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,124\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,241\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,170\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n350\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n15,131\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n44,645\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAsset-based lending\n\n \n\n \n\n46,480\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,801\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,763\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,632\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n411,922\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n518,237\n\n \n\nTotal Specialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n46,480\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,801\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,763\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,632\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n411,922\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n518,237\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n1,151,075\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n529,761\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n599,178\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n955,385\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n775,378\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n724,775\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,505\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,775,057\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n1,664,285\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n656,031\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n847,458\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,018,831\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n769,616\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n736,502\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41,093\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,054\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,734,870\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n258,796\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n74,542\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n85,814\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n131,009\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n83,613\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n163,318\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n66,403\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n863,570\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n329,902\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n179,107\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n171,945\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n554,125\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n434,660\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n96,475\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,441\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,776,655\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n75,849\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,564\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n520\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,301\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n89,474\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n1,099,253\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n868,115\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n719,128\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n373,196\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,313\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,273\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,136,613\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n4,579,160\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,319,120\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,423,763\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,033,066\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,091,580\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,737,343\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n191,078\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,129\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,376,239\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,968\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,978\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,072\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,774\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,792\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n2,748\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n399\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n756\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,075\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n577\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,784\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n698,503\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,331\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n718,173\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n653,333\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n368,156\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n364,405\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n631,555\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n735,751\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n830,570\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,864\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,590,647\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n20,458\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n31,221\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,212\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,538\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,405\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,048\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,766\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n127,648\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n676,539\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n399,776\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n384,373\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n662,168\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n753,733\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n844,402\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n710,133\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,344\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,436,468\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n123\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n162\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n765\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n525\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n466\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,041\n\n \n\nConsumer:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n1,485\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n34\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n23\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n49\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n526\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n160,454\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n162,697\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n8,179\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,743\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,307\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,118\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n248\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n31,887\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n12,907\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,197\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,514\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,917\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n853\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,272\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n44,227\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer\n\n \n\n \n\n22,571\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,523\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,280\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,273\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,995\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,046\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n169,021\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238,811\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n113\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n256\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n183\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,877\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,538\n\n \n\nCredit cards:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n347,749\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n347,749\n\n \n\nCommercial\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n352,984\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n352,984\n\n \n\nTotal Credit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n700,733\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n700,733\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,676\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,676\n\n \n\nLeases and other:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLeases\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,214\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,214\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n181,160\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,408\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,588\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,713\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,344\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,671\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,302\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n237,186\n\n \n\nTotal Leases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n181,160\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,408\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,588\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,713\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,344\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,885\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,302\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238,400\n\n \n\nCurrent period charge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,655,716\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,969,894\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,262,716\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,744,514\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,367,603\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,963,655\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,794,020\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n21,290\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n38,779,408\n\n \n\n \n\n93\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLoan Segment\nand Type\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\n2020\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,054,295\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,045,835\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n916,112\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n682,754\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n293,173\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n135,072\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,975,094\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n20,356\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,122,691\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n9,857\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,750\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,554\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,208\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n356\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n97\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n156,546\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n178,368\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n266,024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n350,733\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n94,730\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,997\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,467\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,080\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n941,454\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,681,485\n\n \n\nOverdrafts\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,227\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,227\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\n2,330,176\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,402,318\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,014,396\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n693,959\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n303,996\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n144,249\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,084,321\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,356\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,993,771\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAsset-based lending\n\n \n\n \n\n5,803\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,026\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,702\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,392\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n395,271\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n469,194\n\n \n\nTotal Specialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n5,803\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,026\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,702\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,392\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n395,271\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n469,194\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n352,517\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n277,049\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n593,480\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n442,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n293,799\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n275,207\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,948\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,266\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,265,071\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n784,434\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n527,773\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,006,769\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n727,365\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n404,362\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n324,839\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,312\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,807,854\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n54,656\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,357\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n58,154\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36,127\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n183,762\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n23,016\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n107,468\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n510,543\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n161,767\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,136\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n302,225\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n256,032\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,819\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,732\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,202\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n823,913\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n46,096\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,385\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,486\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n493,723\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n644,885\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,222,539\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n235,758\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,049\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n514\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n74,950\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,676,418\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n1,893,193\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,545,585\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,183,167\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,698,087\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n914,791\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n642,308\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n228,885\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,269\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,131,285\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n450\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n455\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,049\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n390,843\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,484\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n399,721\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n413,395\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n361,242\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n565,017\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n635,217\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n496,758\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n273,628\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,745,257\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n12,516\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,969\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,004\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,978\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,934\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,676\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n42,152\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n426,001\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n371,227\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n575,471\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n639,650\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n500,026\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n281,353\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n390,918\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,484\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,187,130\n\n \n\nConsumer:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n35\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n101,407\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n101,442\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,429\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,534\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,928\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n673\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n283\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,414\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n13,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,876\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,065\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,659\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n342\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n796\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,216\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n70,004\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer\n\n \n\n \n\n21,652\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,305\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,599\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,587\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,015\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,079\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n118,623\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n193,860\n\n \n\nCredit cards:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n328,474\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n328,474\n\n \n\nCommercial\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n250,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n250,292\n\n \n\nTotal Credit cards\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n578,766\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n578,766\n\n \n\nLeases and other:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLeases\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,492\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,492\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n30,622\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,322\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,284\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,895\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,035\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,310\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n86,803\n\n \n\nTotal Leases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n30,622\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,322\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,284\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,895\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,527\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,310\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88,295\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,707,447\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,346,757\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,807,943\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,099,880\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,751,555\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,072,516\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,808,094\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n48,109\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,642,301\n\n \n\nAccrued interest on loans totaled $176.1 million and $125.7 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in the Accrued income line on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total amount of accrued interest is excluded from the amortized cost basis of loans presented above. Further, the Company has elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable.\n\nCredit Quality Indicators\n\nAs part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to the risk grading of specified classes of loans, net charge-offs, non-performing loans, and general economic conditions.\n\nThe Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a rating to each of its commercial, commercial real estate, and construction real estate loans. Changes in credit risk are monitored on a continuous basis and changes in risk ratings are made when identified. The loan ratings are summarized into the following categories: Pass, Special Mention, Substandard, and Doubtful. Any loan not classified in one of the categories described below is considered to be a Pass loan. A description of the general characteristics of the loan rating categories is as follows:\n\n•\nSpecial Mention – This rating reflects a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the borrower’s credit position at some future date. The rating\n\n94\n\n \n\nis not adversely classified and does not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.\n\n•\nSubstandard – This rating represents an asset inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Loans in this category are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified as substandard.\n\n•\nDoubtful – This rating represents an asset that has all the weaknesses inherent in an asset classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage of strengthening the asset, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, liquidation procedures, capital injection, or perfecting liens.\n\nCommercial and industrial\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Commercial and industrial loans is included below:\n\nEquipment, accounts receivable, and inventory General commercial and industrial loans are secured by working capital assets and non-real estate assets. The general purpose of these loans is for financing capital expenditures and current operations for commercial and industrial entities. These assets are short-term in nature. In the case of accounts receivable and inventories, the repayment of debt is reliant upon converting assets into cash or through goods and services being sold and collected. Collateral-based risk is due to aged short-term assets, which can be indicative of underlying issues with the borrower and lead to the value of the collateral being overstated.\n\nAgriculture Agricultural loans are secured by non-real estate agricultural assets. These include shorter-term assets such as equipment, crops, and livestock. The risks associated with loans to finance crops or livestock include the borrower’s ability to successfully raise and market the commodity. Adverse weather conditions and other natural perils can dramatically affect farmers’ or ranchers’ production and ability to service debt. Volatile commodity prices present another significant risk for agriculture borrowers. Market price volatility and production cost volatility can affect both revenues and expenses.\n\nNon-Depository Financial Institutions NDFI loans are secured by working capital assets and non-real estate assets. The general purpose of these loans is for financing capital expenditures and current operations. The repayment of debt is reliant upon converting assets into cash or through services being sold and collected. Collateral-based risk is due to aged short-term assets, which can be indicative of underlying issues with the borrower and lead to the value of the collateral being overstated. Other risks consist of collateral that is secured by the stock of a NDFI, which can be unlisted stock with a limited market for the stock, or volatility of asset values driven by market performance.\n\nOverdrafts Commercial overdrafts are typically short-term and unsecured. Some commercial borrowers tie their overdraft obligation to their line of credit, so any draw on the line of credit will satisfy the overdraft.\n\n95\n\n \n\nBased on the factors noted above for each type of collateral, the Company assigns risk ratings to borrowers based on their most recently assessed financial position.\n\nThe following tables provide a summary of the amortized cost balance by collateral type and risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,958,147\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,842,768\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n982,320\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n874,006\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n462,210\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n302,753\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,404,325\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,831,021\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n4,962\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37,671\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,883\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,085\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n893\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,535\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n63,256\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,635\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n136,920\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n21,647\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,207\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n49,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n49,139\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,090\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,473\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n168,348\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,059\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n324,255\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n4,273\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,121\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n100\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n513\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,007\n\n \n\nTotal Equipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,989,029\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,901,767\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,039,595\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n929,230\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n471,193\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n321,761\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,636,442\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13,301,203\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n26,921\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n22,252\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24,757\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,254\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,824\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,622\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n406,985\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n815\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n495,430\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n2,464\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n71\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n35\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,374\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,944\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n1,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n333\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n223\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n502\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n558\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,370\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,986\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,443\n\n \n\nTotal Agriculture\n\n \n\n$\n\n30,385\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n22,585\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24,980\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,827\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,859\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,180\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n426,729\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,258\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n521,803\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n129,859\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n277,053\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n364,738\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n82,934\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,470\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n29,289\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,489,473\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n221\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,385,037\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,810\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n50\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,862\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n533\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,399\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,502\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n664\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,238\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal NDFIs\n\n \n\n$\n\n130,392\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n286,076\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n368,137\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n86,436\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,136\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n29,406\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,517,283\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n271\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,430,137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\n2020\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,029,012\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,021,589\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n851,378\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n662,361\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n291,712\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n130,832\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,796,386\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n20,356\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,803,626\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n2,044\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,145\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,075\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,949\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37,419\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n56,271\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n23,044\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,101\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n58,659\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,444\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n822\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n141,289\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n262,599\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n195\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n195\n\n \n\nTotal Equipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,054,295\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,045,835\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n916,112\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n682,754\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n293,173\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n135,072\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,975,094\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n20,356\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,122,691\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,214\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,613\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,465\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,208\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n356\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n97\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n153,585\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n170,538\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n89\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,068\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,294\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n4,643\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,893\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,536\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Agriculture\n\n \n\n$\n\n9,857\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,554\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,208\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n356\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n97\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n156,546\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n178,368\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n266,024\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,733\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n94,730\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,997\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,467\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,080\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n929,976\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,670,007\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,478\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,478\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal NDFIs\n\n \n\n$\n\n266,024\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,733\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n94,730\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,997\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,467\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,080\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n941,454\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,681,485\n\n \n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Specialty loans is included below:\n\n96\n\n \n\nAsset-based lending General asset-based loans are secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and real estate. The purpose of these loans is for financing current operations for commercial customers. The repayment of debt is reliant upon collection of the accounts receivable within 30 to 90 days or converting assets into cash or through goods and services being sold and collected. The Company tracks each individual borrower credit risk based on their loan to collateral position. Any borrower position where the underlying value of collateral is below the fair value of the loan is considered out-of-margin and inherently higher risk.\n\nThe following table provides a summary of the amortized cost balance by risk rating for asset-based loans as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAsset-based lending\n\n \n\nRisk\n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\nIn-margin\n\n \n\n$\n\n518,237\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n469,194\n\n \n\nOut-of-margin\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n518,237\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n469,194\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Commercial real estate loans is included below:\n\nOwner-occupied Owner-occupied loans are secured by commercial real estate. These loans are often longer tenured and susceptible to multiple economic cycles. The loans rely on the owner-occupied operations to service debt which cover a broad spectrum of industries. Real estate debt can carry a significant amount of leverage for a borrower to maintain.\n\nNon-owner-occupied Non-owner-occupied loans are secured by commercial real estate. These loans are often longer tenured and susceptible to multiple economic cycles. The key element of risk in this type of lending is the cyclical nature of real estate markets. Although national conditions affect the overall real estate industry, the effect of national conditions on local markets is equally important. Factors such as unemployment rates, consumer demand, household formation, and the level of economic activity can vary widely from state to state and among metropolitan areas. In addition to geographic considerations, markets can be defined by property type. While all sectors are influenced by economic conditions, some sectors are more sensitive to certain economic factors than others.\n\nFarmland Farmland loans are secured by real estate used for agricultural purposes such as crop and livestock production. Assets used as collateral are long-term assets that carry the ability to have longer amortizations and maturities. Longer terms carry the risk of added susceptibility to market conditions. The limited purpose of some Agriculture-related collateral affects credit risk because such collateral may have limited or no other uses to support values when loan repayment problems emerge.\n\n5+ Multi-family 5+ multi-family loans are secured by a multi-family residential property. The primary risks associated with this type of collateral are largely driven by economic conditions. The national and local market conditions can change with unemployment rates or competing supply of multi-family housing. Tenants may not be able to afford their housing or have better options and this can result in increased vacancy. Rents may need to be lowered to fill apartment units. Increased vacancy and lower rental rates not only drive the borrower’s ability to repay debt but also contribute to how the collateral is valued.\n\n1-4 Family construction 1-4 family construction loans are secured by 1-4 family residential real estate and are in the process of construction or improvements being made. The predominant risk inherent to this portfolio is the risk associated with a borrower’s ability to successfully complete a project on time and within budget. Market conditions also play an important role in understanding the risk profile. Risk from adverse changes in market conditions from the start of development to completion can result in deflated collateral values.\n\nGeneral construction General construction loans are secured by commercial real estate in process of construction or improvements being made and their repayment is dependent on the collateral’s completion. Construction lending presents unique risks not encountered in term financing of existing real estate. The predominant risk inherent to this portfolio is the risk associated with a borrower’s ability to successfully complete a project on time and within budget. Commercial properties under construction are susceptible to market and economic conditions. Demand from prospective customers may erode after construction begins because of a general economic slowdown or an increase in the supply of competing properties.\n\n97\n\n \n\nBased on the factors noted above for each type of collateral, the Company assigns risk ratings to borrowers based on their most recently assessed financial position.\n\nThe following tables provide a summary of the amortized cost balance by collateral type and risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,135,389\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n489,616\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n529,515\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n904,187\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n751,944\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n681,592\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n39,385\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,531,628\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n4,148\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37,092\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,605\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,991\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,892\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,290\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n120\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n131,138\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n11,538\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,053\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n50,058\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,207\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,542\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n15,893\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n112,291\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Owner-occupied\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,151,075\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n529,761\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n599,178\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n955,385\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n775,378\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n724,775\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n39,505\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,775,057\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,619,478\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n652,107\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n827,493\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n974,293\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n749,272\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n716,905\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n36,134\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,054\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,576,736\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n23,339\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,950\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,994\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n745\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,307\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n58,335\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n21,468\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,974\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,013\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,856\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,599\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,290\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,959\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n80,159\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,952\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,688\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,640\n\n \n\nTotal Non-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,664,285\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n656,031\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n847,458\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,018,831\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n769,616\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n736,502\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n41,093\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,054\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,734,870\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n230,559\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67,852\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n65,697\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n116,281\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n80,909\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n124,702\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n65,013\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n751,088\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n18,101\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n342\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n115\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n120\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,869\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,547\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n10,136\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,348\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,613\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,584\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36,747\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,390\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n91,935\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Farmland\n\n \n\n$\n\n258,796\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n74,542\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n85,814\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n131,009\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n83,613\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n163,318\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n66,403\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n863,570\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n329,902\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n179,107\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n157,535\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n543,003\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n426,213\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n96,282\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,441\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,742,483\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n238\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,891\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,447\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n193\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,769\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,172\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,231\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,403\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal 5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n$\n\n329,902\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n179,107\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n171,945\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n554,125\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n434,660\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n96,475\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,441\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,776,655\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n74,900\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,104\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n520\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,301\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n87,825\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n949\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n460\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,649\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal 1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n$\n\n75,849\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,564\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n240\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n520\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,301\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n89,474\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,078,840\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n865,015\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n684,507\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n333,717\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23,062\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,951\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,085\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,025,177\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n14,579\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,100\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n128\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,919\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,903\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n38,658\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n5,732\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n34,493\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,560\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,348\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,293\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,250\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n72,676\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\nTotal General construction\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,099,253\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n868,115\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n719,128\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n373,196\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n28,313\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16,273\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n32,335\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,136,613\n\n \n\n \n\n98\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\n2020\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n316,858\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n276,546\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n590,337\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n442,768\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n289,219\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n267,944\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,266\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,213,886\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n31,213\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,512\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n467\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n33,192\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n4,446\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n503\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,631\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,113\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,263\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,993\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Owner-occupied\n\n \n\n$\n\n352,517\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n277,049\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n593,480\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n442,805\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n293,799\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n275,207\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,266\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,265,071\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n784,434\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n514,745\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n981,769\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n727,365\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n404,362\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n324,310\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n32,312\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,769,297\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,028\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n38,028\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n529\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n529\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Non-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n$\n\n784,434\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n527,773\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,006,769\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n727,365\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n404,362\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n324,839\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n32,312\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,807,854\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n36,771\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n45,055\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n45,131\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n36,127\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n182,769\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,209\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n106,468\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n466,533\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n982\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,324\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,329\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n16,903\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,302\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n993\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,483\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,681\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Farmland\n\n \n\n$\n\n54,656\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47,357\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n58,154\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n36,127\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n183,762\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23,016\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107,468\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n510,543\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n161,767\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47,136\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n302,225\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n256,032\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n28,819\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n18,732\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,202\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n823,913\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal 5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n$\n\n161,767\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47,136\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n302,225\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n256,032\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n28,819\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n18,732\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,202\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n823,913\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n46,096\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,385\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47,486\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal 1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n$\n\n46,096\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,385\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47,486\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n493,614\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n643,050\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,221,251\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n235,758\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,049\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n504\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n74,950\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,673,176\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,835\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,288\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,133\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n109\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n109\n\n \n\nTotal General construction\n\n \n\n$\n\n493,723\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n644,885\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,222,539\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n235,758\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,049\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n514\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n74,950\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,676,418\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Consumer real estate loans is included below:\n\nHELOC HELOC loans are revolving lines of credit secured by 1-4 family residential property. The primary risk is the borrower’s inability to repay debt. Revolving notes are often associated with HELOCs that can be secured by real estate without a 1st lien priority. Collateral is susceptible to market volatility impacting home values or economic downturns.\n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family First lien 1-4 family loans are secured by a first lien on 1-4 family residential property. These term loans carry longer maturities and amortizations. The longer tenure exposes the borrower to multiple economic cycles, coupled with longer amortizations that result in smaller principal reduction early in the life of the loan. Collateral is susceptible to market volatility impacting home values.\n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family Junior lien 1-4 family loans are secured by a junior lien on 1-4 family residential property. The Company’s primary risk is the borrower’s inability to repay debt and not being in a first lien position. Collateral is susceptible to market volatility impacting home values or economic downturns.\n\nA borrower is considered non-performing if the Company has ceased the recognition of interest and the loan is placed on non-accrual. Charge-offs and borrower performance are tracked on a loan origination vintage basis. Certain vintages, based on their maturation cycle, could be at higher risk due to collateral-based risk factors.\n\n99\n\n \n\nThe following tables provide a summary of the amortized cost balance by collateral type and risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,736\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n87\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n407\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,343\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n324\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,979\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n697,853\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,358\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n713,087\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n12\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n312\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n349\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n732\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n253\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n650\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n973\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,086\n\n \n\nTotal HELOC\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,748\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n399\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n756\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,075\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n577\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,784\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n698,503\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,331\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n718,173\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n608,545\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n367,915\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n359,419\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n624,670\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n732,306\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n824,314\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,864\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,524,046\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n44,788\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n241\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,986\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,885\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,445\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,256\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n66,601\n\n \n\nTotal First lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n$\n\n653,333\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n368,156\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n364,405\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n631,555\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n735,751\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n830,570\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,864\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,590,647\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n20,419\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n30,975\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,202\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n28,417\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n17,324\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,974\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,766\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n127,077\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n39\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n246\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n121\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n81\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n74\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n571\n\n \n\nTotal Junior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n$\n\n20,458\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n31,221\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,212\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n28,538\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n17,405\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,048\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,766\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n127,648\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\n2020\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n450\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n203\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n249\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,780\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n390,843\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,879\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n397,510\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n252\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n85\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,269\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n605\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,211\n\n \n\nTotal HELOC\n\n \n\n$\n\n90\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n450\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n455\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n334\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,049\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n390,843\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,484\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n399,721\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n413,060\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n358,303\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n559,689\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n633,749\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n496,615\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n272,601\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,734,017\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,939\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,328\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,468\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n143\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,027\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,240\n\n \n\nTotal First lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n$\n\n413,395\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n361,242\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n565,017\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n635,217\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n496,758\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n273,628\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,745,257\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n12,516\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,952\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,903\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,978\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,934\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,631\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n41,989\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n101\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n45\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n163\n\n \n\nTotal Junior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n$\n\n12,516\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,969\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,004\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,978\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,934\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,676\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n75\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n42,152\n\n \n\nConsumer\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Consumer loans is included below:\n\nRevolving line Consumer Revolving lines of credit are secured by consumer assets other than real estate. The primary risk associated with this collateral is related to market volatility and the value of the underlying financial assets.\n\nAuto Direct consumer auto loans are secured by new and used consumer vehicles. The primary risk with this collateral class is the rate at which the collateral depreciates.\n\nOther This category includes Other consumer loans made to an individual. The primary risk for this category is for those loans where the loan is unsecured. This collateral type also includes other unsecured lending such as consumer overdrafts.\n\nA borrower is considered non-performing if the Company has ceased the recognition of interest and the loan is placed on non-accrual. Charge-offs and borrower performance are tracked on a loan origination vintage basis. Certain vintages, based on their maturation cycle, could be at higher risk due to collateral-based risk factors.\n\n100\n\n \n\nThe following tables provide a summary of the amortized cost balance by collateral type and risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,485\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n34\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n47\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n525\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n159,834\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n99\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n162,071\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n620\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n626\n\n \n\nTotal Revolving line\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,485\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n34\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n49\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n526\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n160,454\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n162,697\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,179\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,292\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,725\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,290\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,109\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n248\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n31,843\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n44\n\n \n\nTotal Auto\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,179\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,292\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,743\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,307\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,118\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n248\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n31,887\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n12,905\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,161\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,514\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,893\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n849\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,245\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n44,134\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n2\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n93\n\n \n\nTotal Other\n\n \n\n$\n\n12,907\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,197\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,514\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,917\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n853\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,272\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n44,227\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Origination Year - Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRisk by Collateral\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n2022\n\n \n\n \n\n2021\n\n \n\n \n\n2020\n\n \n\n \n\nPrior\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost - Revolving Loans Converted to Term Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n35\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n101,407\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n101,442\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Revolving line\n\n \n\n$\n\n35\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n101,407\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n101,442\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,418\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,534\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,920\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n673\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n283\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n22,395\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19\n\n \n\nTotal Auto\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,567\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,429\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,534\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,928\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n673\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n283\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n22,414\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPerforming\n\n \n\n$\n\n13,037\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,876\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,057\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,659\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n342\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n796\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n17,216\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n69,983\n\n \n\nNon-performing\n\n \n\n \n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21\n\n \n\nTotal Other\n\n \n\n$\n\n13,050\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,876\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,065\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,659\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n342\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n796\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n17,216\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n70,004\n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact Credit card loans is included below:\n\nConsumer Consumer credit card loans are revolving loans made to individuals. The primary risk associated with this collateral class is credit card debt which is generally unsecured; therefore, repayment depends primarily on a borrower’s willingness and capacity to repay. The highly competitive environment for credit card lending provides consumers with ample opportunity to hold several credit cards from different issuers and to pay only minimum monthly payments on outstanding balances. In such an environment, borrowers may become over-extended and unable to repay, particularly in times of an economic downturn or a personal catastrophic event.\n\nThe consumer credit card portfolio is segmented by borrower payment activity. Transactors are defined as accounts that pay off their balance by the end of each statement cycle. Revolvers are defined as an account that carries a balance from one statement cycle to the next. These accounts incur monthly finance charges, and, sometimes, late fees. Revolvers are inherently higher risk and are tracked by credit score.\n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025, a co-branded credit card portfolio is also segmented between current and significantly delinquent loans, with accounts being considered significantly delinquent after 60 days. Current loans are segmented by borrower payment activity as described above. Significantly delinquent loans are tracked by the number of cycles past due.\n\nCommercial Commercial credit card loans are revolving loans made to small and commercial businesses. The primary risk associated with this collateral class is credit card debt which is generally unsecured; therefore,\n\n101\n\n \n\nrepayment depends primarily on a borrower’s willingness and capacity to repay. Borrowers may become over-extended and unable to repay, particularly in times of an economic downturn or a catastrophic event.\n\nThe commercial credit card portfolio is segmented by current and past due payment status. A borrower is past due after 30 days. In general, commercial credit card customers do not have incentive to hold a balance resulting in paying interest on credit card debt as commercial customers will typically have other debt obligations with lower interest rates in which they can utilize for capital.