← EPA enforcement cases

KANCHANLAL PATEL (SUPER MART)

Administrative - Formal · FY2008 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 1000011984

Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
04-2008-0001
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (2)

Summary

7/18/2008 - COMPLAINT AND COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED, PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $47,728. ORDER ALLEGES: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THREE USTs AT FACILITY 1. COUNT- RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE UST RELEASE DETECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1. AT THE TIME OF THE INPSECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THE UNDERGROUND PIPING THAT ROUTINELY CONTAINED REGULATED SUBSTANCES AND WAS CONNECTED TO HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 3 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT HAD NOT PERFORMED THE REQUIRED TESTING FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CATHODIC PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 4 - AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 5 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTLIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR HIS FIVE USTs AT FACILITY #2.

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown