{"url_path":"/sec/unf/8-k/2026-06-12/item-5-07","section_key":"item-5-07","section_title":"Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.","topic":"sec","document":{"doc_type":"8-K","doc_date":"2026-06-12","source_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/717954/0001140361-26-025000-index.html","accession_number":"0001140361-26-025000","cik":"0000717954","ticker":"UNF","issuer_name":"UNIFIRST CORP","edgar_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/717954/0001140361-26-025000-index.html","primary_entity_key":"0000717954","primary_entity_name":"UNIFIRST CORP"},"word_count":591,"has_tables":true,"body_markdown":"Item 5.07\n\nSubmission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.\n\nOn June 11, 2026, UniFirst Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, (the “Company”) held a virtual special meeting of\nshareholders (the “Special Meeting”) to consider and vote on the proposals set forth in the definitive proxy statement of the Company prepared in connection with the Mergers (as defined below) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange\nCommission (the “SEC”) on May 11, 2026.\n\nAt the Special Meeting, the total number of shares represented in person or by proxy was 12,113,103 of the 14,532,640 shares\nof Common Stock of the Company and 3,537,257 of the 3,551,265 shares of Class B Common stock of the Company, in each case outstanding and entitled to vote at the Special Meeting as of the close of business on May 11, 2026, the record date of\nthe Special Meeting. For each proposal presented at the Special Meeting, each share of Common Stock entitled the holder thereof to one vote, and each share of Class B Common Stock entitled the holder thereof to ten votes. Together, these\nshares represented approximately 95% of the total outstanding shares of Common Stock and shares of Class B Common Stock, voting as a single class, and constituted a quorum to conduct business. The following matters were voted upon by the\nholders of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at the Special Meeting:\n\nProposal 1. Proposal to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated\n\nMarch 10, 2026 (as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with its terms, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”), Bruin Merger Sub I, Inc., a wholly owned\nsubsidiary of Cintas (“Merger Sub Inc.”), and Bruin Merger Sub II, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cintas (“Merger Sub LLC”). Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub Inc. will merge with and into\nthe Company (the “first merger”), whereupon the separate existence of Merger Sub Inc. will cease, and the Company will continue as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cintas, and (ii) immediately after the first merger, the Company will merge with and into Merger Sub LLC, whereupon the separate existence of the Company will cease, and Merger Sub LLC will continue as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cintas (the\n“Mergers”, and the proposal, the “Merger Agreement Proposal”).\n\nSet forth below are the voting results for the Merger Agreement Proposal, which was approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s shareholders:\n\nFor\n\nAgainst\n\nAbstain\n\nBroker Non-Votes\n\n47,458,203\n\n10,251\n\n17,219\n\n--\n\nProposal 2. Non-binding, advisory proposal to approve certain\ncompensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Compensation Proposal”).\n\nSet forth below are the voting results for the Compensation Proposal, which was approved by the requisite vote of the Company’s shareholders:\n\nFor\n\nAgainst\n\nAbstain\n\nBroker Non-Votes\n\n40,345,244\n\n7,077,010\n\n63,419\n\n--\n\nProposal 3. Proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting to a later date\nor time, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies to approve the Merger Agreement Proposal if there are insufficient votes to approve such proposal at the time of the Special Meeting (the “Adjournment Proposal”).\n\nAs there were sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement at the time of the Special Meeting, the Adjournment Proposal was not presented to\nthe shareholders."}