\n\nThe following table provides a summary of the amortized cost balance of consumer credit cards by risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\nRisk\n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\nTransactor accounts\n\n \n\n$\n\n123,445\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n101,688\n\n \n\nRevolver accounts (by Credit score):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLess than 600\n\n \n\n \n\n13,123\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n16,297\n\n \n\n600-619\n\n \n\n \n\n7,127\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,893\n\n \n\n620-639\n\n \n\n \n\n12,243\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,174\n\n \n\n640-659\n\n \n\n \n\n19,679\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,798\n\n \n\n660-679\n\n \n\n \n\n20,261\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,897\n\n \n\n680-699\n\n \n\n \n\n22,814\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,121\n\n \n\n700-719\n\n \n\n \n\n25,385\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,180\n\n \n\n720-739\n\n \n\n \n\n22,547\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,418\n\n \n\n740-759\n\n \n\n \n\n19,838\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,965\n\n \n\n760-779\n\n \n\n \n\n19,864\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,609\n\n \n\n780-799\n\n \n\n \n\n18,774\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,058\n\n \n\n800-819\n\n \n\n \n\n11,782\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,443\n\n \n\n820-839\n\n \n\n \n\n6,151\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,745\n\n \n\n840+\n\n \n\n \n\n1,213\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,188\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n344,246\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n328,474\n\n \n\n \n\nThe following table provides a summary of the amortized cost balance of consumer credit cards considered significantly delinquent for a co-branded portfolio by delinquent cycles as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\nRisk\n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n61-90 Days\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,084\n\n \n\n91-120 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n848\n\n \n\n121-150 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n805\n\n \n\n151-180 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n766\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,503\n\n \n\n \n\nThe following table provides a summary of the amortized cost balance of commercial credit cards by risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial\n\n \n\nRisk\n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\nCurrent\n\n \n\n$\n\n330,585\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n231,713\n\n \n\nPast Due\n\n \n\n \n\n22,399\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,579\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n352,984\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n250,292\n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\nA discussion of the credit quality indicators that impact each type of collateral securing Leases and other loans is included below:\n\n102\n\n \n\nLeases Leases are either loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures or are loans related to all other direct financing and leveraged leases on property for leasing to lessees other than for household, family and other personal expenditure purposes. All leases are secured by the lease between the lessor and the lessee. These assignments grant the creditor a security interest in the rent stream from any lease, an important source of cash to pay the note in case of the borrower’s default.\n\nOther Other loans are loans that are obligations of states and political subdivisions in the U.S., loans for purchasing or carrying securities, or all other non-consumer loans. Risk associated with other loans is tied to the underlying collateral by each type of loan. Collateral is generally equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, 1-4 family residential construction and is susceptible to the same risks mentioned with those collateral types previously.\n\nBased on the factors noted above for each type of collateral, the Company assigns risk ratings to borrowers based on their most recently assessed financial position.\n\nThe following table provides a summary of the amortized cost balance by collateral type and risk rating as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLeases\n\n \n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\nRisk\n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\nPass\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,214\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n237,186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n86,778\n\n \n\nSpecial Mention\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSubstandard\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25\n\n \n\nDoubtful\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,214\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n237,186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n86,803\n\n \n\nAllowance for Credit Losses\n\nThe ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from loans’ and HTM securities’ amortized cost bases to present the net amount expected to be collected on the instrument. Loans and HTM securities are charged off against the ACL when management believes the balance has become uncollectible. Expected recoveries are included in the allowance and do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.\n\n \n\nManagement estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, related to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable economic forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses and is tracked over an economic cycle to capture a ‘through the cycle’ loss history. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in portfolio industry-based segmentation, risk rating and credit score changes, average prepayment rates, changes in environmental conditions, or other relevant factors. For economic forecasts, the Company uses the Moody’s baseline scenario. The Company has developed a dynamic reasonable and supportable forecast period that ranges from one to three years and changes based on economic conditions. The Company’s reasonable and supportable forecast period is one year. After the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts to historical losses. The reversion method applied to each portfolio can either be cliff in which the Company reverts immediately to historical losses or straight-line over four quarters.\n\nThe ACL is measured on a collective (pool) basis when similar risk characteristics exist. The ACL also incorporates qualitative factors which represent adjustments to historical credit loss experience for items such as concentrations of credit and results of internal loan review. The Company has identified the following portfolio segments and measures the allowance for credit losses using the following methods. The Company’s portfolio segmentation consists of Commercial and industrial, Specialty lending, Commercial real estate, Consumer real estate, Consumer, Credit cards, Leases and other, and Held-to-maturity securities. Multiple modeling techniques are used to measure credit losses based on the portfolio.\n\n \n\nThe ACL for Commercial and industrial and Leases and other segments are measured using a probability of default and loss given default method. Primary risk drivers within the segment are risk ratings of the individual loans along with changes of macro-economic variables. The economic variables utilized are typically comprised of leading and lagging indicators. The ACL for Commercial and industrial loans is calculated by modeling probability of default (PD) over future periods multiplied by historical loss given default rates (LGD) multiplied by contractual exposure at default minus any estimated prepayments and charge offs.\n\n103\n\n \n\n \n\nCollateral positions for Specialty lending loans are continuously monitored by the Company and the borrower is required to continually adjust the amount of collateral securing the loan. Credit losses are measured for any position where the amortized cost basis is greater than the fair value of the collateral. The ACL for specialty lending loans is calculated by using a bottom-up approach comparing collateral values to outstanding balances.\n\n \n\nThe ACL for the Commercial real estate segment is measured using a PD and LGD method. Primary risk characteristics within the segment are risk ratings of the individual loans, along with changes of macro-economic variables, such as interest rates, CRE price index, median household income, construction activity, farm income, and vacancy rates. The ACL for Commercial real estate loans is calculated by modeling PD over future periods based on peer bank data. The PD loss rate is then multiplied by historical LGD multiplied by contractual exposure at default minus any estimated prepayments and charge offs.\n\n \n\nThe ACL for the Consumer real estate and Consumer segments are measured using an origination vintage loss rate method applied to the loans’ amortized cost balance. The primary risk driver within the segments is year of origination along with changes of macro-economic variables such as unemployment and the home price index.\n\n \n\nThe Credit card segment contains both consumer and commercial credit cards. The ACL for Consumer credit cards is measured using a PD and LGD method for Revolvers and average historical loss rates across a defined lookback period for Transactors. The PD and LGD method used for Revolvers is similar in nature to the method used in the Commercial and industrial and Commercial real estate segments. Primary risk drivers within the segment are credit ratings of the individual card holders along with changes of macro-economic variables such as unemployment and retail sales. The ACL for Commercial credit cards is measured using roll-rate loss rate method based on days past due.\n\n \n\nThe ACL for the State and political HTM securities segment is measured using a loss rate method based on historical bond rating transitions. Primary risk drivers within the segment are bond ratings in the portfolio along with changes of macro-economic conditions. There is no ACL for the U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, and GSE mortgage-backed HTM securities portfolios as they are considered to be agency-backed securities with no risk of loss as they are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government. For further discussion on these securities, including the aging and amortized cost balance of HTM securities, see Note 4, “Securities.”\n\n \n\nSee the credit quality indicators presented previously for a summary of current risk in the Company’s portfolio. Changes in economic forecasts will affect all portfolio segments, updated financial records from borrowers will affect portfolio segments by risk rating, updated credit scores will affect consumer credit cards, payment performance will affect consumer and commercial credit card portfolio segments, and updated bond credit ratings will affect held-to-maturity securities. The Company actively monitors all credit quality indicators for risk changes that will influence the current estimate.\n\n \n\nExpected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for prepayments when appropriate. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a concessionary loan term has been granted to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty or the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancelable by the Company.\n\n \n\nCredit card receivables do not have stated maturities. In determining the estimated life of a credit card receivable, management first estimates the future cash flows expected to be received and then applies those expected future cash flows to the credit card balance. Expected credit losses for credit cards are determined by estimating the amount and timing of principal payments expected to be received as payment for the balance outstanding as of the reporting period until the expected payments have been fully allocated. The ACL is recorded for the excess of the balance outstanding as of the reporting period over the expected principal payments.\n\n \n\nLoans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Loans evaluated individually include loans on nonaccrual, loans that include modifications deemed concessionary made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, or any loans specifically identified, and are excluded from the collective evaluation. When it is determined that payment of interest or recovery of all principal is questionable, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for undiscounted selling costs as appropriate. All loans are classified as collateral dependent if placed on non-accrual or include modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.\n\n104\n\n \n\nALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS\n\nThe following tables provide a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal - Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nHTM\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n161,553\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n77,340\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,327\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n966\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,272\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n631\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n259,089\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,645\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n261,734\n\n \n\nPCD allowance for credit loss at acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n45,026\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40,054\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n206\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n85,299\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n85,299\n\n \n\nCharge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n(44,645\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(11,792\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,041\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3,538\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(25,676\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(27\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(87,719\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(87,719\n\n)\n\nRecoveries\n\n \n\n \n\n507\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n196\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n275\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n845\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,519\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,348\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,348\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n77,883\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n45,262\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,171\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,101\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,927\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n157,461\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(961\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n156,500\n\n \n\nEnding balance - ACL\n\n \n\n$\n\n240,324\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n151,060\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,938\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,387\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n18,042\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,727\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n419,478\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,684\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n421,162\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,234\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,741\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n70\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n63\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,124\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,138\n\n \n\nInitial allowance for credit loss at acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n2,166\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,192\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n63\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n114\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,576\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,583\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,514\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(385\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n21\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n34\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(150\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,994\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(6\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(2,000\n\n)\n\nEnding balance - ACL on off-balance sheet\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,886\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,548\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n154\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n91\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n27\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,706\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n15\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,721\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal - Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nHTM\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n157,389\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n45,507\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,941\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,089\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,935\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n877\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n219,738\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,258\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n222,996\n\n \n\nCharge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,441\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(250\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(432\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,524\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,752\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(4\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(28,403\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(28,403\n\n)\n\nRecoveries\n\n \n\n \n\n1,890\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n648\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n241\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,355\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,141\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n7,715\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n32,083\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,830\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,160\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,734\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(245\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n62,613\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(613\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n62,000\n\n \n\nEnding balance - ACL\n\n \n\n$\n\n161,553\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n77,340\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,327\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n966\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,272\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n631\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n259,089\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,645\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n261,734\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,152\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n460\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n117\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n100\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,024\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n64\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,088\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,918\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(186\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,281\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(47\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(37\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(900\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(50\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(950\n\n)\n\nEnding balance - ACL on off-balance sheet\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,234\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,741\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n70\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n16\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n63\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,124\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,138\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\nSpecialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\nConsumer\n\n \n\n \n\nCredit cards\n\n \n\n \n\nLeases and other\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal - Loans\n\n \n\n \n\nHTM\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n137,997\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n39,370\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,148\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n494\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,866\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n961\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n191,836\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,407\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n194,243\n\n \n\nCharge-offs\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,047\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(762\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(266\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,185\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,232\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(9,181\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(17,673\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(17,673\n\n)\n\nRecoveries\n\n \n\n \n\n5,295\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n111\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n45\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n211\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,199\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,199\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n19,144\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n761\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,933\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,616\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,714\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(84\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n38,376\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n851\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,227\n\n \n\nEnding balance - ACL\n\n \n\n$\n\n157,389\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n45,507\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,941\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,089\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,935\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n877\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n219,738\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,258\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n222,996\n\n \n\nAllowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBeginning balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,188\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n418\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n124\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n52\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,981\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,088\n\n \n\nProvision\n\n \n\n \n\n1,964\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n42\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(7\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(4\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,043\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(43\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,000\n\n \n\nEnding balance - ACL on off-balance sheet\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,152\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n186\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n460\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n117\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n100\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,024\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n64\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,088\n\n \n\n \n\nPurchased loans that reflect a more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination at the date of acquisition are classified as PCD loans. PCD loans are recorded at fair value plus the ACL expected at the time of acquisition. The Company recorded $85.3 million to establish the PCD ACL related to the acquisition of HTLF.\n\nThe allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded in the Accrued expenses and taxes line of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, see Note 15 “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees.”\n\n105\n\n \n\nCollateral Dependent Financial Assets\n\n \n\nThe following tables provide the amortized cost balance of financial assets considered collateral dependent as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2025\n\n \n\nLoan Segment and Type\n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Collateral Dependent Assets\n\n \n\n \n\nRelated Allowance for Credit Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Collateral Dependent Assets with no related Allowance\n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n23,594\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,741\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,274\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n2,186\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n687\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n743\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n853\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n853\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\n26,633\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,428\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,870\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAsset-based lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Specialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n10,905\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,746\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n50,955\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,093\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,957\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n3,389\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,389\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n14,324\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,324\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n7,408\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n161\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,700\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n86,981\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,494\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36,116\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n5,319\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,319\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n23,969\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n205\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,720\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n622\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n622\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n29,910\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n205\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,661\n\n \n\nConsumer:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n633\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n633\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n47\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n97\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n97\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer\n\n \n\n \n\n777\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n777\n\n \n\nLeases and other:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLeases\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Leases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n144,301\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23,127\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,424\n\n \n\n \n\n106\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31, 2024\n\n \n\nLoan Segment and Type\n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Collateral Dependent Assets\n\n \n\n \n\nRelated Allowance for Credit Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost of Collateral Dependent Assets with no related Allowance\n\n \n\nCommercial and industrial:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nEquipment/Accounts Receivable/Inventory\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,423\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,423\n\n \n\nAgriculture\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNDFIs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial and industrial\n\n \n\n \n\n4,423\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,423\n\n \n\nSpecialty lending:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAsset-based lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Specialty lending\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommercial real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOwner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n707\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n707\n\n \n\nNon-owner-occupied\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nFarmland\n\n \n\n \n\n135\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n135\n\n \n\n5+ Multi-family\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n1-4 Family construction\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nGeneral construction\n\n \n\n \n\n118\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n118\n\n \n\nTotal Commercial real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n960\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n960\n\n \n\nConsumer real estate:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nHELOC\n\n \n\n \n\n2,211\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,211\n\n \n\nFirst lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n11,240\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,240\n\n \n\nJunior lien: 1-4 family\n\n \n\n \n\n163\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n163\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer real estate\n\n \n\n \n\n13,614\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,614\n\n \n\nConsumer:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRevolving line\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nAuto\n\n \n\n \n\n19\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n21\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21\n\n \n\nTotal Consumer\n\n \n\n \n\n40\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40\n\n \n\nLeases and other:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLeases\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal Leases and other\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n \n\n$\n\n19,037\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,037\n\n \n\n \n\nModifications made to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty\n\nIn the normal course of business, the Company may execute loan modifications with borrowers. These modifications are analyzed to determine whether the modification is considered concessionary, long term and made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications generally include interest rate adjustments, principal reductions, and amortization and maturity date extensions. These modifications allow the borrower short-term cash relief to allow them to improve their financial condition. If a loan modification is determined to be made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the loan is considered collateral dependent and evaluated as part of the ACL as described above in the Allowance for Credit Losses section of this note.\n\nFor the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had seven modifications on residential real estate loans made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty with a total pre-modification loan balance of $1.6 million and a total post-modification balance of $1.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had five\n\n107\n\n \n\nmodifications on residential real estate loans made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty with a total pre-modification loan balance of $1.1 million and a total post-modification balance of $1.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company did not modify any loans made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.\n\nThe Company had no commitments to lend to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for which the Company has modified an existing loan as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Company monitors loan payments on an on-going basis to determine if a loan is considered to have a payment default. Determination of payment default involves analyzing the economic conditions that exist for each customer and their ability to generate positive cash flows during the loan term. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company had no loan modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for which there was a payment default within the 12 months following the modification date.\n\n4. SECURITIES\n\nSecurities Available for Sale\n\nThis table provides detailed information about securities available for sale at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nGross\n\n \n\n \n\nGross\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\n\n \n\n \n\nFair\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\nCost\n\n \n\n \n\nGains\n\n \n\n \n\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nValue\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,301,248\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n20,008\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(441\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,320,815\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n62,069\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n401\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(100\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n62,370\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n8,427,197\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n71,827\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(331,151\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n8,167,873\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n2,494,537\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,898\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(72,847\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,446,588\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n180,854\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n349\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,088\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n177,115\n\n \n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n533,995\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n504\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(119\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n534,380\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n13,999,900\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n117,987\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(408,746\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nGross\n\n \n\n \n\nGross\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\n\n \n\n \n\nFair\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nCost\n\n \n\n \n\nGains\n\n \n\n \n\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nValue\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,331,394\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,751\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(8,072\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,326,073\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n129,246\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n126\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(325\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n129,047\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n4,945,548\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n339\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(524,957\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n4,420,930\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n1,309,126\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n487\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(91,044\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,218,569\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n330,739\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n60\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13,629\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n317,170\n\n \n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n361,623\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,060\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(138\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n362,545\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,407,676\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,823\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(638,165\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n7,774,334\n\n \n\n \n\nThe following table presents contractual maturity information for securities available for sale at December 31, 2025 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized\n\n \n\n \n\nFair\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCost\n\n \n\n \n\nValue\n\n \n\nDue in 1 year or less\n\n \n\n$\n\n609,207\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n609,156\n\n \n\nDue after 1 year through 5 years\n\n \n\n \n\n2,539,550\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,551,820\n\n \n\nDue after 5 years through 10 years\n\n \n\n \n\n565,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n559,783\n\n \n\nDue after 10 years\n\n \n\n \n\n1,858,654\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,820,509\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n5,572,703\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,541,268\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed securities\n\n \n\n \n\n8,427,197\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,167,873\n\n \n\nTotal securities available for sale\n\n \n\n$\n\n13,999,900\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\n \n\nSecurities may be disposed of before contractual maturities due to sales by the Company or because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.\n\n108\n\n \n\nDuring 2025, related to the acquisition of HTLF, the Company acquired securities available for sale with an Acquisition Date fair value of $3.1 billion.\n\nThe following table presents the sales of securities available for sale for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nProceeds from sales\n\n \n\n$\n\n646,962\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,154\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n22,193\n\n \n\nGross realized gains\n\n \n\n \n\n592\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n139\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n154\n\n \n\nGross realized losses\n\n \n\n \n\n(119\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2\n\n)\n\nThere were $13.4 billion and $10.5 billion of securities pledged to secure U.S. Government deposits, other public deposits, certain trust deposits, derivative transactions, and repurchase agreements at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.\n\nAccrued interest on securities available for sale totaled $82.9 million and $43.1 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in the Accrued income line on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total amount of accrued interest is excluded from the amortized cost of available-for-sale securities presented above. Further, the Company has elected not to measure an ACL for accrued interest receivable.\n\nThe following table shows the Company’s available-for-sale investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLess than 12 months\n\n \n\n \n\n12 months or more\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\nDescription of Securities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n \n\n8\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n72,013\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(88\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n30,234\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(353\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n102,247\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(441\n\n)\n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,855\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(100\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,855\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(100\n\n)\n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n82\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n757,160\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(5,682\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n817\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,871,729\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(325,469\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n899\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,628,889\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(331,151\n\n)\n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n152\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n515,364\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(11,181\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,142\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n809,113\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(61,666\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,294\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,324,477\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(72,847\n\n)\n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,990\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(10\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n134\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n164,108\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,078\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n135\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n167,098\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,088\n\n)\n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n20\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n164,531\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(112\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,999\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(7\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n21\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n167,530\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(119\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n264\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,519,913\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(17,173\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,096\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,878,183\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(391,573\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,360\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,398,096\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(408,746\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLess than 12 months\n\n \n\n \n\n12 months or more\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized\nLosses\n\n \n\nDescription of Securities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n \n\n93\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n635,739\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(6,319\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n9\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n142,518\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(1,753\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n778,257\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(8,072\n\n)\n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n4\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n20,858\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(46\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n5\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n56,712\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(279\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n9\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n77,570\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(325\n\n)\n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n159\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,293,953\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(22,468\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n834\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,055,882\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(502,489\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n993\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,349,835\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(524,957\n\n)\n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n264\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n173,006\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,392\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,629\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n953,458\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(88,652\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,893\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,126,464\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(91,044\n\n)\n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n239\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n315,109\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13,629\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n239\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n315,109\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13,629\n\n)\n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,222\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(88\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n5\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,521\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(50\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n12\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n77,743\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(138\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n527\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,170,778\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(31,313\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,721\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,554,200\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(606,852\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,248\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,724,978\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(638,165\n\n)\n\n \n\nThe unrealized losses in the Company’s investments were caused by changes in interest rates, and not from a decline in credit of the underlying issuers. The U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, and GSE mortgage-backed securities\n\n109\n\n \n\nare all considered to be agency-backed securities with no risk of loss as they are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government. The changes in fair value in the agency-backed portfolios are solely driven by change in interest rates caused by changing economic conditions. The Company has no knowledge of any underlying credit issues and the cash flows underlying the debt securities have not changed and are not expected to be impacted by changes in interest rates.\n\nFor the State and political subdivision portfolio, the majority of the Company’s holdings are in general obligation bonds, which have a very low historical default rate due to issuers generally having unlimited taxing authority to service the debt. For the State and political, Corporates, and Collateralized loan obligations portfolios, the Company has a robust process for monitoring credit risk, including both pre-purchase and ongoing post-purchase credit reviews and analysis. The Company monitors credit ratings of all bond issuers in these segments and reviews available financial data, including market and sector trends.\n\nDuring the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a $4.9 million impairment on one Corporate available-for-sale security.\n\nAs of both December 31, 2025 and 2024, there was no ACL related to the Company’s available-for-sale securities as the decline in fair value did not result from credit issues.\n\nSecurities Held to Maturity\n\nThe following table provides detailed information about securities held to maturity at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively (in thousands):\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\nAmortized Cost\n\n \n\n \n\nGross Unrealized Gains\n\n \n\n \n\nGross Unrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nAllowance for Credit Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nNet Carrying Amount\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n38,253\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n27\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(37\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n38,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n38,253\n\n \n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n2,513,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(305,040\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,208,962\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,513,667\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n3,172,307\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,713\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(195,760\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,003,260\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,684\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,170,623\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,724,227\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n27,075\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(500,837\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,250,465\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(1,684\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,722,543\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nAmortized Cost\n\n \n\n \n\nGross Unrealized Gains\n\n \n\n \n\nGross Unrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nAllowance for Credit Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nNet Carrying Amount\n\n \n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n$\n\n116,331\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(581\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n115,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n116,331\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n2,523,134\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(418,482\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,104,652\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,523,134\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n2,739,447\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,035\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(222,946\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,528,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,645\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,736,802\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,378,912\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,035\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(642,009\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,748,938\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,645\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,376,267\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe following table presents contractual maturity information for securities held to maturity at December 31, 2025 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized\n\n \n\n \n\nFair\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCost\n\n \n\n \n\nValue\n\n \n\nDue in 1 year or less\n\n \n\n$\n\n143,103\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n132,313\n\n \n\nDue after 1 year through 5 years\n\n \n\n \n\n392,966\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n389,751\n\n \n\nDue after 5 years through 10 years\n\n \n\n \n\n864,777\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n836,846\n\n \n\nDue after 10 years\n\n \n\n \n\n1,809,714\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,682,593\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n3,210,560\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,041,503\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed securities\n\n \n\n \n\n2,513,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,208,962\n\n \n\nTotal securities held to maturity\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,724,227\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,250,465\n\n \n\n \n\nExpected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.\n\n110\n\n \n\nDuring 2025, related to the acquisition of HTLF, the Company acquired securities held to maturity with an Acquisition Date fair value of $438.9 million.\n\nThere were no sales of securities held to maturity during 2025, 2024, or 2023.\n\nDuring the year ended December 31, 2022, securities with an amortized cost of $4.1 billion and a fair value of $3.8 billion were transferred from the available-for-sale classification to the held-to-maturity classification as the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. The transfers of securities were made at fair value at the time of transfer. The unrealized holding gain or loss at the time of transfer is retained in AOCI and will be amortized over the remaining life of the securities, offsetting the related amortization of discount or premium on the transferred securities. No gains or losses were recognized at the time of the transfers. The amortized cost balance of securities held to maturity in the tables above includes a net unamortized unrealized loss of $139.2 million and $171.3 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.\n\nAccrued interest on securities held to maturity totaled $28.0 million and $25.6 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in the Accrued income line on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total amount of accrued interest is excluded from the amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities presented above. Further, the Company has elected not to measure an ACL for accrued interest receivable.\n\nThe following table shows the Company’s held-to-maturity investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLess than 12 months\n\n \n\n \n\n12 months or more\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n \n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n15,913\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(37\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n15,913\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(37\n\n)\n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n147,066\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(918\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n262\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,998,984\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(304,122\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n272\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,146,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(305,040\n\n)\n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n146\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n687,180\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(41,122\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,354\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,480,709\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(154,638\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,167,889\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(195,760\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n159\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n850,159\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(42,077\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,616\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,479,693\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(458,760\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,775\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,329,852\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(500,837\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLess than 12 months\n\n \n\n \n\n12 months or more\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\n \n\nCount\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n \n\nUnrealized Losses\n\n \n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n115,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(581\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n115,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(581\n\n)\n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n6\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,527\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(103\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n263\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,101,125\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(418,379\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n269\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,104,652\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(418,482\n\n)\n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n47\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n52,468\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,030\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,414\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,972,927\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(220,916\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,461\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,025,395\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(222,946\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n53\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n55,995\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,133\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,687\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,189,802\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(639,876\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,740\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n4,245,797\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(642,009\n\n)\n\nThe unrealized losses in the Company’s held-to-maturity portfolio were caused by changes in the interest rate environment. The U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency and GSE mortgage-backed securities are considered to be agency-backed securities with no risk of loss as they are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government. Therefore, the Company’s expected lifetime loss for these portfolios is zero and there is no ACL recorded for these portfolios. The Company has no knowledge of any underlying credit issues and the cash flows underlying the debt securities have not changed and are not expected to be impacted by changes in interest rates.\n\nFor the State and political subdivision portfolio, the Company’s holdings are in general obligation bonds as well as private placement bonds, which have very low historical default rates due to issuers generally having unlimited taxing authority to service the debt. The Company has a robust process for monitoring credit risk, including both pre-purchase and ongoing post-purchase credit reviews and analysis. The Company monitors credit ratings of all bond issuers in these segments and reviews available financial data, including market and sector trends. The underlying bonds are evaluated for credit losses in conjunction with management’s estimate of the ACL based on credit rating.\n\n111\n\n \n\nThe following table shows the amortized cost basis by credit rating of the Company’s held-to-maturity State and political subdivisions bond investments at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Credit Rating - HTM Debt Securities\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\nAAA\n\n \n\n \n\nAA\n\n \n\n \n\nA\n\n \n\n \n\nBBB\n\n \n\n \n\nBB\n\n \n\n \n\nB\n\n \n\n \n\nCCC-C\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCompetitive\n\n \n\n$\n\n46,933\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n51,390\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n379,973\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n812,061\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n34,105\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23,326\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,424\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,362,212\n\n \n\nUtilities\n\n \n\n \n\n899,088\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n777,880\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n114,845\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n15,824\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,458\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,810,095\n\n \n\nTotal state and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n$\n\n946,021\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n829,270\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n494,818\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n827,885\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n36,563\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n23,326\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,424\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,172,307\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortized Cost Basis by Credit Rating - HTM Debt Securities\n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nAAA\n\n \n\n \n\nAA\n\n \n\n \n\nA\n\n \n\n \n\nBBB\n\n \n\n \n\nBB\n\n \n\n \n\nCCC-C\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCompetitive\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n424,690\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n610,351\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n36,628\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n21,990\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,093,659\n\n \n\nUtilities\n\n \n\n \n\n759,798\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n761,706\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n99,127\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,509\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n648\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,645,788\n\n \n\nTotal state and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n$\n\n759,798\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n761,706\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n523,817\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n634,860\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n37,276\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n21,990\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,739,447\n\n \n\nCompetitive held-to-maturity securities include not-for-profit enterprises that provide public functions such as housing, higher education, or healthcare, but do so in a competitive environment. It also includes project financings that can have relatively high enterprise risk, such as deals backed by revenues from sports or convention facilities or start-up transportation revenues.\n\nUtilities are public enterprises providing essential services with a monopoly or near-monopoly over the service area. This includes environmental utilities (water, sewer, solid waste), power utilities (electric distribution and generation, gas), and transportation utilities (airports, parking, toll roads, mass transit, ports).\n\nAll held-to-maturity securities were current and not past due at December 31, 2025 and 2024.\n\nTrading Securities\n\nThere was a net unrealized gain of $3 thousand on trading securities as of December 31, 2025. There was no net unrealized gains or losses on trading securities as of December 31, 2024 and the net unrealized gain on trading securities was $272 thousand as of December 31, 2023. Net unrealized gains and losses are included in trading and investment banking income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Securities sold not yet purchased totaled $4.1 million and $7.1 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and are classified within the Other liabilities line of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.\n\nOther Securities\n\nThe table below provides detailed information for Other securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nFRB and FHLB stock\n\n \n\n$\n\n137,498\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n42,672\n\n \n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values\n\n \n\n \n\n14,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,596\n\n \n\nEquity securities without readily determinable fair values\n\n \n\n \n\n524,112\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n416,750\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n676,300\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n471,018\n\n \n\n \n\nInvestment in FRB stock is based on the capital structure of the investing bank, and investment in FHLB stock is mainly tied to the level of borrowings from the FHLB. These holdings are carried at cost. Equity securities with\n\n112\n\n \n\nreadily determinable fair values are generally traded on an exchange and market prices are readily available. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values include equity investments which are held by a subsidiary qualified as a Small Business Investment Company, as well as investments in low-income housing partnerships within the areas the Company serves. Unrealized gains or losses on equity securities with and without readily determinable fair values are recognized in the Investment securities gains, net line of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.\n\nDuring 2025, related to the acquisition of HTLF, the Company acquired other securities with an acquired fair value of $99.8 million as of the Acquisition Date, including $2.0 million of FRB and FHLB stock and $97.8 million of equity securities without readily determinable fair values.\n\nThe table below presents the changes in equity securities without readily determinable fair values for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nBalance – beginning of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n416,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n394,035\n\n \n\nHeartland acquisition\n\n \n\n \n\n97,796\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPurchases of securities\n\n \n\n \n\n98,490\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n91,169\n\n \n\nObservable upward price adjustments\n\n \n\n \n\n21,524\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n15,467\n\n \n\nObservable downward price adjustments\n\n \n\n \n\n(10,196\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,153\n\n)\n\nSales of securities and other activity\n\n \n\n \n\n(100,252\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(78,768\n\n)\n\nBalance – end of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n524,112\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n416,750\n\n \n\nInvestment Securities Gains, Net\n\nThe following table presents the components of Investment securities gains (losses), net for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nInvestment securities gains (losses), net\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAvailable-for-sale debt securities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nGains realized on sales\n\n \n\n$\n\n592\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n139\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n154\n\n \n\nLosses realized on sales\n\n \n\n \n\n(119\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2\n\n)\n\nImpairment on AFS security\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(4,925\n\n)\n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair value adjustments, net\n\n \n\n \n\n18,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n168\n\n \n\nEquity securities without readily determinable fair values:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair value adjustments, net\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,573\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,733\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,334\n\n \n\nSales\n\n \n\n \n\n14,017\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,302\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n132\n\n \n\nTotal investment securities gains (losses), net\n\n \n\n$\n\n30,967\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,720\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(3,139\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n5. SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL\n\nThe Company regularly enters into agreements for the purchase of securities with simultaneous agreements to resell (resell agreements). The agreements permit the Company to sell or repledge these securities. Resell agreements were $1.6 billion and $545.0 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company obtains possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned under resell agreements.\n\n6. LOANS TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS\n\nCertain executive officers and directors of the Company and the Bank, including companies in which those persons are principal holders of equity securities or are general partners, borrow in the normal course of business from the Bank. All such loans have been made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and\n\n113\n\n \n\ncollateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. In addition, all such loans are current as to repayment terms.\n\nFor the years 2025 and 2024, an analysis of activity with respect to such aggregate loans to related parties appears below (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nBalance – beginning of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n469,642\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n508,507\n\n \n\nNew loans\n\n \n\n \n\n44,626\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n62,805\n\n \n\nRepayments\n\n \n\n \n\n(25,156\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(101,579\n\n)\n\nAddition due to change in reportable loans\n\n \n\n \n\n3,314\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nReduction due to change in reportable loans\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(91\n\n)\n\nBalance – end of year\n\n \n\n$\n\n492,426\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n469,642\n\n \n\n \n\n7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES\n\nChanges in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 by operating segment are as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nBalances as of January 1, 2025\n\n \n\n$\n\n63,113\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67,780\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n207,385\n\n \n\nAcquisition of HTLF\n\n \n\n \n\n979,464\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n652,976\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,632,440\n\n \n\nBalances as of December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,042,577\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n720,756\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,839,825\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBalances as of January 1, 2024\n\n \n\n$\n\n63,113\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67,780\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n207,385\n\n \n\nBalances as of December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n$\n\n63,113\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,492\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67,780\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n207,385\n\n \n\n \n\nFollowing are the intangible assets that continue to be subject to amortization as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nCore Deposit Intangible Assets\n\n \n\n \n\nCustomer Relationships\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nGross carrying amount\n\n$\n\n481,294\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n124,085\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n605,379\n\n \n\nAccumulated amortization\n\n \n\n81,203\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37,307\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n118,510\n\n \n\nNet carrying amount\n\n$\n\n400,091\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n86,778\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n486,869\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\nCore Deposit Intangible Assets\n\n \n\n \n\nCustomer Relationships\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nGross carrying amount\n\n$\n\n2,345\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n86,800\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n89,145\n\n \n\nAccumulated amortization\n\n \n\n1,600\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n23,898\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,498\n\n \n\nNet carrying amount\n\n$\n\n745\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n62,902\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n63,647\n\n \n\n \n\nRelated to the acquisition of HTLF, the Company recognized $1.6 billion of goodwill, a $474.1 million core deposit intangible asset, wealth customer list of $26.0 million, and purchased credit card relationships of $10.9 million. See Note 20, “Acquisition” for additional information.\n \n\nOn September 2, 2025, the Company acquired a healthcare savings account business, which included $32.5 million of deposits. The purchase resulted in recognition of a $4.8 million core deposit intangible asset.\n\n114\n\n \n\n \n\nThe weighted average life of core deposit intangible assets and customer relationships acquired during the year ended December 31, 2025 was 10.0 years and 5.8 years, respectively. The weighted average life of all intangible assets acquired during the year ended December 31, 2025 was 9.7 years.\n\n \n\nAmortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 was $93.5 million, $7.7 million, and $8.6 million, respectively.\n\nThe following table discloses the estimated amortization expense of intangible assets in future years (in thousands):\n\n \n\nFor the year ending December 31, 2026\n\n \n\n$\n\n93,120\n\n \n\nFor the year ending December 31, 2027\n\n \n\n \n\n82,528\n\n \n\nFor the year ending December 31, 2028\n\n \n\n \n\n70,461\n\n \n\nFor the year ending December 31, 2029\n\n \n\n \n\n61,515\n\n \n\nFor the year ending December 31, 2030\n\n \n\n \n\n52,901\n\n \n\n \n\n8. PREMISES, EQUIPMENT, AND LEASES\n\nPremises and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nLand\n\n \n\n$\n\n101,446\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n40,601\n\n \n\nBuildings and leasehold improvements\n\n \n\n \n\n516,006\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n383,021\n\n \n\nEquipment\n\n \n\n \n\n217,476\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n199,537\n\n \n\nSoftware\n\n \n\n \n\n292,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n290,070\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n \n\n1,127,618\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n913,229\n\n \n\nAccumulated depreciation\n\n \n\n \n\n(447,049\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(418,517\n\n)\n\nAccumulated amortization\n\n \n\n \n\n(282,298\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(272,939\n\n)\n\nPremises and equipment, net\n\n \n\n$\n\n398,271\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n221,773\n\n \n\n \n\nPremises and equipment depreciation and amortization expenses were $44.0 million in 2025, $40.8 million in 2024, and $46.5 million in 2023.\n\nThe Company primarily has leases of real estate, including buildings, or portions of buildings, used for bank branches or general office operations. These leases have remaining lease terms that range from less than one year to 22 years and most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one year to 40 years or more. The exercise of lease renewal options is at the Company’s sole discretion. No renewal options were included in the Company’s calculation of its lease liabilities or right of use assets since it is not reasonably certain that the Company will exercise these options. No leases include options to purchase the leased property. The lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. An insignificant number of leases include variable lease payments that are based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). For the calculation of the lease liability and right of use asset for these leases, the Company has included lease payments based on CPI as of the effective date of ASC 842 or the date a new lease or amendment was entered into, whichever is later. The Company has made the election not to separate lease and non-lease components for existing real estate leases when determining consideration within the lease contract. All of the Company’s lease agreements are classified as operating leases under ASC 842.\n\n115\n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025 and 2024, right-of-use assets of $63.5 million and $47.6 million, respectively, were included as part of Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, lease liabilities of $72.7 million and $55.1 million were included as part of Other liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, lease expense of $16.6 million, $10.5 million, and $11.1 million, respectively, was recognized as part of Occupancy expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, cash payments of $17.4 million, $12.2 million, and $12.2 million, respectively, were made for leases included in the measurement of lease liabilities and are classified as cash flows from operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities were $32.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the weighted average remaining lease terms of the Company’s leases were 5.5 years and 6.1 years, respectively, and the weighted average discount rates were 3.86% and 3.36%, respectively.\n\nAs of December 31, 2025, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n2026\n\n \n\n$\n\n18,125\n\n \n\n2027\n\n \n\n \n\n16,920\n\n \n\n2028\n\n \n\n \n\n14,975\n\n \n\n2029\n\n \n\n \n\n12,594\n\n \n\n2030\n\n \n\n \n\n7,452\n\n \n\nThereafter\n\n \n\n \n\n10,746\n\n \n\nTotal lease payments\n\n \n\n \n\n80,812\n\n \n\nLess: Interest\n\n \n\n \n\n8,153\n\n \n\nPresent value of lease liabilities\n\n \n\n$\n\n72,659\n\n \n\n \n\n9. BORROWED FUNDS\n\nThe components of the Company's long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nLong-term debt:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTrust preferred securities\n\n \n\n$\n\n220,034\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,782\n\n \n\nSubordinated notes 3.70%, net of issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n199,681\n\n \n\nSubordinated notes 6.25%, net of issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n109,255\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n108,829\n\n \n\nSubordinated notes 2.75%\n\n \n\n \n\n144,940\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal long-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n474,229\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n385,292\n\n \n\nTotal borrowed funds\n\n \n\n$\n\n474,229\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n385,292\n\n \n\n \n\n116\n\n \n\nThe following table presents details of outstanding trust preferred securities as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\nAmount Outstanding\n\n \n\n \n\nIssuance Date\n\n \n\nInterest Rate\n\n \n\nInterest Rate as of December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\nMaturity Date\n\nMarquette Capital Trust I\n\n \n\n$\n\n19,306\n\n \n\n \n\n12/28/2005\n\n \n\n1.33% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.50\n\n%\n\n \n\n1/7/2036\n\nMarquette Capital Trust II\n\n \n\n \n\n19,780\n\n \n\n \n\n12/28/2005\n\n \n\n1.33% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.50\n\n%\n\n \n\n1/7/2036\n\nMarquette Capital Trust III\n\n \n\n \n\n7,766\n\n \n\n \n\n5/30/2006\n\n \n\n1.50% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.45\n\n%\n\n \n\n6/23/2036\n\nMarquette Capital Trust IV\n\n \n\n \n\n31,323\n\n \n\n \n\n6/30/2006\n\n \n\n1.60% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.58\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/15/2036\n\nHeartland Financial Statutory Trust IV\n\n \n\n \n\n9,665\n\n \n\n \n\n3/17/2004\n\n \n\n2.75% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.72\n\n%\n\n \n\n3/17/2034\n\nHeartland Financial Statutory Trust V\n\n \n\n \n\n17,477\n\n \n\n \n\n1/27/2006\n\n \n\n1.33% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.50\n\n%\n\n \n\n4/7/2036\n\nHeartland Financial Statutory Trust VI\n\n \n\n \n\n16,946\n\n \n\n \n\n6/21/2007\n\n \n\n1.48% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.46\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/15/2037\n\nHeartland Financial Statutory Trust VII\n\n \n\n \n\n14,828\n\n \n\n \n\n6/26/2007\n\n \n\n1.48% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.53\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/1/2037\n\nMorrill Statutory Trust I\n\n \n\n \n\n9,971\n\n \n\n \n\n12/19/2002\n\n \n\n3.25% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n7.20\n\n%\n\n \n\n12/26/2032\n\nMorrill Statutory Trust II\n\n \n\n \n\n9,730\n\n \n\n \n\n12/17/2003\n\n \n\n2.85% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.82\n\n%\n\n \n\n12/17/2033\n\nSheboygan Statutory Trust I\n\n \n\n \n\n7,345\n\n \n\n \n\n9/17/2003\n\n \n\n2.95% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.92\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/17/2033\n\nCBNM Capital Trust I\n\n \n\n \n\n4,849\n\n \n\n \n\n9/10/2004\n\n \n\n3.25% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n7.23\n\n%\n\n \n\n12/15/2034\n\nCitywide Capital Trust III\n\n \n\n \n\n6,799\n\n \n\n \n\n12/19/2003\n\n \n\n2.80% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.90\n\n%\n\n \n\n12/19/2033\n\nCitywide Capital Trust IV\n\n \n\n \n\n4,694\n\n \n\n \n\n9/30/2004\n\n \n\n2.20% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.34\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/30/2034\n\nCitywide Capital Trust V\n\n \n\n \n\n13,119\n\n \n\n \n\n5/31/2006\n\n \n\n1.54% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.52\n\n%\n\n \n\n7/25/2036\n\nOCGI Statutory Trust III\n\n \n\n \n\n3,020\n\n \n\n \n\n6/27/2002\n\n \n\n3.65% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n7.58\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/30/2032\n\nOCGI Statutory Trust IV\n\n \n\n \n\n5,665\n\n \n\n \n\n9/23/2004\n\n \n\n2.50% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n6.48\n\n%\n\n \n\n12/15/2034\n\nBVBC Capital Trust II\n\n \n\n \n\n7,448\n\n \n\n \n\n4/10/2003\n\n \n\n3.25% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n7.37\n\n%\n\n \n\n4/24/2033\n\nBVBC Capital Trust III\n\n \n\n \n\n10,303\n\n \n\n \n\n7/29/2005\n\n \n\n1.60% over 3-month term SOFR\n\n \n\n \n\n5.53\n\n%\n\n \n\n9/30/2035\n\nTotal trust preferred securities\n\n \n\n$\n\n220,034\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe aggregate contractual repayment of long-term debt of $522.9 million is due after December 31, 2030.\n\nIn September 2020, the Company issued $200.0 million of 3.70% fixed-to-fixed rate subordinated notes that were to mature on September 17, 2030. The notes bore interest at the rate of 3.70% per annum, payable semi-annually on each March 17 and September 17. Unamortized debt issuance costs related to these notes totaled $0.3 million as of December 31, 2024. Proceeds from the issuance of the notes were used for general corporate purposes, including contributing Tier 1 capital into the Bank. During the first quarter of 2025, the Company purchased and subsequently retired $11.1 million of its 2020 subordinated notes. During the third quarter of 2025, the Company redeemed the remainder of the outstanding 2020 subordinated notes.\n\nIn September 2022, the Company issued $110.0 million of 6.25% fixed-to-fixed rate subordinated notes that mature on September 28, 2032. The notes bear interest at the rate of 6.25% per annum, payable semi-annually on\n\n117\n\n \n\neach March 28 and September 28. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, on September 28, 2027, or on any interest payment date thereafter. Unamortized debt issuance costs related to these notes totaled $0.7 million and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Proceeds from the issuance of the notes were used for general corporate purposes, including contributing Tier 1 capital into the Bank.\n\nAs part of the acquisition of HTLF, the Company acquired $150.0 million of 2.75% fixed-to-fixed rate subordinated notes that mature on September 15, 2031. The notes bear interest at the rate of 2.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on each March 15 and September 15. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, on September 15, 2026, or on any interest payment date thereafter. The subordinated notes had an acquired fair value of $138.8 million as of the Acquisition Date.\n\nThe remainder of the Company’s long-term debt was assumed from the acquisitions of Marquette Financial Companies in 2015 and HTLF in 2025 and consists of debt obligations payable to 19 unconsolidated trusts that previously issued trust preferred securities, as summarized in the table above. These long-term debt obligations had an aggregate contractual balance of $262.9 million and a carrying value of $220.0 million as of December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the debt obligations related to the four unconsolidated trusts acquired from Marquette had an aggregate contractual balance of $103.1 million and had a carrying value of $76.8 million.\n\nThe Company is a member bank of the FHLB of Des Moines and through this relationship, the Company owns FHLB stock and has access to additional liquidity and funding sources through FHLB advances. The Company’s borrowing capacity is dependent upon the amount of collateral the Company places at the FHLB. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 the Company owned $10.3 million and $10.2 million of FHLB stock, respectively. The Company had no outstanding advances at the FHLB of Des Moines as of December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had four letters of credit outstanding with the FHLB of Des Moines to secure deposits. These letters of credit have an aggregate amount of $261.0 million and have various maturity dates through March 10, 2026. The Company’s borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2025. During 2024, the FHLB of Des Moines issued a letter of credit for $150.0 million on behalf of the Company to secure deposits. The letter of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2024 expired in January 2025 and was subsequently renewed with an expiration date in March 2025.\n\nThe Company enters into sales of securities with simultaneous agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements). The Company utilizes repurchase agreements to facilitate the needs of customers and to facilitate secured short-term funding needs. Repurchase agreements are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The Company monitors collateral levels on a continuous basis and may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with the Company’s safekeeping agents. The amounts received under these agreements represent short-term borrowings. The amount outstanding at December 31, 2025, was $3.3 billion, with accrued interest payable of $2.2 million. The amount outstanding at December 31, 2024, was $2.5 billion, with accrued interest payable of $1.7 million.\n\nThe carrying amounts and market values of the securities and the related repurchase liabilities and weighted average interest rates of the repurchase liabilities (grouped by maturity of the repurchase agreements) were as follows as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSecurities Fair Market Value\n\n \n\n \n\nRepurchase\nLiabilities\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average\nInterest Rate\n\n \n\nMaturity of the Repurchase Liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2 to 29 days\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,561,825\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,532,305\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3.07\n\n%\n\n30 to 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n772,602\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n759,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.08\n\n \n\nOver 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n1,019\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.75\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,335,446\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,292,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3.30\n\n%\n\n \n\n \n\n118\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSecurities Fair Market Value\n\n \n\n \n\nRepurchase\nLiabilities\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average\nInterest Rate\n\n \n\nMaturity of the Repurchase Liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2 to 29 days\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,123,066\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,105,512\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3.66\n\n%\n\n30 to 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n439,400\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n431,048\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.78\n\n \n\nOver 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\n2,750\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,750\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2.50\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,565,216\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,539,310\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3.85\n\n%\n\n \n\nThe table below presents the remaining contractual maturities of repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2025 and 2024, in addition to the various types of marketable securities that have been pledged as collateral for these borrowings (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRemaining Contractual Maturities of the Agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2-29 days\n\n \n\n \n\n30-90 days\n\n \n\n \n\nOver 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nRepurchase agreements, secured by:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,355,233\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,355,233\n\n \n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n \n\n1,177,072\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n759,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,937,572\n\n \n\nTotal repurchase agreements\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,532,305\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n759,500\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,292,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRemaining Contractual Maturities of the Agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2-29 days\n\n \n\n \n\n30-90 days\n\n \n\n \n\nOver 90 Days\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nRepurchase agreements, secured by:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n608,836\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n608,836\n\n \n\nU.S. Agency\n\n \n\n \n\n1,496,676\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n431,048\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,750\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,930,474\n\n \n\nTotal repurchase agreements\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,105,512\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n431,048\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,750\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,539,310\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS\n\nPayment of dividends by the Bank to the parent company is subject to various regulatory restrictions. For national banks, the governing regulatory agency must approve the declaration of any dividends generally in excess of the sum of net income for that year and retained net income for the preceding two years.\n\nThe Bank maintains a reserve balance with the FRB as required by law. During 2025, this amount averaged $5.8 billion, compared to $3.4 billion in 2024.\n\nAt December 31, 2025, the Company is required to have minimum common equity tier 1, tier 1, and total capital ratios of 4.5%, 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively. The Company’s actual ratios at that date were 10.96%, 11.55% and 13.36%, respectively. The Company is required to have a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, and the leverage ratio at December 31, 2025, was 8.54%.\n\nAs of December 31, 2025, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized the Bank must maintain total risk-based, tier 1 risk-based, common equity tier 1, and tier 1 leverage ratios of 10.0%, 8.0%, 6.5%, and 5.0%, respectively. There are no conditions or events that have occurred since the receipt of the most recent notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s categorization.\n\nIn addition, under amendments to the BHCA introduced by the Dodd-Frank Act and commonly known as the Volcker Rule, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive limits on proprietary trading and on owning or sponsoring hedge funds and private-equity funds. The limits on proprietary trading are largely focused on purchases or sales of financial instruments by a banking entity as principal primarily for the purpose of short-term resale, benefiting from actual or expected short-term price movements, or realizing short-term arbitrage profits. The limits on owning or sponsoring hedge funds and private-equity funds are designed to ensure that banking entities\n\n119\n\n \n\ngenerally maintain only small positions in managed or advised funds and are not exposed to significant losses arising directly or indirectly from them. The Volcker Rule also provides for increased capital charges, quantitative limits, rigorous compliance programs, and other restrictions on permitted proprietary trading and fund activities, including a prohibition on transactions with a covered fund that would constitute a covered transaction under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. The fund activities of the Company and its subsidiaries are in conformance with the Volcker Rule.\n\nActual capital amounts as well as required and well-capitalized common equity tier 1, tier 1, total and tier 1 leverage ratios as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 for the Company and the Bank are as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nActual\n\n \n\n \n\nFor Capital Adequacy Purposes\n\n \n\n \n\nTo Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Framework\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nRatio\n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nRatio\n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nRatio\n\n \n\nCommon Equity Tier 1 Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,459,343\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10.96\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,240,716\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.50\n\n%\n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n5,625,218\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.34\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,232,300\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.50\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,224,433\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.50\n\n \n\nTier 1 Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n5,753,409\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.55\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,987,621\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n5,625,218\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.34\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,976,400\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,968,534\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\nTotal Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n6,654,521\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13.36\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,983,494\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n6,052,101\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12.20\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,968,534\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,960,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10.00\n\n \n\nTier 1 Leverage:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n5,753,409\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.54\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,694,527\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n5,625,218\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,715,746\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,394,682\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nCommon Equity Tier 1 Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n$\n\n3,802,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.29\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,514,987\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.50\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n%\n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n3,835,875\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.47\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,505,357\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.50\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,174,405\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.50\n\n \n\nTier 1 Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n3,802,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,019,983\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n3,835,875\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11.47\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,007,143\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,676,191\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\nTotal Capital:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n4,445,872\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13.21\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,693,311\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n4,094,077\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12.24\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,676,191\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,345,239\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10.00\n\n \n\nTier 1 Leverage:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nUMB Financial Corporation\n\n \n\n \n\n3,802,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.50\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,789,746\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.00\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\n \n\nN/A\n\n \n\nUMB Bank, n. a.\n\n \n\n \n\n3,835,875\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8.52\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,801,784\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4.00\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,252,230\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.00\n\n \n\n \n\n11. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS\n\nThe Company has a discretionary noncontributory profit-sharing plan, which features an employee stock ownership plan. This plan is for the benefit of substantially all eligible officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company recognized expense related to such contributions of $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.\n\nThe Company has a qualified 401(k) profit sharing plan that permits participants to make contributions by salary deduction, to which the Company makes matching contributions. The Company recognized expense related to matching contributions of $21.0 million, $15.2 million, and $15.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.\n\nThe Company recognized $35.9 million, $21.3 million, and $16.2 million in expense related to outstanding restricted stock unit grants for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company recognized $306 thousand in expense related to outstanding stock options for the year ended December 31, 2025.\n\n120\n\n \n\nThe corresponding income tax benefit recognized was $1.3 million, $267 thousand, and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The Company had $27.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding restricted stock unit grants and $86 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding options at December 31, 2025. The tax benefit realized for stock options exercised was $50 thousand, $322 thousand, and $49 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.\n\nLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan\n\nAt the April 26, 2005 shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the UMB Financial Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (LTIP) which became effective as of January 1, 2005. The LTIP permits the issuance to selected officers of the Company service-based restricted stock grants, performance-based restricted stock grants and non-qualified stock options. Service-based restricted stock grants contain a service requirement. The performance-based restricted grants contain performance and service requirements. The non-qualified stock option grants contain a service requirement.\n\nAt the April 23, 2013 shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved amendments to the LTIP Plan, including increasing the number of shares of the Company’s stock reserved for issuance under the Plan from 5.25 million shares to 7.44 million shares. Additionally, the shareholders approved increasing the maximum benefits any one eligible employee may receive under the plan during any one fiscal year from $1 million to $2 million taking into account the value of all stock options and restricted stock received.\n\nAt the April 24, 2018 shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the UMB Financial Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan which became effective as of April 24, 2018 and replaced the LTIP plan. No service-based restricted stock grants, performance-based restricted stock grants or non-qualified stock options have been issued under the LTIP since 2018. There were no restricted stock grants outstanding under the LTIP as of December 31, 2025, 2024, or 2023.\n\nThe non-qualified stock options issued under the LTIP carry a service requirement and grants issued prior to 2016 vested 50% after three years, 75% after four years and 100% after five years, while grants issued in 2016 through 2018 vested 50% after two years, 75% after three years and 100% after four years.\n\nThe table below discloses the information relating to non-qualified option activity in 2025 under the LTIP:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNumber of Shares\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Price Per Share\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term\n\n \n\n \n\nAggregate Intrinsic Value\n\n \n\nStock Options Under the LTIP\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOutstanding - December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n30,214\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n63.87\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nGranted\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCanceled\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nExpired\n\n \n\n \n\n(358\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n51.42\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nExercised\n\n \n\n \n\n(10,548\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n58.29\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOutstanding - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n19,308\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67.16\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.8\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n924,505\n\n \n\nExercisable - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n19,308\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n67.16\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.8\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n924,505\n\n \n\n \n\nThere were no options granted during 2025, 2024, or 2023. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, was $619 thousand, $2.3 million and $640 thousand, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options.\n\nCash received from options exercised under all share-based compensation plans was $615 thousand, $4.1 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.\n\nThe Company has no specific policy to repurchase common shares to mitigate the dilutive impact of options. See a description of the Company’s Repurchase Authorizations in Note 14, “Common Stock and Earnings Per Share,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements provided in Item 8 of this report.\n\n121\n\n \n\nOmnibus Incentive Compensation Plan\n\nAt the April 24, 2018 shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved the UMB Financial Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (OICP) which became effective as of April 24, 2018. The OICP permits the issuance to key employees of the Company various types of awards, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based awards. Service-based restricted stock unit awards contain a service requirement and the performance-based restricted stock unit awards contain performance and service requirements. The number of shares of the Company’s stock reserved for issuance under the OICP is 5.40 million shares.\n\nAt the April 30, 2024 shareholders’ meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved an amendment to the OICP pursuant to which, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s stock available for issuance under the OICP increased by 1.85 million shares. This increased the number of shares of the Company’s stock reserved for issuance under the OICP from 5.40 million shares to 7.25 million shares.\n\nThe service-based restricted stock unit awards are payable in shares of stock and contain a service requirement with grants issued prior to 2023 having a four-year graded vesting schedule in which 50% of the units are vested after two years, 75% are vested after three years, and 100% are vested after four years. Grants of service-based restricted stock units made beginning in 2023 contain a service requirement with a three-year pro-rata vesting schedule.\n\nThe performance-based restricted stock unit awards are payable in shares of stock and contain a service and a performance requirement. The performance requirement is based on two predetermined performance requirements over a three-year period. The service requirement portion is a three-year cliff vesting. If the minimum performance requirement is not met, the participants do not receive the shares. Due to the impact of the acquisition of HTLF on the level of achievement of minimum performance requirements for the open performance periods applicable to outstanding awards, on January 27, 2025, certain non-vested performance-based restricted stock unit awards were deemed to be earned at a percentage of target based on results through December 31, 2024, and will vest solely based on the time-based vesting conditions.\n\nThe dividends on service-based restricted stock units are treated as two separate transactions. First, cash dividends are paid on the restricted stock units. Those cash dividends are then paid to purchase additional shares of restricted stock units. Dividends earned as additional shares of restricted stock units have the same terms as the associated grant. The dividends paid on the stock are recorded as a reduction to retained earnings, similar to all dividend transactions. Dividends are not paid on performance-based restricted stock units.\n\nThe table below summarizes the activity of the service-based restricted stock units during 2025:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNumber of Units\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Price Per Unit\n\n \n\nService-Based Restricted Stock Units Under the OICP\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n366,985\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n85.03\n\n \n\nGranted\n\n \n\n \n\n223,013\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n111.31\n\n \n\nCanceled\n\n \n\n \n\n(27,475\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n102.13\n\n \n\nVested\n\n \n\n \n\n(169,081\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n85.43\n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n393,442\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n98.56\n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025, there was $16.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested service-based restricted stock units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.8 years.\n\n122\n\n \n\nTotal fair value of units vested during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 was $19.2 million, $14.1 million, and $9.7 million, respectively.\n\nThe table below summarizes the activity of the performance-based restricted stock units during 2025:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNumber of Units\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Price Per Unit\n\n \n\nPerformance-Based Restricted Stock Units Under the OICP\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n155,781\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n71.60\n\n \n\nGranted\n\n \n\n \n\n98,534\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88.11\n\n \n\nCanceled\n\n \n\n \n\n(4,144\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n86.33\n\n \n\nVested\n\n \n\n \n\n(120,042\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n89.04\n\n \n\nPerformance-based adjustment\n\n \n\n \n\n89,330\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n80.10\n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n219,459\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n72.65\n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025, there was $8.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested performance-based restricted stock units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.9 years. The fair value of units vested during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $14.1 million, $8.2 million, and $11.1 million, respectively.\n\nHTLF Long-Term Incentive Plan\n\nIn connection with the acquisition of HTLF, certain outstanding and unvested restricted stock unit awards and stock options granted under the Heartland Financial USA, Inc. 2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan or the Heartland Financial USA, Inc. 2024 Long-Term Incentive Plan (collectively, the HTLF Plan) were assumed and converted to restricted stock unit and stock option awards issued by the Company. The number of shares of the Company's common stock subject to each award equals the shares of HTLF common stock subject to the HTLF award multiplied by the exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share. For performance-based restricted stock unit awards, the conversion assumed performance at target. The assumed awards are subject to the same vesting terms and conditions as previously set out in the respective grant agreements.\n\nThe service-based restricted stock unit awards are payable in shares of stock and contain a service requirement with a three-year pro-rata vesting schedule. The performance-based restricted stock units, converted at target performance, are also payable in shares of stock and contain a three-year service requirement with a cliff vesting. Restricted stock units granted prior to 2023 are not entitled to dividend equivalents; most restricted stock unit grants beginning in 2023 accrue dividends, which are paid without interest only upon vesting of the associated grant.\n\nThe table below summarizes the activity of the service-based restricted stock units during 2025:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNumber of Units\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Price Per Unit\n\n \n\nService-Based Restricted Stock Units Under the HTLF Plan\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nHTLF replacement awards\n\n \n\n \n\n270,432\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n117.90\n\n \n\nCanceled\n\n \n\n \n\n(18,056\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n117.90\n\n \n\nVested\n\n \n\n \n\n(197,287\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n117.90\n\n \n\nNonvested - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n55,089\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n117.90\n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025, there was $2.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested service-based restricted stock units. The cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.2 years. The fair value of units vested during the year ended December 31, 2025 was $21.1 million.\n\n \n\nThe non-qualified stock options contain a service requirement with a four-year pro-rata vesting schedule. The exercise price of the stock options is the exercise price at grant divided by the exchange ratio.\n\n \n\n123\n\n \n\nThe table below discloses the information relating to non-qualified option activity in 2025 under the HTLF Plan:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNumber of Shares\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Price Per Share\n\n \n\n \n\nWeighted Average Remaining Contractual Term\n\n \n\n \n\nAggregate Intrinsic Value\n\n \n\nStock Options Under the HTLF Plan\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOutstanding - December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nHTLF replacement awards\n\n \n\n \n\n22,772\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88.80\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCanceled\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nExpired\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nExercised\n\n \n\n \n\n(17,810\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n88.80\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOutstanding - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n4,962\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n88.80\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.9\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n130,203\n\n \n\nExercisable - December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n3,145\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n88.80\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6.9\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n82,525\n\n \n\n \n\nThere were no options granted during 2025. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2025 was $561 thousand. As of December 31, 2025, there was $86 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options. The cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 0.9 years.\n\n12. BUSINESS SEGMENT REPORTING\n\nThe Company has strategically aligned its operations into the following three reportable segments: Commercial Banking, Institutional Banking, and Personal Banking (collectively, the Business Segments, and each, a Business Segment). These segments reflect the type of customer served, how products and services are provided, how executive management responsibilities are assigned, and reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by the chief operating decision maker (CODM). The Company’s CODM is comprised of a group of senior executive officers led by the Company's chief executive officer, chief administrative officer, chief financial officer, and the Bank's chief executive officer.\n\nBusiness Segment financial information is produced using an internal reporting system which is based on a series of management estimates for funds transfer pricing (FTP), and allocations of noninterest expense and income taxes. The process for determining FTP is based on a number of factors and assumptions, including prevailing market interest rates, the expected lives of various assets and liabilities, and the Company’s broader funding profile. These estimates and allocations are periodically reviewed and refined. The CODM uses the Business Segment net income in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance for individual Business Segments, including evaluating the cost or opportunity value of funds within each Business Segment and identifying areas of focus for organic growth or acquisition. For comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on methodologies in effect at December 31, 2025. Previously reported results have been reclassified in this filing to conform to the current organizational structure.\n\nThe following summaries provide information about the activities of each Business Segment:\n\nCommercial Banking serves the commercial banking and treasury management needs of the Company’s small to middle-market businesses through a variety of products and services. Such services include commercial loans, commercial real estate financing, commercial credit cards, letters of credit, loan syndication services, and consultative services. In addition, the Company’s specialty lending group offers a variety of business solutions including asset-based lending, mezzanine debt and minority equity investments. Treasury management services include depository services, account reconciliation and cash management tools such as, accounts payable and receivable solutions, electronic fund transfer and automated payments, controlled disbursements, lockbox services, and remote deposit capture services.\n\nInstitutional Banking is a combination of banking services, fund services, asset management services, and healthcare services provided to institutional clients. This segment also provides fixed income sales, trading and underwriting, corporate trust and escrow services, as well as institutional custody. Institutional Banking includes UMBFS, which provides fund administration and accounting, investor services and transfer agency, and other services to mutual funds and alternative investment groups. Healthcare services provides healthcare payment\n\n124\n\n \n\nsolutions including custodial services for health savings accounts (HSAs) and private label, multipurpose debit cards to insurance carriers, third-party administrators, software companies, employers, and financial institutions.\n\nPersonal Banking combines consumer banking and wealth management services offered to clients and delivered through personal relationships and the Company’s bank branches, ATM network and internet banking. Products offered include deposit accounts, retail credit cards, private banking, installment loans, home equity lines of credit, and residential mortgages. The range of client services extends from a basic checking account to estate planning and trust services and includes private banking, brokerage services, and insurance services in addition to a full spectrum of investment advisory, trust, and custody services.\n\nBUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION\n\nSegment financial results were as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nNet interest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,291,140\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n258,312\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n312,753\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,862,205\n\n \n\nProvision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n126,554\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,844\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,102\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n154,500\n\n \n\nNoninterest income\n\n \n\n \n\n179,612\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n444,502\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n165,936\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n790,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSalaries and employee benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n216,442\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n195,039\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n155,794\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n567,275\n\n \n\nProcessing fees\n\n \n\n \n\n14,649\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,264\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,808\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n72,721\n\n \n\nBankcard\n\n \n\n \n\n12,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,014\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,425\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n48,975\n\n \n\nAmortization of other intangible assets\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,349\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n412\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,761\n\n \n\nAllocated technology, service, overhead\n\n \n\n \n\n421,530\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n131,121\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n220,724\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n773,375\n\n \n\nOther segment items*\n\n \n\n \n\n59,994\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n37,276\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n55,423\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n152,693\n\n \n\nNoninterest expense\n\n \n\n \n\n725,151\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n434,063\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n463,586\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,622,800\n\n \n\nIncome (loss) before taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n619,047\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n266,907\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(10,999\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n874,955\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense (benefit)\n\n \n\n \n\n122,087\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n52,639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,169\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n172,557\n\n \n\nNet income (loss)\n\n \n\n$\n\n496,960\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n214,268\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(8,830\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\nAverage assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n33,205,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n19,548,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n13,503,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n66,256,000\n\n \n\n*Other segment items include occupancy, equipment, supplies and services, marketing and business development costs, legal and consulting, and regulatory fees.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nNet interest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n668,235\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n197,174\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n135,483\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,000,892\n\n \n\nProvision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n51,781\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,155\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,114\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n61,050\n\n \n\nNoninterest income\n\n \n\n \n\n134,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n393,984\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n99,633\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n628,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSalaries and employee benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n110,873\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n168,515\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n93,326\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n372,714\n\n \n\nProcessing fees\n\n \n\n \n\n9,284\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,444\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,186\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n52,914\n\n \n\nBankcard\n\n \n\n \n\n11,680\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21,137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,873\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n43,690\n\n \n\nAmortization of other intangible assets\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,182\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n524\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,706\n\n \n\nAllocated technology, service, overhead\n\n \n\n \n\n202,224\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n129,243\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n118,387\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n449,854\n\n \n\nOther segment items*\n\n \n\n \n\n33,074\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40,795\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,939\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n99,808\n\n \n\nNoninterest expense\n\n \n\n \n\n367,135\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n397,316\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n262,235\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,026,686\n\n \n\nIncome (loss) before taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n383,819\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n192,687\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(35,233\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n541,273\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense (benefit)\n\n \n\n \n\n71,367\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n35,016\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(6,353\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n100,030\n\n \n\nNet income (loss)\n\n \n\n$\n\n312,452\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n157,671\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(28,880\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\nAverage assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n21,539,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n14,578,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,073,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n43,190,000\n\n \n\n \n\n125\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nNet interest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n600,759\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n190,377\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n128,980\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n920,116\n\n \n\nProvision for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n34,315\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n275\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,637\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41,227\n\n \n\nNoninterest income\n\n \n\n \n\n102,753\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n342,794\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n96,306\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n541,853\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSalaries and employee benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n103,784\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n150,579\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88,115\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n342,478\n\n \n\nProcessing fees\n\n \n\n \n\n7,735\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,315\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,754\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n44,804\n\n \n\nBankcard\n\n \n\n \n\n10,433\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,190\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,889\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,512\n\n \n\nAmortization of other intangible assets\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,927\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n659\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,586\n\n \n\nAllocated technology, service, overhead\n\n \n\n \n\n222,457\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n139,316\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n110,332\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n472,105\n\n \n\nOther segment items*\n\n \n\n \n\n33,648\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36,242\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,765\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n98,655\n\n \n\nNoninterest expense\n\n \n\n \n\n378,057\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n370,569\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n250,514\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n999,140\n\n \n\nIncome before taxes\n\n \n\n \n\n291,140\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n162,327\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(31,865\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n421,602\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense\n\n \n\n \n\n49,602\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,060\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(7,084\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n71,578\n\n \n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n241,538\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n133,267\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(24,781\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nAverage assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n20,676,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,504,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,550,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n39,730,000\n\n \n\n \n\n13. REVENUE RECOGNITION\n\n \n\nThe following is a description of the principal activities from which the Company generates revenue that are within the scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers:\n\n \n\nTrust and securities processing – Trust and securities processing income consists of fees earned on personal and corporate trust accounts, custody of securities services, trust investments and wealth management services, and mutual fund and alternative asset servicing. The performance obligations related to this revenue include items such as performing full bond trustee service administration, investment advisory services, custody and record-keeping services, and fund administrative and accounting services. These fees are part of long-term contractual agreements and the performance obligations are satisfied upon completion of service and fees are generally a fixed flat monthly rate or based on a percentage of the account’s market value per the contract with the customer. These fees are primarily recorded within the Company’s Institutional and Personal Banking segments.\n\n \n\nTrading and investment banking – Trading and investment banking income consists of income earned related to the Company’s trading securities portfolio, including futures hedging, dividends, bond underwriting, and other securities incomes. The vast majority of this revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 320, Investments–Debt Securities, and ASC 321, Investments–Equity Securities, and is out of the scope of ASC 606. A portion of trading and investment banking represents fees earned for management fees, commissions, and underwriting of corporate bond issuances. The performance obligations related to these fees include reviewing the credit worthiness of the customer, ensuring appropriate regulatory approval and participating in due diligence. The fees are fixed per the bond prospectus and the performance obligations are satisfied upon registration approval of the bonds by the applicable regulatory agencies. Revenue is recognized at the point in time upon completion of service and when approval is granted by the regulators.\n\n \n\nService charges on deposits – Service charges on deposit accounts represent monthly analysis fees recognized for the services related to customer deposit accounts, including account maintenance and depository transactions processing fees. Commercial Banking and Institutional Banking depository accounts charge fees in accordance with the customer’s pricing schedule while Personal Banking account holders are generally charged a flat service fee per month. Deposit service charges for the healthcare accounts included in the Institutional Banking segment are priced according to either standard pricing schedules with individual account holders or according to service agreements between the Company and employer groups or third-party administrators. The Company satisfies the performance obligation related to providing depository accounts monthly as transactions are processed and deposit service charge revenue is recorded monthly. These fees are recognized within all Business Segments.\n\n \n\nInsurance fees and commissions – Insurance fees and commissions includes all insurance-related fees earned, including commissions for individual life, variable life, group life, health, group health, fixed annuity, and variable\n\n126\n\n \n\nannuity insurance contracts. The performance obligations related to these revenues primarily represent the placement of insurance policies with the insurance company partners. The fees are based on the contracts with insurance company partners and the performance obligations are satisfied when the terms of the policy have been agreed to and the insurance policy becomes effective.\n\n \n\nBrokerage fees – Brokerage fees represent income earned related to providing brokerage transaction services, including commissions on equity and commodity trades, and fees for investment management, advisory and administration. The performance obligations related to transaction services are executing the specified trade and are priced according to the customer’s fee schedule. Such income is recognized at a point in time as the trade occurs and the performance obligation is fulfilled. The performance obligations related to investment management, advisory and administration include allocating customer assets across a wide range of mutual funds and other investments, on-going account monitoring and re-balancing of the portfolio. These performance obligations are satisfied over time and the related revenue is calculated monthly based on the assets under management of each customer. All material performance obligations are satisfied as of the end of each accounting period.\n\n \n\nBankcard fees – Bankcard fees primarily represent income earned from interchange revenue from MasterCard and Visa for the Company’s processing of debit, credit, HSA, and flexible spending account transactions. Additionally, the Company earns income and incentives related to various referrals of customers to card programs. The performance obligation for interchange revenue is the processing of each transaction through the Company’s access to the banking system. This performance obligation is completed for each individual transaction and income is recognized per transaction in accordance with interchange rates established by MasterCard and Visa. The performance obligations for various referral and incentive programs include either referring customers to certain card products or issuing exclusively branded cards for certain customer segments. The pricing of these incentive and referral programs are in accordance with the agreement with the individual card partner. These performance obligations are completed as the referrals are made or over a period of time when the Company is exclusively issuing branded cards. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company also had $51.4 million, $39.4 million, and $39.7 million of expense, respectively, recorded within the Bankcard fees line on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income related to rebates and rewards programs that are outside of the scope of ASC 606. All material performance obligations are satisfied as of the end of each accounting period.\n\n \n\nInvestment securities gains, net – In the regular course of business, the Company recognizes gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities. Additionally, the Company recognizes gains and losses on equity securities with readily determinable fair values and equity securities without readily determinable fair values. These gains and losses are recognized in accordance with ASC 320, Investments–Debt Securities, and ASC 321, Investments–Equity Securities, and are outside of the scope of ASC 606.\n\n \n\nOther income – The Company recognizes other miscellaneous income through a variety of other revenue streams, the most material of which include letter of credit fees, certain loan origination fees, gains on the sale of assets, derivative income, and bank-owned and company-owned life insurance income. These revenue streams are outside of the scope of ASC 606 and are recognized in accordance with the applicable U.S. GAAP. The remainder of Other income is primarily earned through transactions with personal banking customers, including wire transfer service charges, stop payment charges, and fees for items like money orders and cashier’s checks. The performance obligations of these types of fees are satisfied as transactions are completed and revenue is recognized upon transaction execution according to established fee schedules with the customers.\n\n \n\nThe Company had no material contract assets, contract liabilities, or remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. Total receivables from revenue recognized under the scope of ASC 606 were $116.1 million and $100.2 million as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. These receivables are included as part of the Other assets line on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.\n\n \n\nThe following tables depict the disaggregation of revenue according to revenue stream and Business Segment for the three years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023. As stated in Note 12, “Business Segment Reporting,” for comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on methodologies in effect at December 31, 2025 and previously reported results have been reclassified in this filing to conform to the current organizational structure.\n\n127\n\n \n\nDisaggregated revenue is as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2025\n\n \n\nNONINTEREST INCOME\n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nRevenue (Expense) out of Scope of ASC 606\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nTrust and securities processing\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,810\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n262,667\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n77,921\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n343,398\n\n \n\nTrading and investment banking\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n695\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,610\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,305\n\n \n\nService charges on deposit accounts\n\n \n\n \n\n61,898\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n41,697\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,477\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n134\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n113,206\n\n \n\nInsurance fees and commissions\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n910\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n910\n\n \n\nBrokerage fees\n\n \n\n \n\n277\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n68,740\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,575\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n79,592\n\n \n\nBankcard fees\n\n \n\n \n\n105,359\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n29,353\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,513\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(51,301\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n113,924\n\n \n\nInvestment securities gains, net\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,967\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n30,967\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n7,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,844\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,621\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n68,949\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n82,748\n\n \n\nTotal noninterest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n177,678\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n405,996\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n133,017\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n73,359\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n790,050\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2024\n\n \n\nNONINTEREST INCOME\n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nRevenue (Expense) out of Scope of ASC 606\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nTrust and securities processing\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n232,239\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n58,332\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n290,571\n\n \n\nTrading and investment banking\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,131\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n23,095\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n24,226\n\n \n\nService charges on deposit accounts\n\n \n\n \n\n42,309\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36,665\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,425\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n113\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n84,512\n\n \n\nInsurance fees and commissions\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,257\n\n \n\nBrokerage fees\n\n \n\n \n\n267\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n53,532\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,765\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n61,564\n\n \n\nBankcard fees\n\n \n\n \n\n78,422\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n27,262\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21,395\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(39,282\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n87,797\n\n \n\nInvestment securities gains, net\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,720\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,720\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n2,008\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,014\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,639\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n59,809\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67,470\n\n \n\nTotal noninterest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n123,006\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n353,843\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n96,813\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n54,455\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n628,117\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31, 2023\n\n \n\nNONINTEREST INCOME\n\n \n\nCommercial Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nInstitutional Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal Banking\n\n \n\n \n\nRevenue (Expense) out of Scope of ASC 606\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\nTrust and securities processing\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n203,887\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n53,313\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n257,200\n\n \n\nTrading and investment banking\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n298\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,332\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,630\n\n \n\nService charges on deposit accounts\n\n \n\n \n\n38,358\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n40,578\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,918\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n96\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n84,950\n\n \n\nInsurance fees and commissions\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,009\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,009\n\n \n\nBrokerage fees\n\n \n\n \n\n374\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n46,395\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,350\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n54,119\n\n \n\nBankcard fees\n\n \n\n \n\n71,632\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,823\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,246\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(38,982\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n74,719\n\n \n\nInvestment securities losses, net\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,139\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3,139\n\n)\n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n762\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,835\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,582\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n47,186\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n53,365\n\n \n\nTotal noninterest income\n\n \n\n$\n\n111,126\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n313,816\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n92,418\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24,493\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n541,853\n\n \n\n \n\n128\n\n \n\n14. COMMON STOCK\n\nThe following table summarizes the share transactions for the three years ended December 31, 2025 (in thousands, except for share data):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nShares Issued\n\n \n\n \n\nShares in Treasury\n\n \n\nBalance January 1, 2023\n\n \n\n \n\n55,056,730\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(6,737,326\n\n)\n\nPurchase of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(94,727\n\n)\n\nSale of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,782\n\n \n\nIssued for stock options and restricted stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n321,668\n\n \n\nBalance December 31, 2023\n\n \n\n \n\n55,056,730\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(6,502,603\n\n)\n\nPurchase of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(93,428\n\n)\n\nSale of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,330\n\n \n\nIssued for stock options and restricted stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n347,148\n\n \n\nBalance December 31, 2024\n\n \n\n \n\n55,056,730\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(6,242,553\n\n)\n\nCommon stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n23,609,079\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPurchase of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(157,733\n\n)\n\nSale of Treasury Stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,226,386\n\n \n\nIssued for stock options and restricted stock\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n468,766\n\n \n\nBalance December 31, 2025\n\n \n\n \n\n78,665,809\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,705,134\n\n)\n\nThe Board authorized, at its July 25, 2023, April 30, 2024, and April 29, 2025 meetings, the repurchase of up to one million shares of the Company’s common stock. The July 2023 Repurchase Authorization terminated on April 30, 2024, the April 2024 Repurchase Authorization terminated on April 29, 2025, and the April 2025 Repurchase Authorization will terminate on April 28, 2026. All share purchases pursuant to the Repurchase Authorizations are intended to be within the scope of Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 provides a safe harbor for purchases in a given day if the Company satisfies the manner, timing and volume conditions of the rule when purchasing its own common shares. The Company has not made any repurchase of its securities other than pursuant to the Repurchase Authorizations, but did acquire shares pursuant to the Company’s share-based incentive programs.\n\n \n\n15. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES\n\nIn the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in order to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, and futures contracts. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The contract or notional amount of those instruments reflects the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. Many of the commitments expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent the future cash requirements of the Company.\n\nThe Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit is represented by the contract or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.\n\nCommitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the agreement. These conditions generally include, but are not limited to, each customer being current as to repayment terms of existing loans and no deterioration in the customer’s financial condition. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The interest rate is generally a variable rate. If the commitment has a fixed interest rate, the rate is generally not set until such time as credit is extended. For credit card customers, the Company has the right to change or terminate terms or conditions of the credit card account at any time. Since a large portion of the commitments and unused credit card lines are never actually drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s\n\n129\n\n \n\ncredit evaluation. Collateral pledged by customers varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, real estate, plant and equipment, stock, securities and certificates of deposit.\n\nCommercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate trade or commerce. Under the terms of a commercial letter of credit, as a general rule, drafts will be drawn when the underlying transaction is consummated as intended.\n\nStandby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company payable upon the non-performance of a customer’s obligation to a third party. The Company issues standby letters of credit for terms ranging from three months to six years. The Company generally requires the customer to pledge collateral to support the letter of credit. The maximum liability to the Company under standby letters of credit at December 31, 2025 and 2024, was $468.4 million and $404.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, standby letters of credit totaling $5.4 million and $26.7 million, respectively, were with related parties to the Company.\n\nThe credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments when deemed necessary. Collateral varies but may include such items as those described for commitments to extend credit.\n\nFutures contracts are contracts for delayed delivery of securities or money market instruments in which the seller agrees to make delivery at a specified future date, of a specified instrument, at a specified yield. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movement in securities values and interest rates. Instruments used in trading activities are carried at fair value and gains and losses on futures contracts are settled in cash daily. Any changes in the fair value are recognized in trading and investment banking income.\n\nThe Company uses contracts to offset interest rate risk on specific securities held in the trading portfolio. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were no notional amounts outstanding for these contracts. There were no open futures contract positions during the years ended December 31, 2025 or 2024. There was no net futures activity for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023. The Company controls the credit risk of its futures contracts through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures.\n\nThe Company also enters into foreign exchange contracts on a limited basis. For operating purposes, the Company maintains certain balances in foreign banks. Foreign exchange contracts are purchased on a monthly basis to avoid foreign exchange risk on these foreign balances. The Company will also enter into foreign exchange contracts to facilitate foreign exchange needs of customers. The Company will enter into a contract to buy or sell a foreign currency at a future date only as part of a contract to sell or buy the foreign currency at the same future date to a customer. During 2025, contracts to purchase and to sell foreign currency averaged approximately $78.3 million compared to $46.8 million during 2024. The net gains on these foreign exchange contracts for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were $7.4 million, $6.1 million and $4.2 million, respectively.\n\nWith respect to group concentrations of credit risk, most of the Company’s business activity is with customers in the states of Missouri, Kansas, Colorado, Arizona, Texas, and Utah. At December 31, 2025, the Company did not have any significant credit concentrations in any particular industry.\n\nThe following table summarizes the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments as described above (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nContract or Notional Amount December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nCommitments to extend credit for loans (excluding credit card loans)\n\n \n\n$\n\n17,819,711\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n12,904,749\n\n \n\nCommitments to extend credit under credit card loans\n\n \n\n \n\n5,994,640\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,474,758\n\n \n\nCommercial letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n217\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n311\n\n \n\nStandby letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n468,384\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n404,697\n\n \n\nForward contracts\n\n \n\n \n\n119,978\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n55,174\n\n \n\nSpot foreign exchange contracts\n\n \n\n \n\n34,233\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n50,006\n\n \n\nCommitments to extend credit for securities purchased under agreements to resell\n\n \n\n \n\n191,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n96,000\n\n \n\n \n\n130\n\n \n\n \n\nAllowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposure\n\nThe Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancelable by the Company. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. The estimate is based on expected utilization rates by portfolio segment. Utilization rates are influenced by historical trends and current conditions. The expected utilization rates are applied to the total commitment to determine the expected amount to be funded. The allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposure is calculated by applying portfolio segment expected credit loss rates to the expected amount to be funded.\n\nThe following categories of off-balance sheet credit exposures have been identified:\n\nRevolving Lines of Credit: includes commercial, construction, agricultural, personal, and home-equity. Risk inherent to revolving lines of credit often are related to the susceptibility of an individual or business experiencing unpredictable cash flow or financial troubles, thus leading to payment default. During these financial troubles, the borrower could have less than desirable assets collateralizing the revolving line of credit. The financial strain the borrower is experiencing could lead to drawing against the line without the ability to pay the line down.\n\nNon-Revolving Lines of Credit: include commercial and personal. Lines that do not carry a revolving feature are generally associated with a specific expenditure or project, such as to purchase equipment or the construction of real estate. The predominate risk associated with non-revolving lines is the diversion of funds for other expenditures. If the funds get diverted, the contributory value to collateral suffers.\n\nLetters of Credit: includes standby letters of credit. Generally, a standby letter of credit is established to provide assurance to the beneficiary that the applicant will perform certain obligations arising out of a separate transaction between the beneficiary and the applicant. These obligations might be the performance of a service or delivery of a product. If the obligations are not met, it gives the beneficiary the right to draw on the letter of credit.\n\nThe ACL for off-balance sheet credit exposures was $5.7 million and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and was recorded in the Accrued expenses and taxes line of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Reductions of $2.0 million and $950 thousand of provision for off-balance sheet credit exposures were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. Provision of $2.0 million was recorded for off-balance sheet credit exposures for the year ended December 31, 2023. Provision for off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded in the Provision for credit losses line of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.\n\n16. INCOME TAXES\n\nIncome taxes as set forth below produce effective income tax rates of 19.7% in 2025, 18.5% in 2024, and 17.0% in 2023. These percentages are computed by dividing Income tax expense by Income before income taxes.\n\n131\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense includes the following components (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nCurrent tax\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFederal\n\n \n\n$\n\n72,805\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107,697\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n81,565\n\n \n\nState\n\n \n\n \n\n16,927\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,507\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,452\n\n \n\nTotal current tax expense\n\n \n\n \n\n89,732\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n116,204\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n92,017\n\n \n\nDeferred tax\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFederal\n\n \n\n \n\n84,417\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(20,072\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(19,438\n\n)\n\nState\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,592\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,898\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,001\n\n)\n\nTotal deferred tax expense (benefit)\n\n \n\n \n\n82,825\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(16,174\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,439\n\n)\n\nTotal tax expense\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFederal\n\n \n\n \n\n157,222\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n87,625\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n62,127\n\n \n\nState\n\n \n\n \n\n15,335\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,405\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,451\n\n \n\nTotal tax expense\n\n \n\n$\n\n172,557\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n100,030\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n71,578\n\n \n\n \n\nThe reconciliation between the income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate of 21% for income before income taxes is as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nPercent\n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nPercent\n\n \n\n \n\nAmount\n\n \n\n \n\nPercent\n\n \n\nU.S federal statutory income tax rate\n\n \n\n$\n\n183,741\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21.0\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n113,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21.0\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n88,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n21.0\n\n%\n\nDomestic federal:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFederal tax credits, net of amortization (as applicable)\n\n \n\n \n\n(7,280\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(0.8\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,252\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1.5\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,049\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1.2\n\n)\n\nNontaxable and nondeductible items:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTax-exempt interest income\n\n \n\n \n\n(25,916\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3.0\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,487\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3.8\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(20,614\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(4.9\n\n)\n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n11,174\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,235\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.0\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,168\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.3\n\n \n\nDomestic state and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effect (1)\n\n \n\n \n\n10,697\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.2\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,887\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2.2\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,233\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1.5\n\n \n\nChanges in unrecognized tax benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n39\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.0\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(2,087\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(0.4\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,233\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.3\n\n \n\nOther reconciling items\n\n \n\n \n\n102\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.0\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.0\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n71\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0.0\n\n \n\nTotal tax expense\n\n \n\n$\n\n172,557\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19.7\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n100,030\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18.5\n\n%\n\n \n\n$\n\n71,578\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17.0\n\n%\n\n \n\n(1) In general, state and local taxes in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York City made up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category.\n\n \n\nThe income taxes paid, net of refunds, is as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nU.S. federal\n\n \n\n$\n\n49,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n65,500\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n69,000\n\n \n\nU.S. state and local:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nIllinois\n\n \n\n \n\n3,674\n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n10,568\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,430\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n10,334\n\n \n\nForeign\n\n \n\n*\n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n \n\n \n\n*\n\n \n\nTotal income taxes paid, net of refunds\n\n \n\n$\n\n63,242\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n76,930\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n79,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n*The amount of income taxes paid, net of refunds received, during the year does not meet the 5% disaggregation threshold.\n\n \n\nIn preparing its tax returns, the Company is required to interpret tax laws and regulations to determine its taxable income. Periodically, the Company is subject to examinations by various taxing authorities that may give rise to differing interpretations of these laws. Upon examination, agreement of tax liabilities between the Company and the multiple tax jurisdictions in which the Company files tax returns may ultimately be different. The Company is in the examination process with two state tax authorities for various years between tax years 2021 and 2023. The\n\n132\n\n \n\nCompany believes the aggregate amount of any additional liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.\n\nDeferred income taxes result from differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities for income tax return purposes.\n\n \n\nThe significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the following table (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nDeferred tax assets:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet unrealized loss on securities available for sale\n\n \n\n$\n\n107,222\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n196,594\n\n \n\nNet unrealized loss on cash flow hedges\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,035\n\n \n\nLoans, principally due to allowance for credit losses\n\n \n\n \n\n184,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n57,553\n\n \n\nSecurities\n\n \n\n \n\n119,343\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nEquity-based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n9,631\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,067\n\n \n\nAccrued expenses\n\n \n\n \n\n46,886\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,008\n\n \n\nDeferred compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n27,088\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,981\n\n \n\nNet operating loss carryovers\n\n \n\n \n\n43,502\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,507\n\n \n\nMiscellaneous\n\n \n\n \n\n2,217\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,541\n\n \n\nTotal deferred tax assets before valuation allowance\n\n \n\n \n\n540,694\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n331,286\n\n \n\nValuation allowance\n\n \n\n \n\n(39,021\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(11,106\n\n)\n\nTotal deferred tax assets\n\n \n\n \n\n501,673\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n320,180\n\n \n\nDeferred tax liabilities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet unrealized gain on fair value hedges\n\n \n\n \n\n(15,549\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(16,395\n\n)\n\nNet unrealized gain on cash flow hedges\n\n \n\n \n\n(6,186\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSecurities\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(83\n\n)\n\nLand, buildings and equipment\n\n \n\n \n\n(38,434\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(24,859\n\n)\n\nPrepaid expenses\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,885\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(7,245\n\n)\n\nPartnership investments\n\n \n\n \n\n(4,098\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(4,190\n\n)\n\nTrust preferred securities\n\n \n\n \n\n(11,051\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(6,439\n\n)\n\nIntangibles\n\n \n\n \n\n(132,335\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(13,776\n\n)\n\nMiscellaneous\n\n \n\n \n\n(5,999\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(3,149\n\n)\n\nTotal deferred tax liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n(222,537\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(76,136\n\n)\n\nNet deferred tax asset\n\n \n\n$\n\n279,136\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n244,044\n\n \n\n \n\nAs of December 31, 2025, the Company’s gross federal net operating loss carryovers, acquired through the HTLF acquisition and subject to annual utilization limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, totaled $93.7 million. The deferred tax asset associated with these federal net operating loss carryovers was $19.7 million at December 31, 2025, and the Company established a valuation allowance of $2.1 million to reflect expected net operating loss expirations. A majority of these federal net operating losses have an indefinite carryforward period, while others expire at various times between 2026 and 2035. The Company also had gross state net operating loss carryovers of $531.5 million, for which a deferred tax asset of $23.8 million was recorded at December 31, 2025. A majority of these state net operating loss carryovers were acquired through the HTLF acquisition and are subject to annual utilization limitations. Most of these state net operating losses expire at various times between 2026 and 2045 and some have an indefinite carryforward. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had a valuation allowance of $15.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for certain state net operating losses as they are not expected to be realized. In addition, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had a valuation allowance of $21.7 million and $8.6 million, respectively, to reduce certain other state deferred tax assets to the amount management believes will be more likely than not realized.\n\nThe net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are included in the Other assets line of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.\n\n133\n\n \n\nThe Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years prior to 2020 in the jurisdictions in which it files.\n\nLiabilities Associated With Unrecognized Tax Benefits\n\nThe gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits totaled $8.9 million and $8.3 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, net of associated deferred tax benefit, that would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, would be $7.1 million and $6.5 million at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The unrecognized tax benefits relate to state tax positions that have a corresponding federal tax benefit.\n\nA reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nUnrecognized tax benefits - opening balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,279\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n10,921\n\n \n\nGross increases - tax positions in prior period\n\n \n\n \n\n10\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nGross decreases - tax positions in prior period\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,051\n\n)\n\nGross increases - current-period tax positions\n\n \n\n \n\n1,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,915\n\n \n\nGross increases - acquisitions\n\n \n\n \n\n616\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nLapse of statute of limitations\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,497\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,506\n\n)\n\nUnrecognized tax benefits - ending balance\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,944\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,279\n\n \n\nInvestments in Affordable Housing and Renewable Energy\n\nThe Company has invested in affordable housing and renewable energy projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred to as tax equity investments. The primary return on these investments is derived from the realization of federal tax credits and deductions. Tax equity investments are recorded net of accumulated amortization using the proportional amortization method. These investments are included in Other securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and totaled $290.3 million and $251.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Unfunded tax equity obligations are included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and totaled $124.9 million and $116.5 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.\n\nThe following table summarizes the amortization expense and tax benefit recognized for the Company’s affordable housing projects and other tax credit investments (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmortization Expense (1)\n\n \n\n \n\nTax Benefit Recognized (2)\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortization Expense (1)\n\n \n\n \n\nTax Benefit Recognized (2)\n\n \n\n \n\nAmortization Expense (1)\n\n \n\n \n\nTax Benefit Recognized (2)\n\n \n\nLow-income housing tax credit\n\n \n\n$\n\n22,284\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(28,938\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n16,930\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(21,277\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n12,709\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(15,482\n\n)\n\nHistoric tax credit\n\n \n\n \n\n1,481\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,776\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,471\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,493\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n1,464\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(1,714\n\n)\n\nNew markets tax credit\n\n \n\n \n\n303\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(360\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nRenewable energy\n\n \n\n \n\n192\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(13\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n20,750\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(22,318\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n24,260\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(31,087\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n39,151\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(45,088\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n14,173\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(17,196\n\n)\n\n(1)\nThe credit programs disclosed above met the conditions to apply the proportional amortization method. The amortization expense is included in Income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Amortization of securities premiums, net of discount accretion in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There were no credit programs that were not eligible for the proportional amortization method.\n\n(2)\nThe tax benefit recognized primarily reflects the Federal tax credits generated from the investment, which are included in Income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.\n\n134\n\n \n\n17. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES\n\nRisk Management Objective of Using Derivatives\n\nThe Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk, primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its assets and liabilities. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s loans and borrowings. The Company also has interest rate derivatives that result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk of the Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company has entered into an offsetting position for each of these derivative instruments with a matching instrument from another financial institution in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions.\n\nFair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets\n\nThe table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Company’s derivative assets and derivative liabilities are located within Other assets and Other liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.\n\nDerivative fair values are determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows from each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.\n\nThis table provides a summary of the fair value of the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivative Assets\n\n \n\n \n\nDerivative Liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nInterest Rate Derivatives:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives not designated as hedging instruments\n\n \n\n$\n\n126,423\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n102,118\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n130,122\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107,386\n\n \n\nDerivatives designated as hedging instruments\n\n \n\n \n\n148,550\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n132,325\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n36\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n56\n\n \n\nTotal interest rate derivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n274,973\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n130,158\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n107,442\n\n \n\nCommodity Derivatives:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives not designated as hedging instruments\n\n \n\n \n\n6,356\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,294\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal commodity derivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n6,356\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,294\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n281,329\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n136,452\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107,442\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk\n\nThe Company is exposed to changes in the fair value of certain of its fixed-rate assets and liabilities due to changes in interest rates. Interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges involve making fixed rate payments to a counterparty in exchange for the Company receiving variable rate payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company did not have any interest rate swaps that were designated as fair value hedges of interest rate risk.\n\n135\n\n \n\nDuring 2022 and 2023, the Company terminated 10 fair value hedges of interest rate risk associated with the Company's municipal bond securities. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 the Company reclassified $4.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively, from AOCI to Interest income in connection with these terminated hedges. The unrealized gain on the terminated fair value hedges remaining in AOCI was $46.7 million net of tax, and $50.4 million net of tax, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The hedging adjustments will be amortized through the contractual maturity date of each respective hedged item.\n\nFor derivatives designated and that qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in Interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.\n\nCash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk\n\nThe Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps, floors, and floor spreads as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had two interest rate swaps that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk associated with the Company’s variable-rate subordinated debentures issued by Marquette Capital Trusts III and IV. These swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $51.5 million at both December 31, 2025 and 2024.\n\nInterest rate floors designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates fall below the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium. Interest rate floor spreads designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates fall below the purchased floor rate on the contract in exchange for an upfront premium, and involve payment of variable-rate amounts to the counterparty if interest rates fall below the sold floor rate on the contract. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had 13 interest rate floors and floor spreads with an aggregate notional amount of $3.0 billion that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.\n\nFor derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in AOCI and is subsequently reclassified into interest expense and interest income in the period during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in AOCI related to interest rate swap derivatives will be reclassified to Interest expense as interest payments are received or paid on the Company’s hedged items. Amounts reported in AOCI related to interest rate floor and floor spread derivatives will be reclassified to Interest income as interest payments are received or paid on the Company’s items. The Company expects to reclassify $0.5 million from AOCI as a reduction to Interest expense and $3.8 million from AOCI as an increase to Interest income during the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2025, the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of 10.7 years.\n\nNon-designated Hedges\n\nThe remainder of the Company’s derivatives are not designated in qualifying hedging relationships. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and result from a service the Company provides to certain customers.\n\nInterest Rate Derivatives\n\nThe Company executes interest rate swaps with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. Those interest rate swaps are simultaneously offset by interest rate swaps that the Company executes with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. The changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized in Other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had 830 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $11.7 billion related to this program. The acquisition of HTLF included 478 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $4.2 billion as of the Acquisition Date. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 298 interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $5.5 billion.\n\n136\n\n \n\nCommodity Derivatives\n\nThe Company executes commodity swap and option contracts with commercial banking customers to facilitate their respective risk management strategies. The Company simultaneously enters into an offsetting contract with a third party, such that the Company minimizes its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions. As the commodity swaps and option contracts associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. The changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized in Other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had 26 commodity swaps and option contracts with an aggregate remaining volume of 2.1 million oil barrels and 3.6 million British Thermal Units related to this program.\n\n \n\nEffect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income\n\nThis table provides a summary of the amount of gain or loss recognized in Interest income and Other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 related to the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nAmount of Gain (Loss) Recognized\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFor the Year Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nInterest Rate Derivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives not designated as hedging instruments\n\n \n\n$\n\n(45\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n74\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(69\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n(45\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n74\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(69\n\n)\n\nInterest Rate Derivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives designated as hedging instruments:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair value adjustments on derivatives\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n904\n\n \n\nFair value adjustments on hedged items\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(902\n\n)\n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2\n\n \n\nCommodity Derivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives not designated as hedging instruments\n\n \n\n$\n\n84\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n84\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\nThese tables provide a summary of the effect of hedges on AOCI in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 related to the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFor the Year Ended December 31, 2025\n\n \n\nDerivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships\n\n \n\nGain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative\n\n \n\n \n\nGain (Loss) Recognized in OCI Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nLoss Recognized in OCI Excluded Component\n\n \n\n \n\n(Loss) Gain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings\n\n \n\n \n\n(Loss) Gain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nLoss Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Excluded Component\n\n \n\nInterest rate floors and floor spreads\n\n \n\n$\n\n33,517\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n61,785\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(28,268\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(13,071\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(10,727\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,344\n\n)\n\nInterest rate swaps\n\n \n\n \n\n(544\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(544\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n937\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n937\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n32,973\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n61,241\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(28,268\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(12,134\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(9,790\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,344\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n137\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFor the Year Ended December 31, 2024\n\n \n\nDerivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships\n\n \n\n(Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI on Derivative\n\n \n\n \n\n(Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Recognized in OCI Excluded Component\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nLoss Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Excluded Component\n\n \n\nInterest rate floors and floor spreads\n\n \n\n$\n\n(44,268\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(70,323\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n26,055\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n539\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,857\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(3,318\n\n)\n\nInterest rate swaps\n\n \n\n \n\n3,738\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,738\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,417\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,417\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n(40,530\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n(66,585\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n26,055\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,956\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n5,274\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(3,318\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFor the Year Ended December 31, 2023\n\n \n\nDerivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships\n\n \n\nGain Recognized in OCI on Derivative\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Recognized in OCI Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nLoss Recognized in OCI Excluded Component\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings\n\n \n\n \n\nGain Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Included Component\n\n \n\n \n\nLoss Reclassified from AOCI into Earnings Excluded Component\n\n \n\nInterest rate floors and floor spreads\n\n \n\n$\n\n14,123\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n24,826\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(10,703\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n4,605\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,948\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,343\n\n)\n\nInterest rate swaps\n\n \n\n \n\n892\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n892\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,312\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,312\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n15,015\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n25,718\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(10,703\n\n)\n\n \n\n$\n\n5,917\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,260\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(2,343\n\n)\n\nCredit-risk-related Contingent Features\n\nThe Company has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations.\n\nAs of December 31, 2025, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest, related to these agreements was $3.7 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had posted $4.5 million of collateral. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2025, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.\n\n18. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS\n\nThe following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value.\n\nFair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the hierarchy. In such cases, the fair value is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.\n\n138\n\n \n\nAssets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2025 Using\n\n \n\nDescription\n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\nAssets\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,636\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,636\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n13,489\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,489\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n3,697\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,697\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n2,192\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,192\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTrading – other\n\n \n\n \n\n317\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n317\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n22,331\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,145\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,186\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n \n\n2,320,815\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,320,815\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n62,370\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n62,370\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n8,167,873\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,167,873\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n2,446,588\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,446,588\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n177,115\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n177,115\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n534,380\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n534,380\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSecurities available for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,497,930\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,211,211\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values\n\n \n\n \n\n14,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n281,329\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n281,329\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n14,027,491\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,517,765\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n11,509,726\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nLiabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n$\n\n136,452\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n136,452\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nSecurities sold not yet purchased\n\n \n\n \n\n4,052\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,052\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n140,504\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n140,504\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n139\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2024 Using\n\n \n\nDescription\n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\nAssets\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,620\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,620\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n8,369\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,369\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n11,469\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,469\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n6,935\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,935\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTrading – other\n\n \n\n \n\n140\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n140\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n28,533\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,695\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,838\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Treasury\n\n \n\n \n\n1,326,073\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,326,073\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nU.S. Agencies\n\n \n\n \n\n129,047\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n129,047\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nMortgage-backed\n\n \n\n \n\n4,420,930\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,420,930\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nState and political subdivisions\n\n \n\n \n\n1,218,569\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,218,569\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCorporates\n\n \n\n \n\n317,170\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n317,170\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCollateralized loan obligations\n\n \n\n \n\n362,545\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n362,545\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nSecurities available for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n7,774,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,643,243\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,131,091\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values\n\n \n\n \n\n11,596\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,596\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,048,906\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,663,534\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n6,385,372\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nLiabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n$\n\n107,442\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n107,442\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nSecurities sold not yet purchased\n\n \n\n \n\n7,100\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,100\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n114,542\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n114,542\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\nValuation methods for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis\n\nThe following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments measured on a recurring basis:\n\nTrading Securities Fair values for trading securities (including financial futures), are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar securities.\n\nSecurities Available for Sale Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Prices are provided by third-party pricing services and are based on observable market inputs. On an annual basis, the Company compares a sample of these prices to other independent sources for the same securities. Additionally, throughout the year, if securities are sold, comparisons are made between the pricing services prices and the market prices at which the securities were sold. Variances are analyzed, and, if appropriate, additional research is conducted with the third-party pricing services. Based on this research, the pricing services may affirm or revise their quoted price. No significant adjustments have been made to the prices provided by the pricing services. The pricing services also provide documentation on an ongoing basis that includes reference data, inputs and methodology by asset class, which is reviewed to ensure that security placement within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate.\n\nEquity securities with readily determinable fair values Fair values are based on quoted market prices.\n\nDerivatives Fair values are determined using valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows from each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the\n\n140\n\n \n\nCompany has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.\n\nSecurities sold not yet purchased Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Prices are provided by third-party pricing services and are based on observable market inputs.\n\nAssets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2025 Using\n\n \n\nDescription\n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal (Losses) Gains Recognized During the Twelve Months Ended December 31\n\n \n\nCollateral dependent assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n70,012\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n70,012\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(29,420\n\n)\n\nOther real estate owned\n\n \n\n \n\n3,009\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,009\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n178\n\n \n\nOther repossessed assets\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n73,021\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n73,021\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(29,242\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2024 Using\n\n \n\nDescription\n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal Losses Recognized During the Twelve Months Ended December 31\n\n \n\nCollateral dependent assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n2,405\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n2,405\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(256\n\n)\n\nOther real estate owned\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nOther repossessed assets\n\n \n\n \n\n26,779\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n26,779\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nTotal\n\n \n\n$\n\n29,184\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n29,184\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n(256\n\n)\n\n \n\nValuation methods for instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis\n\nThe following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments measured on a non-recurring basis:\n\nCollateral Dependent Assets Collateral dependent assets are assets evaluated as part of the ACL on an individual basis. Those assets for which there is an associated allowance are considered financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Adjustments are recorded on certain assets to reflect write-downs that are based on the external appraised value of the underlying collateral. The external appraisals are generally based on recent sales of comparable properties which are then adjusted for the unique characteristics of the property being valued. In the case of non-real estate collateral, reliance is placed on a variety of sources, including external estimates of value and judgments based on the experience and expertise of internal specialists within the Company’s property management group and the Company’s credit department. The valuation of collateral dependent assets are reviewed on a quarterly basis. Because many of these inputs are not observable, the measurements are classified as Level 3.\n\nOther real estate owned and Other repossessed assets Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets consist of loan collateral which has been repossessed through foreclosure. This collateral is comprised of commercial and residential real estate and other non-real estate property, including auto, recreational and marine vehicles. Other real estate owned and other repossessed assets are recorded as held for sale initially at the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. The initial valuation of the foreclosed property is obtained through an appraisal process similar to the process described in the collateral dependent assets paragraph above. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are reviewed quarterly and updated periodically, and the assets may be marked down further,\n\n141\n\n \n\nreflecting a new cost basis. Fair value measurements may be based upon appraisals, third-party price opinions, or internally developed pricing methods and those measurements are classified as Level 3.\n\nFair value disclosures require disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.\n\nThe estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are as follows (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2025 Using\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCarrying Amount\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal Estimated Fair Value\n\n \n\nFINANCIAL ASSETS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCash and short-term investments\n\n \n\n$\n\n9,441,175\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n7,893,082\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n1,548,093\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,441,175\n\n \n\nSecurities available for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,497,930\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,211,211\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,709,141\n\n \n\nSecurities held to maturity (exclusive of allowance for credit losses)\n\n \n\n \n\n5,724,227\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,250,465\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,250,465\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n22,331\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,145\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n17,186\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,331\n\n \n\nOther securities\n\n \n\n \n\n676,300\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,690\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n661,610\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n676,300\n\n \n\nLoans (exclusive of allowance for credit losses)\n\n \n\n \n\n38,781,438\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,041,201\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n39,041,201\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n281,329\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n281,329\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n281,329\n\n \n\nFINANCIAL LIABILITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTime deposits\n\n \n\n \n\n3,760,862\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,760,862\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,760,862\n\n \n\nOther borrowings\n\n \n\n \n\n3,324,938\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n32,133\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,292,805\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,324,938\n\n \n\nLong-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n474,229\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n523,545\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n523,545\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n136,452\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n136,452\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n136,452\n\n \n\nOFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommitments to extend credit for loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,972\n\n \n\nCommitments to extend resell agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n106\n\n \n\nCommercial letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n130\n\n \n\nStandby letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,483\n\n \n\n \n\n142\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value Measurement at December 31, 2024 Using\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCarrying Amount\n\n \n\n \n\nQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)\n\n \n\n \n\nSignificant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)\n\n \n\n \n\nTotal Estimated Fair Value\n\n \n\nFINANCIAL ASSETS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCash and short-term investments\n\n \n\n$\n\n9,104,445\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n8,559,445\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n545,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n9,104,445\n\n \n\nSecurities available for sale\n\n \n\n \n\n7,774,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n1,643,243\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n6,131,091\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n7,774,334\n\n \n\nSecurities held to maturity (exclusive of allowance for credit losses)\n\n \n\n \n\n5,378,912\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,748,938\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,748,938\n\n \n\nTrading securities\n\n \n\n \n\n28,533\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n8,695\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n19,838\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n28,533\n\n \n\nOther securities\n\n \n\n \n\n471,018\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11,596\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n459,422\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n471,018\n\n \n\nLoans (exclusive of allowance for credit losses)\n\n \n\n \n\n25,645,057\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,665,211\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n25,665,211\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n234,443\n\n \n\nFINANCIAL LIABILITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nTime deposits\n\n \n\n \n\n2,127,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,127,667\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,127,667\n\n \n\nOther borrowings\n\n \n\n \n\n2,609,715\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n70,405\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,539,310\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,609,715\n\n \n\nLong-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n385,292\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n417,217\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n417,217\n\n \n\nDerivatives\n\n \n\n \n\n107,442\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n107,442\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n107,442\n\n \n\nOFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCommitments to extend credit for loans\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n12,515\n\n \n\nCommitments to extend resell agreements\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n292\n\n \n\nCommercial letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n135\n\n \n\nStandby letters of credit\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,375\n\n \n\n \n\nCash and short-term investments The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and resell agreements are reasonable estimates of their fair values.\n\nSecurities held to maturity For U.S. Agency and mortgage-backed securities, as well as general obligation bonds in the State and political subdivision portfolio, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Prices are provided by third-party pricing services and are based on observable market inputs. On an annual basis, the Company compares a sample of these prices to other independent sources for the same securities. Variances are analyzed, and, if appropriate, additional research is conducted with the third-party pricing services. Based on this research, the pricing services may affirm or revise their quoted price. No significant adjustments have been made to the prices provided by the pricing services. The pricing services also provide documentation on an ongoing basis that includes reference data, inputs and methodology by asset class, which is reviewed to ensure that security placement within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate. For private placement bonds in the State and political subdivision portfolio, fair values are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates.\n\nOther securities Amount consists of FRB and FHLB stock held by the Company, equity securities with readily determinable fair values, and equity securities without readily determinable fair values, including equity-method investments and other miscellaneous investments. The carrying amount of the FRB and FHLB stock equals its fair value because the shares can only be redeemed by the FRB and FHLB at their carrying amount. Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are measured at fair value using quoted market prices. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.\n\nLoans Fair values are estimated for portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, such as commercial, real estate, consumer, and credit card. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and variable interest rate categories. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows. The discount rates used are estimated using comparable market rates for similar types of instruments adjusted to be commensurate with the credit risk, overhead costs, and optionality of such instruments.\n\n143\n\n \n\nTime deposits The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates that are currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.\n\nOther borrowings The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other short-term debt are reasonable estimates of their fair value because of the short-term nature of their maturities. Federal funds purchased are classified as Level 1 based on availability of quoted market prices and repurchase agreements and other short-term debt are classified as Level 2.\n\nLong-term debt Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.\n\nOther off-balance sheet instruments The fair value of loan commitments and letters of credit are determined based on the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. Neither the fees earned during the year on these instruments nor their fair value at period-end are significant to the Company’s consolidated financial position.\n\n19. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION\n\nUMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION\n\nBALANCE SHEETS (in thousands)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDecember 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\nASSETS\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nInvestment in subsidiaries:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBanks\n\n \n\n$\n\n7,527,586\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,462,767\n\n \n\nNon-banks\n\n \n\n \n\n209,109\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n188,605\n\n \n\nTotal investment in subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n7,736,695\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,651,372\n\n \n\nGoodwill on purchased affiliates\n\n \n\n \n\n5,011\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5,011\n\n \n\nCash\n\n \n\n \n\n305,672\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n123,091\n\n \n\nInvestment securities and other\n\n \n\n \n\n223,891\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n151,094\n\n \n\nTotal assets\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,271,269\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,930,568\n\n \n\nLIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLong-term debt\n\n \n\n$\n\n474,229\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n385,292\n\n \n\nAccrued expenses and other\n\n \n\n \n\n103,472\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n78,735\n\n \n\nTotal liabilities\n\n \n\n \n\n577,701\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n464,027\n\n \n\nShareholders' equity\n\n \n\n \n\n7,693,568\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n3,466,541\n\n \n\nTotal liabilities and shareholders' equity\n\n \n\n$\n\n8,271,269\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n3,930,568\n\n \n\n \n\n144\n\n \n\nSTATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in thousands)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nINCOME\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDividends and income received from subsidiaries\n\n \n\n$\n\n108,000\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n108,500\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n88,500\n\n \n\nService fees from subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n203,018\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n77,906\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n66,450\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n27,656\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n9,928\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,268\n\n \n\nTotal income\n\n \n\n \n\n338,674\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n196,334\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n168,218\n\n \n\nEXPENSE\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nSalaries and employee benefits\n\n \n\n \n\n127,795\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n75,433\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n67,015\n\n \n\nOther\n\n \n\n \n\n99,802\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n59,974\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n43,418\n\n \n\nTotal expense\n\n \n\n \n\n227,597\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n135,407\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n110,433\n\n \n\nIncome before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n111,077\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n60,927\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n57,785\n\n \n\nIncome tax expense (benefit)\n\n \n\n \n\n3,541\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(8,179\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(9,165\n\n)\n\nIncome before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n107,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n69,106\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n66,950\n\n \n\nEquity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBanks\n\n \n\n \n\n589,408\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n357,257\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n291,473\n\n \n\nNon-Banks\n\n \n\n \n\n5,454\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14,880\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(8,399\n\n)\n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nOther comprehensive income (loss)\n\n \n\n \n\n311,530\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(16,115\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n145,800\n\n \n\nComprehensive income\n\n \n\n$\n\n1,013,928\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n425,128\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n495,824\n\n \n\n \n\n145\n\n \n\nSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nYear Ended December 31,\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2025\n\n \n\n \n\n2024\n\n \n\n \n\n2023\n\n \n\nOPERATING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet income\n\n \n\n$\n\n702,398\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n441,243\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n350,024\n\n \n\nAdjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nEquity in earnings of subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n(702,862\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(480,637\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(371,574\n\n)\n\nDividends received from subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n108,000\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n108,500\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n88,500\n\n \n\nDepreciation and amortization\n\n \n\n \n\n105\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n14\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18\n\n \n\nAmortization of debt issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n745\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n876\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n876\n\n \n\nEquity based compensation\n\n \n\n \n\n37,745\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n22,579\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n18,694\n\n \n\nChanges in other assets and liabilities, net\n\n \n\n \n\n31,527\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n471\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(32,493\n\n)\n\nNet cash provided by operating activities\n\n \n\n \n\n177,658\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n93,046\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n54,045\n\n \n\nINVESTING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet capital investment in subsidiaries\n\n \n\n \n\n(220,287\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,319\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,570\n\n)\n\nNet cash activity from acquisitions and divestitures\n\n \n\n \n\n170,052\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNet increase in investment securities\n\n \n\n \n\n(6,585\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(33\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(30\n\n)\n\nNet cash (used in) provided by investing activities\n\n \n\n \n\n(56,820\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n2,286\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(3,600\n\n)\n\nFINANCING ACTIVITIES\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nCash dividends paid\n\n \n\n \n\n(135,620\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(77,127\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(74,245\n\n)\n\nRepayment from long-term debt\n\n \n\n \n\n(200,000\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nCommon stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n235,141\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPayment of common stock issuance costs\n\n \n\n \n\n(524\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(1,413\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nProceeds from exercise of stock options and sales of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n1,308\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n4,685\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n2,461\n\n \n\nPurchases of treasury stock\n\n \n\n \n\n(17,628\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(7,738\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(8,367\n\n)\n\nPreferred stock issuance\n\n \n\n \n\n294,066\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nPreferred stock redemption\n\n \n\n \n\n(115,000\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n—\n\n \n\nNet cash provided by (used in) by financing activities\n\n \n\n \n\n61,743\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(81,593\n\n)\n\n \n\n \n\n(80,151\n\n)\n\nNet increase (decrease) in cash\n\n \n\n \n\n182,581\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n13,739\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n(29,706\n\n)\n\nCash and cash equivalents at beginning of period\n\n \n\n \n\n123,091\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n109,352\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n139,058\n\n \n\nCash and cash equivalents at end of period\n\n \n\n$\n\n305,672\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n123,091\n\n \n\n \n\n$\n\n109,352\n\n \n\n \n\n20. Acquisition\n\nOn January 31, 2025 (Acquisition Date), the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Heartland Financial USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (HTLF), in an all-stock transaction, issuing a total of 23.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock and 4.6 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/400th interest in a share of the Company’s 7.00% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the Series A preferred stock). Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 28, 2024, (i) HTLF merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and (ii) one day after the closing date of the acquisition of HTLF by the Company, HTLF’s wholly owned bank subsidiary, a Colorado-chartered bank (HTLF Bank), merged with and into UMB Bank, National Association, the Company’s national bank subsidiary (the Bank), with the Bank continuing as the surviving bank.\n\nTotal consideration for the acquisition was $2.9 billion, consisting of the Company’s common stock valued at $2.8 billion (based on the Company’s common stock price of $117.90) and the Company’s Series A preferred stock valued at $115.2 million (based on the Company’s Series A preferred stock price of $25.05) as of close of business on the Acquisition Date. Each HTLF common stock share was converted into 0.55 shares of the Company’s common stock. Each HTLF preferred stock share was converted into a share of the Company’s Series A preferred stock.\n\nThe acquisition of HTLF was accounted for as a business combination using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the purchase price was\n\n146\n\n \n\nallocated based on the estimated fair market values of the assets and liabilities acquired.\n\nThe following table summarizes the net assets acquired (at fair value) and consideration transferred for HTLF as of January 31, 2025 (in thousands, except for per share data):\n\n \n\n \n\nFair Value\nJanuary 31, 2025\n\n \n\nAssets\n\n \n\n \n\nLoans, net of allowance for credit losses on loans\n\n$\n\n9,734,711\n\n \n\nInvestment securities\n\n \n\n3,648,445\n\n \n\nInterest-bearing due from banks\n\n \n\n965,003\n\n \n\nCash and due from banks\n\n \n\n174,985\n\n \n\nPremises and equipment, net\n\n \n\n174,579\n\n \n\nIdentifiable intangible assets\n\n \n\n511,021\n\n \n\nOther assets\n\n \n\n904,481\n\n \n\nTotal assets acquired\n\n$\n\n16,113,225\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLiabilities\n\n \n\n \n\nNoninterest-bearing deposits\n\n$\n\n3,761,997\n\n \n\nInterest-bearing deposits\n\n \n\n10,586,989\n\n \n\nLong-term debt\n\n \n\n278,018\n\n \n\nOther liabilities\n\n \n\n199,532\n\n \n\nTotal liabilities assumed\n\n$\n\n14,826,536\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nNet identifiable assets acquired\n\n$\n\n1,286,689\n\n \n\nPreliminary goodwill\n\n \n\n1,632,440\n\n \n\nNet assets acquired\n\n$\n\n2,919,129\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nConsideration\n\n \n\n \n\nCommon stock consideration:\n\n \n\n \n\nCompany's common shares issued\n\n \n\n23,609\n\n \n\nPurchase price per share of the Company's common stock\n\n$\n\n117.90\n\n \n\nFair value of common stock consideration\n\n$\n\n2,783,510\n\n \n\nPreferred stock consideration\n\n \n\n115,230\n\n \n\nStock-based compensation consideration\n\n \n\n20,389\n\n \n\nFair value of total consideration transferred\n\n$\n\n2,919,129\n\n \n\nThe fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities noted in the table above is preliminary as of December 31, 2025, pending a final adjustment to the valuation allowance against certain state deferred tax assets, as described below. During the preliminary period (Measurement Period), which may last up to twelve months subsequent to the Acquisition Date, the Company will continue to review information relating to events and circumstances existing as of the Acquisition Date that could impact the preliminary fair value estimates of the acquired assets and liabilities. In the table of acquired net assets above, the amount of net assets acquired reflect Measurement Period adjustments made since Acquisition Date that resulted in a net decrease in net assets acquired of $41.4 million. This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in the value of various investment securities of $29.7 million, based on indicative market pricing determined to be in existence as of the Acquisition Date and increases of $23.1 million in the ACL for PCD loans based on credit factors that were determined to be in existence as of the Acquisition Date, partially offset by an increase of $10.2 million in the related deferred tax assets. The Company has been completing a comprehensive review of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities, including an evaluation of all facts and circumstances that existed as of the Acquisition Date. As of the date of this report, this process is complete and the Company has finalized its analysis. After December 31, 2025, but before the end of the Measurement Period, the Company recorded an adjustment of $2.2 million to the valuation allowance against certain state deferred tax assets.\n\n \n\nThe amount of goodwill arising from the acquisition reflects the Company’s increased market share and related synergies that are expected to result from combining the operations of UMB and HTLF. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, goodwill will not be amortized, but will be subject to at least an annual\n\n147\n\n \n\nimpairment test. The Company has approximately $44.0 million of tax-deductible goodwill that arose in previous transactions completed by HTLF which carries over. The remaining goodwill related to the acquisition is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Of the $1.6 billion in goodwill arising from the acquisition, $979.5 million was assigned to the Commercial Banking segment and $653.0 million was assigned to the Personal Banking segment. The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets of $511.0 million is comprised of a core deposit intangible of $474.1 million, a customer list of $26.0 million and purchased credit card relationships of $10.9 million.\n\n \n\nThe following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant assets and liabilities presented above.\n\n \n\nLoans A valuation of the loans was performed by a third party as of the Acquisition Date to assess the fair value. The fair value of loans was based on a discounted cash flow method that considered the loans’ underlying characteristics including account type, remaining terms of loan, annual interest rates or coupon, fixed or variable interest rate, past delinquencies, risk rating, timing of principal and interest payments, current market rates, loan to value ratios, loss exposure, more specifically the probability of default and loss given default, and remaining balance. Loans were aggregated according to similar characteristics when applying the valuation method.\n\nThe Company's accounting methods for acquired Non-PCD and PCD loans are discussed in Note 1, \"Summary of Significant Accounting Policies\". At the Acquisition Date, the fair value of Non-PCD loans was $6.7 billion, compared to the unpaid principal balance of $7.1 billion.\n\nThe following table presents the unpaid principal balance and fair value of the loans acquired in the HTLF acquisition as of the Acquisition Date (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\nUnpaid Principal Balance\n\n \n\nFair Value\n\n \n\nNon-PCD loans\n\n$\n\n7,067,238\n\n \n\n$\n\n6,688,190\n\n \n\nPCD loans\n\n \n\n3,237,332\n\n \n\n \n\n3,046,521\n\n \n\nTotal loans\n\n$\n\n10,304,570\n\n \n\n$\n\n9,734,711\n\n \n\n \n\nAt the Acquisition Date, of the $9.7 billion of loans acquired from HTLF, $3.0 billion were accounted for as PCD loans.\n\n \n\nThe following table provides a summary of PCD loans purchased as part of the HTLF acquisition as of the Acquisition Date (in thousands):\n\n \n\n \n\nJanuary 31, 2025\n\n \n\nPrincipal of PCD loans acquired\n\n$\n\n3,237,332\n\n \n\nPCD ACL at acquisition\n\n \n\n(85,299\n\n)\n\nNon-credit discount on PCD loans\n\n \n\n(105,512\n\n)\n\nFair value of PCD Loans\n\n$\n\n3,046,521\n\n \n\nInvestment securities The portion of the investment securities portfolio that was classified as available-for-sale was valued utilizing third-party pricing services for those securities retained and valued using the actual sales prices for those securities that were sold shortly after the close of the acquisition. The portion of the investment securities portfolio that was classified as held-to-maturity as of the Acquisition Date were priced by a third party using a discounted cash flow methodology similar to the methodology described above for the valuation of loans.\n\nInterest-bearing due from banks and Cash and due from banks The carrying amount of these assets is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the short-term nature of these assets.\n\n \n\nCore deposit intangible Core deposit intangibles represent the value of relationships with deposit clients and the cost savings derived from available core deposits relative to an alternative funding source. The fair value of the core deposit intangible was estimated using a net cost savings method, a variation of the income approach. This approach considers expected client attrition rates, average life and balance inflation, alternative cost of funds, the interest cost and net maintenance cost associated with the client deposit base, and a discount rate used to discount the future economic benefits of the core deposit intangible asset to present value.\n\n148\n\n \n\nDeposits The fair value for demand and savings deposits is the amount payable on demand at the Acquisition Date. The fair value for time deposits was valued by a third party using a discounted cash flow calculation that applied interest rates currently being offered to the contractual interest rates on such time deposits.\n\nLong-term debt The fair value of long-term debt instruments was valued by a third party based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.\n\n \n\nThe Company assumed long-term debt obligations with an aggregate balance of $159.8 million and an aggregate fair value of $139.3 million as of the Acquisition Date payable to fifteen unconsolidated trusts that have issued trust preferred securities. The interest rates on the acquired trust preferred securities ranged from 5.89% to 8.21% as of the Acquisition Date and reset quarterly. The acquired trust preferred securities have maturity dates ranging from September 2032 to September 2037.\n\n \n\nThe Company assumed $150.0 million in aggregate subordinated notes due September 2031. The subordinated notes have a fixed interest rate of 2.75% until September 2026, at which time the interest rate will reset quarterly. The subordinated notes had an acquired fair value of $138.8 million as of January 31, 2025.\n\nThe results of HTLF are included in the results of the Company subsequent to the Acquisition Date. Transaction costs incurred after the Acquisition Date totaled $140.1 million, primarily in Salaries and employee benefits and Legal and consulting in the Consolidated Statements of Income, as well as $62.0 million in Provision expense to establish an ACL on the HTLF loans designated as non-PCD as of the Acquisition Date (Day 1 Provision expense). Additional transaction and integration costs will be expensed in future periods as incurred.\n\nThe following unaudited pro forma information combines the historical results of HTLF and the Company. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not include the potential impacts of possible business model changes, current market conditions, revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies, or other factors. If the HTLF acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2024, total revenue would have been approximately $2.7 billion and $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. Net income available to common shareholders would have been approximately $843.3 million and $504.0 million, respectively, for the same periods. Basic earnings per share would have been $11.20 and $6.96 for the same periods, respectively.\n\nThe unaudited pro forma information above reflects adjustments made to exclude the impact of acquisition-related expenses of $142.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and include such expenses in the year ended December 31, 2024. Day 1 provision expense of $62.0 million was included in 2024 to reflect the assumption of the acquisition timing noted above. Adjustments also included adjusting net interest income by the estimated net accretion of fair value marks on acquired loans, HTM securities, time deposits and long-term debt of $12.8 million and $153.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and adjusting noninterest expense for the estimated net amortization of intangibles and fair value marks on premises and equipment of $8.0 million and $96.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.\n\nThe unaudited pro forma information is theoretical in nature and not necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of operations of the Company or the consolidated results of operations which would have resulted had the Company acquired HTLF during the periods presented.\n\nThe Company has determined that it is impractical to report the amounts of revenue and earnings of legacy HTLF since the Acquisition Date due to the integration of operations shortly after the Acquisition Date. Accordingly, reliable and separate complete revenue and earnings information is no longer available. In addition, such amounts would require significant estimates related to the proper allocation of merger cost savings that cannot be objectively made.\n\n \n\n149"}